Gas prices and mortgage rates drop while the GDP surges.
In just one short year, President Trump has delivered a historic economic turnaround to put our country back on the path to prosperity.
The Trump administration touts the President's policies while also launching a probe in Jerome Powell.
This unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure.
I I'm Georgia Howe with Daily Wire executive editor, John Bickley. It's Tuesday, January 13th, and this is Morning Wire.
The Supreme Court takes up the issue of men competing in women's sports, addressing the question, Can States Ban It?
We are fighting for the bare minimum here.
The bare minimum, can we, as women, call ourselves champions?
And as the turmoil in Minnesota continues news between anti-ice protests and the massive fraud scandal, we speak to the former governor who calls it a reckoning for the state.
Something like 67% of Minnesotans do not feel that Governor Walls did enough to foresee and prevent the fraud.
Thanks for waking up with MorningWire. Stay tuned. We have the news you need to know.
Start the new year with meals that actually make you feel good. Our sponsor, Hello Fresh, takes the stress right out of cooking so you can enjoy delicious homemade dinners every single night. Hello Fresh brings people together with meals that are simple and rewarding, even on your busiest weeknights. With over 100 mouthwatering recipes each week, from seasonal favorites to global dishes like barbecue pork burgers, you'll find bigger portions that ensure nobody leaves the table hungry. To It from me. I've ordered everything from Hawaiian pizza and nacho crunch burgers to lamb chops and filets. And no matter the meal, it's always top-notch and simple to prep. Plus, you can choose from over 35 high-protein weekly recipes, including new Mediterranean and GLP-1 friendly options All made with wholesome ingredients like sustained sourced seafood and 100% antibiotic and hormone-free chicken. Go to hellofresh. Com/morningwire10fm to get 10 free meals and a free zwilling knife on your third box. Offer only valid while supplies last. Free meals applied as a discount on First Box. New subscribers only varies by plan.
One year after retaking the presidency, the White House says Donald Trump's economic and domestic agenda is starting to pay off.
Daily Wire senior editor, Kabbit Phillips, is here to break some of the latest numbers that are pretty exciting for the American people. So, Kabbit, where do you want to start?
Well, President Trump has urgent patience with the American people since winning re-election, telling folks that his agenda would take time to start paying off. Based on some of the latest numbers that are starting to roll in, that prediction looks accurate. So let's start with the GDP growth. When President Trump launched his trade war, the consensus among most economists, and also a lot of Democratic lawmakers, was that it would tank the economy and really stall GDP growth. But each month, the data continues to defy those expectations. At the beginning of 2025, the US GDP shrank by half a percentage point, really setting off alarm bells across Washington that a recession was looming. But quarter two then saw 3. 8% growth. But quarter three, it was up to 4. 3%. Based on the latest projections from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, GDP growth in the final quarter of 2025 will be a stunning 5. 1%. White House Economist Kevin Hassett was jubilant at that news. Here he is taking a victory lap on Monday.
Right now, I'm looking at the output numbers, and we got GDP now north of 5% in the fourth quarter after two 4% the previous quarter. So I think you got to say that Trump policies are really working.
And from there, there's plenty of other good stuff to go on. On Monday, for example, gas prices fell for the seventh straight week. The average price at the pump is now $2. 79. That is the lowest mark we've seen in more than five years. And in 19 states, Americans are paying less than $2 a gallon. Unfortunately not here in Tennessee, but they're moving in the right direction. Now, on the housing front, mortgage rates just fell below 6% for the first time in nearly three years, while the cost of rent nationwide has now fallen five months in a row. That comes after the president directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities, driving those interest rates even lower. Then you have inflation, which has undoubtedly been heading in the right direction over the last few months. The Labor Department will release their latest numbers for December, showing where are later this morning. If those rates hold steady below 3% in the 2. 5, 2. 8 range, there is a very good chance that we'll see further rate cuts from the Fed in 2026, which obviously would provide even more relief for American consumers and borrowers.
Now, those rate cuts, though, are in the hands of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who has found himself in the headlines this week. What's going on with him?
Yeah, as we've discussed quite a bit on this show, President Trump has made no secret of his disdain for Powell, who he is accused of intentionally keeping interest rates high to harm him politically. Now that feud has escalated as Powell is under federal investigation by the DOJ. The investigation centers on the renovation of the Fed's headquarters in Washington, which has gone well over budget and caused taxpayers more than two and a half billion dollars. The Trump administration is digging now to find out whether Powell lied to Congress under oath when asked about the cost of the project. In response, he issued a video statement claiming he was being targeted politically over disagreements with Donald Trump.
