Transcript of Matt Gaetz: Ted Cruz’s Delusional 2028 Bid, the ADL, and Identity Politics Taking Over the Right

Matt Gates, thank you for doing this. Good to be with you. I haven't seen you in a while.

Especially in Florida.

Especially in Florida. Exactly. I just want to start with a clip that I saw this morning that I think is amazing and tells you a lot about a lot. This is from the Jerusalem Post Washington conference this weekend. The man speaking is a guy called Yehuda Kaplan, who I don't think I've ever heard of before, but now apparently works at the State Department in the office to fight anti-Semitism, which I guess is part of the State Department. Here's what he said. Watch this. I get off a plane. I am the President's representative, and I am walking off with a Yamulka, and I have kosher food, and embassies will have kosher food. It is a game changer. The appointment is a game changer, and it's not about history. It's about education. And how do we educate? Indonesia has 350 million Muslims living in the country.

How do we change their textbooks?

How do we hold the people in Gaza accountable that if America is paying for UN textbooks and supposedly the changes are made, why are those textbooks not being used and why are they using their old textbooks? We have to teach people it's not okay to educate your kids to be a martyr. And we have to hold those countries accountable. How do we battle anti anti-Semitism on the Internet? How are we doing better on algorithms? What companies can we work with? We are going to have a whole division within the office of the Special Envoy to combat anti-Semitism that is going to work on technology and working with the greatest leaders in technology, many of whom are Jewish and have offered their assistance. The office is going to be revamped entirely to be one of the highest profile offices in the State Department.

Nothing will convince It's Indonesia to come our way. Sending rabbi Yehuda is probably my guess.

How do we hold the people of Gaza accountable?

There is truth to the claim that in the pedagogy that is administered in a lot of places, there's incitement. My Naya the Martyr is a character. No doubt. And that is awful, and US taxpayers shouldn't fund it, and we ought to hold anyone accountable who does. At the same time, the definition of anti-Semitism in recent times, according to some of the Israel first crowd in the United States, has really migrated. This isn't my line, but I certainly associate it with, anti-Semitism used to mean somebody who didn't like Jews. Now it just means somebody Jews don't like.

That's not a standard that we can live with because the reason anti-Semitism is terrible, it's against my religion. I'm totally opposed to it. And by the way, it does result in violence. I think we just saw that, and I hate it. But it's anti-Semitism is wrong because hating anyone on the basis of their DNA is always wrong. It's a universal principle. It does not apply to one group, my group or your group. It applies to all groups. And if it doesn't apply to all groups, then it's not a principle, and I can just ignore it. That's the problem I have here.

Yeah, but the US ambassador to France, Jared Krishna's father, says that anti-zionism is anti-Semitism. I don't believe that. I think that you can be critical of foreign policy choices a country makes without the assumption that you hate the religion or the ethnic group associated with that country. When I was critical of Joe Biden, that didn't make me anti-Catholic. When I'm critical of Benjamin Netzenyahu, that doesn't make me anti-Semitic.

Well, I agree with that. I do think there has been a rise, I can just notice it, in people hating Jews, disliking Jews, anti-Semitism. I think that's real in the United States. But I think I think you could probably fix that in a week.

How?

By getting Jewish groups like the ADL, like the American Jewish Congress, like whatever group Kaplin runs, to come out against anti-white hate, which is institutionalized in the United States. If you had the ADL and the SPLC and these groups that have fought against anti-Semitism for all these years make the obvious and true point that hatred of anybody on the of how they're born is immoral, and we won't stand for it. In the United States, the institutionalized hate is anti-white, of course, prevented from getting jobs, prevented from getting federal grants, prevented from getting admitted to college. That's still in place.

But you know why that hasn't happened.

I don't understand. You know what I don't understand why.

Well, there isn't a sufficient monetization path there the way it is when the ADL and similarly aligned groups try to make the American people think that anti-Semitism is hiding behind every bush.

Okay, but then I know it's not real. Okay, so if I get up, look, if I get up and say it's only wrong when people attack people like me, then everyone knows that I'm not defending a principle. I'm defending a group interest. And I can ignore your group's interests. I cannot ignore a universal principle. And the universal principle is that hatred is always wrong no matter who it's aimed at. So why doesn't the ADL stand up and do that? I would send money to the ADL if they did that. I would send money to the ADL. I would, and I despise the ADL, because that would be a defense of what's true and so needed. Why won't they do that?

Well, when you're a witch hunter, you have to first convince people of the existence of witches. I think that for the broad goals of the ADL, they have to make the country believe that we are somehow aligned against the Jewish faith and against those goals.

But what they're saying is it's okay to discriminate against white Christians, but it's immoral to to discriminate against Jews? No, it's immoral to discriminate against Jews and white Christians and black people and Indonesians and every group on the basis of their DNA, period.

Well, there has to be a villain, and that's what white people have become in this really threat-constructed environment around identity.

Well, I've actually reached out to those groups and said, I will make common cause with you. I'll support you. I'll send you money if you will just defend the principle, and that would include defending- No, you never heard these people during the DEI craze?

They didn't say one word.

They were for it. They were for discriminating against Whites. Because those kids who've been shafted by anti-white hate as institutionalized in every big company, in every government agency in the whole United States and Western Europe. Those people are mad. Where was Yehud 11 during that? Where was Bill Ackman during that? My point is, come over to the side of universal principles of light and truth, and let's make common cause against all forms of hate. If you won't do that, then I'm not taking you seriously.

No one should take them seriously because they are an advocacy group for a particular ethnic group, and that is fine.

Well, how's it different from like, Ilhan Omar and the Somalies?

Well, I think that in a lot of ways, there are similarities when ethnonationalism is the objective, and obviously, ethnonationalism is the objective in Israel. It's the organizing principle of the country. That's fine.

That's not our country, though.

But oftentimes people are pursuing the policies here in the United States that benefit Israel and our own interests and the interests of our people. The plight you describe that so many young people have endured is not a priority.

White young people. That's why they're mad. Why do you think they're mad? Because they've been told that the country they were born in officially discriminates against them. That's ongoing.

I don't think it's just even white people. I think it's also non-white people who see the attack on white culture, not as an attack on colonialism, but as an attack on success and progress and order. I know a lot of non-white people. They're like, actually, this anti-white activity that's going on is going to make me less prosperous and less safe. For all the criticisms his Whites have taken, we did an okay job setting up an orderly world, and we made some mistakes along the way, and you've got to reconcile those. But at the end, What society would you replace with what we've set up in the Western world? Is there some vision of the way civilizations were built in Africa or the Far East that we would gleefully adopt?

Imagine moving here because it's a white country founded by white people. And getting here and being like, Yeah, I want to be part of that, which I get 100%. And then you get here and the first thing you learn is white people are bad. Yeah. Right. I mean, that must be weird I think that this is shifting the other way.

I really think during the excesses of the post George Floyd era, people attached so strongly to identity. I sense a real pushback against that. You talk about learning it. The main place people learn still is in the school system. Right now, public education is essentially a failing enterprise, and all of the innovation is to take people out of that system, and then people will self-select what they learn, and that may be more productive.

This is one of my closest friends. This is Brookie. She's not her only dog, but she's her head dog. I hunt with her. She sleeps next to me in bed every night. She's four and a half. And smarter than any executive at Fox News. This is a really impressive dog. But I think we all think our dogs are impressive and great, and we love them. I know that if anything ever happened to this dog, there would be no limit to what I would do to help her. So vet bills can really stack Thank heaven she's been healthy. But for a lot of people, including close friends of mine, it can be crushing. When we started talks with the company we're now in partnership with, Dutch Pet, about how they're approaching veterinary care, $82 a year for unlimited care. I just thought that can't be real, but it is real. Dutch Pet, if you're watching this right now, use the code Tucker from this show. If you care about your dogs, if you care about your animals, if it's real to you. Check it out. 82 bucks a year for unlimited veterinary care. You'd pay anything, but you shouldn't have to.

Dutch Pet. Hate to brag, but we're pretty confident this show is the most vehemently pro-dog podcast you're ever going to see. We can take or leave some people, but dogs are non-negotiable. They are the best. They really are our best friends. And so for that reason, we're thrilled to have a new partner called Dutch Pet. It's the fastest-growing pet Telehealth service. Dutch. Com is on a mission to create what you need, what you actually need, affordable quality veterinary care anytime, no matter where you are. They will get your dog or cat what you need immediately. It's offering an exclusive discount Dutch is for our listeners, you get 50 bucks off your vet care per year. Visit duch. Com/tucker to learn more. Use the code Tucker for $50 off. That is an unlimited vet visit. $82 a year. 82 bucks a year. We actually use this. Dutch has vets who can handle any pet under any circumstance in a 10-minute call. It's pretty amazing, actually. You never have to leave your house. You don't have to throw the dog in the truck. No wasted time waiting for appointments, no wasted money on clinics or visit fees, unlimited visits and follow-ups for no extra cost, plus free shipping on all products for up to five pets.

It sounds amazing like it couldn't be real, but it actually is real. Visit dutch. Com/tucker to learn more. Use the code tucker for 50 bucks off your veter care per year. Your dogs, your cats, and your wallet will thank you. Where do you keep your most valuable possessions? Not your necktie or a pair of socks, but things you wouldn't want to replace or maybe couldn't. Heirlooms from your parents, birth certificate, your firearms, your grandfather's shotgun. Where do you store those? Under the bed, in the back of a closet? No, that's unwise and maybe unsafe. Liberty Safe is the place to store them. I would know I have a Colonial safe from Liberty Safe. It's in my garage. It's the best. I keep everything in there. It's a pro-flex system. It allows you to design the inside of your safe in a way that works for you. It's not a fixed setup. Someone else puts the shelves in and you have to deal with it. You make it the way you want it. Have a stock of rifles? You can make room. Need more shelves for handguns, for documents, for valuables, for gold? You can do whatever you want.

You can refigure your safe in minutes. Maximum flexibility, maximum convenience. Liberty Safe is America's number one safe company made in the United States. Great people, I know them. Visit libertysafe. Com. Use the code Tucker10 at checkout for 10% off. Franklin and Colonial Safe, featuring the pro-flex interior that you customize. You're going to dig it. We definitely... Plus they're good-looking, I will say. I think you're right. I think what you're saying... I want to get to the thing that really bothered me about the statement from Yehuda Kaplan, who apparently now runs the State Department, he just told us, I did not vote for this, just to be clear, period.

The- Any of what I just saw.

Yeah, that guy. But you're saying maybe I should calm down a little bit because who cares? History is passing this whole conversation by.

