Transcript of MeidasTouch Full Podcast - 2/6/26 New

We have a lot to discuss on this episode of the Midas Touch podcast, Donald Trump continues to tank the economy that most Americans live in. A horrible jobs report coming out, private sector jobs, absolutely tanking. I mean, We haven't seen anything like this since the great recession of 2009 or right around September of COVID. We'll cover that. The Trump regime continues to cover up Donald Trump's involvement in the Epstein files. And with Epstein, it's harder to do when you see all of these things that have Donald Trump's name on it or referenced 38,000 times in 5,000 different documents. And the more you go through these files, the more grim, grotesque, and disgusting it is. The deeper the connections with Trump's first administration are, I did a deep dive showing that there are messages that show that Epstein said he was going to be hanging out with the Trump I mean, pretty close to the time that he ended up dying. He's speaking with Banon about potential meetings with Trump, and they seem to be all these back channel communications taking place. Again, I could only read what's in the emails, so I don't know beyond what's being said, but it ain't like Epstein's talking to random people.

He's talking to Banon, talking to prime ministers. He's talking to major leaders and political figures. It's just so fascinating to me. I did a whole video on it this morning, how other countries are dealing with this and handling people from their countries who may have been associated with Epstein and basically shaming them, pushing them out, making sure they're fired, and speaking with moral clarity, whether you saw in Poland, the Prime Minister Tusk talking about launching an investigation there, and anybody who has anything to do with Epstein will be gone right away from that government and fully prosecuted. We see what's happening in the UK. I mean, the parliament there yesterday, as all hell was breaking loose, as Prime Minister Starmer was admitted that he knew that this guy, Peter Mandelstown, who was the ambassador to the United States who since have been fired, had these connections with Epstein. Starmer is under fire right now about how do you even allow somebody to hold a position who had these connections. And of course, we see what's in the files. But here with these MAGA Republicans, they just deny that Trump's in them, even though Trump's in them in the most grotesque way.

I checked out these memes and I fact-check that they're true. That Trump appears more in the Epstein files than Harry Potter does in the Harry Potter seven books, including the word Harry. There's more references to Trump than the word Harry in the Harry Potter books and more references to Trump in the Epstein files Jesus in the Bible. It's not like these are just passing references. They're like grotesque references as well. We'll break that down. Also, Donald Trump in this bizarre interview with MBC was, again, bragging about cognitive exams and how he claims that he's so smart and just bizarre behavior. You have California with a massive win before the United States Supreme Court, which upheld the California Prop 50 maps. Not only did California fight back against Trump's attempt to rig the midterms in Texas, and California picked up five seats, Virginia and other states followed the lead of California, and they've been great in Virginia as well. And they put forward the Democrats there, a 10 to 1 map. So Democrats are going to net, it seems, more seats than the MAGA Republicans and Trump in the midterms just based on the gerrymandering. And then the Texas gerrymander by Trump and Abbott seem to be a dummymander because they diluted safer red districts into areas where we're seeing Democrats in their over performances in special elections beating Republicans by those margins.

We'll cover that as well. Brett and Jordie, we've got a lot to discuss here. I wanted to also focus on the good news and the momentum, though, as well with Virginia, the 10. 1 map, and not just focus on some of the dark and grim stuff of these Epstein files. But Brett, every day you're sending me stuff and I'm just like, Oh, my. I'm reading, I'm sending you stuff. Our editorial team were like, this is this is grotesque.

Yeah, we have a ongoing chat where all us and all of our researchers have been pouring through the Epstein files. And as you know, there were something like three million documents released. That's a lot of stuff. And there's a lot of stuff that you just continuously find, whether by putting in different search terms or clicking on random documents. A lot of people have I made indexes of all the documents to make it easily searchable, to make the videos easy to find, to make the photos easy to find. I got to say, I've been deep in it, and it's very dark. It's very dark, very grim. Some of the stuff, quite frankly, you know it's going to be bad, but when you actually see it in writing, it's just jaw-dropping. It's just disgusting. It's abhorrent. It's sick. It's grotesque. It's vile. It's depraved. Any word you want to use to describe it, it is just disgusting. It's so gross. But we've been uncovering it all. I think one of the most fascinating things about it is just to see all of these people, all of these Epstein associates, lying about it in real-time. At this point, we're able to see these communications.

We're able to see people making plans with Epstein at various times, dinners with Epstein, going to the island with Epstein, or at least making plans to go to the island with Epstein, Epstein making plans to meet them in various places in New York, in Palm Beach, you name it. Then many of these same people are going on and they're trying to downplay their relationship, which to me only sounds more alarms. It only raises more red flags because it's like, why are you lying about it? We could see exactly what happened in all of this. We're going to give you our opinions on all of this based on the documentation that we see. We're going to be asking the questions based on the documents that you could see. Obviously, we're unable to confirm 100% of everything and if things actually made it to fruition and all of that. But the stuff that we we are seeing in these documents is shocking, and particularly, as Ben noted, a lot of the stuff about Donald Trump, which shows that it appears that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were very close and had at least lines of communication, potentially going up until as recently with folks like Don Jr, 2018, 2019, months before Jeffrey Epstein died.

There's a lot of interactions about Trump, talking about meetings with Trump, talking about being with Trump right before the 2016, right before the inauguration in 2017. I mean, this is truly, truly jaw-dropping stuff. I look at other countries like the UK, and I'm looking at what's happening in Lithuania and Norway, and they are actually taking action. This is a big deal to people because they actually care about this stuff. Here we have a Department of Justice. Instead of actually trying to find justice to seek justice, what they are doing is they are acting as Donald Trump's personal criminal defense firm, and it is absolutely disgusting. We're going to speak about that and more. First, I'm going to toss to Jordi. Jordi, I got to say, though, light in the mood a little bit, it's a nice jacket you got on.

I knew you were going to say, You always bully me when I wear this jacket, babe.

I thought it was Excuse me, everybody. How's that a bully?

Before we start the show, I told him- Compliment the outfit.

I'm not even going to do the joke because it's mean. I told Brett to comment on my jacket, and he didn't know I was going to do that part of it. I was going to make it seem like he bullied me, but I felt bad and guilty. Hi, everybody. Have you set me up? Yeah, I did. I totally set you up. But I caved immediately, so it wasn't that great.

Who sets up your big bro?

I set you up for an audience of one because that's how quickly I came around on the joke. Anyway, I'm excited to get into today's show. Big show tonight. We are less than 80,000 subscribers from hitting 6 million subscribers on the Midas Touch YouTube channel. You guys are doing it, the Midas Mighty this community. Thank you guys so much. Please check right now to see if you're subscribed. We have about 25 more days to hit that 6 million subscriber mark. I think that was my prediction, and we're getting so close. So please hit subscribe, check if you're subscribed. You may think you're subscribed, but you might actually not be. So just double check. And if you're not, please hit subscribe. It's totally 100 % free and super easy to do and will save me from having to shave my head if we don't hit that six million mark. Benji, where are we starting off today at Big Bro?

I'll show you this document, though, right here. Jeffrey Epstein writing, Can we do coffee with Don Jr. Thursday or Friday? This is January 27th of 2019. Only if easy. As you know, I like people that are funny. And so they're scheduling time to meet with Don Jr. Whether that meeting actually occurred or not. I think that's an important one. You have him talking about Epstein talking about meeting with the Trump boys. We're going to meet with the Trump boys. This is Boris Nikolik. When are you back in New York City?

Epstein was one of the executives of Epstein's estate, by the way.

