Transcript of Trump Ambassador Picks Collapse Under Cross-Exam at Hearing

You will not share your personal views on whether it is right or wrong to re institute discriminatory policies in this country to prevent black people from voting? Senator, my personal views are irrelevant.

Yeah. So that was Senator Murphy cross-examining Donald Trump's pick to be the ambassador for South Africa. And Donald Trump's pick, a guy by the name of Leo Brent Bozel III, was not able to answer his views on whether the United States should discriminate against Black people and prevent black people from voting, and whether the United States should simply take in refugees because they're white and not allow brown or black people to come in as refugees based on their skin color. I'm going to show you what went down. You're probably not seeing this on really any other media network out there, but this took place on Friday. I'm also going to show you some Republicans who were drilling some of Donald Trump's other pics to be ambassador. A guy by the name of the Honorable Amir Galib. This guy was one of the people in Michigan who said that Donald Trump is going to be there to support the Palestinians, and Donald Trump loves Arabs and Arabs for Trump. He was that guy who sat on the city Council there. I'm not sure if you remember him. But anyway, he was picked by Donald Trump to be the ambassador to Kuwait.

This guy previously said Saddam Hussein is a martyr and congratulated Donald Trump for invading Kuwait. Let me show you what went down at this hearing where these individuals were cross-examined. This is what Senator Murphy said when he cross-examined Leo Brent Bozel, who's Trump's pick to be the ambassador to South Africa. Here, play this clip right here.

Do you support having a Refugee Admissions Policy in this country that only admits white white refugees? Senator, I don't make that policy. Well, but it's really important. But I think this is... If I were to ask this question of virtually any nominee to be an ambassador prior to this panel, that would be an easy layup answer. No, of course. Of course, we don't support having a refugee policy where we only admit white people. Why can't you give me your personal view on that? Because, Senator, I am here to serve America and to do what the President is asking me to do, I'll be following the executive order of February. Would you support Reinstituting laws in this country to only allow white people to vote? Senator, I'm going to serve as ambassador of South Africa, and I'm going to focus on that. You will not share your personal views on whether It is right or wrong to re institute discriminatory policies in this country to prevent black people from voting? Senator, my personal views are irrelevant. I am serving here to do what the President is asking me to do in South Africa. That's just simply not true.

The whole reason that you're appearing before this committee is because your personal views, your history is absolutely relevant to your fitness to serve. We wouldn't have this process if your personal views were not relevant. That is pretty stunning that you will not share your views not only on whether we should have a refugee admissions process that is race-based, but you won't share your personal views on whether we should reimpose discriminatory treatment against Black Americans. That is absolutely relevant to your qualifications to serve, and your refusal to answer it, I hope, is something that every member of this committee will think about.

Then you had Democratic Senator Van Holland. Let me show you his cross-examination of Bozell. Play this clip.

President Trump made the legally and morally absurd claim that the government of South Africa was engaged in genocide against Africanters there. If confirmed, you, of course, would be our ambassador to South Africa. I have a pretty straightforward question. Do you agree that that claim was absurd? Thank you, Senator, for that question. My answer to The issue is this. If you were to talk to those people who are involved, they fear- Mr. Vizelle, I'm sorry. Genocide is a legally defined issue. No, it's not a question of someone one's impression. There's a legal definition for it. To your knowledge, has the State Department legal advisor concluded that the government of South Africa is engaged in genocide? Senator, I don't know that answer, but- You should. But, Senator- No, it's It's a straightforward question. I'm not going to... It's a straightforward question. There's a legal definition of genocide. I want to know if you agree that that's an absurd claim made by the President. Senator, I'm not a lawyer, so I can't address it that way. The President, of course, is reported to be engaged right now in reducing the number of refugees that can come in the United States to something around 7,500, and that the overwhelming majority of those would be African or white South Africans.

That, in my view, is a gross misuse of our policies. Do you agree that we should not have a refugee policy, admission policy, that's based on race? Senator, in South Africa- No. Again, it's a straight... I'm asking you if we should have a refugee admission policy based on race. Again, it's a simple question, sir. Senator, I'm trying to answer it. Yes or no? Should we have one based on race? In South Africa, you have thousands of attacks that have taken place against white farmers. They fear for their lives. What the President is saying is that they can come to the United States as refugees if they fear for their lives. Right. That's not an answer to my question. There is a legal criteria for people being admitted to the United States. My question was that based on reports, very credible reports, the Trump administration is talking about making it a cap worldwide of refugees and making almost all of them African or white South Africans. I know you don't want to answer the question. That sounds like a race-based refugee policy. Senator, I can't answer. I'm sorry, I can't answer the question. I'm not privy to that.

