Transcript of Trump AG Humiliates Herself under Cross-Exam at Hearing New

Up jetzt, bestellst du à la carte, und zwar nach Hause. Mit dem E-Rezept auf deiner Krankenkassenkarte und der Shopapotheke-App kommen deine verschreibungspflichtigen Medikamente direkt zu dir. Einfach App öffnen, Krankenkassenkarte mit E-Rezept ranhalten und mit dem E-Rezept Rabatt automatisch bis zu 20 € per decant. On the payments and the pre-purchase products. How does the idea feel? Try it now in the Shopapotheke app. The price revolution. Citroën doubles the e-auto-funders-prämie. Up to €12,000. Pricesurteil by maximaler staatlich-er Förderung. Just a electro-oder Plug-in-Hybrid-Modell wählen and persönliche Förderung checken. Elektromobilität für alle. Der EC3 schon ab 16,990 €. All hell just broke loose in the House Judiciary Committee, where Pam Bondi, Donald Trump's Stuge Attorney General, just completed her testimony. It was utterly humiliating for her. Frankly, It was utterly humiliating for the United States. Let me show you what went down first. I'll show you as Democratic Congresswoman Balant cross-examines Pam Bondi. Watch as Pam Bondi just flails and tries to attack Balant. Let's play this clip. Who is Chris Malin? Was the President aware? Please stop talking. It is not your time to ask questions. It is not your time. I'm reclaiming my time, Mr. Chair. One second.

Time belongs to the gentleman from Vermont. Was the President aware of Secretary Lutnik's ties to Epstein when he chose him to lead the Department of Commerce. Was he aware? Chris Malin was a border patrol agent. Okay, so I'm going to conclude that the President, in fact, did know about his ties because he was the next door neighbor. Shame on you. Oh, for goodness sakes. You're from a tiny beautiful state. This is pathetic, Mr. Chair. I am not asking trick questions here. The American people have a right to know the answers to this. These are senior officials in the Trump administration. More from Congresswoman Balant right here. Let's play it. To know the answers to this. These are senior officials in the Trump administration. This is not a game, Secretary. I'm attorney general. My apologies, I couldn't tell. By 2008, we knew that Epstein was a convicted sexual abuser, and we now know that Lutnik went to Epstein's at the island in 2012. How was that not a deal breaker for the President? Why aren't you asking questions of the commerce secretary about what he saw when he was at the island, which he lied about not ever going to?

Why are you not asking these questions? Next, you have Congresswoman Ross cross-examining Trump's attorney general Pam Bondi. Note that Pam Bondi claims that she didn't even know that Ghislaine Maxwell was transferred from a facility in Tallahassee to club fed with VIP treatment in Camp Bryant, Texas. Sounds like perjury to me. Let's play this clip. General Bondi, does a convicted sex offender like Ghislaine Maxwell deserve special treatment and privileges in prison? Yes or no? Let me be crystal clear on this. No. Thank you. No, let me keep going. Perfect. I did not know she was being transferred. I asked you yes or no, and I'm claiming my time. She was not transferred to a lower level. Mr. Chairman, Can we stop the clock and remind the witness of the rules? One rule she needs to understand here. I'm glad that we're agreeing. When we're agreeing, we can move on to some other things. But I want you to know that every time she does get these perks, and it's been publicly reported, that The folks she's abused, the survivors who are sitting here, they see themselves as being denied justice. They feel retraumatized. I'm glad that we agree on that.

But she should not be in that prison. She needs to be moved back to a maximum security prism as soon as possible. But what she has told another committee here is that she won't cooperate with them unless she gets clemency from Donald Trump. It's just crazy to consider that she can be wielding this influence within the administration. But That begs the question, who ordered her to be transferred to the minimum security prison that she was ineligible for? We heard from Democratic Congress member Ted Lou, who cross-examined Bondi. Let's play it. Former Prince Andrew, Donald Trump attended various parties with Jeffrey Epstein. I want to know, were there any underage girls at that party or at any party that Trump attended with Jeffrey Epstein? This is so ridiculous, and that they are trying to deflect from all the great things Donald Trump has done. There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime. Everyone knows that. This has been the most transparent presidency. He's the one that asked that those files be released. I'm going to claim my time. I got your answer. You said there's no evidence. Mr. Chairman, please stop the clock.

