Transcript of They’re Building the “Safety Layer” for Space and It Could Change the Future of Humanity | Ep 314 with Minh Nguyen & John Avera Co-Founders of xOrbita New

So Min and John, my brain, I was trying to understand what you all are doing. I went on to your LinkedIn page, and I have to say I understood 5% of it. But the 5% that I understood, my mind was blown. And the 95% that I did not understand, I wouldn't understand. I mean, space, debris. I have so many questions about how How does one even get into the business of space debris? But before we go into that, everyone I know is talking about space. Space is the new business frontier, which I find very fascinating. Can either of you or both talk about why in 2026, is everybody now looking at space?

All right, so I'll take the start of that. It's important because the reason why we exist or the reason why we are solving this issue is a part of the reason why everyone is talking about space right now. Because right now, space is at a point where it's easy to get into it. We've had the foundational layers being built upon us year by year, decade by decade, with companies like SpaceX launching the rockets every single day. There's satellites that are being able to be launched for fractions of the cost that they were way back in the day. We've got student groups now that are launching satellites. We have national programs that let high schoolers put satellites into space. That's something crazy that is being said in today's world that everyone just accepts normally. But in that, there's an over-congestion of satellites particles, debris, and objects being centered in space. When you think about why are people all talking about space right now is because everyone's realizing that the infinite possibilities that are able to be extracted from the environment are so easy to get into and so easy to tap into that it's just a no-brainer to get into the situation.

I can add to that. I mean, let's think about the global space economy hit 613 billion last year. The World Economic Forum and McKinsey, they project that it's heading to 1. 8 trillion by 2035. That's tripling in about a decade. And 78% of that is commercial. This isn't just government spending anymore. This is private capital, commercial operators, broadband cancelations, Earth observation companies, all building real business in orbit. Here's the thing that nobody's talking about. All that value is sitting in an environment that's getting more dangerous every day or risky. I use the term risky more than anything. There are over 30,000 tracked objects in orbit and hundreds of thousands of debris, small of debris, from 10 centimeters, which is about the size of a grape fruit, to 1 centimeter, which is about the size of a blueberry, that ground-based sensors can't see it. And so any one of those can destroy a satellite worth hundreds of millions of dollars. So we're building a trillion dollar industry on the infrastructure that we can't fully protect yet.

I mean, this is incredible. You're talking 600 billion now. I didn't even know. To now over maybe be 3Xing to 1. 8 trillion. And I imagine if we're putting, if it's possible to put data centers in space, which I would imagine a data center is very large, if that's possible to do. And there's a lot of debris that's happening. How? Okay. I think there's a lot of people, and I think they call this the Blue Ocean, by the way. I don't know if you've heard this in business. So the space is almost like our new Blue Ocean, right? Not a lot of players, but a lot of opportunity. So when you both looked at this as like, okay, there's a big opportunity in space, the final frontier. How did you then go to, let's look at debris?

All right, so I'll take this one. I actually Starting X-Obito was a lot of a solo student academic thing. I'm still in high school right now. Whenever I first wanted to do space things, for me, it was largely academic-based because I'm in high school. I want to end off my high school year with some cool research, get into a good university. But I dug into it deeper because I was shifting through so many different ideas within this vast ocean, the way that you describe it for the ocean of the amount of ideas and opportunities you could take in space. Before this, I had taken two projects, one in asteroid mining and then one in deep space. Those are two completely unrelated things, but I I wanted to do them because space is awesome. But when I started to try and really work on these solutions long term, I hit a very big wall or a very big fear section because I came across this one article, and of a Chinese university group that was launching their own satellite. Just a year after they launched this satellite that they had spent their entire university time on, it had gotten defunct.

