Transcript of Why 87% of AI Projects Fail—and How Alejandro’s SVCH Is Changing That | Ep 266 with Alejandro Cuauhtemoc-Mejia – Co-Founder SVCH

Alejandro, I love to talk about AI. With you, it's your AI, corporations, the future. We're going to talk all things. We might even get into robots. I don't know why.

Yeah, the people growing everything. There's a lot of options out there in the market, but when they are trying to implement in the companies, they fail. For 100 projects that they propose that they were about AI, just 10 see the light.

What are you seeing in terms of the AI adoption when it comes to corporations?

Divided on three levels: the strategy, the operations, the ethical and safety. What happened is that one of those three things fail.

Do you see a world like 10 years from now where humans and AI talking with each other and everything is a smooth process?

In 10 years, AI will be everywhere.

Alejandro, I love to talk about AI. With you, it's AI, corporations, the future. We're going to talk all things. We might even get into robots. I don't know why. You said you're open to answering any question, but I really want to understand this because I think this is a hugely hot topic right now. But most people are thinking that why AI fails because of the technology. But you say it's because of the people, and why?

The people ruin everything. Why? What happened behind? Well, actually, there's the tools there. There's a lot of options out there in the market, but when they are trying to implement in the companies, they fail. Because imagine, McKinsey actually have a really nice study about it. For 100 projects that they propose that they were about AI, just 10 release, just 10 see the light. Why that happened? Because most of them fail at the beginning. They die because the executives do not understand, because they do not embrace, because they cannot explain what's the pipeline or what's the reason or how does that work. At the end, they prefer just to keep working as they are working right now. With that, everything fails, even if the CEO or the investors or everybody see the potential. If the executives do not understand, they will not embrace and everything will fail. The answer is not actually that the tools are not working. It's that the executives do not understand how they can apply to their operations, to their work, to the strategy, and how they can see the benefits from all that. That's a hard truth.

I read some articles recently that many corporations that they thought they were going into AI AI tools and usage, these are large corporations. They found that production didn't go up from their employees, that many times it actually was stagnant or went down. What are you seeing in terms of the AI adoption when it comes to corporations? I wonder, is it because of the training? Is it because of the certifications or a lack thereof that their teams are not fully embracing it on top of the executive?

We can divide it on three levels. First, the strategy, then the operations, and finally, the ethical and safety use of all the tools. What happened is that one of those three things failed. Or in the executive, do not understand what will be the benefits, or still, they do not know where AI makes sense for their purpose. The second on the processes, like where they will have more ROI, where they will have more impact, where they have the talent to use AI on their operations. Finally, there's a lot of questions about risk, about possible failures, about safety, PR things that if they do not trust or if they do not understand well, everything or one of those things will fail. Actually, that's what we realized, Silicon Valley Certification Hub, that we need to understand every company to see where they can improve better, where they can use AI. Actually, we use AI to support them to adopt AI. That's overall how we support them, to give them a batch, a seal that say, This company is ready to use AI. They use it in their process. It's part of the strategy, they have the talent, and so on.

But yeah, usually we need to go deeper and understand what's the company point of view and work from there.

If we look into the future, I know everyone's talking now about AI agents or agentic AI, and AI talking to AI, talking to AI, which I always find a fun conversation. It's like AI talking to how many AI is talking to how many AI is. But do you see a world where it is so... When it comes to the corporate environment, where it is so integrated because that trust, you mentioned the trust isn't always there that it's going to succeed or be 100% as successful as they want it to be. Do you see a world like 10 years from now where this is humans and AI talking with each other and many AI talking to many AI, talking to many AI, and everything is a smooth process?

In 10 years, AI will be everywhere, in our cereal, in our TV, if we still have TV or other devices. Everything will change a lot. Why, actually? Because it's generating so many efficiencies in the process. Imagine, at least on average, companies are selling 20% more with AI, and they need 10% less resources. Human or other tools to reach those targets. Everybody see the benefits of a good LLM, of AI, and they are growing more and more solutions across all industries. They call it, like Andrew new, call it the new electricity. Let's think like that. The AI will be the electricity, but the companies are building how to focus on electricity, use it for maybe your fridge, for a TV, for a computer, and the same will happen with AI. The companies will use all the LLMs and all the technology to build solutions across all industries, across all needs that supports humanity. What will happen in 10 years, we will need standards. What will happen is that the companies that will have more trust, they will grow faster. In a world where AI is everywhere, trust is everything. That's why at SVCH, we help them to build that trust.