I'd like to sign the This is a legislation. This is time. This is time. I'd like to take my time. Time belongs to the gentleman from California. Okay. I'm going to put up another document from a witness who called the FBI's National Threat Operation Center because I believe you just lied under oath. There is ample evidence in the Epstein fight. Don't you ever accuse me of a crime. I believe you just lied under oath, and this is all on videotape. You said there was no evidence of a crime. I'm showing you, here is a witness statement who called to the FUI's threat operations center. He drove Donald Trump around in a limo. He overheard what Donald Trump said to Jeffrey on his cell phone. He was so angry, he was going to stop a limo and hurt Donald Trump. And he met a girl who said she was raped by Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. She later had her head blown off, and officers at the scene said that could not have been suicide. No one, no one at the Department of Justice interviewed this witness. You need to interview this witness immediately. Epstein should rot in hell, so should the men who patronize this operation.

As we say here today, there are over 1,000 sex trafficking victims, and You have not held a single man accountable. Shame on you. If you had any decency, you would resign right after this hearing concludes. The gentleman has expired. Then you had Congress member Goldman clearly getting under Pam Bondi's skin by just bringing out the facts in the receipts. Pam Bondi tries to play the victim here, and she's like, Stop yelling at me. Stop yelling at me. Here, play this clip. These are obviously improper redactions. Let me stop for a minute. I'm talking. I'm talking. If they're not privileged- Quiet. Don't yell at me. If they're not privileged- Mr. Chairman, would you stop the clock? This is on your time. It's not on Mr. Goldman. Even though you used your improper redaction. You'll like my answer. To continue- More from Congress member Goldman right here who points to the survivors who were standing there who have receive zero communication from Pam Bondi or anybody at the DOJ as the DOJ defames the survivors, tortures the survivors, maliciously leaks the names and personal identifying information of the survivors. Then Goldman's like, To all the survivors who are out there, would you still want to speak with Bondi despite all the things she did with you?

They all raised their hands, yet Bondi refuses to meet with them. Here, play this clip. Ask them if that's true. Now, with the survivors and victims who are here, please stand up One more time. Just by show of hands, how many of you or your loved ones actually have met with the Department of Justice and provided testimony and evidence? None. And of those of you who have not met, which is everyone, how many of you have reached out either individually or through a lawyer or representative to offer to provide testimony and evidence? All of them. Of those of you, all of you who have reached out, how many of you were denied or ignored by the Department of Justice? All of them. Despite the shameful and despicable efforts by Ms. Bondi and her Department to intimidate you, how many of you are still willing to speak to the Department of Justice? All of them. Well, Ms. Bondi, it looks like you have some more witnesses to talk to. Gentlemen, the time is expired. I yield We will go to the good gentleman from North Carolina, congressman- Next. I really like the questioning of Democratic Congress member from Colorado, Naguus.

He was cross-examining Bondi on the fact that she eliminated the entire national cryptocurrency enforcement team at the DOJ, he utterly exposed her. She's like, I refuse to answer the question. Play this clip. It was created after Water... I'm not asking a question, Madam Attorney General. The administration under which it was created was Gerald Ford. When you first started as the attorney general of the United States, there were 35 people working in that office. There are now two people working in that office because you have gutted it. How many people work for the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team in the Criminal Division today? Can I answer the question about Penn? I've asked I'm going to answer a question. How many people work- You've asked me a question, but you don't want to answer. How many people work for the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team? You won't answer how many people- I'll answer PIN. Pin will not be weaponized. What's funny about this? I'll say to the chairman. What's funny about this? The chairman, you know what the answer is, and I think I understand why the general does not want to answer the question because you eliminated the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team last year.