I'm not saying who cares because that was a disgusting display of, I think, parochial interest that you just saw. Yes, that's correct. But we see that often, so I don't get too worked up about it. The bigger issue is that, rabbi Yehuda would probably classify you and I as anti-Semitic because we've been critical of some of the policy choices of the Israeli government. And that broad application of anti-Semitism, to say anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, to say that even some things in the Bible may be deemed anti-Semitic if they're critical of Jews at any point. It has created such a curiosity among young people to test those mores and challenge those dogmas. I think there are a lot of the Mark Levin, Israel First crowd who look at us and say, We're the problem. Tucker and Matt are the problem. Actually, we're not the problem. The problem is you lost us. I know. They show these old videos of you being very complementary of Israel and critical of Israel's critics. You could easily find a lot of my library speaking on the floor of the Congress supporting a strong and robust US-Israel relationship. So two people who in our 30s were incredibly supportive of this relationship- Completely.

Have come untethered. And it is because the relationship has become too burdensome. And friends should be able to tell that to each other. I totally agree. And when you do, that doesn't make you a bad friend. I still consider myself pro-Israel. I think that what the Netanyahu government is doing to Israel is bad for Israel, much in the way the United States created more terrorists than we killed during the the wars in the Middle East that have consumed most of my life. I think that is the chapter of the book they're in right now, this expansionism and the adventurism. And it ends badly. It ended badly for us. You remember Syria is in the news now because tragically, we've lost Americans in uniform in Syria and a translator there as well. And reasonable people are asking, why are we still in Syria? What are we doing being- So we can lose troops.

That's why.

That is so sick.

I believe that's true.

You believe that those people are there so that they can die and trigger a war?

That is correct. And a deeper commitment and an emotional commitment. You've lost people here in I do think that.

When we lost someone in Mogadishu, did that create a deeper emotional connection to Somalia, or did that cause Americans to say, What are we doing patrolling around Mogadishu?

Well, it allowed the State Department and the rest of the federal government and its constellation of NGOs to import tens of thousands of Somalias into the United States because all of a sudden- Well, that had been happening under Clinton for some time. Yeah. Well, that, right. But that, I believe Black Hawk Down was at the During the Clinton administration. Yeah. We now have had military action in this country, so there's a deep and important connection between our country and whatever country we're killing people in. We need to import whoever it is, the Somalias, the Montagnards from Vietnam, whatever. By the way, some of those groups have done well here, others have not done well at all. But the pretext is exactly the same. We occupy Haiti repeatedly. All of a sudden, we have a ton of Haitians. This is how it works. We're fooling with Venezuela policy, got a ton of Venezuela.

Is that the next chapter here? You're welcoming a good chunk of Syria into the United States. I mean, a lot of them are already living in Europe.

Yeah, but let me just say, I've known a lot of Syrians in my life, a lot of Syrian Christians and Aloites and moderate Muslims. It's never been a hotbed of a religious extremism. No. They had a secular government until last year.

Damascus was a great secular center of enlightenment and architecture.

A lot of the New Testament was written from what's now Syria. It's had an ancient Christian presence. Of course, Paul was on his way to Damascus when he met Jesus. So this is the Levant. This is not some far away. This is on the Mediterranean. I know some amazing Syrians, also a lot of war-traumetized, unemployed and unemploymentable dangerous Syrians, and they happen to be living in Berlin right now. So whatever, it's a mixed bag. The only point is, the soon as you intervene in another country, all of a sudden, invade the world, import the world becomes real.

Yeah, I introduced the legislation in Congress to take all of our troops out of Syria. It was defeated overwhelmingly. When was that? That was in 2024, last year. And Anna Paulina Luna, others, and I took to the floor to explain that this would result in American deaths, that those deaths would not be worth whatever gain is attempting to be realized in Syria. In Syria, we had troops funded by the Pentagon, fighting forces funded by the CIA. And Syria is even an example on the limits of Russia's interventionism. I took note of the fact that them propping up a government and trying to keep it loyal was not something that was ultimately sustainable for Russia. And so now we ought to get our troops out. There's no thing that we are fighting for there that is an achievable win. What were these guys doing? You hear it on the news now, key leader engagement. You know what that means? That means we've got troops wandering around Syria, figuring out which Bedouin leaders to go bribe as a part of some coalition we can represent. And that is everything Donald Trump is against. Donald Trump doesn't want to import a bunch of Syrians.

He doesn't want to control Syria. And I think that there is a lot of the military-industrial complex that just needs us to be a state of constant, latent war everywhere.

Oh, there's no question. And I want to ask you- And by the way, just while I'm on the rant, the reason that happens is because in Congress, there's this great sense of deference.

If you're not on the Agriculture Committee, you defer to those people. If you're not on the Intelligence Committee, you defer to those people or the Arm Services Committee. And under a system where people's specializations were being represented in that way, that might work. But it's just a function of which special interests are controlling which committees and which members of Congress. The way you get on the War Committee is to be for the wars. The way you get on the Intelligence Committee is to be for the intelligence apparatus. The way to get on the Agriculture Committee is to be for big food. The way to get on the Natural Resources Committee is to be against natural resources. Then when you do all of that, you end up with this highly deferential system to people who were elected by no one who buy off your leaders. Those leaders justify it by saying, Well, at least I'm moving up in the system, and thus, whatever I do to surrender my agency is justified.

And worth it, because I can have a seat at the table and maybe I can... I think the moral justification for the person who makes moral compromises is, well, at least now I'm here and I can potentially make things better.

Yeah, but you're not even really there because you've sold all the shares of yourself. You know who else was there? Kevin McCarthy. He was there until he wasn't. But the problem is the man had no agency because over such a period of time, he had sold shares of himself to the highest bidder.

Are there any sovereign leaders in the world that you're aware of? Like, does any leader have the ability to say this is the right thing or the wrong thing? And I'm just going to act according to how I feel with the authority vested in me. Yes. Really? Yeah.

El Salvador, Naib Bukele. I think he has total agency to just do things, as he says.

How's the country doing?

It's doing well. People are safe. Investment is coming. You and I have spent time there. And A lot of time. I think that it is a great case study in what happens when you exercise the type of executive power that benefits the people. In a way, If it's a dictatorship, it's a very benevolent dictatorship, and people get to vote for or against him, and they vote for him.

Yeah, they also get to leave. I mean, a third of Salvadorans have left over the past 40 years, come the United States, and now a bunch of them are returning.

They are, yeah. I mean, And by the way, I know out there among your supporters and mine, there's a lot of angst over like, well, has Donald Trump done every single thing I ever wanted him to do in this first year in office? If you would have told me back when we were staring at polls showing us that Kamala Harris was going to be the next President of the United States, that here we would be at the conclusion of 2025 with negative net migration in this country. And some of that indeed is the great work of DHS. But a lot of it is the self-deportation where Trump has set the ethic in this country, where if you are not legally, you are not welcome. A bunch of those people are going home, and I think that is a great credit to the work they've done.

It is. In the case of El Salvador, it's a great credit to the job the President of El Salvador has done in improving his country. Why not live there? Well, here's a pretty obvious question that too few ask, what's the smartest way to protect your home and your family? Is it A, waiting until a burglar smashes a window and tries to get in, or is it B, preventing that attempt in the first place? Well, obviously, It's B, the second option is way better. And unlike most security systems, SimplySafe understands this and acts on that premise. So SimplySafe provides proactive security. It stops criminals before they get inside your house. I mean, really? You would have thought everyone would have thought of that. But no, SimplySafe has, though. Simplysafe's cameras spot threats early and alert live agents, actual human beings who talk directly to intruders. Hey, you're on camera. Get out. And they either bolt, they split the scene. Most Most, of course, do, or police show up fast. No long term contracts or hidden fees, and you can cancel it whenever you want, anytime. Named best new home security by US News will report for five years in a row, plus a 60 day money back guarantee.

Simply Safe is the go to for whoever needs security systems. Takes just minutes to set up, and the app lets you monitor everything from anywhere. There's no tech wizardry needed. This month, right now, get 50% off any new system. This is one of the best prices you'll ever see for Simply Safe. Visit simplisafesimplisafe. Com/tucker. Again, that's simplisafesafe. Com/tucker, and lock in your discount. There's no safe like Simply Safe. Christmas is here. That means you're eating a lot. Well, we are. It's a tough time to get on the scale because the meals keep coming and so does the weight gain. But what if there was a way to eat like you want to eat without getting really fat over Christmas week? This is an ongoing concern in my house. A snack that tastes excellent and is healthy. Well, it exists. It's called masa chips. It's part of a growing movement to revive real food, the kind your grandparents eat before snacks were designed in labs. How do they do it? Well, we'll tell you because it's very simple. Masa chips are made from three ingredients. Only three. Organic corn, sea salt, and 100% grass-fed beef tallow.

That's it. This is not some weird Franken cocktail like most big chip brands. Masa chips taste delicious and you feel way better after. You're not bloated, you don't feel mindless. It doesn't take you out of the game for hours. If you want to pick a flavor, we recommend lime. My producer is literally eating a bag right off camera right now. Ready to give it a try? Masachips. Com/tucker. Use the code Tucker for 25% off your first order, or just click the link in the video description, or scan the QR code. If you don't want to order online, you could also buy Masa Chips at your local Sprouts Supermarket. Stop by and pick up a bag. They're awesome. Do you remember this line from the night before Christmas? The children were nestled all snug in their beds while visions of sugar plums danced in their heads. It's the perfect winter slumber, but it's only possible if you can actually sleep. That's where Beam's Dream Powder comes in handy. Our friends at Beam, which is an American company, have made the perfect formula for the most effective sleep powder ever used. Unlike the junk you would buy from your pharmacy, Beam's Dream Powder is completely clean.

It's got no fillers or synthetic garbage, and it actually works. Lots of people here on our staff use it, and they can affirm that fact. When you use Dream, you fall asleep fast, you sleep through the night, and when you get up, you feel sharp, focused, and ready to dominate the day. It's already improved over 28 million nights of sleep. They've calculated it, and Christmas is the perfect time to try it. This winter, Beam is giving our listeners the Patriot discount. Visit shopbeam. Com shopbeam. Com/tucker. Use the code Tucker and get up to 40% off Beam's dream powder. But here's the catch. It's only available at this price until it sells out. Go to shopbeam. Com/tucker. Use the code Tucker. We recommend it. I just want to get back to one more question about the State Department's new office on anti-Semitism and just say, again, I'm opposed to anti-Semitism every bit as much as I'm opposed to anti-white hate, which is much more prevalent, and all of it, anti-black, anti-Mexican, everything, anti-people. But in there, he says, We need to control what people say on the Internet, and we're going to talk to Jews. He just said that.

