Transcript of Furious Denmark Prepares for World War if Trump Invades

Denmark and Greenland are absolutely furious at the Trump regime. Europe is furious at the Trump regime. We're hearing from Germans' Foreign Minister that they will absolutely invoke all rights under NATO to attack the United States in defense if the United States invades Greenland. Germany has made that very clear. We're learning behind the scenes that Germany, France, and others are actually working up what war plans could look like if the United States invades AIDS, Greenland, a part of a fellow NATO member. Denmark, Donald Trump, when he held this bizarre meeting with oil executives on Friday, started again defaming Greenland and Denmark. He said, no matter what, we're going to take it one way or another. We're going to do this the easy way or the hard way, but this is ours. What right does Denmark have to? They sent a ship to it. This is going to be ours no matter what. Watch what Donald Trump said on Friday. Play this.

Put it on.

Thank you. The policy question, how much money are you thinking of giving people in Greenland to get them on board with a possible US- I'm not talking about money for Greenland yet.

I might talk about that, but right now, we are going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not, because if we don't do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we're not going to have Russia or China as a neighbor. I would like to make a deal the easy way, but if we don't do it the easy way, we're going to do it the hard way. And by the way, I'm a fan of Denmark, too, I have to tell you. And they've been very nice to me. I'm a big fan, but the fact that they had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn't mean that they own the land. Sure, we had lots of boats go there also. But we need that because if you take a look outside of Greenland right now, there are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place. We're not going to have Russia or China occupy Greenland, and that's what they're going to do if we don't. We're going to be doing something with Greenland, either the nice way or the more difficult way.

Then Thomas Danz, one of Trump's people on the Arctic Research Commission, who's been representing Trump on this issue. He says the same thing, not ruling out military invasion. Let's play it. He said the US will take over Greenland and did not rule out the use of force.

The key point here is that I think President Trump has been clear on is America needs this for America's national security. There is a major risk to America's national security. If it doesn't, there's also a, by extension, major risk to our European partners and really to the free people around the world. We're We're at a situation where the current status quo is untenable, so things need to change. So they will change. But I think, as I said before, that eventuality is slight. It's not something that needs or really needs a lot of discussion.

Thomas, it sounds like you're saying that this is going to happen either the easy way or the hard way, but it's going to happen.

Look, I think if you ask President Maduro, the former This week, he would probably agree with that statement. President Trump has been clear. This is the opportunity for everybody to come to the table and I think find the win-win-win deal I've talked about.

Just to be very clear then, bottom line, military, yes or no?

Bottom line is everything's on the table. Everything's always on the table.

I want to bring in the former ambassador to Denmark from the United States, Rufus Gifford. You served in that position from 2013 to '27. Obama's second term, for those listening on audio, the ambassador is shaking his head just even hearing that. I was preparing for this interview. I watched the video you made in 2012 when you were appointed as ambassador starting in 2013, and the warmth with which your reception message... I wanted to get a I mean, I saw you and your partner bicycling there, and you talked about the cultural bonds between the US and Denmark. When you see this, it's such a striking difference. But what do you make of what's going on now, ambassador?

Ben, where do you start? First, I'm going to start. Look, I feel so passionately about this. The first thing that I'm struck by is, obviously, so there's a couple of words that come to mind. Reckless, clueless, a complete misunderstanding of history, a complete misunderstanding of the way NATO works. Let me just start with this. He makes an argument about national security. He says that Greenland is going to become Russian or Chinese if we don't take it. Well, that misunderstands how NATO works, because honestly, in fact, NATO was formed for in part, to avoid something like this from ever having to happen. Because if Greenland were, God forbid, attacked by an adversary, invaded by an adversary, let's say the Russians, the Article 5 would be invoked, and the entire alliance would be compelled to respond. And so in essence, whether Greenland is under Danish control or American control, it actually makes no difference from an American national security standpoint. The NATO Alliance is based on this idea that our national security, the Alliance's national security is universal, that it's the same. So in essence, the whole argument falls apart. I also don't believe that that's real.

I don't believe that that is in any way part of his desire here. And not only that, it goes further than that, Ben, and this is why, is that anyone who is crazy enough to argue that national security That the national security of the United States would be strengthened by taking a stake to the heart of NATO, arguably the best alliance the modern world has ever seen. You take a stake to the heart of NATO, I guarantee you this. Two things happen automatically. Russia and China are empowered. And two, the entire Western Alliance is less safe because of that. So it is anyone who has any national security experience would tell you that that argument is bogus, flawed, incredibly naive, and more than that, legitimately clueless, and doesn't understand a chapter of a history book for the last 80 years.

You must have lots of connections in Denmark and Greenland based on your time there, and you must be speaking to people in leadership positions who want to lean on you for guidance or just to get information about what's happening. What are you hearing now within Denmark, within Greenland?

So again, Ben, this is heartbreaking for me because my favorite word, I'll tell you this, my favorite word in the English language is the word trust. Trust is one of those things that takes years and years to earn and can be broken like that, can be broken with a snap of a finger, and in this case, broken by one administration, very, very quickly. The hard The hard part for me is that I was the guy, when I was ambassador, I would go to the... This is not partisan. This has not been true of just Democrats or anywhere. This is not about that. Any ambassador before Donald Trump would have gone to the foreign the Foreign Minister, the Defense Minister, the Prime Minister, we would ask them to send their young men and women into harm's way without reservation. They always said yes. They bled alongside American soldiers. They died alongside American soldiers. Denmark lost more young men and women per capita in Afghanistan than any country other than the United States of America. This, again, this rhetoric, that ridiculous rhetoric by the President of the United States, it isn't just about the government. It isn't just about green.