Yeah, exactly. He was the executive. He was put there two days before Epstein ultimately died. And this is an email from December 25th, 2016. Epstein says, Fourth in Palm with all the Trump boys. Fun. And Donald Trump and the Trump boys were indeed there during that time period when you go back and you look at it. It should also be noted that There's this message, January eighth, 2017. Epstein to a guy named Richard Merlin, who's an executive. Epstein says, You well? Merlin says, Fair. And you, Epstein, all good with Trump. Lots of opportunity. All good with Trump. Lots of opportunity.

We said, we tracked this. We looked at the news articles, we looked at the footage, we looked at the Getty photos, the historical record in newspapers, various publications. When Epstein said, With the Trump boys in Palm, on that date, Donald Trump and them, they were in Palm Beach that Christmas. Donald Trump was at Mar-a-Lago. There are articles about him doing a Christmas mass that year. It was right before he took office for his first term. That second part where he said, With Trump, lots of opportunity. Again, Donald Trump was in New York when Epstein was saying he was in New York, potentially with Trump. We said, we have no way of confirming if those meetings actually took place, but these are what the emails state. I think it's even more important to note that this clearly shows, despite anything that may have actually occurred at the time, that Epstein viewed himself as having a direct line to people like Don Jr, to people like Donald Trump, the fact that he's trying to these plans with Don Jr, the fact that he's trying to set all these things up, the stuff that he's speaking to Steve Bannon about, who obviously was, especially back then, but still today, very close with Donald Trump and was an advisor and an aid to Donald Trump.

So it's very clear that there were lines of communication we could surmise by just looking at the documents, looking at what's in black and white.

And by the way, also 100% debunked Trump's lie that he had ended his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein decades before. They kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. He's a sleazebag. Did he stop this communication? I mean, it just blows that all up.

Well, yeah. I mean, Jordy, to that point. There was a New York Post article right around the time that Epstein made that Sweetheart deal. And Epstein is quoted in the New York Post as saying, I'm not banned from Mar-a-Lago. I was just invited to show up recently in page six of the New York Post back then, okay? So you had messaged messages like that. You had Ghislaine Maxwell was referred to as G by Melania, and Melania referred to Jeffrey Epstein as J-E. She goes, J-E? Really good in the New York magazine article. Nice story about Jay.

Nice story about J-E in NY Mag. You look great on the picture. He's saying, It's a dear G to Ghislaine. I know you're very busy flying all over the world. How was Palm Beach? I cannot wait to go down. Give me a call when you're back in New York. Have a great time. Love Melania. Then Galaine responds to Melania by calling Melania Trump Sweet pea. She says, Sweet pea, thanks for your message. Actually, plan changed again. I'm now on my way back to New York. I leave again on Friday, so I still do not think I have time to see you, sadly. I will try and call, though. Keep well, G.

By the way, that's the New York magazine article that Donald Trump said that Epstein is a good guy who likes women on the younger side. That was the article that didn't go fully out there and say these things about Epstein because remember, a lot of the reporting was pulled back and we know what was happening and the writer wanted to write more and the editors were preventing it. But there were all the hints in that article as written about what was taking place. And Melania said, J. E. Look great. You look great in this. So it's just so fascinating. Melania wanted to further promote her failed movie yesterday. So she was holding these press conferences, and she used these Israeli-American people who were held hostage by Hamas, and she used them as props in order to promote her movie. And It's because she was like, In the Melania movie, I reached out to their family members. So if you want to see Melania in theaters now, and I'll show you that in a moment. But Melania was asked by reporters, What What do you make of Ghislaine Maxwell being in the minimum security facility? What do you think about that, Melania?

Watch Melania's response. Let's play. There's a call from the US team survivors about Ghislaine Maxwell moved to a high security.

Thank you, Russ. We are here celebrating the release and the life of those two incredible people.

So let's honor that. No, you don't get to enter into polite society. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. You have You have to answer these questions or don't show up. You think, Oh. And did you see immediately her handlers when that question was asked? All right, everybody leave. Time to go out. Everybody leave. Press conference is over. Press conference is over. Let me show you what was just going down in that press conference. Here's how she promotes the movie Meladia while she's with the freed hostages. Just watch this. 7, 2023, and Keith was captured for 484 days. After Aviva was freed, she called me, wanted to see me, and we set up a meeting in New York in January 2025. It was an emotional meeting, and it is captured on camera and available to see in my new film, Melania. That's almost right out of it.

Oh, my God.

You could see it in theaters everywhere. This is It's the craziest thing.

Then a reporter asks her, and I like that reporters are finally asking questions that are more aggressive. It's progressively getting better, these questions, and reporters are starting to feel more comfortable to ask these questions. So Tijana gets asked, why do you feel it's appropriate to use a White House event to promote your movie? That's clearly what you just did. Why do you think that's appropriate? Here, watch this. Why do you feel it's appropriate to use an official White House event to promote your documentary? This is not promotion. We are here celebrating the release of the hostages of Aviva and Keith. They were in Washington, DC. They called me. They said they would like to come over to thank me and to give hugs. That's why we are here. It has nothing to do with promotion. It has nothing to do with a promotion, guys. It has nothing to do with... Do you think we're So much of this is that question. Do you think we're that stupid? At a time where Americans are psychologically tortured, living paycheck to paycheck. At a time where you have January layoff surging to 17-year high, as US employers announced 108,435 layoffs in January, up 205% from December, the highest amount of layoff since January 2009.

Or how about job openings falling to 6. 5 million in December, the lowest level since September 2020, while Donald Trump's out there suing his own government, settling with himself for $10 billion, and they treat us all like we're so stupid. We don't know that what they're doing is what they're doing. Donald's going to give it a charity. He said he's going to give it a charity. Oh, got it. This was in promotion when you just promoted the film Melania. They just called you up to say thank you while you were out promoting your move. Oh. That ties into the release of these Epstein files, though, as well, because what was taking place was a cabal of rich men using sex trafficking as their currency, abusing little girls, and destroying the world, destroying the lives, and destroying the world while they were at it, too, with everybody else. We see... I mean, look, you had Epstein talking about shorting the Russian rubble three days before or five days before the annexation of Crimea. He knew when Crimea was going to be attacked by Russia. Russia. And so much of this was... It's notable, too, that they were talking about Bitcoin and Putin getting involved in Bitcoin and Epstein speaking with the royal family of UAE about Bitcoin.

Back in 2013, 2014. And just think about how these individuals got so much richer propping up Bitcoin. And then you see today, Bitcoin crashing. Bitcoin has lost 50% of its value in the past week, week and a half, or the past few months. Go back to that last one right there. Before this, the crypto market lost $2 trillion in value since October of 2025. As the Kolbiasi letter explains, on October sixth, crypto markets hit a record high market cap of $4. 3 trillion. Today, the crypto market is worth just $2. 3 trillion, losing $2 trillion worth of market cap in four months. 46, I said 50, I'll be precise, 46% of crypto's entire value has been wiped out right now. These are a lot of people who put money into this thinking, Oh, I'm going to be rich.

Especially at the beginning of Trump's campaign, because Trump made such a big deal. I'm against crypto regulation. I'm the crypto president. If you like crypto, I'm your guy. Now, all of these people who bought crypto at that time were left holding the bag. A lot of them are just completely wiped out, completely liquidated, because crypto now is below where it was after Donald Trump was elected. It had spiked quite a bit. It had this big sugar eye and peaked about four months ago before, boom, just the bottom dropped out. It is ugly right now. I see these crypto people. They are scared. They are not happy. Some of them have lost their life savings. It's disturbing. When you actually look at the files also, as Ben said, all of this is connected to all of global affairs and the way the world works. These are a lot of the people, and I know it sounds conspiratorial, and I think a lot of things that sound conspiratorial we're learning are very much real things. But there are people who are pulling the strings in world affairs, and I think Epstein was very central to all of that.