It's so funny. It's like, do they really think that's going to work?

Does anyone think- But that's why should the US government be trying to censor its own citizens? I thought that was, first of all, illegal.

I thought we ran against that. That was the Biden administration.

But isn't that... How is that different from slavery? If you can't say what you believe- The bondage part. Well, I don't know. It's a form of bondage. It's like, I'm not treating you as a human being, as a free man, if I won't allow you to say what you think.

I thought that's what America was.

It was the place where you could say what you think.

The opportunity to do that, apparently, will be constrained worldwide as as rabbi Yehuda is serving you your kosher food and telling you what you can't say.

But why should the US State Department... I thought we were against censorship.

Wait a second. You thought the US State Department was against censorship? That's not true.

This guy's standing up at some event with a bunch of lunatics saying, I'm for censoring Americans and I'm at work for the US government? How about you get fired today?

Yeah, I think he was pointing globally, and the US State Department has a long history of trying to control what people see and hear and how they react to that.

We need to change the textbooks in Indonesia. Should we really be changing other people's textbooks, whatever.

No, I think there's a reasonable argument to be made. We should not be funding the textbooks. No, we should not be funding anybody's textbooks.

There are people living on the street, but whatever. Leaving that aside, you're not allowed to censor our social media, period. Because we're Americans, we can say and think whatever we want. That's the point of being American. How can a US official say that?

I think we have crossed that Rubicon long ago. When you had people in the Biden administration censoring true information about vaccine side effects, and no accountability for that, no action against those officials, it has blown the door open to use powers in government to try to advance the viewpoints that you find to silence the ideas that you find uncomfortable.

I've never heard anybody say we should censor anti-white hate on the internet. Not one person has ever... By the way, I don't think we should censor it or any expression of what people believe should ever be censored.

Do you think censorship digitally is ultimately sustainable with the fragmented digital environment we live in?

That's the point. I'm coming once again.

I'm not as worked up over it as you are. I know. Because I think that we have so many different opportunities to communicate now, more so than in the 2010s. And the censorship regime is only going to backfire on these folks. And it's sad. Honestly, I wish people like Jonathan Greenblatt at the ADL and this particular rabid I, would see that what they are doing is ultimately to their detriment, because more and more people are going to wonder why there is this one group that seems to have primacy in speech and discourse.

You're 100% right, and you're able to control your emotions sufficient to see that, which is why I'm glad you're here.

Controlling emotions really is what I'm known for.

No, it is actually, because you're seeing, at least compared to me, it was no self-control at all. You're seeing the big picture, which is that this is a conversation that can only be counterproductive. They don't understand the nature of human discourse and of the internet, and you can't censor it.

No. How are you going to censor the presidential debate stage in 2028? Because let me walk through what you're going to see. You are going to see candidates on the Republican debate stage and on the Democrat debate stage that are going to say, I'm going to cut off all aid to Israel. I believe the US-Israel relationship is toxic. I think it is an abusive relationship, and the United States is the abused partner, and we need to leave. And those people are automatically going to surge to a prominent position in the polling in their parties. So then how are you ultimately going to censor a viewpoint that is a rising viewpoint on the left and the right. Among the bases of those parties. This isn't a viewpoint percolating among the elites that maybe the US-Israel relationship is something we have to question in its current iteration in its current form. But this is coming to a head. I saw the deal where, have you looked at the Fara filings with the Israeli government, is paying to geo-fence US churches so that they can propagandize evangelical Christians? I'm watching this saying, It's not going to work. People are still going to ask questions, and I still can't find any of Israel's strongest defenders who will defend that conduct.

They've also, I guess, hired Brad Parscale to spoof the AI bots. I saw that and I thought, at least it's them getting grifted this time.

He's pathetic. But yes, no, I mean, literally pathetic. But it's still so dishonorable what he's doing. But you're absolutely right. I should have a lighter heart about this stuff. I guess what concerns me is these are people who are totally committed to violence, who, I mean, for a rabbi, whatever his name is, to say, We need to hold the people of Gaza accountable when they already, the Israeli and the US, have murdered tens of thousands of women and children, murdered them. It's like, that's not accountable. Like, what?

Is there anyone who believes that Israel's campaign in has killed more terrorists than it's created? Is there a single serious person who believes that?

Well, it's a crime. It's a crime. The more you know about it, the more shocking it is that it's happened, a first-world country doing something, murdering all those kids, murdering them, which they have. All these people like, rabbi whatever, and Marklevin defending it, they're just pro-violence. They believe in violence. Marklevin, when Charlie was murdered three months ago, said he was murdered because people called him a Nazi, and that's an invitation to shoot somebody. Next thing you know, he's running around calling everyone who disagrees with the next aid package a Nazi. He's espousing violence. Marklevin is totally for violence. A lot of these stronger voices are for violence. So if censorship doesn't work, it makes me uncomfortable when people who believe in violence and murdering the innocents, as they do, if they can't achieve their goals by peaceful means, what's the next step?

Violence. I think that they come from a viewpoint of every 400 years, people round up the Jews and kill them on the planet Earth, and they think that their struggle is existential. And if they do not become violent in certain places in certain iterations, that they become the victim of it. Okay.

Look, I get that. Actually, one thing that I grieve over because I hear about it all the time from friends of mine is that people are panicked or panicked. And then you have a shooting, this massacre in Australia is the worst thing I've ever... I couldn't even watch the video. It was so horrible. And it's like that adds people's sense that there's something like that is going to happen here. And totally sympathize with all of that. But violence is not the answer. That's the point. It's why you can't defend the murder of kids in Gaza. You can't call for your enemies to be killed like Mark Levin, in effect, does. Don't do that, right?

Yeah. It probably is the next chapter of all of this, is that more of that type of violence is visited here in the United States, and we're against that. By the way, that's why the speech and the dialog in the discourse is so important, which is what Charlie Kirk understood. I know.

And said so.

All the time. And I mean, you and I know what few others do, and that is the operational competence of Charlie Kirk in doing everything he could to support the Trump administration to make the best possible decisions on the information that existed. And Charlie told me something once about President Trump and Twitter. And he said, you know, man, how many times back in 2016, 2017, did we have someone come up to us and say, We love Trump, but can we get him off Twitter? Can we just get him to stop tweeting every impulse? And by the way, I always loved the posts, still do. But so many people were focused on the information flow from Trump out into the Twitter sphere. What we, I think, discounted was when Trump was scrolling Twitter regularly, he was getting bi-directional feedback that does not exist right now. That avenue is not open the way it was in those years. I think it was really special and awesome about Trump that he was able to understand the zeitgeist and what the temperature and mood of the country was. I would love to see Trump back on Twitter posting regularly and seeing the feedback from users.

I think it's a really smart point and true. We did an interview with a woman called Casey Means. She's a Stanford-educated surgeon and really one of the most remarkable people I have ever met. In the interview, she explained how the food that we eat, produced by huge food companies, Big Food, in conjunction with pharma, is destroying our health, making this a weak and sick country. The levels of chronic disease are beyond belief. What Casey means, who we've not stopped thinking about ever since, is the co founder of a healthcare technology company called Levels. We are proud to announce today that we are partnering with Levels. By proud, I mean, sincerely proud. Levels is a really interesting company and a great product. It gives you insight into what's going on inside your body, your metabolic health. It helps you understand how the food that you're eating, the things that you're doing every single day are affecting your body in real time. You don't think about it. You have no idea what you're putting in your mouth, and you have no idea what it's doing to your body. But over time, you feel weak and tired and spacy, and over an even longer period of time, you can get really sick.

It's worth knowing what the food you eat is doing to you. The Levels app works with something called a continuous glucose monitor, a CGM. You can get one as part of the plan or you can bring your own. It doesn't matter. But the bottom line is big tech, big pharma, and big food combined together to form an incredibly malevolent force, pumping you full of garbage, unhealthy food with artificial sugars, and hurting you and hurting the entire country. So with levels, you'll be able to see immediately what all this is doing to you. You get access to real-time personalized data, and that's a critical step to changing your behavior. Those of us who like Oreos can tell you firsthand. This isn't talking to your doctor in an annual physical, looking backwards about things you did in the past. This is up to the second information on how your body is responding to different foods and activities, the things that give you stress, your sleep, etc. It's easy to use. It gives you powerful personalized health data, and you can make much better choices about how you feel. And over time, it'll have a huge effect. Right now, you can get an additional two free months when you go to levels.

Link/tucker. That's levels. Link/tucker. This is the beginning of what we hope will be a long and happy partnership with Levels and Dr. Casey means. What role does Twitter X play in the discourse of the nation?

It's the global newswire. It's where news is made. I think that people discount the significance of the platform when they say it doesn't have the same user base that you see on Meta or TikTok. But the reality is the news that is made on X Twitter really pollinates to those other platforms extensively and I think drives all the action.

Twitter is real life is what you're saying?

I think that it is.

Could you understand what's happening in the country without reading I don't think so because you would be limited in the inputs to your system, right? Well, you host a show, but even long before you hosted the show, you're in the middle of the national conversation. You were the subject of the national conversation for a while. Where do you get your information? How do you know what reality is?

I try to read a lot. I try to watch cable news as little as possible, even though I'm a host of a cable show on One America News. I think we've lost an appreciation for the 10,000-word piece in society today. For sure. I miss the long investigative reporting pieces we used to get at places like the National Pulse and places like Revolver News. And more and more, the attention span of the country is limited. And so you've got to be able to convey messages sharply, crisply, so that they're absorbed and people can act on the information.

Do you read Twitter a lot?

I do. Yeah. I'm on Twitter a good bit. A Citizen Free Press is one of my daily check-ins for the news as well. And also more and more since I've left government life, seeing how the movement of money impacts policy decisions. I totally agree. I was so into what was on the next committee agenda, what the next witness would be in the chair. And oftentimes, it's the way money moves in global marketplaces influencing events. And I also think this is informative on our discussion on the Middle East, because for most of you in my life, the principal capital markets that mattered in the world were New York and London. I think a lot of people were really comfortable with that. And then as capital has really flown out of these Gulf Monarchies, out of the Middle East, you're seeing places like Doha, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Muscatoman, Riyadh emerge as these very significant capital marketplaces. I think Netanyahu is trying to wash that region in blood and chaos and war migrants so that there is a return to New York and London being the principal capital market.

Yeah. I saw an Israeli I remember the cabinet minister the other day described, was talking about the Saudis and go back to your camels and sleeping with your cousin or whatever, eating lamb in a tent. It was dismissive, I'm not even taking sides in it, but it was more than dismissive. It was idiotic. I was like, Have you been there recently? There are not a lot of camels in downtown Riyadh, which that's like 8 million people in it. It's like the most modern city in the side of China. I think people don't fully understand how quickly that region has changed.