I understand why you don't want to tell the American people who works there. No one works there anymore. I understand why you don't want to talk about Mohamed Solomon in your in your district. In any event, I would- Who murdered people. Mr. Chairman, will you stop the clock so his time is not wasted, by the way? More from Nagoos as he makes that point. Let's play it. The general does not want to answer the question because you eliminated the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team last year. I understand why you don't want to tell the American people who No one works there. No one works there anymore. Yeah, I understand why you don't want to talk about Mohamed Solomon in your district. In any event, I would- Who murdered people. Mr. Chairman, will you stop the clock so his time is not wasted by the witness? I've been very generous with allowing- Here's Nagoos again. Let's play this clip. Mr. Chairman, They're not trick questions. They're not got you questions. They're actually basic questions about how the Department of Justice functions and the unwillingness of this attorney general to answer them in good faith. When a member of Congress asks how many When people work at the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team and the attorney general refuses to answer it, it is not a coincidence.

It's because she eliminated the team. Why? Because her boss, the President of the United States, is making money hand over fist, $1. 4 billion over the course of the last year through cryptocurrency holdings. I think what is happening at the Department of Justice is a disgrace, Mr. Chairman. I would urge you to gain in control of this hearing. With that, I yield back to bounce my time. Then you have Pam Bondi trying to attack Republican Congress member, Massey, who's behind the discharge petition with Democratic Congress member, Roe, Kana. Watch as Bondi is like, Were you talking about Epstein before for the last four years? And Massey's like, You're the AG right now. Do your freaking job and stop covering up a child sex trafficking ring. Here, play this clip right here. Fbi. Did you ask Merritt Garland that the last four years? Did you talk about Epstein at all the last four years? I'm reclaiming my time. I'm glad you're asking about Merritt Garland. You don't give a reclaimed time when you don't- Because this is bigger than Watergate. When I don't answer a question the way you want. This goes over four administrations. You don't have to go back to Biden.

Let's go back to Obama. Let's go back to George Bush. This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of it. I want to know, at what point did the FBI and the DOJ may decide that Lex Wester was not a co-conspirator? Because our Epstein Files Transparency Act requires you, please put it back on the screen, to release the internal decision about whether to prosecute him or not, and it's not in the files, and it's not in the files for any of these other men. Time of the gentleman has expired. May she answer? More from Bondi and Massey's interaction. Let's play it. Respond, and then the gentleman can move to his next question. Chairman, it's my time. Within 40 minutes, you asked me a question. Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was added back. Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed. There was one redaction. He's listed as a co-conspirator. We invited you in. This guy has trumped arrangement syndrome. You're a failed politician. He needs to get on this now. Chairman, please restore his time and remind the witness of the rules here. There is no credible information. Next, I'll show you Democratic Congress member Jamie Raskin, who asks a very basic question of Bondi.

Donald Trump's paying himself $10 billion by suing the IRS, and you, as the DOJ, are supposed to defend the IRS, and you're just going to cut a $10 billion check to Donald Trump just stealing it from the taxpayers? And Bondi's like, Oh, I can't answer that question. Here, play this clip. But now he's suing the IRS for $10 billion. He's suing the IRS for $10 billion, which I think is around 80% of its annual budget. It's interesting because his tax returns were leaked, and they were illegally leaked by a private contractor who actually is in prison now, Charles Littlejohn. But he wants $10 billion. Now, I want to ask you the question of whether you think it would violate the domestic emoluments clause for you to settle that $10 billion case or any of the other claims that the President has made against the government. He himself has remarked, It's interesting because I'm the one that makes the deal, right? And he says, I have to work it out with myself. Do you think it would violate the domestic emoluments clause for the President to work out a deal from people who are his subordinates under his unitary executive theory to get money in one of these cases?