The reason why it got in defunct is because this piece of debris particle had hit the satellite and basically made the practical application for it unusable. Because even if the debris was just maybe a centimeter in diameter and it didn't cause this massive rupture that people talk about, it caused just enough damage to where all of that effort, all of the money spent and all of everyone's time was useless. When I thought about it, I was like, In years time, that could be me. That could be my mission. That could be my friend's mission. That could be my family's mission if anyone else wants to get into space. I thought, I want to try and solve this issue. But looking at the companies that were doing it and trying to tailor my life around getting a good university degree, having good projects so that I could work at one of these companies, I thought, These companies are also working too slow. The horizon that I saw for space debris was that the problem was not going to get solved in the time where I thought that it would be useful enough. The issue is growing exponentially.

You've heard about doomsday scenarios like the Kessler syndrome, and with now an insane upramp of the amount of satellites and objects in orbit. We need the issue to be solved as quickly as possible. At that point, I decided, I need to create a company around this. That's how Xoverit is starting.

Wow. I don't know what I was doing in high school, but I definitely was not solving space problems. I love that because I think there's always a misconception about generations. Every generation says generations ago were lazy. It always is like, are generations above, say, generations below, or X, Y, Z? But the fact that you wanted to solve this major problem. And then, John, how did you come on board?

Well, I'll tell you, I was just cruising around looking at quantum computing, which is a new thing. So I was doing a search on quantum, and I saw an article that men had written about a spectrometer, quantum. Spectrometer. But on the title, I just saw quantum, and then I saw space. I said, Well, this looks cool. I'll take a look at that. And I started to read through it, and it was well written. It was a lit article on the spectrometer. And I started to say, Wait a minute, this is sensors. This is short wave IR. I know a little bit about this. And he's trying to detect things. I know a little bit about that. I worked in the Air Command Command Federal Laboratory, it used to be known as the U2 Federal Laboratory, where we were doing just this. I was part of that team that put AI on a weapon system for the first time. We were doing detections from the edge. We were doing this back in 2019. I said, I think I can help here. Because the very bottom of his page said, Do you want to help build this with us?

Something to that effect. I was like, Yes, I do. Yes, I do, because I think I know how to help. I think I can help him with this. We started talking. He got excited because I was like, Here's how we're going to do it. He's like, John, how would you do it? I said, Well, let me explain to you. I started getting technical details that make most people go to sleep. But I was like, I think we can do this. I think we can build enough of this to gain attention. That's how I got involved. And then it started transitioning from there.

So when you think about the hurdles, you're doing something that I'm just going to say is newer than maybe what most are thinking about compared to other industries, right? Maybe people have been thinking about it for years, but probably not maybe decades and decades of how to solve the problem. So you're going to something that... It's also obviously not something that you can touch and feel right here. I mean, it's in space. What are some of the hurdles that you've to overcome because of that.

We're going to hit it two-pronged. I'll talk the industry-facing ones, and then we'll talk about the technical details that we've had. The SSA industry is what we like to define ourselves in, space situational awareness. That's the whole system of tracking, analyzing debris, and making satellites to move out of the way of it. It has a really bad look on. There's a really bad look on the SSA industry because it's extremely inefficient. I talked to you before about how I thought that those companies currently working on the issue were not doing a good enough job. Well, the whole space industry thinks so as well, because even if they are a necessary component and a majority of satellites use them, a majority of satellites don't actually listen to the behaviors that space traffic management systems are giving them because they're just losing them more than they're giving them in the benefit of. Most satellite companies would rather actually take the risk as a as opposed to both buying a management system and spending their own propulsion time on using it. Because that's the real issue here. Everyone brings out the big numbers. There's 120 million estimated debris particles in space, and we've tracked 40,000 of them.

It sounds like a big number, but that's 0. 04%. People think that's the big issue, but it isn't. Spatially, between between the 10-centimeter debris particles and the 1-centimeter break particles, their actual density is like 50/50. Adding more data wouldn't exactly solve the issue. You'd think it would solve the issue. But why isn't There are other companies already doing it if it was the issue. The issue, to me, throughout talking to actual satellite operators, talking to people that are also trying to do data centers in space, is that it's not giving them the full potential of the practical application of their satellite. Let's use Starlink, for example. We like to bring in Starlink to the conversation because when I say a majority of satellite operators use SSA tools, it's just Starlink. They're the only ones that are capable of affording it. They've made a total of 300,000 maneuverings in 2025. They have around 7,000 satellites generating nearly $8 billion in revenue. If we took every single satellite that Starlink had and we extended their lifetime to as long as they could physically live, like their hardware could physically live, it would be around seven to eight years.