Yeah. That change is frightening to people who are losing power. I get it. I think a lot of those people are the constituency that Netanyahu is serving as he is trying to advance an agenda that will create more war and create more violence. Nobody's going to want to do business deals in Doha or Abu Dhabi or Dubai if there are 30 million Iranians that are on the move because they are war migrants.

No, that's really smart. I want to get to something. You sponsored this bill in the Congress in 2024, last year, that would have pulled the United States finally out of Syria. And of course, it didn't pass. Did it even get to a vote?

Yeah, I was able to force a vote on it under our rules. Really? Yeah. I mean, it lost by a margin of two to one. I didn't even have a majority of Republicans. At least.

Oh, of course. But the fact that you did that, which, by the way, for people who aren't from Washington, that's like a radical act. That's like tea party level. It's like throwing the tea in Boston Harbor. No one would do that. Poor Chelsea Gabbard once said, Why do we have to be in Syria? And they spied on her and kept her off commercial airplanes for saying that. So it was a ballsy thing to say. But you've always had this independent cast to your thinking. It's been very obvious for a long time. Several years ago, your life got completely blown up. It sounded like you were going to jail. People started calling you a child molester. You're a child molester. I was attacked for talking to you, which is funny. Normally, people were attacked for talking to me, but I was attacked for talking to you. And But at the heart of that story was foreign influence, and I've never heard you describe what exactly happened there. In one sentence, news broke in the New York Times that the house, at the House Ethics Committee?

No, I got news that the Department of Justice-Oh, sorry, it was DOJ. It was a criminal investigation. The Department of Justice was investigating me, and obviously, I knew that the allegations were false, that someone was just- You'd be in jail right now if they were true.

You and Andrew Tate would both be in jail, so stop with the bullshit.

And by the way, no one has ever even made an accusation against me in any forum in which I can depose witnesses, do cross-examination, review records. So that's how you know the allegations against me are false. No one is ever willing to make them in any forum where I'm allowed to fight back, where I have any of the tools that you would get in due process.

You haven't been charged and brought to court.

Charged, sued, anything. You've never been sued on the basis of this. No, Of course not. If anyone were to sue me, a human being would have to stand up and make an accusation against me and have their name behind it. That's never happened. Who is the person who has publicly accused me of misconduct regarding women? It doesn't exist. It is just an op. It was an op to silence me, and Israel was involved. I hate to say that. I was shocked to learn it, but there was a consulate official.

Okay, this is amazing. This is the charge that you were trafficking underage girls.

It's absurd.

I don't even know what the charge was, but that was the headline. Mac Gates traffics underage women. It's like, oh, my gosh, can't talk to Mac Gates anymore.

For us, the shocking moment was when my father, who's a prominent person in our community, got outreach from someone he had never met that said that there were pictures and images of me with underage prostitutes, and my dad needed to meet with these people right away. My dad, somewhat surprised and concerned, goes and talks to these people and says, What in the world are you talking about? They said, Well, Mr. Gates, we need $25 million from you to go and rescue a spy that is being held in Iran. If you do that, we can make these things about your son go away. Which was crazy and wild. We did what any reasonable people would do. We went to the FBI and said that we were being extorted by these folks with their false claims. We later learned that this consulate official working for the Israeli government was sending text messages to Scott Adams, of all people, the Dilbert cartoonist, saying they were expecting my father to furnish this $25 million payment and that that would be evidence of my consciousness of guilt.

For the American FBI agent grabbed on an Iranian Island, maybe 18 or 19 years ago.

I don't know anything about this person. I don't know if the person's dead or alive, but it was troubling and concerning to me that someone who was getting paid by the Israeli Israeli government was involved in a criminal shakedown of a US congressman. Someone went to jail for this. The person who conveyed this message to my father, pled guilty to the attempted fraud. Surprisingly, There was never really an effort to figure out what the government of Israel's involvement was in this matter.

But you know that the government of Israel was involved because this was an Israeli government official who was involved in this?

Yes. A person who his name is Jake Novack, I think he currently works for Real America's Voice, and he sent text messages. Wait, what? Yeah, that's the name of the official. And he sent messages to Scott Adams saying that he was involved in this scheme that was later deemed a criminal scheme to shake down my family. So what happened to him? Based on these false allegations. So what happened to him? He got a television show.

Come on now. I didn't know any of this. I'm not playing dumb. I really didn't know that. Have you ever talked to him about it?

I have attempted to figure because obviously, I still have a lot of unanswered questions about why he was working for a foreign government and trying to shake down my family.

What's the answer, do you think?

Well, some have shared with me their concern that this was a consequence of some of the votes and positions I took in the Congress. I represented one of the most military-heavy districts in the entire country. I think number one. Yeah, right up there. I saw these wars in the Middle East that my neighbors and friends had fought in as unworthy of our best, unworthy of the disruptions in parenting and the divorces and the injuries. Suicides, yeah. And so I took the position that we should be less entangled in these things. And I think that really shocked a number of people who thought I would be more of a neocon coming from the district I came from. And I think that with the Israel influence operation, it's always fire and ice. It's always outreach, followed by consequence, and then outreach, and then consequence. Even to this day, there was someone who just appeared and offered to pay me a bunch of money to go to Israel and give a bunch of speeches, and you decline those offers when you don't feel they're appropriate. Then, lo and behold, it's like green blood on the other side of the operation calling you an anti-Semite.

This just happened to you?

Yeah.

You don't need to be an economist to see what's happening. The dollar is in trouble. It's getting weaker. It's sad, but we're not in charge of it, so we have to respond appropriately in ways to protect our families. When paper money dies, it's going to be replaced by programmable digital currency or gold. Gold survives. The same Americans who think they're protecting themselves with gold are the ones getting ripped off by big gold dealers. After we left corporate media, we got offered tens of millions of dollars to promote gold companies. How do they get the money to spend that much on marketing? Because they're scamming their customers. We didn't want anything to do with that. So we sought an honest broker, and together we formed a precious metals company that you can actually trust. It's called Battalian Metals. At battalianmetals. Com, we publish actual spot prices. We're totally transparent about the VIG, what we take, and we treat everyone with honesty. So if you've been watching what's happening, it's not just about money, it's about sovereignty and holding something that endures and cannot be manipulated or taken from you. So if you've been waiting for the right time to act, this is it.

Visit battalianmetals. Com. You've got such a... Maybe you've just been around. You're younger than I am, but been around a lot. You have such a blasey attitude. Like, yeah, that happens. People try to pay you off, then they threaten you, pay you off, then they threaten you.

Yeah. Unfortunately, this is the parlance of government. It's a series of carrots and sticks. I was the only Republican in the entire Congress during my time there who refused all PAC and lobbyist donations because it was like a game I just didn't want to win. What you have to realize is what most of your Congress is doing most of the time is trying to move up in this system. And sometimes moving up means a better committee. Sometimes it's like getting invited to better dinner parties. We lived in Washington for many years. You know that there's this hidden dinner party circuit that is reflective of your influence and your acceptance. And people who are probably good people when they get elected go there and morally compromise for that. And I just reached a point one time when I just thought, I don't even care. It's like, oh, well, if you do If you have favors for the chief deputy whip, they'll invite you to their fundraiser, and then you could move up, and the whip could invite you to his foreign trip. If you say the right things on the foreign trip and kiss the ring, well, then maybe the majority leader will want you on a task force.

At the end of the day, I thought, I'm not here to do any of this stuff, and I don't really care about any of it.

Those are prizes not worth winning, too.

Yeah, it's like the homecoming court. Nobody really cares except the people doing it. The problem is in Congress, the people who are not brightest and not the, I think, most service-oriented often prevail in that system.

It's all so low bar, so just pathetic.

It's even more pathetic when really smart, accomplished people do it. That's always what amazed me. I'm just a country lawyer from North Florida. I'd been in the legislature, got elected to Congress. I'd never done anything in my life that rendered me a war hero or some tycoon of industry. But those people do get elected did at times. And then you just go watch them debase themselves. Oh, I know. And they become actors. And the scripts are written by the lobby corps and produced and directed by the leadership.

You never took APAC money?

I did not. I refused those funds. How did that go for you? I just...

Well, I guess you ultimately got blackmailed.

I didn't become attorney general. No. But I forgot about that. But that wasn't precisely about APAC for me. That was just about all of it. I even had groups like DNRA or Right to Life that I was largely aligned with, say, Well, will you take our APAC money? And I just the whole thing seemed untoward. How do you take money from people who have a specific interest, it times hundreds of thousands of millions of dollars, and then go stand at the Fish house in Pensacola, Florida, and tell people you're not influenced by it? I couldn't perform the act anymore. Now, there are other Throughout my time in Congress, there are other accommodations you have to make. I had to be their willing, able, anytime your bookers or anybody else's bookers would call and say, Come be on television. Because my theory was, if I wasn't going to have the resources to buy ads, just go be on TV a lot. And that comes with this own compromise to your life and your overall operation.

Right. Well, life is a series of traps. And sometimes you don't know you're falling into them. Because it seems like a good trade, but it never is. But just to go back to what happened to you. So this guy or a series of people approached your dad and said, we have documentary evidence that your son- Photos. Photos, slept with underage girls. Will you give us $25 million to go find the FBI agent, Bob? Levinston. Levinston, right. Also working for CIA, who was grabbed on this island in Iran, still in custody, dead or alive. Your dad says, No, contacts you. You call the FBI. The person who reached out gets convicted. If that goes to jail for it. But this other guy, never punished for it, the one who's working for the Israeli government. And then the story winds up in the New York Times. How does it wind up in the New York Times?

Well, I think that Bill Barr told them. Bill Barr was a very well-known source for the New York Times.

Bill Barr was the attorney general.

He hated me. Why did he hate you? We were in a big dispute about his unwillingness to enforce some of the election integrity laws. There was a case in Florida where a Democrat supervisor of elections, brought to the US attorney a clear instance of fraud, where a Souris-aligned organization was fraudulently creating voter registrations so that they could request absentee ballots that were ghost votes. And the US attorney asked for resources sources to pursue that investigation, and Bill Barr refused, and said, I refuse to investigate any of this stuff because it will decrease confidence in the elections. This was before the 2020 election. And so I was constantly pestering President Trump and members of his administration. The Bill Barr had to be dealt with on this. You can't just say that you're not going to investigate something because the investigation itself will impact people's confidence. And so he and I were in that big struggle, and I believe he was angry me and wanted to leak things that would hurt me.