There was an email with Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Thiel, which I think speaks to this issue that we're talking about right now. In general, a lot of the things that we're going to be speaking about, Peter Thiel, obviously, the Silicon Valley guy, he helped found PayPal with Elon Musk, Musk, very tied into that whole tech cabal of Elon Musk and David Sacks. He's the reason why JD Vance is where he is. He funded JD Vance, he Palantier, all that stuff, Peter Thiel. Here is a message that Jeffrey Epstein sent to Peter Thiel in 2016. I think this is very revealing. Jeffrey Epstein said to Peter Thiel that... First, he said Brexit, just the beginning. They're talking about Brexit back then. Peter Thiel says, Of what? Jeffrey Epstein says, and I want you to think right now, if this sounds familiar to the policies of the Trump regime and to exactly what Trump is trying to do and what all of these people who are involved in this are trying to do right now and how it fits in with current society and economics and geopolitics. Jeffrey Epstein says, Return to tribalism, counter to globalization, amazing new alliances.

You and I both agree, zero interest rates were too high. I mean, how often have we heard Trump said that? And as I said in your office, finding things on their way to collapse was much easier than finding the next bargain. So he's saying out loud that they will have an easier time making money if things collapse, if they're able to return to tribalism. I mean, does this not define the last few years of the United States and the world of these right-wing oligarchs who have been pushing all of this stuff? You're seeing it right there in black and white. As we see the communications as well between, as we showed you, he was trying to set up a meeting with Don Jr in 2018, 2019, as we saw him saying that he was with the Trump boys in Palm Beach, it appears in 2016. I thought about this article that was written, I think it was sometime last year in the Daily Beast, where they allege that Epstein's Butler, where they say that Epstein's Butler alleged that Jeffrey Epstein boasted about getting a job offer from Donald Trump to work in the first Trump administration.

If you remember, listeners of the show know, I made a joke about this a few weeks ago, that if Epstein wasn't arrested, that he'd probably be in Trump's cabinet. He'd probably be like, Treasury Secretary. I forgot about this article right here. Epstein Butler claims Boss boasted about Trump job offer. This isn't some guy who was just in and out of Epstein's orbit. This was a guy who was with Epstein for more than a decade. I could get the exact... I think he was with Epstein for 15 years or something. At his Paris, 18 years. He ran Epstein's Paris home and worked for the Disgrace Financier for 18 years, and he gave a wide-ranging on-the-record interview with the Telegraph, where he said the following, Trump asked me to work for him in the new government, the Butler claimed, Epstein said. I said, Congratulations. I'm happy for you in my bad English. And Epstein said, No, I didn't accept. Now, that on its own is just one data point. When you put that with all these other data points of showing in the emails that Epstein is saying, essentially, that he's very close with Trump, that he's with Trump, to send this message to Trump, trying to get set up with Don Jr, whatever it is, in my opinion, in my First Amendment protected free speech opinion, I completely believe that that is the case.

Absolutely. I mean, when you look behind the curtain at all of this, I feel like it's just so much even more evil and coordinated than anyone maybe even could have thought. Pulling these pieces together, it is wild. It is wild. And I just want to comment on a few things here. On Inauguration Day, January 20th, 2025, Bitcoin was over $109,000. As of right now, it is $64,000. So just absolutely bonkers for someone, Donald Trump, who campaigned as the pro crypto guy. I also don't want to lose this site, Ben. When Galaine called Melania sweet pea, I don't know if that's a regional term or whatever, but the only times I've heard sweet pea is the ultimate term of endearment. So I just want to put that into the world. My wife's grandmother refers to her as sweet pea. It is someone that you know. You're not just calling any Joe Schmo off the street Sweet Pea, just to show you just another data point for how close these two likely were. And I know you're giving it up, Ben, for the press, finally pushing Melania a bit more. And I agree with you. I think the questioning was better, but I just can't happen to I think to myself sitting here right now watching those clips, if that was Dr. Jill Biden being asked those questions by those same reporting class, how much more with vigor would those reporters be coming with?

And there wouldn't just be one question just peppered in here and there. It would be every single question. And by the way, they would have every legitimate right to do it if President Biden was in the Epstein files at all. And so when you see these reporters I think to your point, Ben, there are some asking good questions, but I just have to be like to myself, I wish they were asking you more. I wish they were being stronger and more forceful about it because there's clearly a much more deeper relationship here between Ghislaine and Melania than we all know. And we, the collective, we should all know what that relationship entails.

If Dr. Jill Biden was friends with a child sex trafficker and in the files, and was promoting her own movie. A right wing oligarch paid her $75 million for and then had a state regime media promote it. I agree, Jordi. Dr. Jill Biden would be asked a lot more difficult questions. But that's where I want to pull back and just say, we are in these unprecedented times where Donald Trump is having his IRS, where the acting director is Bessent, who runs the Treasury Department. Give Donald Trump from the General Fund of Treasury paid into by taxpayers $10 billion because Donald Trump said that he was the victim of a data breach. That 404,000 other Americans also were back in 2021. So now Trump wants $10 billion for himself, which he claims he's going to give to charity. I'll address that. I'll explain, though, what I think the scheme is there as well, which seems pretty obvious to me. But then you have Donald Trump posting things like this. This is the White House Post. Then even they had to delete it. For the first time in five years, a majority of Americans say their personal finances are improving.

This is just the beginning of the Trump economic boom. 62 2% say their personal finances are getting better. I mean, quite literally, the poll is the opposite. 72% or 75% of Americans say that the economy is poor or just fair. But no one's saying it's doing good You're better right now.

It's the most- By the way, I think that's so indicative of where we are right now, right? Because even on a right-wing friendly platform like X, formerly Twitter, the White House posts that propaganda image, and they were so ruthlessly mocked and derided by people of all sides that they actually deleted it. I mean, that to me alone speaks volumes.

Or Trump during an interview yesterday with NBC, and we'll show you more of the cognitive stuff that he was saying, but he says that he really likes Bill Clinton. He's upset that Bill Clinton has been subpoenaed to testify, along with Hillary Clinton, regarding the Epstein files, and that Bill Clinton is being treated unfairly. Watch this, and then we'll talk to you about what's really going on. Let's play it. Mbc news broke the story today. I don't know if you saw it that the Democrats are already saying, If you bring President Bill Clinton, and he has to testify, we're bringing President Trump. What do you say to that? I think they might say that, but they've already brought me. See, I've been brought. They had me indicted many, many times. Many, many times. The President had some surprising thoughts about former President Bill Clinton. It bothers me that somebody God is going after Bill Clinton. See, I like Bill Clinton. I still like Bill Clinton. What do you like about him? Well, I liked his behavior toward me. I thought he got me. He understood me. He was the one that said very famously that You don't want to run against Trump when there were 18 people.

It was 18 people, including me, total. And he kept telling them, You don't want to run against Trump. Run against anyone. Don't run against Trump. And Hillary laughed at him. He goes, I mean, he's a deranged, demented human being. I don't even have to show you the other clips, but we know Donald Trump's been the one saying, Go after Bill Clinton, go after Hillary Clinton. Focus on them with the Epstein files, not me. So what changed? Oh, I know what changed. Former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, posted that she and former President Bill Clinton have agreed that not only do they want to testify before the House Oversight Committee, they want to do it in public. Here's what former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, writes, For six months, we engaged Republicans on the Oversight Committee in good faith. We told them what we know under oath. They ignored all of it. They moved the goalpost and turned accountability into an exercise in distraction. So let's stop the games. If you want this fight, James Comer, the MAGA Republican who leads the House Oversight Committee, let's have it in public. You love to talk about transparency privacy.