This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. It is not about Congress's oversight role. Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public rather than following the preferences of the President.
Now, for his part, President Trump denied that the investigation was politically motivated. He said that he, quote, didn't know anything about the probe. Here's White House press secretary Caroline Levet, elaborating on Monday.
One thing for sure, the President's made it quite clear is Jerome Powell is bad at his job. As for whether or not Jerome Powell is a criminal, that's an answer the Department of Justice is going to have to find out, and it looks like they intend to find that out.
Now, remember, Jerome Powell's term is set to expire in May, regardless of the findings of this investigation. But he could be forced out even sooner, depending on what the DOJ discovers.
Well, regardless, a lot of good news for everyday Americans. Kabbit, thanks for reporting. Absolutely.
Customer trust can make or break your business. It's the foundation of every partnership, every contract, every dollar of revenue. The more your business grows, the more complex your security and compliance tools gets. You're juggling multiple frameworks, drowning in spreadsheets, trying to keep track of control across dozens of systems. It can turn into chaos, and chaos is not a security strategy. That's where our sponsor, Vanta, comes in. Think of Vanta as you're always on, AI-powered security expert that grows alongside your business no matter what stage you're at. Vanta takes the complexity out of compliance by automating the tedious processes, continuously monitoring your security controls in real-time, and providing you with a single unified source of truth for all your compliance and risk management needs. Vanta integrates seamlessly into your existing workflows. This means your team can focus on what they do best, building and growing, all while maintaining the robust security posture that earns and keeps your customers' trust. Get started at vanta. Com/morningwire. Again, that's V-A-N-T-A. Com/morningwire.
The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments today in two high-stakes cases that could have sweeping consequences for women's sports and state authority.
Joining us with the details is Daily Wire Culture reporter, Megan Basham. Megan, we've been closely tracking these particular cases after the high court agreed to take them on. But can you just remind us, what exactly are these cases about and what's at stake here?
Yeah, Georgia. So these are two paired cases out of West Virginia and Idaho. And what they center on is whether states can enforce laws that keep biological males out of women's sports. So in Idaho's Little V. Hiccup, Lindsay Hacox, who is a man who identifies as a woman, is challenging Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act that bans biological men from participating in women's athletic events. In the West Virginia case, a male middle school athlete known as BPJ is asking the court to invalidate a similar law. So the court consolidated these two cases because they raise nearly identical legal questions. Kristen Wagener, who is the President and CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom, is helping to defend these states' laws. And she says the impact that the court's ruling can have here on women will be enormous. The issue that will be before the court is whether states have the right to make legitimate biological differences, and particularly in athletics as a start, whether we have the right to equal opportunities under federal law and the right to fair play and privacy.
Now, what are the legal arguments that the court is expected to hear on each side?
Yeah. So there's two major claims that this is going to be turning on. The first involves Title IX, and that's a federal law that was passed more than 50 years ago to guarantee equal educational opportunities for women, including athletics and sports. So supporters of these state laws argue that Title IX was designed to protect women, not to erase sex-based distinctions. But first, the Biden administration and now the plaintiffs in these two cases, argue that the sex discrimination that Title IX bans should also include, quote, unquote, gender identity. So they say that these laws conflict with Title IX. And then the second argument centers on the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause. Here's what Wagoner said. The question before the court is, can the states make biological distinctions on the athletic field? Are those differences important and do they matter? And the question is, obviously, yes, common sense tells us that, but so does the science. And again, this isn't just theoretical, Georgia. These real female athletes from both states are arguing that they have lost podium spots, championships, and even scholarship opportunities. And data from the UN does show that men have won nearly 900 women's medals globally.
Now, what about science and what it tells us about sex differences? Are we expecting to hear arguments along those lines?
Yes, Absolutely, we are. So Madison Kenyan is petitioning the court in this Idaho case. She's a former runner who we also spoke to who competed against a biological male early in her college career. And she stresses that sports opened a lot of doors for her educationally in her career. And she really wants to ensure that future generations of women have access to these same opportunities. She says that the physical differences between her and her male competitors were undeniable, overwhelming, and demoralizing.
Running is a mental sport. If you think you've lost before you start, then you have. And so to step on the line with a male athlete in the woman's division of running, it's deflating, it's defeating, it ruins the integrity of women's sports, and it's not fair.
Now, what are the potential outcomes from a ruling here? What downstream effects will it have?
Yeah. If the court rules against these two states, it could invalidate protections for women with similar laws at the state level in 27 different states. But a win for them will affirm that states do have the right to enact these laws. And certainly, I think that the implications will go far beyond sports.
Well, we are going to continue to monitor here on this show. Megan, thanks for reporting.