I'm not going to discuss pending litigation. Okay, so theoretically, you're saying because his privacy rights were violated in that tax case, and they were. I'm with the on that. I mean, his Mar-a-Lago thing is ridiculous, but there's no doubt that his tax returns, despite the fact that he promised to release them, despite the fact that every other President released the tax returns, he suffered embarrassment when it showed that he hadn't paid taxes for several years, and he had a right for that not to happen. Now, I want to show you this as Democratic Congresswoman Scanlan cross-examines Bondi about, Can you provide us your list of entities that you consider to be terrorist organizations? And Bondi is like, I can't do that. I'm I'm not going to do that here. Play this clip. Will you commit to providing this committee with any list of organizations that you have recommended be designated as domestic terrorist organizations? We will comply with the law in all matters. Will you commit to provide this committee with your list of entities that you recommend be designated as domestic terrorist organizations? I'm not going to commit to anything to you because you won't let me answer questions.

Okay, well, then we do understand that your current position is that you have a secret list of people or groups that you are accusing of domestic terrorism, but you won't share it with Congress. I'd remind you that when the US government designates an entity as a foreign terrorist organization, it must report that to Congress and to the entity because The government can make a mistake and the entity has the opportunity to contest it. So your position seems to be that if you falsely designate an American or an American organization as a terrorist group, there's nothing they can do about it. I think we get it. You don't want to answer the question. You don't get anything regarding public safety. Thank you. Nothing. Thank you for the insult. It's clear you didn't come to Congress prepared to answer questions that the American people have every right to have answered. But- More from Scanlin right here. Let's play it. On September 25th, President Trump signed a memorandum known as NSPM-7, purporting to address domestic terrorism. But Americans, across the political spectrum were immediately alarmed by the memo's blurring of the line between unlawful conduct and constitutionally protected speech and activity, as well as its call to investigate, prosecute, and dismantle groups that the President and Steven Miller described without evidence as, an organized campaign of radical left terrorism.

Now, counterterrorism experts were further alarmed by the administration's singular focus on left-wing extremism, combined with the sudden deletion from the DOJ website of decades of research and law enforcement analysis, which had concluded that right-wing extremism extremism poses the greatest terrorism threat to Americans. The President's memo broadly and vaguely links violent conduct to ideologies, and it targeted specifically anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-capitalist beliefs, as well as, Hostility to so-called traditional American views on family, religion, and morality. President Trump has repeatedly and openly, however falsely, tried to brand his political opponents with these sentiments listed in his memo. But as you know, as a lawyer, holding beliefs that the White House disagrees with is not a crime. The statute defining domestic terrorism requires criminal acts, not just thoughts and ideas. That's why legal experts, nonprofit leaders, religious freedom, and civil rights advocates immediately raised the alarm that the new presidential directive was a politically motivated attack on civil society designed to silence those who disagree with the administration. Ms. Bondi, section three of that memo directed you as attorney general to submit to the President and Steven Miller a list of groups or entities whose members are engaged in acts that meet the definition of Domestic Terrorism.

Then on December fourth, you directed the FBI to work with a variety of law enforcement entities to compile a list of groups and entities engaged in such acts by January 3, 2026, and to update that report every 30 days thereafter. Can we assume that you or persons under your direction at the Department of Justice have prepared that list of groups or entities who are designated as domestic terrorist organizations? I just remind you that's a yes or no question. I'm not going to answer it, yes or no. But what I will say is I know Antifa is part of that. I will talk to you about that. On February fifth, 2025, an Antifa member was arrested in Minneapolis. I'm reclaiming my time. Did you have a list? They ask a question and don't want an answer. The answer is yes or no. Tom DeLong, a gentleman from Pennsylvania. General, can you proceed? Okay. You realize that Trump's DOJ, they've made a list calling organizations that they don't like. We're probably on the list as well. Domestic terrorists, okay? That's what's going on, and great questioning by Scanlan. Next, I'll show you as attorney general Bondi says that Trump's name does appear countless times in what has been produced.