But why are they capping their lifetime at five years? It's a really odd question of mine. If it's not the hardware, if it's not the actual satellite bus, then what is it? It was the propulsion issue, actually, because whenever they use a collision avoidance system, you see this piece of space every coming at you and you have to move out the way. Every time you do that, you're using a little bit of the small reserves of propulsion that you have or fuel that you have aboard your satellite. The amount of that that you can use throughout your lifetime is what we call delta-V. As you use that delta-V, inherently, your satellite is not going to live as long. We've calculated that based off the amount of debris that's being picked up and the amount of maneuvers that's being picked up, we're losing around 30% of operational lifetime just off of doing that collision avoid it. That's why satellite operators are like, Hey, I don't want to do this, because especially on the frontier of data centers in space, they want their satellite to live as long as physically possible. It's not an iterative system like Starlink or SpaceX can do.

People need to preserve the work, time, and money that they put into every single satellite in space.

I can tell you, what we're doing is we're building an intelligence-first space situational awareness And it's right now, all they got is they're looking from the ground up through the atmosphere. We're talking about putting sensors into orbit, but on small affordable cheap sites. And we paired them with AI that doesn't just process data. It learns from it. It's going to continue to learn from it. East observation, HD system is smarter. And that's suddenly different from legacy SSA, which essentially static right now. You build a radar, you point it to the sky, and it gives you the same capability on day one that it does on day one in the 1,000. Our system is compound. The more data ingest from the detentions, the better it gets to finding the things that nobody can see. And turn those detections to real-time collision avoidance recommendations that satellites operators can act on immediately. So I'm seeing you real-time. I process it there. I'm not sending data down to the ground. I'm processing on the edge. And now I've turned data into intelligence. And now I need to let know who needs to know. And not just saying what I found, but give them recommendations.

Give them a maneuver if they need to make it. That's how our approach is different beyond just the AI, it's information density. A lot of companies in space, they're taking a brute force approach. They're going to do massive sensor fleets for coverage. We're achieving comparable global coverage with roughly a six of the size of fleet to our licensed sensor technology and learning architectures. We have an architecture that's designed to be flood small in learning. This isn't just concept. We got a working system. Running, in the end, on-flight representation edge hardware. In the same processes that could fly in space, it processes sensory imaging. It could detect the objects, propagate the orbits. This is important, calculate the collision probabilities, and then recommend maneuvers. That's our MVP, and that's what we essentially got running today.

Amazing. What do you see the benefit is? Obviously, besides the biggest benefit here, which I understand is the less maneuvers or better maneuvers, more information, the less fuel they use, the longer they can stay in space. Obviously, you're spending billions of dollars on it, or hundreds of million dollars on a satellite. The longer you can have it operate, You could cut in half the cost of then having to send another one up. I'm sure every time you send a satellite up, there's a possibility the satellite may not even make it to space. Something might happen, and it's going to be a big cost. What do you see the data that you could then use besides this long term, what data do you think you could get? Or what can you use the data for? Or are you thinking about this now?

Right. Yeah. The obvious next steps are two different things. First, it's active debris removal, and second, it's active debris recycling. Monitoring is a very small step in the full scale of actually solving the issue. Now, we always think we're solving the tracking issue. Now, there's a bunch of companies is popping up. Transastro shifted their model from asteroid mining to a debris capture with a debris capture bag. But we're not even there yet. For us, we're thinking about it in this system, and we can work through the system into multiple hoops, constantly being there for every single step of solving the debris issue. Right now, we're monitoring debris and collision avoidance. We can get good at collision avoidance, but I am in no way saying that once we good collision avoidance, that that's going to be the end of it. Because even then, you reduce, let's say, maybe 75% of your unnecessary collision avoidances, you're still losing maybe three or four months of operational lifetime. That can convert to millions of dollars of a revenue loss, and that can maybe even convert to a lot of actual lives being lost in the process. I'll explain that a little bit here because there's a realization here that we don't just use satellites for our own little quality of life and benefits.