This is the guy who covered up the murder of an American citizen in federal detention in New York City. I mean, the person who was murdered is called Jeffrey Epstein. So I understand that I'm not defending Jeffrey Epstein, but no American should be murdered extra judicially in federal lockup. And Bill Barr covered up that murder.

Also, we're the United States of America. You can't even go in and out of a casino without people knowing that you're there and without it being on every camera. And you're telling me that we don't have the video of Epstein killing himself and that we're all just supposed to expect this guy who we know, we know all those people who are in the admin now, my friends, they know Epstein was Intel. They know he was tied to our Intel. They know he was tied to Mossad. They knew he was tied to Saudi. He was a free agent. He was willing to go- And British intelligence. Yeah. And he was willing to go and get this compromise at a time when the British and the Israelis and the United States government needed to get people aligned with the Iraq war. And there was a worry that people would and start opposing an increasingly unpopular war in Iraq. And so they got together, a bunch of people in academia, politics, media, business, and tried to get them in a compromising situation so that then everyone would stay on board no matter what.

That does not sound unlikely, but when he died, Barr, by his own admission, he said, Our job is to convince the American public he killed himself and to prevent dangerous conspiracy theories from threading. The guy was murdered. Barr is, by definition, corrupt. Like, you can't. Attorney generals can't do that. That is totally over the top. And he was fighting with you. But you think he's the one who leaked this stuff?

I do. Leaks happen in a while. I'm not going to sit here in Pearl Clutch over some leak. When the FBI took my phone away, I assumed this was all... When they first came- On what grounds did they take your phone away? They came with a subpoena and said, We want your phone. And at the time, I was somewhat relieved because I thought, Perfect. If what you think is in my phone is some untoward issue with underage people, have a look. Obviously, if I'd committed any crimes, they kept my phone for years. They did? Yeah, they did.

You've never been charged with anything? No. What's it like? Because we have a justice system. It's still in place, I think. Got courts and stuff and police and all that. But what's it like to be accused of a real crime? Child sex trafficking. And then wait for all these years to get indicted for it, have someone prove it, and that never happens.

Well, I know who I am. The people around me know who I am. During these investigations, repeatedly run back to my district Despite Kevin McCarthy spending millions of dollars to try to defeat me, I was always overwhelmingly reelected. And so I took comfort in no way- You got reelected in the middle of this.

Yeah.

Despite a lot of folks not wanting me to return to Washington. But there is There's comfort in knowing that the people will be there for you, your family, the folks you care about. And so I'm not a tragic case by any sense. I wish I would have had the chance to be attorney general. I said a lot of bad things about senators over the years that made that impossible for me to achieve.

You certainly did. Walk us through that. So Trump announces you're going to be AG.

And I have not campaign for that position. To be clear, I love President Trump and was there to support his transition as a friend, a confidante, someone who had been there during the tough times in his first term. The real reason I was hanging around the transition is because I remembered what it was like when you had a good amount of the cabinet hoping that Donald Trump was a criminal and wanting to install Mike Pence. For sure. Just the nightmare that that was. So I was there to be a trusted friend. And Charlie Kirk and Steven Miller and I had talked to a number of people who wanted to be attorney general, and we were presenting some of those ideas ideas to the President. I was advocating for a different person to be the attorney general on a plane ride with the President. And he just, as he has a tendency to do, said that that wasn't who he wanted, and he wanted me to do the job.

And you had no idea this was coming?

No, none. You're telling Trump, actually, I think you should pick so and so.

Right.

I did tell him if he wanted me to do it, I would do my best job. I would work hard to be confirmed, and that I thought I could lead the department out of some its darkest days and towards something better. I think Pam Bondi has done a very good job. I know she has her critics. By the way, I would have, too. If I'd have been the attorney general, there probably would be a whole ecosystem saying, I wasn't doing enough. But I actually think Pam Bondi has done a good job, and I'm here to be her supporter and advocate.

Clearly, you are here to be her supporter and advocate. I disagree. But whatever. I think- But let's get into that, Tucker. Wait, but hold on. I'm not here to attack Pam Bondi, who I know well, and I have always liked Pam Bondi. But you were willing, as a sitting member of the Congress and the House, to go after your own party when you thought that they were wrong.

I think Trump also believed that someone who had been unfairly accused of something and who had endured the grind of that. Would care about justice. Yeah, would be really interested in fixing it. I think that's why President Trump asked me to do the job is because he saw that I could empathize with those who had been treated unfairly and that I would approach the position with a true sense of justice.

I love that. No, I share that view, and I do think the only quality that matters in a leader is strength. Not so we can oppressed people, weak people oppressed others. Strong people have no need to oppressed others or rule over others. They can serve others because they're not compensating for the void within them. I think you would have been the best person I can think of because you've been through it, you didn't collapse, you married a great girl right in the middle of it. You got reelected. Like, your life shows that you were not destroyed by what happened to you. So you are strong by definition. That's what we need. And all of America's problems are downstream from weak men, obviously. It's why the women are crazy, because the men are weak. So let's find a strong one to lead a critical agency. That's my primitive view of it, but I think I'm right. What happened? Why did you not get that gig?

There were a lot of great people I interacted with in the Senate, but at the end of the day, there was a core block of about half a dozen of them who'd said they would never vote for me. I could have endeavored to grind that down, maybe win one or two of them, possibly, over an extended period of time. But you saw the way courts started in joining the actions of this administration right off the bat. Pam Bondi did defeat nationwide injunctions as a ruling legal theory. Had we not had her and her team lined up to do that, I actually think that we'd be in a very different position today with the deportation agenda.

Yeah, how can...

But I mean, look, you know how a lot of my conversations went? I'd be like, Yes, Senator, so this is Matt Gates. I'm calling about my confirmation for attorney. What was tweeted about you? Now, that was a staff for years ago, and they were fired immediately.

Oh, they were that petty.

Oh, yeah. Several would bring things I had tweeted about them to the meetings.

Is that really so the point of your attorney general is not to say mean things about an individual senator? What? Talk about making it about you.

Well, that- Who cares? Then I had one senator from Oklahoma really grill me about my vote against the anti-Semitism bill. How can I vote for someone who voted against the anti-Semitism bill. I'm thinking, is this some driving issue in Oklahoma that I'm- Was it Jim Langeford? Unaware of? Just mentioning it.

Yeah, Langeford is such a as a weak, such a weak man. It's sad. And as a tool for evil, in my opinion. So sorry, that's what I think. But despite having good qualities. But who are the senators who are against you? Do you care to name any of them?

I don't know that that's productive, but I think that it would not be difficult to look at the college of senators who have been otherwise problematic for some of Trump's appointees. And that's where I had problems.

So you you decided to bow out.

Yeah, I didn't think that me doing some multi-week, multi-month fight to try to grind down the last of Mitch McDonald was somehow going to help the administration in the end.

Can I ask, do you think, since you know the system so well because you serve within it most of your life, do you think there's anything you could have traded in exchange for their support?

I don't know. I oftentimes couldn't get a meeting with people like Senator Mokowski and Senator Collins. They were not interested in even having a discussion with me. It would have been hard to execute a trade.

I think part of the problem is you're not the guy who makes those trades, and that's why they opposed you in the first place.

Well, and I think also there's something unsettling about my unpredictable. People who read the script are easy to predict and manage.

So you wind up with a government and business. You wind up with a government and business. You of the whole society run by weak people.

Not at the top. Trump's pretty strong. And I think Vance is strong. And I think Susie Wiles is strong.

There's no doubt about what you just said. But no, I mean, beneath the... You're talking the pinnacle of the pyramid. I mean, all the way down. Everyone's so weak, and that's where evil thrives is in weakness.

Weakness and risk aversion. Yeah, same thing. Risk aversion is fundamentally anti-American. We are a nation of risk makers at our best moments. That's who we are. But in government, it's often, how do I avoid any attention or ire? I do think that the riskiest thing we've seen is what Obama got everybody together to do on December ninth of 2016 when he ordered the Russia hoax. I think that is really the original sin of a lot of this that has happened. I certainly would have brought a RICO charge against the people who were involved in that decision making process and participating in the various predicate criminal acts. I wouldn't be surprised if that's precisely what Pam Bondi does. When the Biden FBI raided Trump's house, they engaged in a predicate criminal act to try to get information back that was exculpatory as to Trump. From my standpoint, that would properly venue a RICO charge against the major players in the deep state in the Southern district Florida rather than in Washington, DC, where they have an administrative and judicial advantage.

The Russia hoax was predicated on something that I'm pretty sure was a lie, which is that the Russian government stole a tranche of emails from the DNC earlier that year.

But it got reinvigorated after. Of course it did. All of that got dispensed with. Then Trump won, which people weren't expecting, and Obama, on December ninth, calls in Klapper, Brennan Komi, and says, You guys have got to go out and reignite this Russia thing. In that effort, you see all of this offense against George Papadopoulos. You see the activation of foreign intelligence networks to try to create some predicate for spying on the Trump campaign. Where does that leave us? I think in almost a post-coup country.

Well, we're literally at war with Russia today as a result of this hysteria, which was all the predicate for that war. There was a real discussion in the '90s going on about extending NATO membership to Russia, which is what we should have done. What do you mean? Putin, in his first meeting with George W. Bush, was right at the beginning of 2021, said, I want to join NATO.

Imagine where we would be right now if the United States and Russia had created peace and a security infrastructure around Europe I think, appropriately positioned NATO as an alliance against the excesses of Sino expansion. It would be a safer world. It would be a more prosperous world.

Of course, all the way to Asia because Russia extends into Asia. You would have a Western block of not identical countries. Russia's got a different system, different culture, different language, different history.

But so many aligned interests with NATO when it comes to countering extremism, having strong borders, all of the things that Trade.

Trade. One of the of the most mineral dense countries in the world. It's basically a Western country. Produced Dostoevsky. Don't tell me otherwise. Anyway, yeah, I couldn't agree more. But I just want to get to something I've never gotten past, which is the question of whether the Russian government stole those emails from the DNC during the Democratic primary. Then this D&C staffer called Seth Rich is murdered in Washington, DC, in a robbery in which his wallet is not taken. And a number of conservative people who call themselves Conservatives went on TV and said, I think Seth Rich was murdered because he knew too much. And then those people were either sued or threatened with lawsuits from Seth Rich family. So everybody shut up about it. And then Julian Assange has asked repeatedly, who runs WikiLeaks at the time before they went to prison for talking like this, did the Russians send you that information? And he goes, no. Did Seth Rich, and he says, We're not going to talk about that. So the heavy implication is that Seth, and I don't know the answer despite knowing Julian Assange, but the heavy implication was that Seth Rich sent this information because he was offended by how the DNC was taking Bernie Sanders out, was basically all behind Hillary Clinton.