I don't know the answer. Do you agree? I don't know the answer about camps. Let me ask you this. This is a question. Apart from South Africa, do you believe we should have a race-based Refugee Admissions Policy. Yes or no? I believe that in South Africa- No, that wasn't my question. You're going to be a representative of the United States overseas if you're confirmed. But my focus, Senator- Let me go on. The whole issue of South Africa is not new to you. Back in the 1980s, I happened to be a staff member on this committee when this committee passed the comprehensive antiapartheid legislation, sanctions against South Africa. As I look at your comments from that period, you were not supportive of that effort. Is that a fair characterization of your statement? I'm being very broad. I'm not aware of what you did, Senator, but I can tell you what our position was, as Conservatives, back in the 1980s, ANC and Elsa Mandela, at that time, were aligned with the Soviet Union, which was the biggest threat to peace in the world and the mortal enemy of the United States. As such, we were in opposition.

I think, Senator, at the same time, it's an extraordinary evolution that 10 years later, approximately, when the wall came down and that association ended, so, too, did the relationship that the conservative movement had with Nelson Mandela. If I'm asked today, who do I think is the most revered person in South Africa? Who do I have the most respect for? It would be Nelson Mandela. Okay, because you You criticized others for what you call the glorification of Nelson Mandela, as you know. It's interesting to hear that statement today. Let me just say in closing, I think at that time, you worked with then Senator Jesse Helms to have a hearing that actually objected to the Reagan administration's decision to send an emissary to meet with the ANC. That was after this committee on a bipartisan basis, led by Senator Luger, passed the sanctions bill. I I think you probably were very strongly opposed to that bill. But in my view, that bill was one of the great things this committee did on a bipartisan basis, and that helped bring Apartheid to an end. People who oppose that have to live with the idea that there could still be an Apartheid regime in South Africa today, but for that legislation.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Then you had Democratic Senator Cain. I'll show you what he had to say here. Play this clip.

Senator Murphy said, It is an easy question. It's a layup. When you're asked the question of, should our refugee programs be race-based? Our Constitution in the 14th Amendment says, all persons, not all citizens, all persons in this country are entitled to equal protection of the laws. You'll take an oath. You'll take an oath to support that Constitution should you be confirmed. It's not a hard question, and your unwillingness to answer it is very troubling. I want to ask you this, are you aware of the Freedom Plus Party in South African politics? No, Senator. I'll tell you, the Freedom Plus Party is an Afrikaner political party that has the most representation of Afrikaners in the South African Parliament and that is part of the National Unity Government. It was a party that used to be an opposition, but since 2024 has been part of the National Unity Government, the Afrikaners that President Trump believes are being persecuted are actually represented by a party that made the decision to join the National Unity Government. I think that's something you should pay some attention to.

Cozy Earth's pajamas and blankets are so soft, so breathable, and so cute, you'll start planning your evenings around them. I've got their bamboo stretch-knet pajamas, and let me tell you, the first time I slept them on, I could not believe how light and cool they felt. They've got this luxurious drape, and they honestly sleep degrees cooler than cotton. I used to just throw on whatever for bed, but now this has become my cozy all day set. It is that good. The bubble cuddle blanket, wow. Mine lives on the couch, and it's basically my go-to for everything: reading, binging shows, or quick naps. The textured bubble design looks amazing, but what gets me is the softness. Just makes lounging feel elevated. Just so you know, Cozy Earth stands by their quality. Their blankets come with a 100-night sleep trial and a 10-year warranty. In their apparel, it's backed by a lifetime guarantee. So yeah, they mean it when they say it's made to last. Go to cozyearth. Com and use code MITUS at checkout for up to 40% off your new favorite pajama set and blanket. That's cozyEarth. Com code MITUS, M-E-I-D-A-S. If you get a post-purchase survey, let them know you heard about CozyEarth right here.

Elevate your downtime with CozyEarth. Then it was the Republicans term. Then you had Senator McCormick of Pennsylvania cross-examine Donald Trump's pick to be the ambassador of Kuwait, Amir Khalib. He pointed out that Khalib had previously referred to Jewish people as monkeys, or he liked a post that referred to Jewish people as monkeys, said that Israel should never exist, and then praised Saddam Hussein as a martyr. This is Donald Trump's pick to be the ambassador of Kuwait. Here, this clip.

I was a member of the 82nd Airborne Division that actually helped oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. You referred to Saddam Hussein sympathetically as a martyr, which has some significance given that you'd be the United States's highest ranking diplomat in Kuwait, a country that was invaded by Saddam. How do you justify calling Saddam Hussein a martyr to us, but also to the people of Kuwait?

Thank you, Senator. I explained earlier, that post was in January 7, 2020. I was a private citizen before. It wasn't in my official capacity. It was the day when the American military bases in Iraq were attacked by Iran. I was angry that we did not respond to the Iranian regime. In a moment of anger, I recalled and complimented Saddam Hussein for keeping the Iranian regime in check. I said earlier that probably in his career, that would be the only positive thing he did and the only thing I would agree with. No doubt he was a dictator. No doubt the invasion of Kuwait was a crime, was a violation of the international law. For those, Those who are offended by that and those who suffered from Saddam or lost loved ones, I apologize. I'm not very adamant about describing him like that, but like I said, it was a moment of anger. I know he did a lot atrocities to his people.

Let me move on to my second question. As a mayor, you repeatedly targeted American ally Israel through your support of Boycott, Divest, and Sanctions Movement against Israel. You called for Israelis to, quote, leave the land, unquote, thereby supporting the end of the State of Israel. My question to you, given the role you are being nominated for, do you accept President Trump's view that Israel is and should be the national home of the Jewish people. Thank you, Senator.

Thank you, Senator, for that question. Let me make it clear that the BDS Movement resolution was drafted by a Jewish attorney who was part of the- This question is, do you agree or do you disagree with President Trump's view that Israel should be the national home of the Jewish people?

Just a yes or no.

Well, thank you, Senator. I think at this point, we have a peace plan that everybody in the region agreed on.

There's no yes or Do you agree with the President's position?

I think everybody, we can coexist in the region, and that's the answer that everybody has the right to exist now.

Well, no, that's not the President's position. Do you agree with the President?

I trust the President's policies, and I will support his policies.

Let me move to my third question, and I want you to take a minute and really try to explain this to me. In 2025, so this is this year, you liked a Facebook comment referring to Jews as, Monkeys, who levy taxes on the, The air we breathe. Now, I heard you say before that you have this habit that you acknowledge all of the posts, but I don't totally understand that. Could you please provide an explanation for the rationale of liking this comment? Do you agree with that comment?

Thank you, Senator, for that question. First of all, let's correct the misinformation. It's very disturbing. That comment When I was when I was a private citizen about six or seven years ago. It wasn't this year. It was under a post that I posted as a private citizen. Part of my bad habits of acknowledging reading those posts, but in the responses, I told the guy, You cannot say this in the United States of America. You can The media did not translate that response. So it wasn't until 2025. That's misinformation. And just by making assumptions and judging my intentions based on social media posts in the past, I would recommend that you look at the facts and judge my I'm asking for the fact.

So would you like to clarify, do you agree with that statement?

No, definitely. I totally disagree.

How would you respond to the fact that you liked it in the moment? What is your response to that specific comment now?

At that moment, I responded that this is not appropriate to say this, but in my official capacity, I responded in 2021, '22, in the second month of assuming the mayor office by passing a resolution to condemn anti-Semitism, and that was complemented by the Jewish community. That's how I perform in my official capacity, and I represent everyone. At the end, I'm a Samite. The Arabs are Samite. Do we read history? How can we be anti-Samite? I think, like I said, judge my actions and not my intentions, because we have to lay down the fact. Senator Shahin earlier said that I hired someone after he said, No, that guy has been serving in the city for the past.

Thank you. I'm out of time. Thank you. Thank you.

Even Ted Cruz was a bit perplexed. Yeah, Ted Cruz was perplexed at why this guy was picked to be the ambassador of Kuwait. Here, play this clip.

You've been asked about this before, but it is really quite astonishing that on Facebook, You liked a post that called Jews Monkeys for their own benefit.

Thank you, Senator.

Why would you like a post that calls Jews Monkeys?

Thank you. I explained that earlier. For From 2010 to 2000, before I became the mayor, I used to have a bad habit of acknowledging every comment under my post. It doesn't mean that I agree with it, just acknowledging. But there were a response under that that was not translated or interpreted that says, You can say this in your country, but not in this country, which means that I did not agree with that post, even though I acknowledge it. I know it was a bad habit, but let me be clear, I don't agree with that statement, and I treat everybody with respect in my official capacity.

Let's be clear, the statement that you liked said, They are all monkeys for their own benefit. So every Jew is a monkey.

I don't agree with that statement, Senator. The person who wrote it is mentally challenged in our community. He's well known. I used to have this idea of inclusivity in my past ideology. I changed in 2024. I changed even my party.

Mr. Khalib, there may well be positions within the Trump administration that you are qualified to perform in that are unrelated to these issues that you have such passionate beliefs about. I believe your beliefs are sincere. I believe that when you became the mayor of the first city in America to pass a BDS resolution, it's because you believe in BDS. I disagree with you on that. That is contrary to the policy of the United government, but you're entitled to have your own views.

But can I- What I do not understand is how you could possibly serve as a United States ambassador for President Trump in the Middle East when you have passionate views, including having been a vocal opponent of the Abraham Accords, the singular and most consequential accomplishment President Trump has negotiated.

Your long-standing views to publicly oppose the Abraham Accord.

Thank you, Senator. Let me be clear. I support the Abraham Accord, and I think there's a golden opportunity to get everybody involved in that. Let me be clear. In February of 2022, as the mayor, the first thing I did is to pass a resolution to condemn anti-Semitism. It's documented. That's what I perform in my official capacity. The other things, people are making assumptions based, trying to judge my intention.

I'm curious, would a statement like All Jews are monkeys, would that qualify as anti-Semitism?

Somebody wrote it who's mentally challenged.

My question is, does the statement All Jews are monkeys, does that qualify as anti-Semitism?

I don't agree with it, sir. You're not answering my question. It's definitely anti-Semitism. But clicking on it doesn't mean I endorse it. It's just acknowledging reading.

Well, actually, like means exactly that. When you like something, it means you like it.

No, Senator, every post since 2010, every comment, because I used to have 10, 20 comments, I used to acknowledge it, to read it, but Sometimes I would respond to oppose it. There was a response here that wasn't translated by the media that says, You cannot say this in your country. It wasn't translated. When I met with Senator- But that's not disagreeing with the statement that all Jews are monkeys. But let me be clear now. I disagree with that.

But you didn't at the time.

You are making assumptions, sir. No, I'm asking.

I'm not making an assumption.

That's a question. I did disagree at the time, and I still disagree.

Did you disagree publicly? Did you say a word of disagreement, or was your only public statement a like, which is the universal method of saying you like something and agree with it?

Everybody who asked me, I told them it doesn't mean I endorse it. It's just acknowledging reading it, but I am opposing that, and I make it clear now. I pass a resolution to condemn anti-Semitism in all forms or shapes.

Just so you can see, Donald Trump's position is... Donald Trump's made up a genocide in South Africa that doesn't exist and says that there's a genocide against white people, And so his ambassador is also making up this idea that there's a genocide against white people and that America should only take 7,500 total refugees, and they must be white only. And so that if you're brown skin or black skin or whatever, unless you're a white Afrikaner from South Africa based on a made-up genocide that Donald Trump claims takes up in South Africa, you cannot be a refugee is the program. But here's what Donald Trump said, just so you remember, back in May, to South Africa's President Ramaphosa. Here, I'll play this clip right here.

What would it take for you to be convinced that there's no white genocide in South Africa? Well, I can answer that for Chris. It I'm happy for him. No, seriously. I'm glad you have him as your other. My president will respond to you. Thank you, Mr. President. It will take President Trump listening to the voices of South Africa, some of whom are his good friends, like those who are here. When we have talks between us at a quiet table, it will take President Trump to listen to them. I'm not going to be repeating what I've been saying. I would say if there was an Africa and a farmer genocide, I can bet you these three gentlemen would not be here, including my Minister of Agriculture. He would not be with me. So it'll take him, President Trump, listening to their stories, to their perspective. That is the answer to your question. But Mr. President, I must say that we have none of it. We have thousands of stories talking about it. We have documentaries, we have news stories. Is Natalie here? Somebody here to turn that? I could show you a couple of things.

It has to be responded to. Let me see the articles, please, if you would. Excuse me, turn the lights down. Turn the lights down and just put this on. It's right behind you, Yohann. This is not what this Parliament can do with or without you. People are going to occupy land. We require no permission from you, from the President, from no one. We don't care. We can do whatever you want to do. Who are you to tell us why not can you occupy land or not? Who are going to occupy land? South Africa, occupy land. That's who we are.. I'm just bringing you the receipts right there about...

And remember, Donald Trump showed President Ramaphosa a bunch of fake articles that were saying, See, this is where all of the White people are buried, and it's not actually a burial ground. I mean, look, the truth is that there's high crime in South Africa. That's fair. Black farmers and white farmers have been killed. But there's not a genocide against white people in South Africa. But Trump makes it up. You saw that clip of Ramaphosa, right? Well, there you have it, folks. Let me know what you think. Just bringing you the receipts and facts. Hit subscribe. And again, shouldn't that be, I don't know, at least mentioned in the news somewhere that that happened on Friday, that Trump's colonies don't take a position or seem to suggest that it should be okay to prevent black people from voting. I mean, you heard him say it, right? We all heard what they said, right? Okay, just want to make sure we all heard that. Hit subscribe. Let's get to 6 million. Thanks for watching. Love this video? Support independent media and unlock exclusive content. Add free videos and custom emojis by becoming a paid member of our YouTube channel today.

Also give memberships to others. Let's keep growing together.