Transcript of Blue Tsunami Explodes as Veto Proof Majority is Possible!

17:51 13 min read 20 views Published 3 days ago

Copy link
Episode summary

Aaron Parnas reports on a projected Democratic House majority that he calls a blue tsunami, arguing it could make Trump's vetoes easier to override. He covers Republican reactions, including Speaker Mike Johnson's remarks about voters.

The episode also features Congresswoman Sarah Jacobs urging Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's impeachment and incoming Colorado Democrat Manny Rutinel discussing costs, corruption and AI. A Senate judicial nomination hearing rounds out the show.

In this episode Aaron Parnas, Manny Rutinel

The transcript of this episode on the projected Democratic House majority was made with the technology behind HappyScribe's subtitle generator.

Aaron Parnas00:00:00

We've got some huge news right now: Democrats have secured their largest House majority this century. The largest, largest House majority in decades, in decades. The Blue Tsunami is growing one week after Election Day; it continues to get bigger. Now we have confirmation that Democrats will secure at least 258 seats in the United States House of Representatives, likely set to go over 260 seats when all is said and done.

Some states continue to count ballots, like in districts in North Carolina and elsewhere. 258 seats. That is the largest margin in nearly a century. Make sure, if you can, to subscribe, support this work. We're going to talk about some of these wins, like, comment, share, and we're going to talk about some of the losses that Republicans are increasingly facing on Capitol Hill. As it currently stands, Democrats are surging one week after Election Day.

The majority continues to grow. The White House continues to grow, increasingly concerned that we may be getting to the point where Trump's veto may not actually matter that much. Let me tell you why. In the United States House of Representatives, Democrats need 290 votes to block a veto of the president's. They're at 258. When all is said and done, they're likely to be above 260, potentially even closer to 263, 264, maybe even 265 seats.

That is a monumental majority. That would mean they need less than 30 Republicans to come over and break from them and join them to override a veto of the president's. And they're getting close. And there are real issues, like tariffs, where you could very well see Republicans come on board and vote, especially Republicans who don't want to be, uh, to potentially lose their job in 2028. But that's not all. Democrats are setting the stage for, in 2028, to potentially take over the House of Representatives by a Veto Proof Majority.

Now, Republicans didn't necessarily get the message, and Mike Johnson is putting the blame on voters. Take a listen to what Congressman McGovern had to say about this.

Speaker 200:02:23

I want to thank the gentleman from Virginia for yielding me the customary time, and I yield myself such time as it may consume.

Speaker 300:02:29

The gentleman is recognized.

Speaker 200:02:31

Mr. Speaker, the sun is coming up, and soon it will be a new day in America. And the American people are the ones who are bringing the light. They voted against the chaos, the corruption, and the cruelty, and they voted overwhelmingly in red states and blue states, in small towns and in big cities, from sea to shining sea, to reject this president and this failed administration. They voted to repudiate MAGA, to rebuke Stephen Miller and Elon Musk and Kristi Noem and Kash Patel and all the rest of the incompetent clowns empowered by Donald J.

Trump. And the American people delivered their verdict on the work of this failed Republican majority here in this Congress. Come January, Republicans will no longer be in charge around here. Their incompetence and their foolishness and their obsession with culture wars and billionaire giveaways have cost them the majority. And what is stunning to me, Mr. Speaker, is that instead of taking the hint or listening to the overwhelming majority of Americans who told them to change course, Republicans are doubling down on the same tactics and messaging they've been jamming down our throats these last two years.

And it's a perfect example of why they lost in the first place. They do not listen. Speaker Johnson said yesterday that the voters made the wrong choice. The voters made the wrong choice? I mean, are you kidding me? Now, you might disagree with their choice, Mr. Speaker, but it's not wrong. You just ain't listening. And then, to double down even further, the failed lame-duck president appointed Stephen Miller, the architect of all the cruel policies that most people hate, as his new White House chief of staff.