There's nothing more transparent than a public hearing. Cameras on, we will be there. So in response to that, that's why Donald Trump has changed his tune on Clinton. And the Clinton's called Trump's Bluff. You want to do a whole hearing in Congress on Epstein? Let's do it. Hillary Clinton says, I'll go first. Let's do it in public. Let's go. We'll talk about everybody's connections with Epstein. That's Donald Trump.

That's the Jamal Jibril post by her. That is really like, no, it is.

Let's do it. Let's do it. And it needs to get more... By the way, what she's doing there needs to get more attention. And it's weird, though, to your point, Jordi, about corporate media. No one's connecting the dots. Obviously, that's why Donald Trump is now saying that. And you know the MAGA Republicans are going to say, Oh, actually, we want to do a deposition in private first, and they're not going to want to do it in public. And then they're going to try to hold them in contempt when they don't want to do it in private. Exactly. Then they're going to try to take little snippets of it and say, Oh, look what we got of Bill Clinton, because they're clowns. They're fascist clowns, all of them. Not political Republican. They're just bad humans, these magas, who engage in this types of behavior.

Ben, it's what I said last episode. They don't have an honest bone in their body. They don't care. These Republicans do not care to get to the truth at all. That's the last thing they want. That's actually the last thing they want. They want to use their positions of power to enrich themselves.

Take a quick break. We'll be right back. A reminder, hit subscribe. You may think you're subscribed. We're close to that 6 million mark. Help us get to 6 million. Subscribe now. Go check out our audio podcast as well. If you watch on YouTube, subscribe on audio. Leave a five-star review as audio on the audio podcast and go to midisplus. Com. That's our sub stack. Let's take our first quick break of the show. We will be right back.

This episode is sponsored by Betterhelp. Sometimes it can feel like everyone else has it all together in their love lives. Whether married, dating, or single, the truth is, most of us are still figuring it out and finding our way. No matter where you are in your romantic journey, therapy can help you find your way, help you determine what you want, what feels heavy, and how you can take some pressure off yourself. Remember, an imperfect love life is common, and a little work in therapy can lead to a lot of progress. The way I see it, everyone is still figuring it out, including myself. I encourage you to take the pressure off yourselves. Therapy can help you identify what's weighing your relationships down and finding ways to brighten them again. Whether it's for individuals or couples, therapy is an opportunity to identify what's getting in the way and help remove any blockers. Betterhelp therapists work according to a strict code of conduct and are fully licensed in the US. Betterhelp does the initial matching work for you, so you can focus on your therapy goals. A short questionnaire helps you identify your needs and preferences, and their 12 plus years of experience and industry leading match fulfill rate means that Betterhelp typically gets it right the first time.

If you aren't happy with your match, switch to a different therapist at any time from their tailored recommendations. With over 30,000 therapists, Betterhelp is the world's largest online therapy platform, having served over 6 million people globally. And it works with an average rating of 4. 9 out of 5 for a live session based on over 1. 7 million client reviews. Sign up and get 10% off at betterhelp. Com/mitis. That's betterhelp. Com/mitis.

Most of us are numb to it now, but wow, this has been a wild ride. Ai is coming for jobs, tariffs and tax fights are shaking things up, and the market is swinging like it's had way too much coffee. It feels like near spastic economic uncertainty is just the new normal. Honestly, that's forced a lot of us to take matters into our own hands when it comes to protecting ourselves and our families. One of the smartest ways to do that is with better life insurance. I hate to say it, but if your policy is through work, you're probably underinsured, overpaying, and underprotected. That's why I'm looking at a new life insurance policy with SelectQuote. For over 40 years, SelectQuote has been one of the most trusted brokers in insurance, helping more than 2 million Americans secure over $700 billion in coverage. Their mission is simple: to find you the right insurance policy for your unique needs. They shop, you save. Unlike one-size-fits-all companies, SelectQuote's licensed agents work for you. In as little as 15 minutes, they compare policies from top-rated carriers to find you the best fit for your health and your budget, and they work for you for free.

No medical exam, no problem. Same day coverage, up to $2 million. Pre-existing conditions like high blood pressure, diabetes or heart disease, they've got options for that, too. Life insurance is never cheaper than it is today. Selectquote, they shop, you save. Get the right insurance for you for less and save more than 50% at selectquote. Com/media. Com. Mitas. Save more than 50% on term life insurance at selectquote. Com/mitis today to get started. That's selectquote. Com/mitis, M-E-I-D-A-S.

Welcome back. Thank you to our sponsors. Discount codes in the description below. Jordie had to go on papa job, being a parent. And so he's dealing with that. Let's get into some of the other news right now. So during that bizarre interview that Donald Trump had with NBC, Donald Trump was asked about settling with his own government, settling with the... It should be our government, but he's basically... His regime has taken over all layers. Remember, so he just sued the IRS, the Treasury Department, so his own United States. He sued for $10 billion saying that he was part of a data breach on tax returns back in 2021. And there was that guy, Little John there. That was the guy's name, not the rapper, who took- Okay. Who had access to all of these things. I think it impacted over 400,000 Americans who were subject to that data breach. During the Senate hearing with Bessent, it sounds like they were saying 44,000, but I think maybe they were saying 404,000. I'll show you that in a moment, but I'll make the point I want to make then. But anyway, on that basis, Donald Trump has sued basically himself with Bessant as the defendant, $10 billion.

And Trump says he's already won the lawsuit against the United States government. He just sued as the President. He goes, But I did it in my private capacity. So now he's going to pay himself $10 billion of our taxpayer dollars, and he's asked about it. With a straight face, he's like, Yeah, that's what I'm going to do. Absolutely. Here, play this clip. Essentially, the lawsuit has been won. I guess I want a lot of money. How about this work, though?

Scott Beston is the head of the IRS.

What I want to do- Pam Bonny is the head of the Justice Department. They're going to defend the IRS against you. You're the boss. Well, there's never been anything like it in all fairs. So are you going to tell them to pay you? Don't forget, I sued as a private citizen because I sued between terms. I won three times. But are you going to tell them to pay you? I won three times, but I didn't assume. Unfortunately, Unfortunately for this country, I didn't assume office the second day, but here's the story. I sued because they broke into Mar-a-Lago. That was before I became President. Now it goes along and it turned out that the suit is a very strong suit. You're going to tell them to pay you, though? You're the boss. Well, what I would do, tell them to pay me, but I'll give 100% of the money to charity. I don't want any of that money. You take it out of the system. A couple more questions here. No, I'm putting it back into the system. If I give money to American Cancer Society, I will give A hundred % of the money away to charity.

I don't want any of that. Thirty trillion dollar debt, and we're going to take 10 billion out of the system? Well, you give it away anyway. They give away a lot of money. Okay. First off, I think we all agree that's crazy. That's criminal, in my opinion, First Amendment, right? I'm giving you my opinion. You're going to steal our taxpayer money and force the government to settle with yourself? This stuff is unfathomable. It's unfathomable, criminal, and crazy, in my opinion. This is serious thing that they're actually doing right now. I also think we all agree that he's probably not going to give this money to charity.

Sure he is. The Donald J. Trump Foundation.

But just assume he gives it to charity, though. You know what the plan would be, right? Everybody gets what he's going to try to do then. Here's what I think he's going to do. I'll give you my opinion. First, he's going to claim that he suffered physical emotional distress such that he's going to claim that the $10 billion is tax-free and not income when he settles with himself. Is the IRS going to enforce that? Yeah. Bessent is going to make an opinion that Trump is in a personal physical injury. You think they're going to audit Donald Trump and say that that's how he's taking it? So he's going to take it as a personal physical injury under the IRS code that I used to advise clients in personal injury cases that you should see a tax advisor who will give you the real, but you We can get it tax-free if it's a personal physical injury. Obviously, this isn't a personal physical injury, but I bet you Trump will claim it that way. We won't even pay taxes on the amount. Then if he gives 10 billion to charity, what he'll do is he'll use it as a complete offset on his income, or he'll use it as a deduction.