It was a rigged election, and they were crushing Bernie Sanders, and he was offended, so he leaked these emails, and they killed him for it. No one was allowed to talk about that. Now, I don't know if that's what happened, but I knew someone at a very high level, the DNC, who thought that that's what happened, and no one's ever talked about it again.

We, in Congress, had people that were doing various roles within the DC Police Department come and say, We want to be whistleblowers, and we want to talk about the way in which this investigation was truncated, and we didn't get to really do the- No, the FBI took over. Yeah, do the shoe leather work. But there's a way that the FBI can involve themselves in these investigations that doesn't strip the agency completely away from their partners to also participate. And so these whistleblowers were concerned about that. And then ultimately, they weren't really given much of a platform.

We never saw Seth Rich's laptop, and that story just ended. And I'm not alleging anything.

Isn't the tell in that how it kept shifting? First it was the emails, and then it was Vladimir Putin had taken over Facebook with $120,000, and then it was really, like George Pappadopoulos in a London bar. Then it was Don Jr at Trump Tower. It was an effort to obscure the lack of quality in any of these theories by just having a sufficient quantity of them.

Well, that's always... It's called flooding the Zone, and that's what happened. I'm watching that happen right now. That's what always... That is the most classic move of anyone involved in a PSYOP, the Intel community. Yeah, you just flood. You see this with UAPs. It's pretty obvious what they are actually, in my view. But no, it's this. It's Men from Mars. It's an advanced technology program. It's like, whatever. Yeah, they flood it with too many theories. And you think that's what happened there?

Of course, because none of the theories could individually hold water. And I had a recent conversation with CIA director John Radcliffe, and I like John, but I chastised him for not answering some of these fundamental questions. Joseph Mifsud was this professor who was drawn into an intelligence operation against the United States. He was drawn into that operation either by the United States or one of our allies. How do we not know the answer to that question? This was the key thing that we said we were going to uncover when we got power. I know they got a lot of work to do to keep the country safe, but I would encourage the director of the CIA to really tell us the CIA's role.

What's the answer, do you think?

Well, I believe that some of this crowd in the Obama administration knew that their direct management of an asset against the Trump administration would create paperwork, payments, complicating things that could be found out. And so they went to other European countries and said, you do us a favor, we do you a favor, but the favor we want from you is actually to go against our country, our presidential candidate, Donald Trump. And that is treasonous. That is straight treason to ask another country to attack your country. And I think that occurred. I think that if we knew who had authorized that, we would have a person to be at the center of this Puerto Rico conspiracy.

Yeah. Traditionally, it's been Britain and France who played that role.

There's a huge intel presence in Italy as well. Exactly. It's one of the biggest CIA.

Now with the growth of NATO under this war, it's Romania, it's Eastern Europe, it's wherever you have a NATO base, you have there are a lot of other things that come with it, of course. You've I've seen this a lot where American political actors or IC members in the United States use foreign governments to do their work for them.

Yeah. I am concerned that that doesn't just happen abroad, that that happens even within the eight square miles of Washington, DC.

Did you feel when you worked there that there was a lot of intrig?

There's always intrig, but I think that a lot of the decisions that get made in Washington are detached from the elected leaders. And there probably should be more intrig, actually. Our lawmakers should be more curious and inquisitive and skeptical.

What do you mean a lot of the decisions that are made are detached from elected leaders?

Well, take these bills that get written, right? Do you think that anyone who voted for the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act was trying to outlaw hemp? It just was stuck in the bill, and then they voted for it. And however you feel about hemp, I think it's crazy that an issue wouldn't even get its own dignity. The lashing together of disparate issues for just an up or down vote that becomes a shirts and skins exercise is a way to detach from the realities of the decision making. And those decisions are made by staff, by interest groups, by foreign countries at times.

What's going to happen in the next two election cycles?

I think we are headed for a bloodbath in the midterms for a few reasons, primarily history. The President's Party loses seats during the midterms. I don't think I'm breaking any news there. I think that the other side has just really worked up, and they have an organizing principle. The organizing principle of the left in America today is we hate Trump, and they don't really need any more than that. There's something elegant politically about using that to activate voters. Yeah, Whereas we're trying to tell people to reward us for securing the border. And voting is rarely an exercise in rewarding prior conduct. It is always about new promises. What are the new promises you're making? Right now, a lot of people have economic anxiety around the cost of living. I think the Democrats, again, have an elegant presentation to make, which is we're going to take the things that cost you a lot of money and have the government provide those to you. And then those things won't cost you a lot of money. And we try to make an argument about economic theory that doesn't always land with the same poignance.

So midterms in a year, very tough.

Yeah. I think Hakeim Jeffrey becomes the speaker. I think that they will then... The problem is the candy becomes the poison for them because when they do this big elect us so that we can use all these tools to fight Trump, then once they get that hour, they're going to be pressed to continually use the silliest ones. And think about what they've already used. They've already used the attempted application of criminal law. That backfired. They already used the impeachment process. That backfired. And so what I think Democrats believe, or what they've recently been conditioned to believe, is that shutdowns are good for them under Trump, that that's good politics. So my prediction is Democrats win the midterms. They execute a series of ransom-like shutdowns on Trump. The country gets weary of that and probably elects J. D. Vance president in 2028.

What's the field look like in 2028?

On our side?

I mean, I'm just assuming that there will be Ted Cruz is running, I guess.

Against you, apparently.

Which is like- I'm not in a race.

I've never seen that. It's odd to have someone running for president against... That the organizing principle of their campaign is to attack someone else who is not running for president. It's a novel. I'm not sure if you ever will. For Ted. What is that to you think? Ted and Ron DeSantis both want to be president really bad, but they suffer from a likability problem, and they're not really having a good time. I can tell. When you run for president- Ted looks miserable. When you run for President, there's an element of it where the people have to feel like they're a part of something fun. That's something Trump understood. That's something Charlie Kirk understood. For Ron and Ted, the campaign is something they have to do in order to get the power that they seek.

What is that? Ron DeSantis has been really successful in a lot of ways.

I would vote for him again for governor. If he could run again for governor Florida, I would vote for him again.

I would, too, despite the fact he signed a hate speech law in Israel, which is so offensive to me as an American, not because I'm against Israel, but we don't have hate speech laws in the United States. When we do, we don't sign them in foreign countries.

But you'd still vote for him again.

For governor of Florida? Yeah. Oh, without thinking about it. For sure, I think he's been a great governor. He could, whatever, quibble about it. But generally, no, he's been great. I totally agree. But Ted Cruz is not going to be President. Obviously, nobody thinks that. I'm sure Mrs. Cruz doesn't think that. She probably wants to get out of the house. Who knows what's going... But why doesn't Ted, who's famously, obviously the smartest person in America, why can't he see that?

Well, I think that, as we were discussing earlier, running for President is an itch that doesn't go away with one scratch. I think that he believed he should have defeated in the 2016 election, and he's toiling in the Senate until he gets a next bite at the apple. I think on the other side, I would have believed before Kamala Harris that the Democrats had nominated their last straight white guy. Yeah, I would think so, too. Yeah, that just not... I mean, it is a movement that stands against straightness and white people. Is Gavin straight? He seems to be pretty enthusiastic, heterosexual, based on some of his personal conduct. Again, no judgment.

You never know. It could be an omnivore. There's some of those.

Yeah, we're not the bedroom police.

Oh, no, I don't even want to think about it, honestly.

But Newsom has at least demonstrated power. I think that is what Democrats have lacked in this time in the wilderness in the Trump era is that no one steps up and says, I'm ready to use power effectively. When Gavin Newsom stole those congressional seats with Prop 50 in California, it was an effective exercise of power. I think voters may reward him for that. Someone else in the Democratic Party who wants to be President told me that it was actually Kamala Harris, who has like, reignited the prospects of Gavin Newsom. If they had just run Biden and lost, they would have never gone back to another straight white guy. But rolling out Harris and the embarrassment that that was has people thinking, well, you know, maybe we don't want to try this again.

No, that's I believe that. Just knowing what they're like. They're just transactional. They just want power. That's it. They don't have any beliefs. They just want to be in charge. And I get it. I find it terrifying, but that's who they are. I also think that when Gavin started going on conservative podcasts, that's when I was like, Oh, you are formidable. I mean, he didn't defend his own policy is very effectively. It didn't matter. He went on other people's podcasts and took questions.

Balsey. Well, that in essence is an indictment of Harris, because Harris could not have an extended intelligent conversation about anything. Just getting over the most basic of hurdles to be able to string sentences together was this great display of talent in the Democratic Party.

And he'll say anything. He just doesn't.

But look at what they've been through, right? Joe Biden never did extended discussions. Harris never did extended discussion. So he was giving the base, at least some viewpoint into his thinking on things.

So do you think Gavin will be the nominee?

Right now, I would say so. I think that AOC is going to make a compelling run, and I think she will be formidable as well. You really do? If Bernie really does the handoff. You and I, Bernie has this a goofy professor persona, but in reality, Bernie is a deeply selfish person. He's selfish. And he doesn't like... And a coward.

He's a total coward.

And he believes he is the leader of the Democratic Party. Does he really? Well, but he's won every argument in it. Maybe he is the leader of the Democratic Party. If you look on policy, Bernie has won the argument on this shift towards socialism. But they The party structurally did things twice to stop him from becoming the nominee.

They stole the election from him twice. Yeah. And he sat back and was like, Oh, I've been a sexist. I'm sorry. I mean, he's such a fucking coward. I can't deal with it. If he was real, at least I would respect it. Aoc, same thing.

Yeah, AOC is a very different person today than when she got to Congress. Totally corrupted. Co-opted. Completely.

Oh, the guys war is fine. It's like, what?

When we were ousting McCarthy, she came up to me and was like, I really respect this because I'll be honest, we don't have the guts to do this on our side. What's she like? Before January sixth, she was incredibly chummy with Republicans in Congress would regularly come over to our side, sit down, hang out, talk about her day. Did you ever date her? I did not. No. Did you try? No. And not my cup of tea. But she, after January sixth, treated us all like we had horns or something.

So she gave this famous statement after January sixth and said, as a trauma survivor, I was traumatized. I was almost killed that day. Do you think... Was that real?

No, but it is reflective of the performance art of Congress, and it was just bad performance.

But how could you get points from anyone for being like, Yeah, I'm a terrified little girl?

Because on- I find that contemplative.

You can't be in charge of anything if you're a terrified little girl. Sorry.