Mr. Speaker, what planet are these people living on? Republicans need to take a long, hard look in the mirror. Because if they don't break with this delusional thinking and actually start listening, start rejecting extremism, it's going to be a long, long, long, long time before they are ever in the majority again.

Advertisement00:05:05

Now, the problems for Democr the problems for Republicans are growing increasingly on Capitol Hill, with Pete Hegseth right now significantly in the crosshairs. I want to tell you what we saw today, but before we do, a quick word from our sponsor. I need to tell you about something personal that happened, something recent, and it's an uncomfortable conversation, and the conversation centered around life insurance. After my wife and I had our daughter, who's now six months old, my wife sat me down and she essentially said, "Aaron, it's time to have this conversation.

You now have a six-month-old, you now have a baby, you need to make sure that in the event that, God forbid, something ever happens to you, that we are okay." And I remember that conversation, and it was the first time I had really thought about getting life insurance. And it's why I partnered for this video with a company called Ethos. Ethos makes getting life insurance fast and easy. It's 100 percent online. You get a quote in seconds, apply in minutes, and get same-day coverage. There's no medical exam. Just answering a few simple medical questions, you can get up to $3 million in coverage, and you'll get the lowest rate from their network of trusted carriers.

It's super simple. Take 10 minutes to get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your free quote at ethos, E-T-H-O-S dot com slash parnas, that is ethos.com/parnas. Application times may vary, rates may vary. TrustPilot rating as of August 1st, 2026, which is 4.9 out of 5 stars, with over 5,500 reviews. Take a look. Trust Ethos. Now let's talk about Pete Hegseth, because Congresswoman Sarah Jacobs went on the House floor moments ago and made clear that she supports removing Hegseth from office.

Aaron Parnas00:06:48

Take a listen.

Speaker 300:06:49

One minute.

Sarah Jacobs00:06:52

I'm so proud to represent San Diego, the biggest military community in the country. It's my community, my neighbors and friends, who've been shipped off to fight Secretary Hegseth's reckless war in Iran. So I take it personally when our leaders are cavalier with our service members' lives. I take it personally when our leaders ask our service members to take illegal action in Iran and Venezuela and Yemen. And I take it personally when my constituents aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln spend 10 months at sea, sometimes without enough food to eat, hot water to take a shower, and sufficient access to health care.

It's my constituents who are still there fighting this war. And what has it all been for? We're not any safer or more secure. And look what's been done in our name. A girl's elementary school bombed in Menab. Hundreds of people murdered in boats in the Caribbean and the Eastern Pacific. This isn't strength; it's recklessness. It's illegal, and someone should be held accountable, and we should start with Secretary Pete Hegseth. So my vote today to impeach him isn't political.

Speaker 300:07:55

Your limit of time is expired.

Sarah Jacobs00:07:56

It's personal, and it's for the service members that I represent.

Speaker 300:07:59

Your limit of time is expired.

Aaron Parnas00:08:00

And then we spoke about the accountability part, and newly incoming Democrats like Congressman Manny Routonel from Colorado are making clear that we need accountability. Because if you have accountability, you actually get to more affordability. Take a listen.

Richard Blumenthal00:08:15

First of all, give me some idea. What are you telling your constituents you want to start off with? How do you want to hit the ground running?

Manny Rutinel00:08:21

Well, I want to focus on lowering costs, on stopping corruption, and on passing meaningful guardrails on artificial intelligence to protect the American people. And when I'm talking about lowering costs, I'm talking about reversing the cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. When it comes to corruption, we need to stop members of Congress from trading and selling stocks in ways that enrich themselves. And on the artificial intelligence question, we need to make sure that these AI companies are held accountable when they potentially harm the American people. We need to make sure that there are whistleblower protections and a series of other ideas that we need to be pushing forward because it's now or never.

