Transcript of Trump in Psychotic Meltdown After This

One of the most vile and disgusting men in the country, uh, who I believe—in my opinion—is a total sadist, freak, is Stephen Miller. And Donald Trump, um, as we've learned, autocrats do: they double down. They double down when they are cornered. He appoints Stephen Miller, the architect of these horrific, cruel, dehumanizing, murderous immigration raids. He appoints him to be White House Chief of Staff. And my God, am I so relieved that we just had the election, because now we have fighters.

In so many other states, and then he decides to hire the most broken man to continue to run the most dysfunctional White House that we've seen. I don't know what Stephen Miller has actually contributed to our culture, our society, in any real way, except for to make us more angry, to stoke the worst kind of fear and vitriol, to weaponize ICE in our streets to take American lives. The real question is: why appoint this man White House Chief of Staff if you want to have a productive relationship with the Congress that actually intends to deliver on the mandate that the American public has just given us?

Unfortunately.

Josh.

Well, I—I—it's hard to pick the worst cabinet member for Trump. I think it rotates, uh, once a day, maybe. Stephen Miller, um, his policies are the problem here. Everything he's done—I mean, we go back to all of these ICE raids, all of these ICE shootings, all the lives that were lost, and you can pin all of that on one man that's got control in the White House. The havoc that he's wreaked on the American people, the injustices, uh, and he likes it. There's something about him that enjoys that cruelty, obscene it.

He's a liar.

Like, yeah, he doesn't—he—and they're in just kind of this grab-ass situation where they don't know what they're doing. They just got their ass handed to them. You're seeing a mass exodus at DOJ with a lot of their top brass. You're seeing a lot of people leaving, fleeing. You're seeing the Vice President write a—basically an op-ed piece saying, "I don't know what happened, but this war is awful," you know? And so they just don't know what they're doing. But as far as Stephen Miller, notice that he wants to keep him inside his circle so that he can claim executive privilege when he has to testify.

And I think these election results were a complete repudiation on Stephen Miller's policies. So Trump's appointment of Stephen Miller to be White House, uh, Chief of Staff is a fuck you to the electorate. But that doesn't surprise me. It doesn't surprise me that Trump lies. It doesn't surprise me that Trump hangs out with losers. It doesn't surprise me that Trump said, "Who's the biggest loser in the United States of America?" Oh, Stephen Miller? Perfect. I want him to be my Chief of Staff. That is perfect. There has never been a more MAGA decision than this.

Yes.

This is—this is exactly what they do. This is exactly who they are. This is exactly what was repudiated. And good on Abdul El-Sayed for standing up, calling him broken, calling him exactly what he is, and, uh, and rightfully acknowledging that the American people just gave this incoming, uh, House and Senate a mandate to deliver for us.

And last thing I want to say about that: I saw in the comments somewhere that someone said, after this appointment of Stephen Miller, they said, "What are you doing, trying to turn Oklahoma blue?" I thought, that's perfect.

Honestly.

This is the biggest gift Democrats could have, him doing this stupid shit, because the voters just spoke. And so just keep doing it.

Texas is blue. If they continue doing this, Ted Cruz is gone. Keep—keep—keep Turning Point campaigning for people, because Turning Point, under 30, every state went blue. Every state went blue to voters under 30. So what they are doing is wrong. So if they intend to double and triple down, keep doing it. We will have the biggest majority ever to deliver FDR-style, um, for the American people, and the accountability will be Watergate level only.

And, uh, and this is in the West Bank and Gaza. And this man believes in universal human rights. This man, uh, uh, is—there's no prostitution politics with this man at all. I completely believe this, that this is the right move to go if he decides not to run for 28. But Charlamagne thy God, I stepped into this national conversation we're having about our party right now and the leaders that we deserve and the leaders that we need in this moment. And Charlamagne is calling for Schumer and Jeffries to be replaced.

He's going to the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, and House minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries. Your friendly neighborhood bad guy, Charlamagne thy God, has been telling you for well over a year that Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries should step down. So it warms my cold heart to see so many people calling for the same thing now. Schumer and Jeffries simply do not get it. I need to know that when the interests of working-class Americans conflict with the interests of corporate America and powerful foreign policy lobbying organizations, the people leading this party, Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer, are prepared to put working Americans first.

Josh.

Well, it's interesting. He would say that about Hakeem Jeffries, who would, uh, be the first African American or Black speaker of the House. And so it shows you the opposition to him, that you have someone who's a voice of the Black culture like Charlamagne is. Um, but it's refreshing to see. It's refreshing to see that. And I think all of this, to me, means that these seats are up for debate. Like, this is not a foregone conclusion that we're going to have Jeffries and/or Schumer. And everything he said is spot on.

We have to have politicians in these positions that are going to take on MAGA and don't share donors with them, that are going to investigate, uh, these tech oligarchs, that are going to investigate what they've been doing to the algorithms, what they did with the Brazilian election. Uh, just a complete accountability. We need to return to the party of law and order, to being a country of law and order for everyone. And more than anything, the, uh, financial shift that Donald Trump and Republicans before him have ushered in led to this moment, led to this moment where, uh, we have incubated this full-blown fascist takeover by MAGA.

I think we're quite literally on text chains right now, still counting the votes in Alaska and Mississippi, but I think this is like it's an open field. And I think those conversations are happening, um, rapidly, um, between, uh, Democrats—I mean, new Democrats who just won, Democrats in the sophomore class, the freshman class. I think there's quite a bit of upward pressure. I'm not going to have any big announcements.

I just—I think that the Senate is going to be doable, Josh. I—I would be shocked if Chuck Schumer ends up being the majority leader. I—I just think, you know, it's—I appreciate the work that he did for the Democratic Party. We're in a different era right now. This isn't glad-handing with Trump and cutting deals. This is a completely different beast, in my opinion. And it's not just my opinion. The voters want Schumer and Jeffries out. Pop this up.

And I would have a little bit of a different take on that. I—I, for me, I would want someone to lead the Senate and/or the House who matches the will of what the American people voted for, whoever that person is, whether—whether you're progressive, whether you're a woman, whether you're a man. But it has to be someone who matches what the voters wanted. And they wanted change. And these corporate Democrats, these institutional Democrats that have been around a long time, they just don't get it. And I think the thing that I always go back to, I think of John Stewart laughing at Sam Cedar when he's listening to Chuck Schumer talk about the bricks on the wall.

That's why Robert Garcia popped off, Lawyer Up, because that was the energy of the electorate. And then Hakeem's first is, the American people aren't going to look even. And we're all like, what are you talking about? We want investigations. We want accountability. We want to restore the rule of law, because that is intricately connected to affordability and delivering for the American people. If we do not restore the rule of law and we merit garland this thing and we let the, uh, elites and the Epstein files that are actively trying to cover up child sex crimes, um, and we let the president of the United States who's involved in the Epstein files, who's grifting off the American public, um, and Pete Hegseth and the war crimes I believe he's committed, we can't let these people off the hook.

Yeah. And I don't think last week when I saw Schumer, I don't think I've been that mad since I saw Joe Biden in the debate with Trump. I mean, that's just how mad you get. Like, who are leading these Democrats? Who is in charge here? Because I'm just some guy in Oklahoma. Seriously, who's doing this stuff to us? So I'm—we're going to continue to raise hell about this issue.