Then what he'll also do, because who's going to audit him? Then he'll carry the extra money. Let's just say he donates 10 billion paid himself from the government to them. Then in his own mind, he'll never pay taxes for the rest of his life because he'll get a tax person to tell him that he can then carry the deduction over to every tax year for the remainder of his life, and then he'll never pay taxes again. Then when he does the shady deals with United Arab Emirates or whoever and makes the billions of dollars, he'll pay zero income tax because he entered into a tax-free settlement that he then donates the money it's a complete offset on all of his taxes. I just want to let you know with that, assume he gave it to charity, that's what his plan... You're not tricking people who are professionals. You're like, I know what he's trying to do there as well, assuming he does that. If he doesn't just take it for himself, then we never hear from it again, and we never see the donation. I'm thinking about it. I'm thinking about what I'm going to...

I'm thinking about what I'm going to do.

And think about how much money Trump has already made from the presidency. He's profited from the presidency like nobody ever in history. The New York Times did that report recently where they estimated that he has already made at least $1. 4 or $1. 5 billion at the floor, at the absolute lowest. Obviously, wealth and stakes and things are not necessarily liquid cash and income in that capacity. But you could see, if that's where we're starting at, at the lowest end right now, and I think it's personally significantly higher than that, if that's where we're starting, think the buffer he just gave himself, to Ben's point, with the taxes to continue to earn billions and billions and billions of dollars completely tax-free by scamming the United States taxpayer. I mean, it is a devious plot to enrich himself and not have to pay a penny.

What do you think he's setting up the offshore Qatari bank accounts for? He's diverting government money for unlawful invasions of countries and other activity like that to then to keep the money not within the treasury, but then to segregate money in a Qatari account that he has access to, that there's no oversight over at all. Again, this shouldn't be a Democrat-Republican independent thing. Anyway, we should all be infuriated by this behavior, especially as Americans are psychologically tortured living paycheck to paycheck right now. If they're lucky enough to have a paycheck, Americans can't afford rent, they can't afford homes, highest student loan delinquency since great recession, that type of thing, highest car loan division, all of these things. I'll just show you this other clip with Donald Trump. I want to show you what happened at the Senate hearing where Senator Gallegos was cross-examining Besteff. But first, let me just show you Donald Trump talking about cognitive stuff and that he takes cognitive exam just so you can see the level of insanity we're dealing with here here, play this quote. I feel great. I mean, physically and mentally, I feel like I did 50 years ago.

It's crazy. Now, there'll be a time when I won't be able to give you that answer, but that time hasn't come. I do. I think it's very important. I've done more physicals. I take physicals just to give the report out. I take cognitive physicals, so I do a cognitive mind test, okay? A lot of people wouldn't be able to do very well. Not easy. You get to those last questions. I've aced. I've done three of them. No other president has agreed to do them. I do them because I have no problem with it because I'm 100 Okay. And again, as we watch him there, and our audio listeners, you can't see him. I mean, you hear how crazy he sounds, but he looks like a mad person. And then you have the interviewer looking at him like he's watching somebody who is deeply unwell, and that shouldn't be acceptable for our country.

There was that one moment that was particularly bizarre. Speaking of cognitive issues, we don't have to play the clip, but there was the moment where he was asked about people getting killed by ICE. And Donald Trump said, I I hate even talking about ICE. Two people, he downplayed people's deaths and said, Fewer deaths than there's actually been from ICE. But he says, Two people out of tens of thousands, and you get bad publicity. Yamos was like, There were two Americans who died. Then Trump, just his brain, who the hell knows what the hell was happening here. But he's talking about the deaths at the hands of ICE, the murders by the ICE people. Donald Trump responds, We have the smallest trucks. We have been very tough on the waters. Tom Yomas, the MBC host, was like, I'm what? The waters? Did you just say the waters? Then he started talking about, Oh, yeah, we knocked out a lot of boats on the waters, just completely veering off topic into something that was so utterly nonsensical, talking about bombing drug boats when he's in the middle of a completely other thought. It was bizarre. I think you saw more evidence of that cognitive decline in this interview that was on MSNBC.

I mean, that was just one of many very strange moments.

That brings us to the Senate hearing from earlier in the day, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is the witness. Let me show you a part of the cross-examination that transpired. Democratic Senator Gallegos of Arizona, Secretary starts cross-examining him. Let's just play the first clip of Gallegos. But the President prevails in this lawsuit. He's going to be able to pocket that money. My question is, is the President, is anyone in the President's office talk to you about this lawsuit in any regard? They have not. The President said he will donate the proceeds to charity. You may have missed that. So no one at all has discussed this to you whatsoever? No, sir. The President said he will- Have you received... I didn't ask any more questions. Have you received any advice from Treasury's Legal Division about how to handle this potential conflict? This is a Justice Department matter. They represent treasury in it. Have someone from Department of Justice actually come and talk to you saying that this is their purview and you need to stay out of it? Who has discussed to you what is your role Our general counsel who's sitting behind me, has told me that it is a Justice Department matter, the Justice Department defends treasuries and treasuries in matters like this.

Okay, so it has been discussed with you. Do you have any final say at all in the process of this? Or is the DOJ just going to instruct you to cut a check and/or settle, and you have no independence to actually make a decision whether or not the President deserves $10 billion? Again, that is a DOJ matter. The DOJ will entirely make that decision, whether or not the President should receive $10 billion. You have no say at all. Correct. You will just have to write the check if you were told to write the check. Correct. You would write the check willingly if you were told by a DOJ to the President. I will follow the law, Senator. Okay. I think for many of us, this is very simple. I think if this had been happening in any other countries, it would look absolutely like a total shakedown of the American taxpayer. Yeah, because you watch that, you're like, How is this even real? How is this even a thing? And I think when I show you in the next segment what was happening in the UK Parliament and how they're addressing it versus how things are being addressed here in the United States, or not addressed based on the Trump regime and Donald I'm saying, I'm not in the files.

I'm vindicated. There's no issue. I'm perfect. And then our corporate news is just like, on the one hand, it's denied. On the other, it's just like, we are living in this really warped and timeline here in the United States that is lacking normalcy, setting aside politics, like basic morality. But I want to show that-Let's just sum up the Trump administration's philosophy here.

They don't have money to help you, the average American, but they will happily give $10 billion of your money to Donald Trump while telling you that you should enjoy your one pencil, your one doll, your one piece of broccoli, your one tortilla, and your one piece of chicken, and you will be happy about it. I mean, it's such a slap in the face to people. It is so offensive. It is so grotesque. It is just the height of kleptocracy and oligarchy. It is just detestable.

I want to talk more about that hearing. Producers are saying we got to take our last break of the show. Let's go to our last quick break. A reminder, we're close to 6 million subscribers. If you want to have me stop saying, let's get to 6 million and have me start saying, get to 7 million, make sure you're subscribing.

Pretty good offer right there, Ben. You really know how to incentivize people.

I've got a great offer for everybody when we come back. How about I give you a plan each to make 10 billion dollars million dollars. And how about this? All of our audience can make somewhere in the range of $10 to $20 quadrillion more than trillion. We're in the quadrillion.

It's getting I've got a plan.

I'm going to lay it out there. Actually, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent gave me the idea, and I'll show you why after this last quick break.