It's not just like we get data centers in space and then we have lower latency in processing on AI tools. It's not like we get satellites in space and now we have better internet. It's we have satellites in space, but we have satellites in space that are specifically targeted to doing things like sensing fires, sensing emergency contacts, and stuff like that. Once those are down or once those have maybe three or four months of lifetime shave off of them, that could be the difference of something major happening within orbit or even happening down here on Earth. The first step is monitoring, having better collision avoidance. The second step from there is once we have reliable enough data, then we can start sending up satellites or thinking about having those companies that are being built right now send up satellite to capture the debris. From there, then we can maybe think Okay, we have the debris. We have custody over the debris. Now, can we actually do something with it, make it useful back to humanity, not just throw it away and have space being called, everyone says, a loss leader, an economic loss leader, because we're always losing economic value and losing money for the sake of science, right?

I can see, even in the longer term, Xorba become an infrastructure the entire industry even relies on. You think about operators, launch providers, insurers, regulators. As space commercializes further and more nations or businesses, global businesses become space farry, there's an enormous need for trusted operational or operatable Safety data. And so in the long term, we want to be the backbone on that. I like the point that men brought in about, you think about what's roughly run through space today, GPS. If the US GPS When the system went down, did a little math in it. It's estimated as suggesting it would cost about a billion dollars a day. Whether forecasters, disaster response. I come from disaster recovery. I'd spent many years in the National Guard. Broadband for rural, I've done their serving communities and crop monitoring. I had spent time in the Fintech world, financial transaction timing, as well as supply chain logistics. So space isn't inspirational anymore. It's infrastructure, and it's only become even more essential. That's why this safety, I see this as big safety data, big future.

I'm fascinated. We had another guest on who was talking about using space matter to solve hacking of quantum computing. They were explaining to me about space matter and such, and I thought, entropy. I thought it was very... I'm really fascinated with the future of space. I'm curious that two of you, regardless of ex-orbital, not a business question, more a personal question. What do you think the future is when we look at space, space travel, interplanetary, maybe setting... Can we really live on the moon or Mars? How do you see the future of all this going? Nothing relates to ex-orbit, just in general. If you think 100 years, 200 years, Could we be like Star Trek just floating around space full-time?

I like this question because when you think about ex-orbit, and when you talk about X-Obita, when you pitch the actual idea and you talk about it for months and months and months of time over talking to investors, talking to satellite operators. It's a lot of fear. It's a lot of looking at the problem of things and saying, Hey, we need to solve this. It's very uncomfortable that we have to get down to that truth because we do have to solve the issue. But I like this question because really, from the start of this, I'm not a pessimist. I don't look at space and I see the issue, and that's all I focus on. I am an optimist. I like looking at space and thinking like, These are all the amazing things that we can do. For me, I'm not looking here on Earth. I'm not looking here on Leo, but I know that's what we need to start with. I'm looking far out deep space, Ashrid Mining. I mentioned before, that's what I wanted to work on before this, but I understood there are steps that we need to do before we can get to there.

What I would like to see, at least in my lifetime, well, I hope it happens in my lifetime. If it doesn't, then that would be pretty sad. But I hope at least in my lifetime, that we can see a large majority of satellites going out to deep space and taking advantage of all the different minute details that are out there that are completely irreplicatable, even here in our solar system. My favorite mission of all time has to be the Europa Clipper. I wanted to work. I was this naive high school student wanting to work on the Europa Clipper. I was messaging random NASA people at Godard and JPL like, Hey, can I work on this? They're like, Well, obviously, no. But it's the fact that we can go out and analyze moons on Jupiter for of life or the potential to house life being a multi-planetary species. That's what gets me excited because it's like, we can do so much more as a species and as a civilization. Being able to take advantage of that in the next coming few years is my optimism towards space.

I see that's the adventure side, right? I mean, that's the pioneering side of it. I'm that way, too, but also look at the industry. Well, first of all, let's talk about the science. The more we understand our environment, which space is our environment, the more we understand that, the better I think we can make informed decisions about what makes this good for us here on Earth. But also look at there's an untapped resources. Now, we're talking way in the future, but every body that's out there has resources, from oxygen to minerals. I mean, think about a Rare earth minerals is a very valuable thing, like magnets, rare earth minerals that come out of very small places in United States. So we have to sometimes factory do things or run electrical circuits through a metal to actually get a magnet versus a natural magnet. Think about what's out there. What rare minerals are out there that are very useful that could be back here. That's like mining, mining on a moon, mining on Mars. And that's just scratching the surface. So I see it as an industrial resource that's out there that is untapped. We got to get good at it.

We got to make space travel safe. As men said, we got to start within our reach. Within our reach is the North Earth orbit. And we could talk about the mid-earth orbit, and then we can talk about geo. But right now, you got to take it one step at a time. And once you learn from that step, then you advance it to the next step that you learn. And then you learn. Then you take it to the next step. That's the way I see it.

If you If you had the chance, it might be a one-way ticket, though, to go and set up on another planet, but you could be moving species to another planet. Would you do it?

I would do it. Like I told you before, at heart, all I talk about is an issue, and all I'm solving is an issue. But if I had the opportunity to build forward and do something of that scale or that magnitude, I would take it in a harp. It's not like there's this dissatisfaction here on Earth. All I've known for my entire life, really, is that we can do more. I feel like that's what we've been building to all of these years and all these decades, at least leading to my generation, is that we're capable of doing a lot more. That's not all that I know. But it is the biggest avenue or the most probable avenue that I would take forward to just build and do more.

I have a pioneering spirit about it. If I was given you up, then absolutely. Highly unlikely, but I would absolutely do it. I've been around the world and back again several times, and sometimes in bad places, sometimes in good places. So I would do it. But right now, I think as a being Realist, though, which makes me give it even more attention to it is that if I was sending someone young like men there, I want to make sure it's safe, and I want to do everything I can to make something that's safe, accurate, and efficient. Yeah, I mean, I would do it, but yeah.

That's why we need X over there. So men can go travel to other... We can all travel to other planets and set up life. Very interesting. Thank you so much. I mean, this has been great. I don't get to talk to too many people about space, but I would say probably 250 people I have asked this question, though, about if they would go on a one-way ticket. I have to say maybe only five people have said they would. But so we need people that will because obviously at one day, hopefully, we'll have some robot companions at that time, which it seems that'll be possible in the next year. If people want to get in touch with you both, obviously, it sounds like investors, if people are interested to partner, I'm sure there's companies that need your services. How can they do so?

All right. Well, you guys can always check us out on our website, which is just www. Exorita. Com. You can always check out both me and John's LinkedIn. We're flying out to different places. I'm going down to Space Foundation's economic forum next week. We're both going to Stanford down in March to pitch at their VC boot camp. We're going a bunch of places. People know where we're going. If you want to see us there, meet us there. If you want to talk to us directly over the phone, we have our contact information on the Xeroa website with the exact message that led John to work on this in the first place. Do you want to help us build this? If you want to help us build this, then do it. Reach out to us, put your contact information there, and we can set up a call.

Awesome. Well, thank you, Min and John. I can't wait. In a year from now, come back. I want to know what's happening in space in six months to a year because the technology moves so fast. Everything is just so fast right now. But I super appreciate both your time and the fact that you are dedicating to something that could possibly solve and make humanity better. I don't get to talk to people doing that every day. So thank you for what you do.

Thank you. I appreciate it.

Thank you.