But we are a society that is increasingly built on grievance identity. You are the grievance that you can access. And so if you are a woman, that can be a source of grievance. If you're a minority. And then you have people who are just odd and say, well, maybe if I'm trans, then that can be this source of grievance. And then you have a bunch of white men looking around saying, well, I guess I'll be a drug addict because then that can be my source of grievance. And she was leaning into that. She wanted to show that she had been aggrieved by this act and should be owed some unique empathy.

But she revealed that she's afraid, that she's a coward. How is that a... The only thing people respect on a gut level is strength and courage. That's it. I just don't get what's the...

You really think that works? And sincerity. I mean, yeah, strength, courage, and sincerity. Well, sincerity grows from strength and courage.

I'm brave enough to tell you what I really think.

Yeah. I got to to a point where I was confident enough with my district where I could say the things I believed that I knew they didn't, because even if they disagreed with me on a subject, they knew I came to that view sincerely, that I wasn't holding... Marijuana legalization is something you and I disagree on. I disagreed with a majority of my constituents on that point. I authored Florida's Marijuana law. I support President Trump rescheduling marijuana. When people at my first Baptist Church in Fort Walton Beach, Florida, came up to me to say they really disagreed with me on that, they did not vote against me as a consequence because they knew that these were views that I sincerely hold.

Well, I could be one of those congregants if I were Baptist in the Baptist Church, because I agree with that. I don't expect people to agree with all of my eccentric views or my heartfelt views. It's okay. We're different people, but can't deal with falseness at all.

That, I think, was the magic of I think that's a magic that he knows he needs to reignite on the campaign trail going into these midterms, the connection directly with the American voter that no matter who you are, if you're the President and behind the Resolute Desk and in the Rose Garden, it's a different experience than being out on the trail in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

So what's AOC's lane? Is it the- The Bernie Lane. Okay, but the Bernie Lane was an economic lane, which I always had respect for. I didn't agree with all of it, but we've got too many billionaires not a big enough middle class. That's true. That's factually true. And anyone who says it, I will agree with. And he used to say that.

And the open borders lane. I mean, they're two are related.

I mean, we have all these billionaires because we've had open borders.

They weren't always there. They weren't always there. I mean, Bernie at one point, as part of his pro American worker agenda was actually for restricted immigration.

No, I'm saying they're related in that.

But it's the AOC corollary. It's to take the Bernie economic socialism and lâche it to unchecked borders.

If you care about the lopsided economy where all the wealth is concentrated in too few hands and the country is becoming unstable as a result, becoming pre-Jeves Venezuela. We're going to get a revolution if this continues. I wrote a book about this. If you care about that, you have to ask, how did that happen? The main way it happened was by unchecked immigration, which devalued labor. People have less economic power because there are more people willing to work for less. It's really simple. It's the way organized labor always supported immigration restrictions. They're the ones who got them in 1924. They closed the borders for that reason. And Bernie was from that tradition, and I always respected it. And then he became this neoliberal hybrid where he's like, Oh, we got to fight Russia, and it's racist to be against borders. And like, what? You know what I mean? We have to send money to Israel. What? So I don't think that's a real lane. I don't think it's a sustainable lane. Do you?

It is a sufficient cohort of voters to virtue signal a reignition of Bernie's economic policies alongside. She will stand up and say, no more money for Israel, no more money for ICE, and universal basic income for Americans and open borders.

That will be the core of the- Open borders with universal basic income.

And print more. By the way, did you see what we just did in the economy in this past week? We are printing money to buy our own debt right now.

The self-licking ice cream cone, the electric windmill. I know.

There's...

Right.

How much of it is real when we're printing money to buy our own debt?

Yeah. And the explosion of personal wealth among people I know is just I believe, not me at all, but I... At all. But all of a sudden, you know people who are just like, worth hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, whereas I never... And I grew up in a rich people world. I never really knew anyone with hundreds and hundreds of dollars.

One in every 10 Americans is a millionaire now. Actually? Yeah.

You're including assets. Yeah. Yeah. Well, homeowners are millionaires now.

Well, if you talk about the revolution coming, I mean, housing is as likely to be a part of that as anything else because the way housing is indexed to what people make and what they can afford is insane in this country.

Yeah, and I'm totally opposed to revolutions. However, if there was ever a reason to have one, it's that. That's a real grievance.

I think that's totally- Isn't it That's what all revolutions are about? Where am I going to live?

What's going to be- Yeah, and how do my kids have kids? How does this continue? How do my genes thrive when I'm gone? I mean, yeah.

Have you noticed this trend online where all these lonely women in their 30s are making car selfie videos about their personal anguish that they can't find men. I posted one recently, got millions of views. And I feel sad for these women. Oh, so sad. My wife has so many friends who are beautiful, accomplished, wonderful people, but they cannot find men. They cannot find men to marry them. They start to feel the clock ticking, and it's really a lonely world out there.

Well, I think it's important to identify how we got here, and certain bad ideas played a huge role. Feminism, which is just a total lie on every level. But also the way the economy is structured, where businesses decided it would be a good idea to bring women into the workforce, a better idea than, say, supporting families or allowing people to have children. It was more important to have female workers than it was to have American families.

This is a constant discussion we have on my One American News program is like, can you have both? Because I do see women who Excel in the workplace- Rich people can have both, sure. Who build businesses, who have great ideas, and are the center of their family.

Well, I certainly know a lot of women in the workplace who are amazing. If women left the workforce, my business would fall apart. They're the best. Anyone who's an employer, I'm a small bore employer, will tell you, female employees, man.

There are some jobs, type A women. Well, that's-Crush it.

That is 100% right, of course. They're also just the greatest people to work with if you're a man. Because There's no competition. They're so nice. They're always nice. I'm 56. I've never had a dispute with a woman at work, ever. Not one. I've seen them mistreat each other in a way that North Koreans could learn from. It's truly cruel the way they behave to each other. But if you're a male employer, having female employees, it is 100% upside. They will never stop thinking about their job. They will never stop being nice to you. They're great at their job. Certain jobs, they're the only ones who can do it because they- But do you think men are out there looking for jobless women?

Because I certainly wasn't when I was single and trying to find a wife. I was not out there seeking someone who had nothing else going on but to serve me in a marriage. I think it's people's passions and enterprises- Women will choose their family if given their choice, and some won't.

I mean, there's anomalies in every cohort.

But what do you say to the ones who are like, I want to make that choice? Millions of women out there that are like, please present me the guy who isn't spending all this day playing Fortnite and hanging out at the tattoo parlor.

Look, the first thing to know is men and women need each other. They can't exist separately or they're destroyed. They destroy themselves 100%. They fit together like puzzle pieces and they can't live alone. Again, there are exceptions to all of these rules, but overpopulation these are hard and fast rules that have existed since Adam and Eve. So it's just a fact. If you ignore that fact, you'll be destroyed, and we are because we've ignored it. Most women, if given the choice between going to work at J. P. Morgan or staying home and raising their small children, will, of course, choose staying home and raising their small children. If they're given the choice, they're not given the choice because feminism is a total fucking lie. There are no choices.

Get to work. Well, oftentimes it's people's economic conditions that take the choice away. If you're sitting on $130,000 in student loans because you were told that you had this great- That's the point I'm making.

Great future. They don't have a choice. That's why they do it. It's a Hobson's choice. It's no choice.

But it's not marital bondage as much as it's economic bondage to debt.

Marriage isn't bondage for women. Marriage family is the context in which women have the most power. Women have no power outside of their relationships. Women are relational. If you want to empower women-They can have power in business.

They can have wealth. They can have money.

That's not power. That's not power. Who has more power over you, your employee or your mom, your employee or your wife, your employer or your daughter? Real power is the power to influence other people. And women outside the family have very little. Within the family, they have huge power. There's no man. Almost all of it. Almost all of it. There's no man who ignores his wife. There's no son who ignores his mother. There's no father who ignores his daughter. I mean, there may be, but they're freaks. The average man is influenced by women in the family more than any other place. If you want to empower women, put them at the center of a family. If you want to disempower them, put them at the center of City Bank. It's super simple. Liars and dumb people, like a fucking feminist, are like, Oh, real power comes from money in a job title. And it's like, that's a lie. And anyone who believes that is an idiot.

But they think it's their power to get a man. There was this theory that the way you prepare yourself to get the husband you want is to showcase your LinkedIn resume. Who told them that? You don't think there are a lot of women who are going to watch this program, they may have tuned out by now, and say, yeah, I actually thought if I had the big job and had the house that a man would want me more. Are you being serious?

Look, I shouldn't be surprised if people believe dumb things because look around. But that's the dumbest of all.

Look, imagine believing that and now being caught.

How much social science do we need? First of all, we don't need any because we just know our lived experiences. But there's a lot of study on this. If you're interested, I happen to be. Women do not want to marry men who make less than they do, period. In any society in which that becomes the case, you find marriage dropping off a cliff. That's what happened to black America. Black people used to be married like everybody else. Then black women started making more than black men. The marriage rate declined. Rural America, rural Whites. I live in a place like this. The women on average make more than the men because they work at the hospitals and the schools. The men have only seasonal work. Guess what? No marriage. If you want discourage marriage, set up a system where the women make more, which is the system that we have. That's why people don't get married because women make more. And the women are making the decision. They don't want it. They may want to sleep with them. They may want to have his babies. They don't want to marry him. It's just a fact. Ask them.

Ask a woman, do you want to marry a man who's shorter than you or makes less than you? And the answer is no. But nobody asks women because nobody cares because the idea is to destroy the country, its people, and its most basic structure of the family. So it's just like, we're going to do this in your name and tell you what you But they don't want that. And if you ask, ask 15 women, do you want to marry a man who's shorter than you or makes less than you?

No, I've asked. Yeah, you're right. It's I'm so lonely. I need to find someone. I have so much love to give. I've built a great life. I want to share it with someone. And then it's like, okay, well- A woman says that? Oh, no. Women say this. And then I say, well, are you cool? It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Are you cool with a guy who makes less than 100 grand? Well, that shows that he doesn't have ambition. Oh, what about someone who's a little shorter? Well, I want to feel feminine. And if someone's shorter, I don't think I'll be able to- Things are more fucked up than I realize.

If people actually believe that, what? Look, a man's job is to protect and provide, period. Those are his jobs, protect and provide, period.

Yeah, but when that class of men is shrinking because testosterone is falling, because of the war on masculinity that we've endured for the last 40 years, when that resource isn't available, then women start to say, Well, I've got to put a roof over my own head. I've got to protect and provide for myself. There are a lot of them who would say, Where is my protector and provider?

I get it. I'm not attacking women. I'm just at all. I feel so... I've got three daughters. I feel so sorry for women. I do. And I, as a man, I always blame the man first. Always 100%. It's your job. You're the man. Your wife's unhappy. Whose fault is that? Yours.