Richard Blumenthal00:08:55

On the ballot in which you won, there was an awful lot of similar measures for about data centers that lost. Data centers took a licking on Election Day across the country, not just Colorado. Do you think there could be unanimity on dialing those back?

Manny Rutinel00:09:10

Well, I think what folks are looking for is to be able to have a say in these conversations. Right now, they are being shoved down community's throats. We need to have a community-first approach. We also need to make sure that ratepayers aren't footing the bill for these data centers and that our natural environment is protected. That's what I'll be pushing for when I get to Congress.

Richard Blumenthal00:09:26

What part of your term should be spent on investigations? What would you like to see the House or the caucus do to investigate the administration?

Manny Rutinel00:09:34

Well, I think what we need to be focusing on is lowering costs and also accountability. And I think corruption has a real cost on the American people. And right now, the cost is being borne by working families who right now are paying more for their health care costs because Donald Trump decided to give billionaires the biggest tax breaks in American history. And so we need to make sure that we investigate the members of the Trump Cabinet that are enabling this corrupt regime. We also need to make sure that we use those subpoena powers and committees to bring those civil and criminal investigations wherever relevant, because in America, no one is above the law.

Richard Blumenthal00:10:10

If you were here today, if you're voting on impeaching the Defense Secretary, so I'm wondering, when you get here in January, how much time do you want spent on things like that? Some time? No time? A lot of time?

Manny Rutinel00:10:23

Well, I think accountability is important. And I think when people send us into a forever war in Iran without any plans, putting American lives at risk, in violation of our Constitution, there needs to be accountability. Also, that accountability and those investigations will benefit the American people, not just by taking us out of this forever war in Iran, but also by lowering the gas and diesel prices. Back home, gas has gone up over 50 percent since the beginning of this war. Diesel has gone up over 70 percent since the beginning of the war.

Folks back home are struggling. There needs to be real accountability because that is hand in hand with the question of lowering costs.

Aaron Parnas00:11:01

Okay. But through it all, Republicans are right now, at least, focused in the lame-duck session to ram through as many Trump judges as possible. And yet these judges, with lifetime tenure potentially, cannot even say who won the 2024 election or the 2020 election, or any election for that matter. This is a long clip, but I want you to watch everything from Senator Richard Blumenthal in this exchange with judges or nominees to potentially be judges on the supre on various district courts across the country.

Richard Blumenthal00:11:33

Who won the popular vote in the 2020 election?

Speaker 200:11:39

Senator Joe Biden was certified the winner under our under our system.

Richard Blumenthal00:11:46

Okay, so you know you're not answering my question, right?

Speaker 200:11:51

Senator, in line with other nominees that have come before this committee, including Justice Jackson, the underlying subject.

Richard Blumenthal00:12:01

My question to you is who won the popular vote? I know who was certified. My question to you is who won the popular vote? And reciting the standard evasive line, I think, really is an insult to your intelligence as well as to ours.

Speaker 200:12:24

Senator, again, our system prescribes the winner of the election under.

Richard Blumenthal00:12:29

Who won the Electoral College in the 2020 election?

Speaker 200:12:34

Joe Biden was certified under the Electoral College.

Richard Blumenthal00:12:36

Did Donald Trump win the 2020 election?

Speaker 200:12:41

No. He was he was not certified the winner under our system.

Richard Blumenthal00:12:46

Are you unable to say that that Joe Biden won the popular vote? Is that just something that will not emerge from your lips?

Speaker 200:12:58

Senator, in line with other nominees that.

Richard Blumenthal00:13:01

Well, I'm asking you as an individual because on the bench you will be making individual judgments. You don't have to side with other members of the panel. You're not going to be repeating puppet-like what other nominees, no matter who they are. But certainly, the rote repetition of this line about certification, I think, betrays a lack of independence. You understand that point, don't you?

Speaker 200:13:30

Senator, an important role is following precedent. And so I'm just outlining the precedent.

Richard Blumenthal00:13:35

But you're following the precedent of other nominees who have been schooled and prepared to refuse to answer this question.

Speaker 200:13:44

Nominees of both parties, including Justice Jackson, have taken the.

Richard Blumenthal00:13:48

Well, Justice Jackson was in an entirely different situation. And I think it also betrays a lack of adherence to fact as well as logic that you are repeating this distortion that has been relied on by other nominees. Let me ask you, was the Capitol attacked on January 6th?

Speaker 200:14:15

Again, Senator, the broader characterization of it is attack. The Supreme Court has used the word "breach," and I would adopt the again, I was in Mississippi, I think, on January 6th, but so I have no firsthand knowledge. But based on news reports and things that I've seen, I think the Supreme Court has characterized it as a breach, and I'm comfortable with that language.

Richard Blumenthal00:14:37

Well, I'm asking you whether you agree with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who said, quote, "A mob of rioters breached the Capitol on January 6th, 2021." Do you agree?

Speaker 200:14:54

Senator, I've certainly seen news reports and videos of violence, and I condemn that, especially being someone who has represented law enforcement the entire of my career.

Richard Blumenthal00:15:06

How about Judge Kelly? Timothy Kelly, U.S. District Court judge, in an order on July 10th, 2026, he said and by the way, he's a Trump appointee, quote, "As the Court has said many times, the attack on the Capitol on January 6th, 2021 was a perilous event. It was an attack on people, including police officers, many of whom were injured." Do you agree with Judge Kelly that the Capitol was attacked on January 6th, 2021?

Speaker 200:15:39

Again, I think I've seen certain videos of clear violence, which I condemn.

Richard Blumenthal00:15:49

Attack? Are you willing to use that word?

Speaker 200:15:52

I've seen physical violence against police officers that I condemn.

Richard Blumenthal00:15:57

So there was an attack. Are you able to say that? Will that word emerge from your lips?

Speaker 200:16:05

Senator, again, broader characterizations of an attack are characterizations that began a political controversy that other nominees.

Richard Blumenthal00:16:16

So you are willing to say, I don't want to be disrespectful, the Capitol was attacked on January 6th?

Speaker 200:16:25

Again, Senator, I think I have witnessed certain certain events of violence against police officers, which I condemn.

Richard Blumenthal00:16:32

And you understand the reason that I'm harping on this question is not to be pedantic or taunting. It's simply to know whether you're going to be independent, whether you will speak from your own conscience and conviction, from the learning that you've acquired in your trial practice, whether you will be a member of the bench who will do justice. You understand? That's why I'm asking this question.

Speaker 200:17:02

I understand. I understand, Senator, and I'm committed to judicial independence, and I will take an oath to.

Richard Blumenthal00:17:08

Well, I am.

Speaker 200:17:09

Have equal.

Richard Blumenthal00:17:10

Of a contrary view, that your failure to acknowledge that Joe Biden won the 2020 election and you refuse to use the word "attack" is the result of the lines that have been dictated to you by the handlers and the minders and the preparers in the White House.

Aaron Parnas00:17:33

So that's the news right now. Make sure to subscribe if you can, support this work, and I'll see you soon. They're surging right now, and thanks to you. Thank you for watching this video. Thank you for sharing our content. Make sure to hit that subscribe button. We're on the road to a million subscribers. Like, comment, share, get the word out. Thank you so much again.

Episode description

Aaron Parnas reports on breaking news of a blue tsunami exploding and sending white house into a panic, including a look at major moments today in Congress, important updates on Pete Hegseth's future, and much more!

------------------------------------

Get your free quote at https://ETHOS.com/parnas

------------------------------------

Substack: https://aaronparnas.substack.com/

X: https://twitter.com/AaronParnas

Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aaronparnas6?lang=en

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aaronparnas/?hl=en

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aaron.parnas/

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@aaronparnas?hl=en