Yeah, my Pleasure.
For those who haven't listened yet, you can also hear more from both Maddie and Kristen Wagner in an episode we aird on Sunday. The protests gripping Minneapolis over the last few days have come amid federal investigations into wide-scale fraud. Which President Trump is now sending in even more agents to investigate.
Former Minnesota governor Tim Palenti, joins us now to discuss the issues gripping his state. Governor, first of all, thank you so much for coming on the show.
Happy to do it. Good to be with you.
First, let's talk about the immediate context of the protests that we've seen over the last few days. The mayor of Minneapolis has told ICE to get out of the state in less kind words than that. Governor Walls has demanded that the administration leave Minnesota alone. What is your take on presence of ICE in the state?
Well, ICE has a duty to fulfill, and that is the enforcement of our immigrations and customs and border laws in this country. We're a nation on the rule of law. So the idea that they're supposed to just abdicate a big piece of territory in the United States is ridiculous. And one of the reasons that this became so dangerous is because, stupidly, the city of Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota declared themselves sanctuary cities. So the local officials with their usual capabilities don't the ICE officers with perimeters, other reinforcements. And so ICE is out there by themselves, and it is a terrible formula and set of dynamics on the ground.
Proceeding this fallout from the ICE incident, the state has become a national focus over these new revelations about really jaw-dropping levels of fraud. Are things as bad as they seem in the state with the fraud situation?
Yes. And the non-partisan US attorney's office in Minneapolis, by the way, beginning their investigations under a Democratic administration, the Biden administration, recently said that this could tally up to $9 billion or more. And if that turns out to be true, this could be the largest theft or fraud of public money in the history of our country. So it is a big deal. It's a huge deal. And sadly, the warning signs and the paper trail going back, trying to alert leaders about lack of financial controls and the likelihood of fraud go back years. And so we had number of key leaders and people in the bureaucracy sleeping at the switch or worse.
Yes. Speaking of that, you're a former governor of the state, obviously. As someone who knows the ins and outs of that office, how likely is it that Governor Walsh knew something about this fraud before it really became public?
Well, what we do know for sure is that the paper trail goes back years. You had, for example, the non-partisan, well-regarded legislative auditor in Minnesota say that they felt that the Walsh administration had a, quote, unquote, shoot the messenger mentality. We had another instance, going all the way back to 2018, where our Bureau of Criminal Apprehension was investigating an earlier version of child care fraud, and they ceased the investigation because the bureaucrats involved wouldn't help them, wouldn't provide information that they had requested. They wrote up in their report that those people refused to comply. The bureaucrats refused to comply because they didn't want to, quote, unquote, enable or be a tool of law enforcement. I mean, can you imagine the mindset, the culture, the rot inside of government when you have a mid-level bureaucrat being able to stiff arm a criminal investigation over public fraud?
It's alarming indeed. In terms of motive for covering up things like this, is there a profit motive for political leaders, or is it all about re-election?
Well, so far, there has been no credible allegation or evidence that a public official pocketed money, but there's lots of other people who pocketed money, affiliated with nonprofits, leaders of nonprofits, founders of nonprofits, over 90 people criminally charged so far, with many more to come, presumably. But beyond that, I think there's another motive going on that's political, which is, look, we shouldn't stigmatize people because they belong to a particular racial or religious group. But we also should look the other way or excuse behavior that's criminal or inappropriate because somebody's in such a group. And there are allegations here that people in the state government were slow to respond or look the other way because these were folks from the Somali community, which is a big political constituency for Democrats in our state. And they also didn't want to be perceived as being racist or discriminatory. And so I think some of that was going on as well.
Yeah, it certainly appears. So Governor Palenti, thank you so much for joining us.
Happy to do it. Thank you.
Thanks for waking up with us. And for those of you listening to the show, now you can watch for free on Daily Wire+. We'll be back later this evening with more news you need to know.
New economic data rolls in with good news for Americans’ wallets, the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on whether states can bar men from women’s sports, and how did Minnesota get to this point? We speak to former governor Tim Pawlenty to learn more. Get the facts first with Morning Wire.
- - -
Ep. 2577
- - -
Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3
- - -
Today's Sponsors:
HelloFresh - Go to https://HelloFresh.com/morningwire10fm to Get 10 free meals + a FREE Zwilling Knife (a $144.99 value) on your third box. Offer valid while supplies last.
Vanta - Get started at https://Vanta.com/MORNINGWIRE
- - -
Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
morning wire,morning wire podcast,the morning wire podcast,Georgia Howe,John Bickley,daily wire podcast,podcast,news podcast
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices