Transcript of 522. Warlords of the West: A Clash of Ice and Fire (Part 3)

Thank you for listening to the rest is history. For weekly bonus episodes, ad free listening, early access to series, and membership of our much loved chat community, go to the rest is history.com and join the club. That is the restishistory.com. A victorious line of march had been prolonged above a 1000 miles from the Rock of Gibraltar to the banks of the Loire. The repetition of an equal space would have carried the Saracens to the confines of Poland and the Highlands of Scotland.

The Rhine is not more impassable than the Nile or Euphrates, and the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Quran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, And her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Muhammad. From such calamities was Christendom delivered by the genius and fortune of 1 man. Charles, the illegitimate son of the elder Pepin, was content with the titles of mayor or duke of the Franks. But he deserved to become the father of a line of kings.

That was Edward Gibbon in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, 1 of the most famous passages of historical prose ever written. He is describing the legacy of the Battle of Tours which was fought on 10th October 7 32 or perhaps 733, nobody is entirely sure, between the Franks and what he called an invading force of Saracens. So Tom,

great passage, great book, great subject. Yeah.

Just bring some of it to life for us. So who is Charles? Who are the Saracens? Where are we? And what's going on?

Okay. So we are still in our series on the Franks. And, Charles, who Gibbon in that passage is very careful to specify, is not a king but a mayor or a duke of the Franks. Mhmm. He is perhaps the greatest of all the Frankish warlords since the time of Clavius, the king who founds the great kingdom of the Franks as the Roman Empire is falling.

But we're now in the early 8th century. And Charles will be known from the following century onwards as Charles Martel,

the

hammer. So a tremendous name for a guy who has a very mailed fist. The Saracens are an army in the service of the Umayyad caliphate. So that is the first great Arab empire, the first great empire of Islam. And this is why Gibbon is casting it as a peculiarly decisive clash.

He's framing it as a battle between Christianity and Islam. And he's suggesting that had it gone the other way, had the Franks lost to the Saracens, to the Muslims, to the Arabs Yeah. Then perhaps we might have seen the interpretation of the Quran taught in Oxford. And there's a bit of a joke here, because Gibbon had been a student at Oxford and had absolutely hated it. He despised all the Dons, who at the time were Anglican priests.

And so I think he's slightly tweaking the noses of his old teachers and suggesting that they might have been circumcised followers of Mohammed. But it's obviously it's not just a joke. Because Gibbon has a genius for well, Byron referred to his solemn sneer. When he makes a joke, there's often a kind of very serious purpose. And he's making a serious point here.

He's saying, this is 1 of the great decisive battles of world history.

And this is an argument that people made particularly in 19th early 20th century, isn't it? That, the Battle of Tours, if it was fought in 732, was 1 of the genuinely pivotal moments when history might have gone differently. That had the Franks lost to the Saracens, then Islam, the advance of the Arab armies would have continued up into France and that the entire course of European and world history might have been different. And in fact, all Europe might have fallen within the kind of Islamic world. And people genuinely made that argument very vigorously, among them, Adolf Hitler.

Right?

Right. So most of the historians in the 19th 20th century who are pushing this case, they see the possibility that Christian Europe might have become Muslim as a disaster. So Gibbon refers to it in that passage he read as a calamity. But 1 person, as he said, who thought it was a great shame that the Franks had won was Adolf Hitler. And the reasons for this, he spelt it out in his table talk and I'll I'll read it.

Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitier, he said. Already you see the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing is Christianity. Then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism. That cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the 7th heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.

Christianity alone prevented them from doing so

Cranky.

Because to Hitler, Christianity is a kind of weedy, wet religion that encourages peace.

But this is not what the vast majority of historical scholars now think, is it? Most agree now that the Battle of Tours was massively overblown. It was kind of a propaganda victory above all else partly because the Arabs are not trying to launch a massive invasion of what was once Gaul. It's a raid, 1 among many that they launch. And the consequences Yes.

Is perhaps not as great as is often thought.

Yes. So that's 1 argument that is, I would say, is pretty much the consensus now among academics on the status of the Battle of Tours. That it's not an invasion, that it's a raid. Also, that it's not a clash between Christianity and Islam because no contemporary really seems to frame it as such. And also that in a way, it owes more to faction fighting among various Frankish warlords of whom Charles Martel is 1, than it does to Muslim dreams of world conquest.

But, you know, there are plenty of other scholars who do hold to the kind of Gabonian view. And it's a debate that's been rumbling away now for decades. And it is a debate that has kind of echoed beyond universities in a way that is unusual for debates about Frankish history. Because this I would say in general, you know, the period that we've been discussing, these centuries of Frankish history, are among the most obscure in European history. It's not a period that people know a great deal amount.

But the Battle of Tours does have cut through. And there's an obvious reason for that, which is basically the kind of political context in Europe today. And specifically, the fact that over recent decades, the growth of the Muslim population in Europe has been considerable. And this particularly in France, so the ancient Frankish heartland, it has generated quite a far right reaction. But, you know, not only in France.

So in Britain, for instance, there are now Muslim scholars preaching the Quran in Oxford. And there are people in here, in Britain, as in France, as in other countries in Europe, who regard this with extreme hostility. And I think the implications of this for discussion of the Battle of Tours in far right circles is, I mean, is unbelievably toxic. So you can see this in the way that it's been used by far right groups. So as early as the 19 seventies in France, in the wake of the Algerian War, the Gaulle settlement of that, and the growth of Algerian immigration into France, in the seventies, there was an anti Algerian terrorist group, a far right terrorist group, and it called itself the group, Shal Martel.

So drawing its direct inspiration from the, you know, the Frankish duke who had won the Battle of Tours. Then in 2015, after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, you know, so the publishers of the hysterical magazine in France who were kind of shot by an Islamist gunman. Jean Marie Le Pen, who was leader of the National Front at the time, father of Marine Le Pen, there was this slogan, je suis Charlie. So people saying you know, identifying themselves with the victims of the attack on Charlie Hebdo. But Jean Marie Le Pen said no, I I Charlie Martel.

And perhaps the most brutal manifestation of the way in which the far right have identified with Charles Martel is that in 2019, people may remember there was a terrorist attack in New Zealand of all places, so the opposite end of the world from France, done by an Australian terrorist. And he attacked a mosque and an Islamic center in Christchurch, killed 51 people. And on his gun, he had inscribed the name of Charles Martel. So you can see that for academics, this is very difficult, I think, to kind of banish this from what they're doing. Wouldn't you say?

I mean, it's kind of Yeah.

Of course. I do think when you read an academic on the Battle of Tours, academics who say, oh, it's a terribly important moment. It's a pivotal moment in world civilization. A battle that changed everything. They always do tend to be of a very particular political persuasion.

I think equally, you could say that those who say that it's unimportant, that it's a minor border skirmish, also tend to be of a particular political persuasion, which is simply to say that it is difficult, I think, to remove discussions of this battle from current political contexts.

Mhmm.

So just as there are people on the right who say this was the saving of Europe. So on the other hands, on the left, you occasionally, you will get the sense that, basically, it was kind of racist of the Franks not to have surrendered to the invaders at all. And I think it reflects the fact that maybe of all the battles we've discussed so far on the rest is history, this is politically the most sensitive of the lot. So that's why I think before we get into the details of the battle itself, it's really important to explain the context for what is going on here in some detail.

Alright. Well, let's start with the Arabs. So Gibbon calls them Saracens, which is not a word that you often hear these days. But actually, they're not really Arabs, are they? Most of their army are almost certainly Berbers from North Africa, from what we'd once called Mauritania.

Or probably a lot of them from Spain. So they're not Arabs. And actually, are they even Muslims? Because, of course, at this point, Islam is still in the process of kind of being formed, isn't it, to some degree?

Yeah. It's really difficult to know what what word to use to describe these invaders for the reasons that you said. I mean, and, certainly, the Berbers in the army, probably the majority. I mean, loads of them would have had only the haziest sense of what Islam was. And as you say, Islam itself is still in the process of evolution at this point.

Islam at this point is best thought of as a kind of franchising system. So groups of people beyond the kind of the heartlands of the Umayyad Empire back in Syria and and Iraq and Arabia are licensed by the caliph in Baghdad to form their own kind of posses, their own groups. And essentially, the license that the caliph is giving these groups of people is to go out and proclaim the revelations of Mohammed to the limits of the world. But the reason that lots of people kind of buy into this isn't necessarily because they are kind of passionately committed to spreading the message of the Quran. It's because they want to go out and grab stuff and

Yeah.

Script and loot monasteries and towns or whatever.

It's a raiding party. And not, I guess, totally unlike Scandinavian raiding party in a, you know, not massively dissimilar period.

I think you're right. And again, that's kind of parallels with this in the Viking period is something we might come to kinda later on in the episode. And so what you have going over the course of the late 7th, going into the 8th centuries, is war bands who are kind of nominally Muslim, spreading westwards from Egypt along the northern coast of Africa all the way to Mauritania. And then in 711, there's a kind of exploratory raid across the Straits of Gibraltar. So a warband of Berbers, of Arabs, of Muslims, whatever you want to call them, they land in Spain and they have spectacular success.

So they meet the king of the Visigoths, this is the kingdom that had given the Franks Brunhild, and wipes the king and his army out. They go on, they capture Toledo, which is in the center of Spain, the main Visigothic city. And it's a spectacular victory. It's a kind of Hernan Cortes type victory, the overthrow of a great and wealthy empire. And the loot that gets sent back to Syria is so overwhelming that Spain comes to seem to the eyes of the Umayyads back in Syria, a kind of land of wonders.

It's a place of talking statues where cities are fashioned entirely out of brass, just full of treasure and also full of slaves. So a massive coffle of 30,000 Visigothic slaves are sent back to Damascus. And again, you know, this is seen as being something extraordinary. And so it's not surprising in the wake of this success that the invaders press onwards. And by 7/19, so that's just 8 years after they'd landed in Gibraltar, the invaders have crossed the Pyrenees.

And in 7/20, they capture the great city of Narbonne, which Mhmm. There's still a kind of tiny strip of Visigothic territory on the coast of southern Gaul. Narbonne falls to the invaders, and then they fan out to conquer the remaining Visigothic strongholds in southern Gaul, say Bezier, Agda, Nimes. They all fall. And, essentially, pretty much the whole of the Visigothic kingdom, with the exception of kind of the northern reaches of Spain, have fallen in the space of basically a decade to these invaders.

I mean, it's a spectacular feat of conquest.

So now beyond that is the land

of the Franks. And that's the kingdom

we talked about last week. It's ruled by the Merovingian dynasty. We left it with Clothar the second. He's won his victory over Brunhild. And he's basically got a monarchy over the whole of what was once the Roman territory of Gaul.

So all the different kingdoms are now acknowledging him as their all the different bits rather are now acknowledging him as their king. But I read that the seeds of the Merovingian's downfall had already been sown.

It's contained in this very success. So yes, as you say, Clothar the second had patched together all the various parts of what had been Roman Gaul. So Neustria, which is the kingdom kind of abutting the channel, Austrasia, which is the kind of the eastern reaches of the kingdom, stretching beyond the Rhine deep into Germany, Burgundy, which is the kind of the southeast, and Aquitaine, which is the southwest. And Clothar the second has managed to rule them all. But the reason why this ultimately is not good for the Merovingian dynasty is that, basically, it's too large, it turns out, for Clothar the second and his son and heir, Dagobert,

to rule.

So what Clothar ends up having to do is to essentially send his sons out to rule as kind of sub kings. So 1 goes off to Aquitaine, he's absolutely useless. A chronicler dismisses him as simple minded. Mhmm. Dagobert, Clothar's son, he sent off to rule Austrasia.

He's slightly more efficient. But when he arrives, he's young, he's inexperienced. And this means that he is very malleable in the hands of the 2 greatest men in Australia who we have already met. We met them at the end of the previous episode. Because these are a lord called Pepin Yeah.

And a bishop called Arnulf. And these are the guys who had got together to overthrow Brunnhild. They'd betrayed her. And so she'd ended up being captured by Clothar and then very horribly executed. So Arnulf serves the young Dagobert as his kind of preeminent counselor, and Pepin serves him, kind of off and on.

Sometimes he retires. Sometimes he comes back. But he is basically not just the kind of the leading magnate in Australia, but he is also the leading official in that kingdom. And his status is, in Latin, mayor domus, which, you know, you could Anglicize that to be majordomo, his mayor. He's the leading official.

And these officials are very, very ambitious. So powerful, ambitious, and resolute were the Maores, who stood at the most important junctions of Merovingian polity. So that's how, Yitzhak Hen, scholar of the Merovingian Kingdom, describes them. And I guess, traditionally, so going back to the time of Clovis, the role of these maores, these mares, let's call them that Mhmm. Was to kind of mediate between the king and the local magnates, the local lords.

But Pepin is so able, so powerful, Dagobert is so kind of inexperienced and young, that Pepin is able to make himself into something more than that, effectively the power behind the throne. And Pepin's achievement is to set up what effectively is a kind of shadow dynasty to the Merovingian dynasty. So Pepin's daughter goes on to marry the son of Arnulf, the bishop, who's the kind of the chief advisor. Yeah. And this couple, they have a son who is absolutely, kind of in every sense, a chip off the old block.

So he, like his grandfather, is also called Pepin. So he's called Pepin of hairstyle by the chroniclers to distinguish him from his grandfather. He becomes the mayor of Australia in 6/80. And, I mean, he's not just the power behind the throne. He puts the throne in his shadow.

He is an absolutely domineering figure. And he's able to do that because, for the mayor of India, it's very unfortunate series of circumstances. They're a succession of, kind of, children who succeed to the throne, die, succeeded by another child. You know, if they grow to adulthood, they're absolutely useless. And so in the shadow of Pepin of Herstal, this great overweening mayor, the mayor of Ingjan King is reduced effectively to a kind of cipher.

And by the time that Pepin of Herstal dies in 714, he's made himself the master not just of Australia, where he's the mayor, but also of Neustria, that northern kingdom of Burgundy. And he's also been pushing eastwards. So under his leadership, the Franks have begun conquering swathes of what today are the Netherlands and, central Germany. And Pepin of Hoessdall is no longer content just with the title of mayor. He wants something more.

And so he has given himself an absolutely brilliant title, dux etprincheps francorum, the duke and the Prince of the Franks. And he has established this title, as though it was a kind of kingship, as hereditary. And his son, Pepin of Hurstel's son, is Charles Martel.

Right. So Charles Martel, although there is a Merovingian king we don't need to really worry too much about him. He's called Theuderic the 4th. Yeah.

He's useless.

But Charles Martel is the ruler of huge swathes of what was once called Austrasia, Neustria, Burgundy, and so on. But that leaves 1 other place in the south east of France, which is Aquitaine. And Aquitaine stands against Charles Martel. Is that right? And this is going to be very important for our story of the Battle of Tours.

So Aquitaine has got a duke called Odo or Odo. Let's call him Odo. So tell me about him. He's a very grizzled, experienced bloke.

He is battle hardened, cunning, and absolutely does not want to submit to the rule of Charles Martel. You know, he wants to effectively maintain his kind of independence. He's Frankish, but he's able to draw on the kind of the ancient traditions of the Roman province that had been there. So it's a kind of independence that he wants to uphold. And this has been fine while he's only had to deal with Charles Martel and the kind of the Franks to the north, north of Loire.

The nightmare for Odo is the arrival of the Saracens, as he calls them. He is sandwiched between these 2 terrifying enemies. And he's got the Frankish kingdom to the north, and he's got the Saracens who are kind of riding up from the south. And so unsurprisingly, Odo tries to kind of play these 2 kind of menacing enemies off against 1 another. So in 7/21, the Umayyad forces, they've completed their conquest of the Visigothic stretches of Gaul.

And so then they turn their attentions to Aquitaine. And the spring of 7/21, they lay siege to the greater city in Aquitaine, which is Toulouse. And Odo turns to Charles Martel and he says, look, we're all Franks together. Can you come and help me? This is a nightmare.

And Charles Martel, far from rallying to the cause of Christendom, he says, no. I'm not interested. You're on your own. So poor Odo has to kind of basically deal with this crisis under his own agency. And he does it very, very effectively because he gathers his forces together.

He approaches the besieging Arabs around Toulouse by stealth. And he takes them completely by surprise, and he wipes them out. And this is the first great defeat suffered by the Umayyad forces in Europe. And Odo is absolutely triumphant. He writes a letter to the pope saying, I'm absolutely brilliant.

I've killed 375,000 Saracens, which is possibly an exaggeration. But, clearly, it is a crucial victory. For the moment, he has saved Aquitaine from invasion. And he's won a breathing space, not just for himself, but also for Shah Martel up in the the northern lands, basically to prepare for the storm that they know is going to come. They know the storm clouds of war are gathering.

And so both men prepare for the invasion that is coming. And they know this because even though the the Umayyads have been defeated before the walls of Toulouse, they have not been expelled from Gaul.

And they are launching raids all the time northwards as far as Burgundy. Right?

Right. So Aotun in Burgundy, which Brunhilde, in the final years of her regency, had made her capital a kind of very beautiful ancient Roman city. That gets put to the torch. Lots of other towns do, particularly monasteries. You compare to the Arab invaders to the Vikings Yeah.

For the same reason. They target monasteries because they're full of, kind of, riches that can be carted off. And so this is looking really bad. So Odo, his strategy is to try and kind of pick Arab warlords off and enter into an alliance with them. And he succeeds in doing this with a Berber warlord called Uthman, who has been given the command of what today is Catalonia.

So for the Umayyads, it's a kind of border region, a Marcher region. And Ode wants to stabilize his southern frontier, and Uthman wants to carve Catalonia out as a kind of independent fiefdom. He wants to rule it under his own steam rather than in subordination to the EMEA governor in Toledo. And the alliance is signed in 7:30. And to seal it, Odo gives Uthman his daughter in marriage.

Can I just stop you right there? So lots of listeners may find that really interesting because that obviously undermines the idea that this is a sort of titanic clash of civilizations, and that people are consciously engaged in a clash of civilizations. Because here, you have an alliance between Christian and, in inverted commas, Muslim, and a marriage alliance along with that. So there's no sense that they've crossed some kind of tremendous ideological divide in doing that.

No. Because what matters to both men, Odo and Uthman, is power politics. That's much more important than any sense of a kind of titanic clash of civilizations. And to begin with, it seems to work. There is stability along the line of the Aquitainean border.

Uthman is able to establish himself as independent, but trouble is brewing. The storm clouds of war continue to gather. Because back in Toledo, the news of this alliance goes down like a cup of cold sick. And unfortunately for both Uthman and Odo, the governor in Toledo, he's a new governor, is exceedingly able and also exceedingly devout. And this is a man called Abd al Rahman al Ghafiqi.

He is from Arabia. He's from the Red Sea. He comes from the heartlands of Islam. He, probably far more than most people in Spain, is completely on top of what is becoming Islam. And he is not prepared to put up with this.

So his response is completely devastating. 731, he invades Catalonia. He defeats Uthman, has him killed, captures Uthman's wife, who is the daughter of Odo, and packs her off to Damascus to live in the Caliphul harem there. So, you know, that's bad news for Odo and indeed probably for Odo's daughter. And you were saying that there's no real sense of a kind of clash of civilizations going on.

While, Abdul Rahman is doing this in Catalonia, Shah Martel is signally not helping the Christian cause because he has crossed the Loire and is taking advantage of Odo's state of despair at the collapse of his alliance by launching an attack on Aquitaine and carting off loads of loot northwards to the right. So that's not helpful at all. Then the following year in spring, Abdurrahman invades Aquitaine. He sweeps northwards through Ghastigany. He descends on Bordeaux.

He captures it. He sacks it. Odo has been frantically marshaling men to try and resist this attack. He meets the army of Abdurrahman on the banks of the Garonne beyond Bordeaux. And the result is a completely devastating defeat for Odo.

And we have a chronicle that was written by an anonymous Christian priest back in Spain. It's called the Chronicle of 754 by scholars. And it's essentially our main source, our most contemporary source for what's going on. And he records of this battle that Odo's army was scattered into flight, and only God could know the number of those who died or were slain. So this is terrible for Odo.

He survives the battle, but, essentially, he must fear that Aquitaine is lost. So he musters what troops have survived the disaster, recruits what more he can from the kind of the outer reaches of his duchy, and then he rides with them northwards to the Loire and crosses into the lands that are ruled by Charles Martel. And he comes to the Duke of the Franks and, you know, his great rival, humiliating for him, but he has no choice, you know, and he begs him for assistance. And Charles is still driving a hard bargain. You know, it's not as though he feels, well, we're all Christians together in the face of this terrible threat.

You know, he drives a really hard bargain. He demands that Odo submit to him, that he acknowledge him as Odo's superior. And Odo has no choice, so reluctantly, he gives his submission. Meanwhile, back in Aquitaine, Abdul Rahman's men, they've won this great victory and they are keen to profit from it all that they can. So they are spilling out across Aquitaine.

They're falling on towns. They're falling on monasteries. They're stripping them bare. They're loading wagons high with loot. And they rumble northwards.

You know, the army spilling up the Roman roads that lead towards the Loire, the wagons full of gold and treasure accompanying them. And the further north they go, the closer they come to the lands ruled by the Duke and Prince of the Franks, Charles Martel. And I think for the Umayyad forces, there's a definite sense that they're venturing into unknown territory here. You know, it's a long, long way from Toledo, let alone from Africa. They don't know much about Jean Martel.

They don't know much about the people that he rules. They don't really have a sense of what might lay ahead. But there is 1 thing, of course, that they are alert to, and that is the prospect of plunder. And again, in in this, they are like the Vikings. And of course, the nearer they head to the Loire, the more they are picking up the rumors of I mean, not just a wealthy shrine, but a fabulously wealthy shrine.

The wealthiest shrine in the whole of Gaul. Rich in every kind of treasure. And this shrine, of course, is the shrine of Saint Martin of Tours, the great patron saint of the Merovingian monarchy, but also more generally of the Franks themselves. And there is no way that the Duke of the Franks can possibly allow the invaders, if he can in any way help it, to strip the shrine of Saint Martin bare.

Okay. So what will happen? Will they strip it bare? Will there be

a great battle? Who knows?

Come back after the break and find out.

Hello everybody, Dominic Sandbrook here. And I'm Tom Holland and we have some incredibly exciting news to tell you. Don't we Dominic?

We do. So we often say we've got exciting news, but this is genuinely very very exciting news. We are thrilled to announce that after

the sellout show that we did earlier this year, the rest is history will be returning to the Royal Albert Hall on Sunday, 4th May to perform live once again with an orchestra. And we will be bringing you a brand new show and this time discussing 2 more of history's most extraordinary, fascinating, and iconic classical composers, in this case, Tchaikovsky and Wagner. And these extraordinary lives will be brought to life thanks to the accompaniment of the renowned Philharmonia Orchestra conducted by the celebrated Oliver Zephyrman. So that first show that we did

this year was a truly glorious experience, and we are hoping that this too will be an unforgettable night. There'll be great music. We'll be telling great stories.

We'll be delving into the history. So you had better get your hands on tickets for the show

as soon as you can.

And these tickets will be available from www.royalalberthall.com on Thursday 19th December with a presale for the rest is history club members and Royal Albert Hall friends and patrons 24 hours earlier on Wednesday 18th December at 10 AM. That is the rest is history live with the Philharmonia Orchestra Tchaikovsky and Wagner. It's at the Royal Albert Hall on Sunday, 4th May. Now the tickets are available for members on Wednesday, 18th December, and for the general public on Thursday, 19th December. And please make sure that you don't miss it.

Now Christmas is just around the corner and a very happy festive coincidence. Sunday Times top 10 bestseller, The Rest is History Returns, is now available in the form of a very lovely gift appropriate hardback book. It is packed to the brim, absolutely bursting with

the most colorful and fascinating historical questions that you never thought to ask, including did Christians steal Christmas from somebody else's religion and pass it off as their own? Well, you can discover when you read the book. It's got puzzles. It's got quizzes to put your family's historical metal to

the test and make Boxing Day much more entertaining for everybody involved, and it is available in bookshops everywhere now.

In this year, 2 comets appeared around the sun, striking great terror into those that saw them. 1 went before the sun rising in the morning. The other followed it, sinking in the evening, as if foreboding dire calamity for east as well as west. Certainly, 1 anticipated the day's beginning and the other the nights, So that they might act as a sign that evils threatened mortals at both times. They bore a fiery torch to the north as if to start a fire.

They appeared in the month of January and remained for nearly 2 weeks. At that time, a very serious plague of Saracens plundered the Gauls with miserable slaughter. So that was the Venerable Bede writing in the Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Now Bede,

not brilliant at dates to be fair to him. He said this happened in 7/29. He's pretty good. He's the guy who comes up with our dating system.

He's at least 3 years out here.

Probably. So he dated the comets to 7/29,

but there wasn't any Saracen invasion that gone to 7/29. Most scholars think he's got in a muddle and he's actually talking about 7:32 Yeah. Which is a a bit odd because he actually claimed that he finished his book a year earlier. So maybe he put this in afterwards.

I think that's probably the generally held theory. And if he did that, then it's witness to the fact that his sense that this is an amazing episode. It's something that's worth recording. And also, it bears witness to the fact that the news of this great battle that's been fought, this great Saracen invasion, has kind of crossed the channel. It's spread up all the way through England up to Northumbria.

Yep. So this is something that really resonates. And if Bede is writing about this invasion of 732, then this is the earliest witness that we have to it. And it is indeed very dramatic. It's not surprising that Bede, who's kind of obviously very tuned to the flow of great events, would have heard of it and been interested in it.

Because we have 2 great and formidable generals coming up against 1 another. So Abdul Rahman, the Umayyad general, the governor of Spain, I mean, he's already proved himself very, very formidable in battle. He's overthrown Uthman. He's defeated Odo. He's now heading northwards towards the line of the Loire.

We don't know how large his invasion force is, but it's evidently, you know, I mean, it's large enough to have defeated Uthman, to have swatted aside Odo. And it is also much, much better equipped than the Frankish army. I mean, I always remember I had a children's book of history that had an illustration of the Battle of Tours. And the Franks in that were kind of knights on armor. And the Arabs all had you know, they were kind of loosely, you know, wearing their kind of flowing robes.

They were a salad in in the ladybird.

Yes. Exactly. But actually, it's the other way around. It's the Umayyad forces that are very much heavier in cavalry than the Franks. And they're also much, much better equipped.

So a quote, Bernard s Bachrach, whose book on early Carolingian warfare is brilliant on this whole campaign. And he writes that the Arabs had acquired by conquest the arms manufacturing infrastructure of what had been a large part of the eastern half of the Roman Empire. These production resources were far better developed than those found during the early 8th century throughout the Empire's Romano German successor states in the West. So basically, you know, their kit is loads, loads better. And also, the Emeids, they're just much richer.

You know, they've had a century and more of plunder behind them. They can afford better armor, better helmets, better swords Yeah. Than the Franks have. And on top of that, they're also much more technologically advanced. So there's 1 key technological development that the Franks can't rival.

And again, to quote Bacharach, finally, the Muslims have the technology to construct the composite recurve bow, which was made from various layers of bone, horn, and wood. These weapons were far superior to the wooden self bows available to the Northerners. In addition, the shorter and more powerful recurve bow could be used effectively by mounted troops. And I read that because I don't really know what a recurve bow is. I was

about to say, it's 1 where the limbs of the bow kinda curve away. So it's a sort of more elaborate curve. Yeah. So they kinda curl back on themselves, like a horn almost.

It's the kind you get in the Arabian knights.

Yeah. Arabian knight kind of bow. And even because of that, because of their extra substantial or whatever, you can have a shorter bow. So in other words, it's easy to fire when you're on horseback.

And also, apparently, it can go further than the Frankish bows can. So it's basically a brilliant bow. It's a great bow. It's a top bow. So basically, you know, this is not a kind of ragtag desert army.

This is a very, very formidable force, and 1 that effectively is a kind of worthy successor to the Roman armies Yeah. Because it's drawing on those traditions. Now people who've listened to the first 2 episodes will remember that the Franks too are drawing on a Roman inheritance. So they were trained to fight in a Roman way. Yeah.

And that's a tradition that's endured for the 2 centuries since the fall of the Roman Empire in the West. And on top of that, they have Roman military manuals, which we know that they read. So like the Romans, they have an emphasis on infantry. At this point, the Franks do not have the kind of the heavily armored lorocati, they're called, the kind of the armored horsemen that are the precursors of the Western knight. They are very, very much focused on fighting on foot.

I think in part, although I gather that this is hugely debated by military historians because they haven't yet adopted the stirrup. The stirrup is just kind of being introduced to the land of the Franks at this point. So Charles would have had horsemen with him. And these were called palatini, so people who are, you know, his elites who surround him in the palace. And this is where the word paladins comes from, which is kind of very King Arthur.

Lancelot and Gawain are the paladins of King Arthur. So he does have some of them. But the main focus is on, as I say, on infantry, and specifically the Franks fight in a phalanx, so like the Romans had done. Very close order, shields locked together. If they are faced by archers, as the Romans had done, they're able to kind of form a testudo, a tortoise.

So you put the shields up and over your heads, and the arrows just kind of bounce off your shields. And they fight so closely together that there's a Frankish report of a battle that was fought a century before the Battle of Tours that describes how the slain had nowhere to fall but stood in their battle lines, corpse supporting corpse, as though they were still alive. So very, very close formation.

So it's a bit like the, images of fighting that you get in Bernard Cornwall's books, which are again Yes. Not a massively dissimilar period. People packed in a kind of shield wall, stabbing with their swords relentlessly through the gaps in the enemy line.

Yeah. The use of the stabbing sword rather than the slashing sword. And I guess people would associate kind of Frankish knights as using a massive great heavy slashing sword. But at this point, again, they are using the gladius, as the Romans called it, the kind of the stabbing sword. So they approximate to a Roman legion more than to anything else.

And, of course, Roman legions were dependent on relentless training. And this seems to have been what Charles had given his troops. So, you know, that breathing space that Odo's defeat of the Arabs before the walls of Toulouse had brought Charles, he doesn't seem to have wasted it. He seems to have essentially put his troops through their paces, drilling them and drilling them and drilling them. And even if his men are not as well equipped as the Umayyad forces, they are as well trained.

And I think that this is what Charles is relying on to defeat them. So those are the armies. What about the strategy of the 2 commanders? So Abdul Rahman's strategy is very plain. He wants to sack the shrine of Saint Martin.

Mhmm. And there are various reasons why he would be particularly keen to do that. The obvious 1 is loads of his troops are following him in the expectation of loot. Yeah. Most of them, I suspect, are not motivated by a passionate commitment to the teachings of the Quran.

They want to get as rich as they possibly can. Of course. And Saint Martin's shrine promises them all kinds of goodies. I think Abdul Rahman recognizes the kind of significance to Frankish prestige of the shrine of Saint Martin. If he can sack it, you know, it'll be a real body blow to the prestige of Shah Martel and his regime.

And I think, you know, we've said Abdul Rahman, you know, he comes from the heartlands of Islam. He definitely has a kind of a doctrinal motivation. He wants to strip the shrine of Saint Martin Bare, not just because it's full of treasure, but because as he sees it, it's full of kind of idols. He wants to humble the pride of the cross worshippers into the dust. Yeah.

But to do that, to reach the shrine of Saint Martin, you know, he's gonna have to wipe out the army of the Franks, Charles' army. And the reason for that is that Charles' strategy, essentially, is to block his access to tour and force him to attempt a decisive battle. And this for Abdul Rahman is gonna be a real challenge because even though his men are superior in kit and in, military technology, The Franks, as we've said, are at least as well trained, and they're also probably numerically superior. And that's because Charles' forces have been swelled by, you know, the troops that Odo has brought with him from Aquitaine. And, of course, you know, they are absolutely resolute in their determination to defend Saint Martin's shrine, just as Abdul Rahman wants to strip it because it's so precious to the Franks.

Obviously, for that reason, the Franks are determined to defend and protect it. Charles is confident that this is potentially winning strategy because he can rely on his men to hold their ground, not to break, not to flee, but also should the Arabs be defeated, not to run after them, you know, which would potentially then open the mark to attack by the Arab cavalry. So this strategy effectively means the late autumn of 732 that a battle is going to be inevitable. Charles is gonna block the road to Tours. Abdul Rahman is gonna have to engage him if he wants to break through.

And the reason for that, he can't really retreat because that would, you know, be very damaging to his prestige. And also, if he retreats as a risk to his baggage train with all that kind of gold and stuff. So effectively, there is no choice but to engage. So there's essentially a kind of week of shadow boxing. And then finally, the moment comes.

The Arabs are on the Roman road. They see the Franks lined up ahead of them. There is no choice now but to engage in battle. And again, the best account of what happens is this chronicle of 754. And the Christian priest writing that, he describes the Frankish battle line in incredibly memorable way.

The Northerners held their position like a glacier from the frozen north. I mean, amazing Yeah. Description.

Kind of impassable, immovable, indomitable.

But also icy cold and dangerous. He describes how the stabbing swords of the Franks, the gladies, inflict terrible damage on the invaders. And among the dead is Abd al Rahman himself. So, again, the chronicle of 754, The Austrasians, so that's the Franks, with a terrible strength in their limbs and an iron hand throughout the hard fight killed him when they found him. And as evening comes, it's clear that the victory is the Franks.

But what is perhaps the most impressive witness to their discipline is that they hold their line. I mean, as I said, it's the only way that they could have lost at this point would be if they'd kinda go, woah, we've won. Brilliant. And piled off. They don't.

They hold their positions. And then they retreat to their camp pretty confident that the next day they're gonna have to fight again, that the battle will continue.

Right.

And I'll describe what what then happens and what they find when they wake up the day after this this first engagement, by quoting the the chronicle of 754. So this priest writes, rising from their sleeping bags at dawn, the Europeans, and it's such an interesting use of that. I mean, I think it's the first use of that phrase in any medieval chronicle. The Europeans beheld the tents and camps of the Arabs' canopies located and ordered as they had been, not knowing that they were all empty. And supposing that the Saracens' phalanxes were prepared for battle within, they sent scouts and found that all the Ishmaelites' columns had escaped.

So that's the Arab columns. And that all of them were secretly fleeing home passing the night in tight formation. The Europeans were anxious lest they might have concealed themselves on a hidden path as a stratagem. Stunned in every way, they hunted the surrounding area in vain. Making no further effort to find the aforesaid people, they returned to their own countries rejoicing with their booty and the evenly divided spoils.

So that's it. The invaders, the raiders have been beaten off. And they've they've vanished with their stuff because they don't wanna lose their what plunder they've had.

They leave some of it behind, and this is what the Franks pick up. Yeah. But the Franks don't pursue them. I mean, that's what's striking. They let them go.

Right.

And it's indisputably for them a great victory. Saint Martin is safe. Saint Martin is safe, and his shrine will never be threatened again. But this leaves open the question that we began this episode with. Yeah.

What is the significance of this battle? Yeah. You know, is it world historical in its moment? Mhmm. And I guess the first question is, what do we make of this attack that the EMEA forces have launched on the Loire?

Is it a raid? Is it a maneuver in a kind of factional battle between assorted Christian and Muslim warlords? Is it a Muslim attempt to humble a Christian shrine? I reckon the answer to that is that it's all of those. Mhmm.

I mean, they're not mutually exclusive. You know, the desire for loot, the ambition that Abdul Rahman had to punish the treachery of Uthman and to kinda humble Odo into the dust, his zeal for Islam. I mean, all of these are clearly part of the mix of motivations, I think, that are encouraging him.

But what it isn't is a long planned, cold blooded, coordinated, massive invasion.

No.

It's not that.

It isn't. But I think that doesn't mean that it's not significant.

Mhmm.

Let's do a counterfactual. Abdirahman wins. Yeah. Charles Martel is killed. Odo is killed.

They march on the shrine of Saint Martin. They strip it bare, and then they cart all the treasure back. And what happens next? You know, we can never be sure in any of these situations. So, you know, there are so many kind of intangibles.

But the balance of probability would be that Aquitaine would definitely fall to the Umayyad forces. I mean, if Odo is dead, if his men have been wiped out, there's no real prospect of the Umayyad forces not occupying it and kind of making it a forward base beyond the Pyrenees.

The 1 thing I would say is, if they have that, they have to keep supplying it with men and whatnot from beyond the Pyrenees, which does look like a pretty significant natural barrier through most of history between France and Spain.

They do. But then the Straits of Gibraltar are also

Yeah.

A pretty significant barrier, and they've managed to take Spain. And I think part of the reason for that is that success attracts followers. And there would undoubtedly have been people in Aquitaine who would have wanted to side with the winners. And that would then have provided a kind of reserve of manpower that the EMAID occupiers could have drawn on. And if they do that, then the consequences of that for southern Gaul are pretty clear.

I mean, southern Gaul will become part of the EMAID caliphate. And that, in turn, I think, would have put Italy in peril. And Italy, of course, is the home of the papacy in Rome. And the Byzantine forces there are, you know, under attack.

You've made a massive leap in the course of a sentence from they'd probably got aquitaine to suddenly Italy has fallen as well. Like, your dominoes are falling very quickly.

Well, if southern Gaul falls, then the Franks can't come to the rescue of the papacy. And as we will see in our next episode, essentially, in this century, the papacy is dependent for its political survival on Frankish support. So I think it's improbable that the papacy that Rome would have held out against Muslim domination had Tor gone the other way. And the implications of that would have been pretty significant. I mean, what about the implications for the independent Frankish kingdom?

Mhmm.

I mean, it's got huge reserves of manpower. It could easily have rallied. It could have held out. It could have launched a reconquest of the South. That after all is what, you know, in the long run, the Spanish Christians do over the course of the Middle Ages.

But I think that there are 2 episodes from early medieval history that suggest that it would have been a challenge. It would have been difficult for the Franks to do that. And the first, of course, is what we've just been talking about, the defeat of the Visigoths. Because if you say, you know, the attack on Tours was just a raid, well, essentially, the invasion across the Straits of Gibraltar into Spain was just a raid. But because the invaders won this massive battle and killed the Visigothic king, within a decade, pretty much the whole of Spain had fallen into their lap.

And, you know, with Aquitaine as a base, I think the potential for a kind of campaigns of jihad against the Franks in the north would have been considerable, which isn't to say that the same thing would have happened. But it might have done. We don't know. But the other event that I think, you know, had the the shrine of Saint Martin been sacked, there is then an obvious parallel later in the century, which you alluded to right at the beginning of this episode. And that's what the Vikings do when they launch their campaigns against, particularly, England.

And that begins with the sack of a famous shrine, the shrine of Saint Cuthbert on Holy Island, the island of Lindisfarne. And what that demonstrates is that to loot a shrine that has a kind of a special holiness is never just to loot it. Because as well as the financial loss, there is also the shock that it delivers to people for whom this shrine is a kind of central part of their spiritual identity. So the sack of the shrine of Saint Cuthbert on Lindisfarne sends shock waves not just across Britain but across the whole of Europe. And I think it, you know, it gives a pretty devastating blow to Northumbrian morale.

And the Kingdom of Northumbria falls to pieces fairly soon afterwards. And I think that the sack of the shrine of Saint Martin would have had probably an even greater impact. Saint Martin is the great patron of Frankish royalty. But by the 8th century, it's become much more than that. So Saint Martin, you know, he's the first.

He's the most celebrated of all Gauls monks, of all Gauls holy men. And he has become the emblem of a kind of common identity that has joined Franks and Romans. They all share a kind of common devotion to this saint. And so you could say that the sack of Saint Martin's shrine would have been a blow, not just to Frankish

Yeah.

Prestige, but to the very spiritual identity of, you know, this emergent Frankish nation. And, of course, at the same time, it would have offered evidence for those with eyes to see of the truth of the message that is being proclaimed by the invaders. And it's absolutely true that this is not kind of at the forefront of the EMEA campaign. It's not particularly what they are proclaiming. And therefore, very few people at the point where the battle of Tur is being fought really have a sense of anything approximating to Islam.

So this is why it's not couched by contemporary chroniclers as a, you know, a great clash of civilizations or anything like that. Yeah. So Bede, who we've referenced this, you know, the great scholar and historian writing in his monastery up in Northumbria. He has only the vaguer sense of who the Saracens, as he calls them, you know, vaguer sense of who they are. He thinks that they're pagans, that they're worshippers of the morning star.

There are others who are closer to them who think of them essentially as Christian heretics.

Which is so common. That's what Christians think of them in the early years of Islam, isn't it?

Right. And I think right the way through to the middle ages, I mean, Dante is still kind of you know, that's still how he's framing them. I mean, they don't really have a sense of Islam as a religion. I mean, that's a much later kind of conceptualization. And maybe because of that, maybe because Islam in some ways is very close to Christianity.

You know, Jesus is in the Quran. Virgin Mary is in Quran. Both Christianity and Islam have a respect for the Hebrew prophets. That is a big difference, I think, between the Muslim invaders of Spain and Gaul and the Vikings. Because there are doubtless people in England who do end up abandoning their Christianity and turning to the worship of the Viking gods.

But it's not a sophisticated framework of belief. And the kind of structures of imperialism that the Vikings bring are, you know, it's basically kind of grab it and settle. And that's the limit of it. But the evidence of Muslim Spain shows that Islam is very, very different, that it has a very sophisticated relationship to Christianity. It has a framework for subordinating Christians and Jews and kind of, you know, putting them within an empire.

The Quran mandates how they should be taxed, how they should be subordinated, all these kind of things. It's a program for imperial rule. And that is an obvious point of differentiation between the Vikings and the Arabs. Right. And that's why Spain it's not just that it is ruled by Muslims.

It becomes Muslim over the course of the centuries that follow its conquest. And I think you could suppose the Muslims hold on to southern Gaul. You could see the same process happening there. You know, that would have pretty seismic implications for the future course of medieval history. And I think, ultimately, to think that the annihilation of Charles Martel's army has no real significance, that it's just a raid, that it's, you know, nothing very important.

And I think, ultimately, that to suppose that had Charles Martel lost the battle, had he died, had his troops been wiped out, had the shrine of Saint Martin been attacked, that it was just a raid. I think that to kind of believe that, it's effectively to argue that Islam and Christianity, and specifically the distinctive form of Christianity that emerges in Western Europe in the centuries after the Battle of Tours, that they're essentially the same. There's no real difference between them. It doesn't really matter if you're ruled by Christians or by Muslims. And I just don't think that's true.

I think that there is a very, very profound difference between the 2 ways of seeing the world. And so, therefore, I think that the Battle of Tours is significant. I mean, I don't think it's a kind of peripheral clash. I think it is momentous, perhaps not quite as momentous as Gibbon suggested, but pretty important. And Charles Martel's victory, in that sense, is pretty seismic in the long run.

But it's seismic also in the short term because it has very important implications for the future of the Frankish kingdom and for his own dynasty.

Are there not some other reasons why, you could question the idea about the momentousness of this battle? So, for example, the Maillard chronicles often mention big defeats. So they mentioned defeats in the early stages of the Reconquista, for example. But they never mentioned this at all. Like, it doesn't even feature.

They treat it as a raid that just, you know, just 1 raid among many beaten back. I looked this up. There were more raids in 734. There was a raid in 736. And there was actually, some people think, an even bigger raid, even bigger invasion in 739 when the Umayyads got to Burgundy, only to be beaten back by the Franks.

So in other words, this was not the end of their incursions. So in that sense, it's not really a turning point. It doesn't change anything because they just keep coming.

I think it is for reasons that we'll look at in the next episode. Because it means it's not just the Franks have won, Charles Martel has won. The kind of the glory of his victory kinda resonates to his prestige. And as we will see, he is now in a position not just to defend his kingdom

Mhmm.

Against the invaders, but to go on the offensive. And his son, in turn, will be able to do that. And his grandson, who is Charlemagne, will definitely be able to do that.

But there's 1 other thing which is even more important, which I think is arguably much more important than the Battle of Tours. And that's in 7 40. A huge revolt breaks out in what's now Morocco, Great Berber Revolt. And that basically cuts off Umayyad, Spain from the sort of Arab heartland. It means that the age of raiding kind of comes to an end because they can't keep raising all the you know, there's so much internal dissension and the Umayyads can't keep raising all these Berber troops.

So that would seem to undermine the idea that, oh, they get agitating, then they get this, and they get this, then they get this. Because actually, actually, they've got so many problems in their own kind of backyard as it were. That they were actually never gonna be able to do all that because the massive ructions going on in North Africa.

No. I don't think so. Because what also then happens after that is that, and we've did this in our history of Baghdad, is that the Umayyads are overthrown by the Abbasid. But 1 of the Umayyads is able to get to Spain where he establishes himself as its ruler and in in the long term as its caliph. And this is the great golden age of Umayyad Spain.

And it's ferociously and impressively formidable. It's a very potent military power, and it's a very great kind of civilizational power. And this is the period when you see large numbers of Christian Spaniards converting to Islam. Yeah. Because, you know, it has this kind of great force of appeal.

It's culturally, militarily, politically more appealing than Christianity, which seems a kind of defeated and superseded way of seeing the world, way of explaining man's relationship to god. And had that realm that the Umayyads take over in the wake of the Abbasid revolution, had that extended to southern Gaul, had it extended to northern Italy, then, you know, that would have been an even larger power base for for the Umayyad caliphate.

Alright. Well, if people want to listen to that, they've got an episode on Umayyad Spain, which, I greatly recommend. But for the time being, we're gonna be going on with the story of the Franks. Right, Tom? So what's coming up next?

So coming up next, it's the son of Shah Martel and his relationship with the papacy, which is, again, a development of seismic impact for the future history of Europe, and therefore, in the long run, the world. And this man, Pippin, who overthrows the Merovingians, makes himself king, he is the father of a much greater and more famous king, Charlemagne. And so at the end of our next episode, Charlemagne will be entering the story.

Brilliant. So next up is our Charlemagne trilogy, 1 of the most epic stories we've ever done on The Rest is History. Now the good news, if you remember The Rest is History Club, is that you should have all 3 parts of that trilogy right now. Now, if you're not a member of the club and you'd like to get your hands on them, all you need to do is head to the rest is history.com and sign up and you can have that Charlemagne trilogy straight away. If not, I'm afraid you'll just have to wait.

See you then. Bye bye. Bye bye.