We analyze their process, their operations, their talent, the strategy, and at the end, they have a good signal to say, Hey, investor, Hey, partners. Hey, clients. I'm a good company that is using AI, and I will grow fast, I will create an impact, and I will have all the trust for everybody that use and is part of our network.

Well, I don't eat a lot of cereal, but if I had AI in my cereal, I probably would eat more cereal. I can't wait to see how that will play out there. But everyone is rushing now, at least what I'm seeing, to put AI-powered in their pitch deck. I run across a few pitch decks, or anyone pitching anything, it's like you said, the joke about serial in a sense. If they're making an app about something and it's serial involved or whatever, they'll put AI. It seems to be like they have to do that. But what is the cost, though, of doing it wrong? How can you spot the real innovators when everyone is saying AI literally is everywhere?

There are some studies super interesting about the use of AI. Let's think about those that use AI a lot, even in their serial, usually they have more average answers. Imagine, for example, for students, if they use AI in their essays on their homework, everybody will have an overall good essay, good grammar and structure, but nothing interesting. But those that actually combine AI with their work that they use just for minimal things, they have much more interesting essays, better results, more interesting way to present all the content and explain everything. Actually, the innovation for those that work combining AI with their worldview or their capabilities, they have much better results. Now, let's translate that to companies. Those companies that will maybe adopt some AI without any strategy that they say, Okay, I will use ChatGPT to write my emails. I will to use this tool to help me to have some other ideas, will stay there, will not be bad, they will just survive. But those that will combine the right strategy, the right talent, the right way to use AI for their operations will go beyond and will grow faster. That's the way that they will differentiate.

That's actually how we work with them to help them, Hey, your talent, understand AI. They can build solutions with that. They can have impact on this more technical or tactical parts of the company. So focus on that, have our seal, and grow and differentiate for all the others that they are just taking some other solution of AI that is not integrated at all.

Yeah. I mean, you have with vibe coding now and all these apps that can create, whether it's another app or a website in five minutes. Differentiation, I would imagine, is going to be such a big part. It's great that everyone has access to doing something, but when everyone has access, the amount of your competition goes to the roof. You have been called the ISO of AI. But what is the actual hardest truth around AI adoption that no one, especially in Silicon Valley, because I think you're in Palo Alto, what does no one there want to actually admit?

Nobody wants to admit that they are are not using AI. Everybody say that they are using AI, but they do it. When you ask the double click, is like, How do they use it? The answer is like, They are really impressive. They use it to answer their emails, to book some meetings, maybe, to create some deck or some presentation, period. At the end, they are just substituing. They are changing a couple of analysts or interns work with AI, but they can Not substitute, but create more power to all the talent that they have. Instead of having 10 or 20 people in their team, they will have 20 20 super PhD-level workers with AI. But they need to guide them. They need to tell them, Hey, let's use this tool of AI for A, B, and C on their processes. This is the ETA that will have. You will be trained to understand all the capabilities of this tool, and this will be the expected results that you That's where makes sense AI, where the companies that can't see all the power of that, they will grow fast, they will gain trust with clients, with investors, with partners, but they need the right strategy.

So as VCH, we help them to see if they are ready, how they can integrate in their work, if they are safe the way that they are trying to do and have a clear path of how to move from this random, really vague way to use AI to a super company AI integrator.

I like how people are like, I use AI, ChatGPT, as if AI is only ChatGPT. I know you have a very impressive roster of coaches, and there are a lot of people out in this world that are saying that are teaching or certifying AI, and I think many of them never even had experience before in AI, which I find also very interesting. For you, though, if people are like, Yeah, but why would I trust Alejandro or Daniel to be doing this business? Or why would I trust the coaches that you have? What would you say to them?