Let's face it, after a night with drinks, I don't bounce back the next day like I used to. I have to make a choice. I can either have a great night or a great next day. That is until I found pre-alcohol. Zbiotics pre-alcohol probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic byproduct in the gut. It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration. That's to blame for rough days after drinking. Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to make pre-alcohol your first drink of the night. Drink responsibly and you'll feel your best tomorrow. Every time I have pre-alcohol before drinks, I notice a difference the next day. Even after a night out, I can confidently plan on having a great next day without worrying. Ready to try it? Go to zbiotics. Com/mitis now. You'll get 15% off your first order when you use Mitis at checkout. Plus, it's backed by a 100% money back guarantee, so there's no risk. Subscriptions are also available for maximum consistency.

Remember to head to zbiotics. Com/mitis and use the code MITIS at checkout for 15% off. How much time, money, and energy have you spent on health, wellness, and beauty products to look and feel younger and healthier? If you're like me, probably too much. Now, I'm so excited to share with you guys C15 from Fattie 15, the first emerging essential fatty acid to be discovered in more than 90 years. Now, it's an incredible scientific breakthrough to support our long-term health and wellness, and you guessed it, healthy aging. Fattie 15 co-founder Dr. Stephanie VanWatzen, she discovered the benefits of C15 while working with the US Navy to continually improve the health and welfare of aging dolphins. Now, based on over 100 studies, we now know that C15 strengthens our cells and is a key to healthy aging nutrient, which helps to slow biological aging at the cellular level. Now, in fact, when our cells don't have enough C15, they become fragile and age faster. When our cells age, our bodies age, too. So Fattie 15 is a science-backed, award-winning patent 100% pure C15 supplement. It's vegan friendly, free of flavors, allergens, or preservatives. Fattie 15 has three times more cellular benefits than omega-3s or fish oil.

I love Fattie 15. I've personally seen the benefits. Definitely check this stuff out. Best of all, Fattie 15 comes in a gorgeous reusable glass bamboo jar, and refills are shipped right to your door. Now, Fattie 15 is on a mission to optimize your C15 levels to help support your long term health and wellness, especially as you age. You can get an additional 15% off their 90 day subscription starter kit by going to fatty15. Com/mitis and using code MITIS at checkout.

Welcome back. Thank you, everybody, for watching the MITUS Touch Network, watching this podcast. It's great to be here with you all, as always, and just keep on growing this network together one day at a time. All right, going back to Senator Gallego, his cross-exam of Treasury Secretary, Bessant. I loved how Gallego here makes it clear that this money leaves no doubt that this money is being stolen from the taxpayers. Like that this is coming from the IRS General Fund, which is where when you pay your taxes, it goes into a general fund account at the IRS. And that's what Trump is rating in his lawsuit. Taking $10 billion out for himself at a time where, as you heard in the other interview, our national debt is heading to $39 trillion. And Trump is increasing our debt dramatically, and federal spending is up, and all the stuff that Doge promised it was going to do was a complete and utter failure. It actually added to our national debt. Let's play this second clip. We touched on this earlier. In addition to being Treasury Secretary, you are serving as acting director of the IRS. So following up on Senator Kim's questioning, so you are fully aware that the President is suing your agency for $10 billion.

Yeah. Would you agree that $10 billion is a good sum of money? Yes, sir. Where would that be cut from? Let's say for some reason he actually wins that lawsuit, where would that $10 billion come from? Again, it would come from- Process I'm not asking your opinion, whether it's right or wrong. It would come from treasury. It comes from treasury, which comes from the general fund? The treasury general account. So taxpayers? Yes. Thank you. Part of the 440,000 taxpayers whose returns were leaked. Now, if the President... They're not suing, but- They're not suing. But this is where I told you I'd give you advice. I just want you to think about why Donald Trump has bankrupted so many things. He hasn't think ahead. And he's a criminal. And he's also a sexual abuser, and he's also an utter fraud. But let's use that example right there. I originally thought I heard Besson say 44,000, but listening to it again, he said 404,000, I believe. Hundreds of thousands of people were impacted by the same data breach that Trump is claiming injured him personally, he says, to the tune of $10 billion. And mind you, Trump sued the Wall Street Journal for $20 billion, and the Nobel Well, peace, the Pulitzer Prize committee, rather, for billions of dollars.

And this one for billions of dollars, that one for billions. You add up all of Trump's lawsuits, it's like $100 billion. He's got $200 billion in claims out there, which are all bogus and BS and frivolous, in my opinion. Those numbers are just utterly pathetic. It just made up numbers. But assume he's saying that the damage for the data breach in 2021 is $10 billion, right? So What would stop somebody right now who was also impacted by that data breach to say, I want to be part of a class action of people impacted by the same data breach? What would stop a lawyer from finding a victim of the data breach? And by the way, in these data breach cases, they usually settle for like 500 bucks and you get data security. I used to handle data breach cases as a lawyer as well. When Equifax and all those types of companies, remember, like those companies had their data breached, people would get like a thousand bucks or 2000 bucks, and you'd get like a data security for like five years free or something. That's usually how those cases, you don't get $10 billion. But okay, what if you have a good data breach plaintiffs class action lawyer says, Oh, wow, $10 billion per victim, per person?

Okay, well, let's have a class action. I'll represent all 404,000 or let's just say 44,000 because that's what I did the math on. Then everybody's damages, 10 billion. We'll file the class action. The Department of Justice is going to have to defend it. They're conceding on the Trump lawsuit that they owe him 10 billion. Besson said that there's $44,000 or a thousand other people impacted by this. Okay, so the class action demand, if it was 44,000 people impacted, would be about 470, whatever it is. I'm horrible. But around 450 to 470 trillion dollars. So if Trump sets a precedent that he gets 10 billion, then shouldn't the other 400,000 people all get 10 billion dollars? So now our national debt just went from 38 trillion dollars, which Trump is responsible for about 30 to 35 % of that, and that's going up, by the way, to now in the quadrillions, because now the government's going to have to pay out a class action settlement of a quadrillion or at the low end, $470 trillion, based on that logic. Then you're going to go, Well, actually, we're going to fight the class action, but Donald Trump, we're going to settle with Donald Trump.

Okay, well, that'll be an interesting argument for the DOJ to have to make before a federal judge. Hey, Judge, they conceded that this is a claim. But do you see how just even doing this has repercussions on everything? You see how Donald Trump's Tariffs Against the World ends up leading to all the other countries countries entering to agreements with each other and cutting the United States out? Do you see how Donald Trump trying to enrich himself and his Bitcoin company, World Liberty Financial, by giving away our Semiconductor technology to the UAE ends up resulting both in the destruction of our national security secrets and Bitcoin collapsing as well as Trump enters the Bitcoin space in such a in a phony and, in my opinion, fabricated way. Now Bitcoin is crashing, in my view, as a result of that. Do you see how all of his things have the same reaction? Now you have a stock market here in the United States and GDP, which is basically propped up by deal churn of AI companies just doing deals with each other. They are concealing, in my opinion, the debt on their balance sheet by saying it's CapEx expenditures on paying loans or paying leases, rather, on data centers.

They're actually hiding debt by creating these structures that act like their debt is CapEx expenditures. It's all bogus, in my view. It's all a fugazi. The SEC, which is supposed to step in and regulate, they're nowhere to be found. The criminals are getting pardoned by Donald Trump. This doesn't actually help anybody because Everybody gets screwed by it in the long run. Which brings me to, I know American media does not usually cover what goes on in the Parliament of UK, but I think it is telling and important for us to talk about. Brett, before I show the UK Parliament, did you want to comment on any of that?

I think you basically covered it all. But I just want to say, if you're a Trump voter out there, what are you getting out of this at this point? You're losing your jobs. If you're a big crypto person, you've lost all your crypto, you're giving Donald Trump $10 billion of your money. It's like the guy is screwing you left and right. He's scamming you in emails with all these tricks. Is it just so you could hate whoever you want to hate and feel good about it? Because right now, there is really, truly no justification for anything. Even if... Well, I'm not even going to go. But it's just like, wake up. This guy is a scam artist, and you are the mark, and you are the ones who are enabling this to continue to happen. I think that's why, though, we see this see Donald Trump's approval rating right now. Even the latest Rasmussen poll falling off a cliff because he actually is starting to lose some of these base voters. Before we get into the clips from the UK Parliament, I do want to give a shout out to people in the UK. I've always loved watching clips of UK Parliament.