Here, play this clip. General Bondi, it's been reported that there were at one point 1,000 personnel assigned to the task of identifying and scrubbing Donald Trump's name from the Epstein files. Were those reports accurate? I believe his name has appeared countless times in the document. How many people were assigned? If I could finish, I'm going to read you the stats. I just simply asked Whether or not it was true that- Okay, then just show us all the files. Show us the redacted file, show us the unredacted file. Just show us everything. Then Bondi claims not to know what Jekyll and Hyde means. Play this clip. Because you're not answering the question. You do a Jekyll and Hyde routine around here. I just want you to answer my questions. What does Jekyll and Hyde mean? Can you explain that? It means you're nice to the Republicans and you turn like Hyde on Democrats. But let me ask you. I like this moment a lot where Democratic Congress member Moskowitz points out that Donald Trump's name appears in the Epstein files more than Jesus's name or God's name appears in the Bible. Then Moskowitz pulls out a Trump Bible.

Watch this. Recently tells a House Oversight Committee that she wants clemency to release more names. Cash Martell under O said, Trump's name appears less than 100 times in the files. We now know that's not true. Trump's name appears more times in the Epstein files than God's name appears in the Book About God. Okay, by the way, this is the Trump Bible. Move over King James. More from Moskowitz here. Let's play it. Trump's name also appears more times in the Epstein file than Harry Potter's name appears in the seven books about Harry Potter. We're going to get more from Moskowitz here. Lutnik says that in 2008, he went to Epstein's home, says he had a massage table in the living room. But Epstein said he got one every day, that it was the right type of massage. He and his wife decide to leave and say they'll never be in a room with him again. Howard then says, I'm sure the Epstein stuff is all on video. He was the greatest blackmailer of all time. Well, how would Howard know that? But now the fires are public. In 2012, we found out that he and his family are on Epstein Island after, after, after Epstein pled guilty to state charges.

I'm from Florida. I take my family to Disney World, not to Epstein Island. Then Bondi was not liking those questions, and she's like, I think it's so inappropriate that you would hold up a Trump Bible. Okay, here, play this clip. Now, I'm at a maternity general. I have 25 seconds left. Because I'm curious, and I'd like to see you flip to the Jared Moskowitz section of the Binder, I'm interested to see what staff provided on the oppo on me. Because we're in the Olympics, I'm going to give it a grade. I just want to see how good it is. Give me your best one. First of all, nothing is funny about mocking the Bible and holding up a Trump Bible. That's what you did. You made a joke, and I find a sense to that. That's all I have to say. I want it from the Burnbrook. I want it from the Burnbrook, which is the best one. What you got? It has expired. The gentleman from Wisconsin's recognition. Thank you. More from Congresswoman Ballant here who said, We have all this evidence of senior Trump officials with ties to Epstein. And Bondi's like, I don't know what ties are.

Here, play this clip. There is. We have evidence. Do you know who Chris Neyland is? We have evidence that three senior officials within the Trump administration have ties to Jeffrey Epstein. And what I can conclude. What does ties mean? I can conclude from what you are saying that you have not talked to them. What does ties mean? I think Americans would be shocked to learn that you are not interested in talking with these officials who have ties to Jeffrey F. C. What does ties mean? Can you define that? Across the world, prominent men who've been exposed in the files have resigned their jobs in disgrace. That's a good first start. That same standard- Grace is not saying the word Chris Malin. This same standard should apply here, and Americans want accountability. Who is Chris Mayland? Was the President aware? Who was he? Please stop talking. It is not your time to ask questions. Who was he? It is not your time. I'm reclaiming my time, Mr. Chair. One second. Time belongs to the gentleman from Vermont. More questioning between Balant and Bondi obfuscating. Bondi's like, Well, let's talk about Merrick Garland and Balant's like, Just answer your freaking question.