It is the job of a husband to keep your wife happy.

A hundred %. That's your job.

Yes, I agree.

I literally couldn't agree more. And if she's a drunk or something, it's not going to work. It's out of your control. But in a normal marriage with two sober people who are trying, it is It's up to you. By the way, her happiness is not contingent on yours. Your happiness is contingent on hers. That's the great equalizer designed by God to keep balancing a relationship.

I don't know a single man who's truly happy, whose wife hates him. Of course.

I don't know one. The reason our system, our biology, is set up that way is because men are physically dominant. You could just beat up your wife and rape her and make her do whatever you wanted. It sounds terrible. Exactly. It sounds terrible. Exactly. That's exactly the point. It sounds terrible. Men don't want that. They want a woman to be sexually attracted to them, to be happy, to have real orgasms. They want it to be genuine, and that's the equalizer. You're totally focused on your wife's happiness. That keeps it equal. That gives her power. That's where her power comes from.

How do we fix it?

By letting people observe the laws of nature, which they ignore at their peril. You can't ignore the laws of nature around you or you get killed.

Nature is sending us the message. When we see the declining birth rate, when we see the societal impact, nature is sending us the message that this isn't working.

Yeah, and you're not allowed... You're considered some weird religious freak when you're like, I don't know, a natural sex ax gives rise to disease. A lot of people are like, Shut up. Shut up. They do. I mean, I don't know. I've been alive for 56 years. I've watched this. That's just a fact. I'm not saying I want it to be that way. I'm not in charge of nature, actually. I'm not in charge of human nature above all. None of us is. Do you really know women who think if they get a big salary in a house, some guy will want to marry them? Oh, yeah.

Would you want to marry? There are many who will watch this discussion and say, I am that. I am perfectly suited for marriage. I've done everything society has asked of me. I got an advanced degree. I got a six-figure job. My LinkedIn is fire. I do five spending classes a week. I look good. And every man that I find either is on the dating apps and they have so much optionality that there's not really an incentive to anchor your life with someone or they're losers. And they can be losers who've inherited money and just have no desire to build something beyond that.

I'm sorry to sound like a liberal. I do blame society. I blame what people are taught and the lies that they get through propaganda for convincing them that something so obviously absurd could be true. I mean, of course, men find that emasculating, unappealing. No man wants to marry a woman with her own house and a higher income than him. No way. And she doesn't want to marry him.

You had marriage as this thing that gave people financial security, right? Yeah. And people, '40s and '50s, people were getting married, and then you're bound to someone economically and built a life together. You got married in your 20s and did your thing. And then when we did no-fault divorce, then marriage really became a contract more than anything else. And just like any other contract, when you're out of the contract, there are certain obligations that you still have to fill financially and otherwise. And then the obvious next step is, well, if marriage is a contract, so is dating in a weird way on what you will provide and what I'll provide. And if at the end of it, there are women who say, yeah, if I'm going to spend my time to go on a date, I want you to pay for it. I think that's where we are. And I don't mind. When I hear women say that they go out and the guy wants to split the check, to me, there's something chivalrous or interesting about that. I think that- Well, it's awful.

Look, again, men and women need each other. They complement each other. Any attempt- Tame each other.

Tame each other. Men are necessary to tame women, and women must tame men.

A hundred %. And without each other, they become just industrial components who can be manipulated by global capital or whatever. Whatever force you're afraid of, the only The only real protection is your family. And that includes the one not just you were born into, but the one that you start yourself. That's your bulwark. That's your fortress. And if people are making it impossible for you to build that fortress, I respect the whole man. It's not just what you say you believe. It's how do you live? If I had a camera in your house, do your kids respect you? Does your wife respect you? If not, why would I respect you?

I feel that. Do you think that the notion of the barren life is what motivates people like Lindsay to go to try to create conflict?

A hundred %. A hundred %. A normal person goes home. You go home. I don't know if you and I are normal, but just a conventional person goes home and it's like, I've got all kinds of views, but continuity matters to me because I've got descendants. If you have no descendants, it ends with you. And you don't believe clearly these people, none of these people believe in God. So it's like, I don't know. I got 15, 20 years, five, three years, whatever I have, we don't know. It doesn't matter what happens after that. That's That's scary. That's day trading with the world, right?

With your life.

No, but with everyone else's life. You think, why would Lindsay Graham carry 70 years old? He has no kids. Why does it matter if there's a nuclear war? I mean, he's looking just at... He's not the back nine. It's like the back three at this point. His options are heart disease, cancer, and Alzheimer's. That's it. There's no tomorrow.

Sad. Don't you think? I do think having children vests you in the future in a way that not having children just doesn't.

I mean, hasn't it changed your attitudes?

Of course. The way you care about what comes after you shifts dramatically.

Well, it was like maybe 10 years ago, Some smart friend of mine sent me this list of European leaders I'm interested in Europe. I felt like I knew a lot. I didn't know that none of them had kids. I remember thinking, first of all, you can't say anything about that because you want to seem like you're attacking people without kids, which I'm not. I'm feeling sorry for them. I'm attacking the idea of childless leadership. You can't have leaders with no kids because they're not thinking long term, because why would they? And look what happened to Europe.

And the Harris campaign.

And the Harris campaign. Yeah. What's going to happen to her?

She's running again. You haven't seen the news? She's assembling her team. For what? President.

Yeah. Come on now.

As we've said, it's an ambition that resurfaces often in one way.

You know a lot more about this than I, but let's say you decide you're going to run for President. How does your party exert influence on you? That's such a bad idea. You would think someone in the Democratic Party be able to say no?

I don't know. Again, you assume the Obamas are in charge of that party, so potentially they could move her to another path. But they'll have a crowded field. It may be the case that having ancillary people around soaking up votes is good for the ultimate objective. I can't imagine the Obamas in the Gavin Newsom world would mix well. That's not really the same vein of the Democratic Party.

Do you know anyone who's friends with her or knows her well?

Harris? No, I don't think I do.

That's strange, considering you know everybody.

I know a lot of people, but I can't say that there was a single member of Congress I ever interacted with that could talk about any private moment or in-depth conversation they'd ever had with Kamala Harris.

So there was really no constituency for her? I think that Democrats believed that there is this vast part of the population whose dream candidate is some combination of Michelle Obama and Oprah.

And the closest they could get was like, Bargain Basement, Kamala Harris, to go and attempt to achieve that archetype. And it just didn't work out.

So it was all about race and gender.

I think that was a huge part of it. We saw the limits of playing into those impulses with Harris.

Last question, where do you think the country goes in the next, say, three years? What are the big trends? No, what are the big trends?

Obviously, we're going to see automation in the next three years in a level that you and I have never seen in our lives.

You really believe we'll see that in the next three years? I do.

I believe that automation in transportation, in agriculture, in manufacturing will be the new dominant force in our lives. And I don't think that's going to be entirely good. I think that it's inevitable. Because the capabilities- You think automation will be a dominant force in our lives in three years? Yes. I think that I will tell my grandkids what was like to order food from a person. That will go the way of the pay phone. There are seven million American men who make their living driving today in one form or another. Those jobs are gone in the next half decade.

Where do those people go?

I think that's when you start to see these calls for universal basic income, because we will say that there's such wealth being created on a lot of these tech platforms that It doesn't get shared broadly. I worry that that draw politically is something that will zap the motivation of the country in a bad way. Just look at this health care debate that's happening right now as a microcosm of this trend. Republicans are trying to cobble together something that they think is a free market approach to health care, as if anything in health care is a free market. Democrats are just saying, We're going to give you free stuff for longer. I think that Republicans Americans in swing districts have seen that, and so we can't beat that. We have to have our own version of, We'll give you free stuff longer. You may see these Obamacare credits extended via a discharge petition that does just that. That brings the right in America in line with where the right has moved in Europe, which is toward economic liberalism, which I'm not for.

I think you'll see what also has happened in Europe, where the richest people, the Bill Ackman, the bottom feeders like Bill Ackman, non-productive elements of the economy, who just made billions of dollars shorting stocks. Those people are totally fine. They offshore their money. They find ways around tax compliance. But it's the level down. It's the 65-year-old Florida retirees who own some insurance company in Indiana.

They spent their whole life building it. They sold it for five million bucks. Exactly.

Exactly right.

They have just enough money.

Exactly right. To live on a golf course outside Sarasota, love Ron DeSantis, love Trump, and those people are going to see everything stolen from them.

And the method of theft will be the devaluation of their existing assets.

It will be the devaluation of their existing assets. That's it, especially real estate. I totally agree with that. And I think in taxation.

And I love Steve Banet, so I don't want our last discussion to come across as a criticism of Steve. But he's going to run for President on just a straight Elizabeth Warren wealth tax economic agenda. Actually? Yeah. He's going to run for President and say, take the money from those people who have way too much of it, the Bill Ackmans of the world, and I want to give it to you.

I wonder if that has it ever... It always seems like those people flee the country. I mean, Miami is filled- The people who flood other countries for that purpose.

Exactly.

That's exactly right. And they live in splendor. Not attacking them, but they didn't give up their money. They just left. And then the middle class, upper middle class, especially, just get hammered. And that is the core of your society, right?

It won't last that way. And Trump's elections have been, I think, a reaction to that broader trend we've experienced for decades. And what I hope doesn't happen is that it just becomes a policy race to the bottom to try to throw Insufficient solutions at that. Things like, well, we'll just give them free houses. We'll just give them free health care.

The robots will just build the houses in national parks.

Right. Right. And that wouldn't that be awful?

Matt Gates, thank you for spending all this time. It's always good to see you. And I'm just glad that you survived everything and you're thriving.

Likewise.

Are you running for President?

No, not of this country. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.

Well, some Americans have become cut off from the things that once kept us grounded, our land, the skills that tied our families to nature. Told you who's getting his next spot. To remind us, we made a new six-part series, American Game: tales from the Wild. We follow the sportsmen who are keeping these ancient traditions alive. We follow a prominent native to seal into the mountains of Texas. Donald Trump Jr. Crossed the ridges of Lanai. That's what we call from going from zero to hero. And wander with me through the quiet woods of Maine. I have just three dog commands, and then as I direct the dogs, find the bird. Find the bird. And then dead bird, obviously. I don't use as much as I'd like to. We cast for Steelhead on the Deschutes River in Oregon. I have the first one I've caught in a while. Tracked mule deer in the Utah high country. Spearfish in the waters off Montauk, chasing striped bass and bluefin tuna. See you on the other side. It's called American Game, tales from the Wild Outdoor Series. Watch it at tuckercarlson. Com.