You all get rowdy, you get right up in each other's grill. I would love to be able to see in the United States, a President of the United States just get screamed at by everybody around there in Congress. It really is actually It's really, to me, a very powerful thing to see leaders be held accountable in a setting like that. These clips, I think it's interesting to note right now that as we see the fallout from the Epstein files, a lot of what we're seeing in terms of the fallout, politically speaking, is happening overseas. It's happening in the UK. You have Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the UK under fire. You have Peter Mandelson in the UK. He's resigned from his position. He's out and now appears to be under a criminal investigation due to giving Jeffrey Epstein some tips of information from the government before it was actually made public about major, major global affairs and economic policy shifts. You're seeing things in Norway, you're seeing investigations in Lithuania, you're seeing Poland speak out, Donald Tusk and Poland speaking out about this. But here, as I said earlier in the episode, you have the Department of Justice and these Republicans acting like Donald Trump's personal law firm.

You are seeing some fallout in certain sex of corporations and whatnot. You're seeing the chair of Paul Weiss, the law firm, I should note, maybe the first law firm to cave to Donald Trump. He is out because he was all over the Epstein files. And so we are seeing a fallout like that. But as of now, and I don't expect this to change anytime soon, all these Republicans and the DOJ, our government structure right now, is protecting Donald Trump. Throughout all of this. Now, Ben, let's go to the UK because these clips, to me, I think they're powerful.

You also have David Ross, Department Chair at the School of Visual Arts in New York City, former Director of the Whitney Museum of American Art, announced resignation as well. Okay, let's take a look at what was going on in the UK. To be just so everybody knows the dynamic, this Mendelsohn guy, he was the UK ambassador to the United States. People knew that he had had some or the party that appointed him, the labor party, knew he had some connections to Epstein, but didn't know the extent of it. And he had some questionable ethical issues in the past as well. By the way, he's in the Epstein files in very grotesque ways. But in my view, not quite as... It's hard to say which is more grotesque than the other. But I mean, Trump was in it far more than Mendelsohn was in it, and Trump was closer. Every Trump says Epstein is a great guy, even the stuff that are in the files that we knew about Trump before all over. So we know Trump's deep connections to Epstein, undisputed. But now the opposition party, the Tories in the UK, the conservative Party there, they're out there.

And by the way, the Tories have their own issues and their own... It's not like they're free of any corruption and issues. And also, I don't want to lose sight of the reform party, Nigel Farage, which is their far right wing party, working with Russia and as part of a lot of this cabal as well in order to and break down government. When I focus on the labor party, I think it's important, especially as an American, talking about politics of another country, that I do so with the nuance it deserves, that I'm not in any way ignoring Nigel Farage, reform party, the right wing extremist party there, and their links to Putin and their links to Brexit, which is what Epstein was also involved in Brexit, and talking about how that's going to create opportunities for this cabal of people. Obviously, Faraj was a major player in Brexit, for example as well. I don't want to talk about it. Anyway, you have the opposition party in the UK Parliament pressing Prime Minister Keir Starmer for answers and accountability. Hey, Starmer, when you won the election, and there's a big Labor Party majority right now in the Parliament from the election that they won.

And a Starmer should be relatively... The Labor Party itself, based on the seats that they hold in Parliament, should be relatively safe through 2029, which is when the next elections would otherwise be. But Starmer right now, personally, is vulnerable because what did he know? When did you know it about Mandelson? And that became a big theme. This guy was hanging out with the pedo, and he disgraced and shamed the UK. So first, I want you to watch as some of the opposition leaders and opposition figures start raising the issue of Mandelson's connections with Epstein, and what did Prime Minister of UK, Kier Starmer, know and when Did he know it? Let's play the first one. Absolutely. It absolutely beg us belief. If we want to clean up politics, then this thing should not be being allowed to happen. Politics is a difficult place, we know that, but this was down to judgment. It was down to the judgment of one person, or was it the judgment of others around that person? I urge the Honorable and Right Honorable members on the Labor Benches opposite, do the right thing this evening. Stand up for democracy, stand up for parliament, and stand up for decency.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Liberation Day. That is how Mandelstown described the day of Epstein's release for prison, for procuring children to be trafficked and raped. Mandelstown's next message was, How is freedom feeling? Epstein replied, She feels fresh, firm, and creamy. Mandelstown's next reply, Naughty boy. Disgusting. Now, we hadn't seen this email, I'll admit, when the ambassador was appointed. But let's look at what we did know when he was appointed ambassador. We knew at that point that he had consoled this pedophile, consoled him on his being found guilty and convicted for just one of the many, many crimes he committed. We also knew that while he was Deputy Prime Minister of this country and business and Trade Secretary, carrying the flag of our great nation on an official visit to New York, he stayed in a convicted pedophiles flat. Let me show you this next clip of another person.

By the way, I guess the Epstein people really like using the phrase Liberation Day. That was the phrase that he- Absolutely.

Liberation Day is what we hear from Trump. All of Liberation Day. Liberation. Take a listen to this next member of Parliament there. Now, the Prime Minister was asked today directly, could he tell us, did the official security vetting that he received mention Mendelsohn's ongoing relationship with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. And he replied, yes, it did. Now, the point is that when the minister says he lied to the Prime Minister, but the Prime Minister knew that the relationship was ongoing. So even if he lied about some other aspects of the relationship, cannot the Minister see that the fact there was any ongoing relationship at all with a man who'd been imprisoned for pedophilia and prostitution, can he not see that that was an impossible position to defend? Finally, let me show you when Prime Minister, Kiara Starmer, was directly confronted, and he had to stand there and answer for it. And while to me, his answer was not acceptable, and I think That's how most people in the UK feel. And again, I want to be very clear. It's very hypocritical for the Tories to act holier than thou. I know that's coming in the comments.

And certainly by my focus here, I'm not ignoring the reform party's role in Brexit and being part of this whole desire of right wing authoritarians to topple the world order, create disruption that we talked about. So I just, again, I need to be very sensitive when reporting on foreign air, especially as an American, that I listen to you loud and clear. But I want you to watch as Starmer admits to a mistake and says, Yes, I was told. I was lied to. But he doesn't deny, No, I don't know what you're talking about. He takes a level of responsibility for it and confesses and says, Yes, I knew. Then there's an audible gasp of, Watch this. Can the Prime Minister tell us, did the official security vetting he received mention Mandelsen's ongoing relationship with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein? Prime Minister? Yes, it did. As a result, various questions were put to him. I intend to disclose to this house all of the national security, prejudice to international relations on one side. I want to make sure this house sees the full documentation so it will see for itself the extent to which time and time again, Mandelstown completely misrepresented the extent of his relationship with Epstein and lied throughout the process.

I thought that was important to show you and to share that with you. Of course, here you have Maga Mike Johnson. Let's contrast that to what Maga Mike Johnson said when he was asked by Manu Raju in the walls of the Capitol about Trump appearing over and over again on these files. Just take a look at the difference. Play this clip.

Trump had to answer some questions, too.

He's been named more than a thousand times in these documents. The President submits to press inquiries every day. Not under oath. Not under oath. Not under oath, but he's asked the questions all the time, and he answers them.

We'll see where it goes.

Brett, isn't that just night and day?