Stop everything former President Biden. You're in charge now. It's you. Every word is going to be Biden or Garland. Here, play this clip. Didn't ask Merrick Garland anything about Epstein, not once, when he was- Weeksauce. Also, I want the record to reflect that with this anti-Semitic culture right now, she voted against a resolution condemning- Oh.. Do you want to go there, attorney general? Do you want to go there? Are you serious? I belong to the gentleman from South Carolina- Are you serious? Talking about anti-Semitism to a woman who lost her grandfather in the Holocaust. I reclaimed my time. I reclaimed my time. Really? The committee will be in order. Talk to Jared Wise about anti-Semitism. The ranking member knows that- I'm going Can I get 30 seconds back? I think the whole- Balant took 30. Balant was great. Next, you have Democratic Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett. Here is what she said. Play it. Valarie, while in office, the fact of the matter is that you will be remembered as One of the worst attorney generals in history. An attorney general who has prioritized obstruction over justice, corruption over the law, fealty to the President, over loyalty to the Constitution.

Mr. Chairman, I will yield. The only to yield-more from Crocket right here. Let's play Now, I'm not saying that the President is a pedophile, but there is a lot of evidence in these files that suggests that he's very close friends with a lot of men who are pedophiles. What's crazy about all of this- More from Crockett right here. Let's play it. You're spending more taxpayer resources arresting journalists than you are prosecuting pedophiles and creeps. In fact, your boss, the President of- Then I'll show one more clip of Crockett because I thought she was great. Fact number one, Donald Trump is one of the most named people in the Epstein files. At least 5,000 files contains more than 38,000 2,000 references to Trump, his wife, or Mar-a-Lago. Fact number two, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell may young girls available to Trump on multiple occasions. For example, according to this file, Ghislaine Maxwell presented a young girl to President Trump who spent more than 20 minutes apparently floating with her. Here's another example. This shows notes from FBI investigators that describe Jeffrey Epstein transporting a victim to Mar-a-Lago to meet with President Trump, where he bragged to Trump that, This is a good one.

Now, I'm not saying- Then we put this montage together of just the behavior of Bondi because it was so utterly unhinged. Take a look at this utterly deranged behavior right here. Let's play it. There was one redaction. He's listed as a co-consider. We invited you in. This guy has Trump derangement syndrome. You're a failed politician. I find it interesting that she keeps going after President Trump, the greatest President in American history, and if they could maintain their composure. You don't tell me anything. I did tell you because we saw what you did in the Senate. You're not even a lawyer. Maybe we'll be in. To the best with Donald Trump, your Trump derangement syndrome. All of you who participated in those impeachment hearings against Donald Trump, you all should be apologizing. You sit here and you attack the President, and I am not going to have it. I'm not going to put up with it. The Dow is over 50,000 right now. The S&P We had almost 7,000, and the Nasdaq smashing records. Americans 401k and retirement savings are booming. That's what we should be talking about. Trying to intimidate and punish these ladies. Your time is up.

There you have it, folks. Let me know what you think. Hit subscribe. Let's get to 6 million. And thanks, everybody, for watching. The truth is more important than ever. Check out our new Truth Over Lies collection at store. Mitustouch. Com. All 100% USA Union made. Okay, Nikola. Quizfrage: Homeoffice Barstado oder Fahrtkosten? Was bringt uns mehr? Moment, ich check das kurz. Oha, Homeoffice gewinnt. Bringt uns 150 Euro mehr im Jahr. Ja, richtig. Aber wieso weißt du so was? Weil, WISO Steuer die Erstattung live anzeigt. Das ist einfach die Steuer app für alle Fälle. Ja, und Fragen beantwortet sie auch. 247 und ohne Beamtendeutsch. Das ist einfach die App, die uns versteht. Steuern erledigt? Safe. Mit WISO Steuer. Jetzt kostenlos ausprobieren.