Trust, what we give them is trust of their brand with our sale. That doesn't work if we do not have trust. Overall, how we build all that, that's really interesting. We have Daniel, he's a software engineer with I have a huge experience working with big companies as PM and specifically working and understanding AI. I work from technology, working also with a huge algorithm algorithms to a DD and other parts that help them grow. Most of our work actually is to analyze recent papers, academic papers that help us see where's the future, what is the research, where it's going. Actually, we invite you to enter our LinkedIn and follow our blogs because we post a lot of papers from top universities. We have webinars and conferences with great PhD doctors that have really interesting research. We obtain all that information curated with great experts from top universities, from founders, from experts that at the end help us build a solution that is really good, really curated, and specifically for non-technical executives. You will not code in our platform with our certification. You will not go deeper. But you need to understand what's an LLM, what's a rack, what's a vector, to be able to live with a right understanding of all that.

We have the trust, we have the network, and actually, we have a really nice course with Murf Hiccup, who is a professor from Michigan University, and she helped us build all the part of ethical and responsibility. Overall, we have the trust, we have all the capabilities. We invite you to send us an email and enter our website, sbch. Com.. Io, by the way.

Alejandro, I love that. My last question is this, because you're seeing all of this fascinating data and studies and all these things, is there anything interesting? It doesn't even have to be related to corporations and AI, but is there anything interesting that stands out or sticks to you that you've been seeing recently around all of these data and papers and all this information that you've been gathering? Is there something in it that you're Oh, wow, this is fascinating. I'm really interested to see how this goes, or I'm really interested to see how this impacts corporations or business. Is there something there that maybe you haven't said or maybe something you've been talking about recently?

There's a paper that I loved a couple of weeks ago from a professor from Florida International University. What What he analyzed is the chat bots that help people to buy more. Imagine, okay, if you are buying this thing, or trying to use it, the chat bot said, Oh, that looks really well combined with your background, is the right size, and whatever. But the issue is that when people realize that this a robot or a bot, they trust more because they say, Okay, there's no bias. It's not that the seller wants to complement me or my taste, so I'll buy it. Versus if the chatbot is super realistic, they think that it's a human, and then they start to say, Wait, he just wants to sell more. What's the reason behind all those nice comments about me and all that? At the end, they realize, and it's statistically significant, that the robots that look like a robot have better sales that are super humanized, at least for sales, and give those compliments. That's really interesting how people start to trust more on robots than in human behavior, even if both are robots, by the way.

Wow, that is fascinating. I was just hanging out with a robot yesterday. True story. This woman was telling me she's a researcher at MIT, and she's living with this robot because they're studying how it is to live with robots. She was showing us this robot and all the things that it could do. But that is fascinating around, and I wonder how this is going to change as we get more integrated with humanoids and robots, and if eventually we won't be able to tell an actual human from a robot. But it sounds, though, which it makes sense. If I think it's a robot right now, I trust it because I don't think it has a reason to oversell something that I may not need. It is recommending things to me because it thinks I need it, even though it actually might be trying to sell us. But our human mind can't wrap our head around the fact that it's a programmed robot. It's almost like the robot works for me versus trying to sell me something. Thank you for sharing that. I'm very interested to see and to read more about this Alejandro, this has been great.

Share one more time where people can find you and get more information.

Yeah, for sure. Please follow us. Our website is svs. Com. Svch. Io. Or also you can find all our content and blog in our LinkedIn, which you can find us at Silicon Valley Certification Hub or LinkedIn/svch. Also, there's my social media, which is my Alejandro Cuauhtemoc here on LinkedIn. I post a lot about AI, specifically on marketing and sales.

Wow, Alejandro. I'm really, really fascinated with corporations, sales, sales, marketing all around how AI is transforming this. But Silicon Valley Certification Hub, thank you for sharing everything today. I can't wait to continue reading about all the papers and data. You got to come back. I mean, six months 10 months from now, can you imagine what's going to change? You got to come back in six months. We have to talk about how AI is transformed in six months. I'm sure we're going to look back laughing. Ai chat bots are more human than humans are. But this has been a great conversation. Thanks for joining us on Founder's Story.

Thank you so much, Dan. Yeah, for sure. Hopefully, it's not in our serial in six months, the AI. It might.