Like I said, this is Republicans, the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, everybody here just acts as if they are Donald Trump's own personal defense attorneys. This is a really serious subject and a really dark subject and not something to joke about. It's horrifying. It is something that demands accountability from those figures who are deemed to be guilty of heinous acts via the files. While it's heartening to see other countries step up and demand accountability for their leaders, it's very disheartening here in the United States to see this protection racket that exists around Donald Trump right now because this is, like I said, really serious, really heinous stuff we are dealing with. It certainly appears that Donald Trump was right in the center of all of it.

Absolutely. What's Donald Trump focused on today? He will agree to remove blocking important critical funds for New York if you put his name on everything. Trump wants his name on Dulles and Penn Station, and he has asked Schumer, Support renaming Washington Dulles and Penn Station after Trump. And then Trump will release the funding for the Gateway Project. I mean, you just see this behavior over and over again, and you're like, What the hell is even happening? I'll leave us with some good news. Virginia in the In their, both houses, their chambers controlled by Democrats in both houses now, they put forward a 10: 1 map. And not only have Democrats now completely neutralized neutralized MAGA's effort to rig the midterms. Democrats are actually going to net more seats, it seems, in the mid-decade redistricting. And not only that, what Trump has done in Texas, based on what we saw over the weekend in Texas the state Senate district number 9, where a plus 17 Trump district turned plus 14 to Democrat, a 31 plus shift is by creating five additional Republican seats that they believed would go Republican in mid-decade redistricting. They've now diluted other seats that may have been even safer Republican seats.

So now there's so many more seats that have been put down below plus 15 in Texas. So now would Trump, in inadvertently did is made all these other seats more vulnerable in Texas right now based on the results that we're seeing in Democratic overperformance. And so not only may the Democrats win those five seats that Trump thought would turn Republican, but now some of those other seats that maybe, say, went from plus 17 or plus 20 to plus 12 or plus 13 in order to then give some of those voters to the blue districts to turn those districts red. You have to pull from someplace in order to create a redder district. They may have now created a situation where they just handed even more seats to Democrats as a result. Let me leave you with the Senate pro tempi, Tempore, the leader of the Senate, along with the leader of their equivalent of their house chamber there. Watch this press conference that they held. Let's play. Give me more seats. Then that's not enough. He calls North Carolina, Missouri, Ohio. I need more. I need more. Today, we are leveling the playing field. These are not ordinary times, and Virginia will not sit on the sidelines while it happens.

We made a promise to level the playing field, and today we're keeping our promise. Our maps are ready. Virginia is ready. We said 10,1, and we meant it. We are proud to deliver a map that stands up for democracy, to stand up for Virginia, to stand up and give us a voice. He started this mess, and Virginia is going to finish it. Virginia to the rescue. Senator Lucas said it best. We've been working really hard to make sure that we got this delivered. This is about leveling the playing field across the country. Republicans are gerrymandering maps to override the will of the voters. We just saw it in Texas, North Carolina, and Missouri. At Donald Trump's direction, they're manipulating election maps because they know they can't win on their agenda in 2026. Instead of changing their ideas, they're trying to rig the system. A 10: 1 map levels the playing field, and we're ready to move forward. Then we're making good on our promise by releasing the maps publicly. We're going to get them released either by the end of the day or early tomorrow. We'll get those maps released. It's putting them out in the open and allowing them to be debated the way they should be in a democracy.

We're going to leave it up to Virginia voters. The maps are ready. Virginia is ready, and And that's what my senator said many times. Ten-one. Ten-one. Ten-one. Thank you all. They did say ten-one the entire time. So hat tip right there to the Senate pro-temporary, State Senator Lucas, and Speaker Scott right there. Who's been in the show a lot before. But also give a hat tip to Governor Newsom with Prop 50, really starting the pushback. You see, when you fight back, you win. To me, that's the lesson, and that's a good lesson to end on. When you fight back, you win. We're seeing that when you fight, Trump wanted to hide the Epstein files. By the way, there's still 3 million files that have not been produced that I believe are far more devastating than what's actually been turned over. But you fight for them, you get leaders who say, We're not giving up. You've got García in the House Oversight Committee, Kana, Massey, and others. Boom, you get a release. And what a difference. That's been one of the biggest game changers. Prop 50, biggest game changers. He's got to keep on fighting back with moral, formal, authority, with people power.

Brett, I'll give you the final word of the episode.

But just think about Governor Newsom's move. Governor Newsom decided that he was not going to take what the Republicans were doing, laying down. And he got up there and he took a risk. There was no guarantee that Prop 50 was going to work. He took a big swing here. I remember all those various pundits on Capitol Hill were mocking him, this is never going to work. Look at the polling. The polling doesn't look so good. If it's like this right now, these usually get less popular as it goes on. But Gavin Newsom hit the ground. He made the case. He brought this directly to the voters, unlike what Texas did. He sold the crap out of it, and people were all on board, and people now see Governor Newsom as a fighter. He set the stage for these other Democrats to follow in his lead and do the same thing. He also sent a warning shot out there to these Republicans that, You want to keep playing this game? We could keep doing this every single time. Now we're seeing how this whole process of the gerrymandering by the Republicans has backfired. The Democrats are likely to end up with a net gain of seats since the Republicans started this, whatever you want to call it, this game, this competition, this gerrymandering battle.

Democrats are actually going to win because the Democrats in the States are actually fighting back to Ben's point. Now, even the Supreme Court, within the past 24 hours or so, they said that we're going to reject the Republican petition to try to overturn Prop 50. We're not even going to take it up. It was a unanimous decision in the Supreme Court. You could officially mark it up on the board that Governor Gavin Newsom has defeated the Republicans in this battle, and it should be a model for all Democrats and all people going against this mega co-opted Republican Party that is trying to destroy everything we have, that we have to be fighting fire with fighter. We got to be able to punch back, and when we fight, we win, as they say.

Right. If Trump's saying that he can fire everybody, without any oversight, Democrats can do it, too, and we take control of the White House, right? They could do it, too. All of these things Democrats could do. Okay, these are the new rules that you are all creating? Okay. Are you sure? And they don't think through those things. It's time to fight back with moral, formal authority, not because of any political party, but because we're in a fascist situation. We're not in a constitutional crisis. We're well beyond that. It's time that we take back our country. We fight for our country. We fight for democracy. We stand up together. Thanks, everybody, for watching. A reminder, hit subscribe. Help us get to 6 million subscribers. We're like 80,000 subscribers away. You may think you're subscribed, double check and hit subscribe and turn your notifications on in the channel. Try to join the channel as well. Become a member of the channel and you could gift memberships to others. Check out our sub stack at mitisplus. Com. Subscribe on audio. Just search Midas Touch on audio podcast. And we appreciate you. We're grateful for you. We're in this together.

Keep fighting, keep the momentum. I know difficult times. I know it's challenging. We're in it together. We'll get through this together. Thanks, everybody. Everybody for watching. We're grateful for you. Shout out to the Midas Mighty.

The Midas Mighty, standing strong. Against the fascist We will get it right whenever.

Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber for our sub stack at midasplus. Com. You'll get daily recap from Ron Filipkowski, add free episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content, only available at mitusplus. Com.

Okay, Nicolas. Quizfrage: Homeoffice bei Stade oder Fahrtkosten. Was bringt uns mehr? Moment, ich check das kurz. Oha, Homeoffice gewinnt. Bringt uns 150 Euro mehr im Jahr. Ja, richtig. Aber wieso weißt du so was? Weil, wieso Steuer die Erstattung live anzeigt. Das ist einfach die Steuer-App für alle Fälle. Ja, und Fragen beantwortet sie auch. 247 und ohne Beamtendeutsch. Das ist einfach die App, die uns versteht. Steuern erledigt? Safe. Mit WISO Steuer. Jetzt kostenlos ausprobieren.