It actually hits them. This is where I think it's going to impact every single American, is that it makes them lose faith in us. And that makes them less likely to... I mean, this is the stupid transactional stuff, right? But it makes them less likely to travel here. So many of them have sent their kids to school here. They're less likely to do that. They're less likely to buy American products. Businesses are less likely to invest here. This trust that's broken, the work of diplomacy, is very hard to build back. So that's what I hear from my Danish friends. I got a heartbreaking note from a Danish soldier yesterday morning, which I posted and it's gone viral. It's just about... I'm actually going to read you the last line of it because it's so powerful. It's like, A soldier never forgets who stood by his side. Nations shouldn't either. And come on, guys. This is just human. This is absurd the way that he is treating one of our best allies in the world with outrageously flawed rationale. And I will say, too, look, the weird thing is everything I'm saying, I know I'm speaking pretty forcefully.

Everything he says he wants, which is an increased military presence in Greenland and increased economic partnership with Greenland, we could have tomorrow, Ben. If you sat across the table with some of our best allies in the world, the Danes and the Greenlanders, rolled up your sleeves, and we would make that deal. We would make that They would make that deal gladly. But this ridiculousness, I just don't even know. Americans, be real clear, This rewrites the world order in a way that we don't know what's on the other side of it. And so take it seriously. It matters. And we're going to do everything. I know that I'm going to do everything I possibly can to ensure that it actually doesn't happen. Everything that they said in those clips you just played doesn't happen because it would be awful for every single American citizen.

To your point, if this was truly about military security, that could have been accomplished yesterday. If it's about increased economic development of rare earths, that could have been done yesterday. If it was about, I don't know, improving tourism or building further bonds or, I don't know, even perhaps building more American things in green. All of these things could be done by cooperation. So you have to ask, well, what's this really about here? And then when you listen to the people in Trump's cabinet and Donald Trump and the way he views the world. It's about power and being a predator. And they use that language. They say that the United States is a predator country. Listen to what a lot of the people in his inner circle say. And as predators, it is about conquest and manifest destiny and taking over. And I think he looks at the map, which shows Greenland looking bigger than it actually is because of the way the globe is. But he looks at a massive landmass US, and he sees it close the same way he looks at Canada, except I think he views Canada as being a little more difficult to take over.

And he goes, It's a big landmass. There's 50,000, whatever number he gives of the people in his own mind that live there. This is easy to take over and imagine how beautiful the map would look if that was America. I think that's what that's. I think when you really break it down, he doesn't know what comes next, doesn't care about what that does for NATO, and I'll throw it to you in a moment. I also find that Trump escalates the Greenland rhetoric when he has a meeting with Putin's people. The moment Dmitriyiv and Yushaov met in Miami with Trump's people, Special Envoy, Jeff Landry gets talked about, and I just feel like it's the same thing, and that connection is so there. What do you make of that? Because it seems very Putin.

A couple of things on this. One, I agree with you. I do. I find it fascinating. They're actually lumping Greenland and Venezuela together because they actually couldn't be any more different. Look, I disagree profoundly with the tactics used by the Trump administration by Venezuela. But I think a lot people could agree that Venezuela is better off under Maduro. And so that, which and everyone from Marco Rubio to the President have said this was more of a law enforcement operation than anything else. Greenland is entirely different. Greenland is attacking an ally, attacking and provoking essentially a fight with your best friends. That's what it is. Venezuela is nothing like that. Venezuela and Greenland do have two things in common, though. And this is why I think it's interesting when Trump loops them together, the Trump administration lump them together. The first thing is resources. Venezuela has oil. Greenland has rare earth minerals. The second thing is Western hemisphere domination, which is your point. And I think it tends to make sense because their arguments for needing it don't hold any practical, logical water bend, like zero. They don't hold any water for anybody anybody who knows anything about history or American foreign policy.

So where do we go from here? What's next? What do you see happening?

So, Ben, this is what I say. Look, I think that the truth of the matter is that we need to talk about this. We need to articulate how important this issue is. This is not just about Greenland, an island of 57,000 people. And yes, that is the actual right number, not what the Trump administration tells you. Let's be clear, none of those people have ever been there. The only one who's ever been there is JD Vance, who was there for a couple of hours on our military base because he wasn't welcome in the rest of Greenland. This is what I say. I say we got it. I do think, look, I haven't been particularly forgiving of Republican members of Congress and senators over the course of the last year. Many of them have spoken out in the last couple of days, and I think that's a good thing. I think we have to build a movement inside the United States domestically that convinces both elected members of Congress as well as the American people, that this action flies in the face of American self-interest. This is one man's selfish self-interest. This is not American self-interest.

That's vitally important. I do think also our allies need to step up here. I think that for the longest time, our allies have been playing by a traditional playbook as it relates to Donald Trump. They'll talk about treaties signed decades ago, agreements made with other presidents. Donald Trump doesn't care about any of that. And I think we need to be playing hard ball here. If he's not going to listen to the Daines and the Greenlanders, then maybe he will listen to a larger collection of people who say that they will somehow retaliate against the United States were Americans to take this unprecedented action. I do think that's important. Again, I'm speaking like this, Ben, as a patriotic American. I speak about it in no other way. I want greater partnership with Greenlanders England. What I don't want to see is that NATO Alliance fall apart. What I don't want to see is our best friends lose faith in us. And that's what we're seeing right now. I think all of us as Americans have a responsibility to fight as as hard as we possibly can against that.

Rufus, I hope you come back. I want to talk more about this, but we appreciate your time. Let's stay in touch on a weekly basis, at least, because we're going to need to have you on more to give us more updates. But Rufus Giverd, former ambassador to Denmark from 2013 to 2017. We appreciate you.

Thank you, Ben. Anytime. Thanks for having the conversation.

Everybody hit subscribe. Let's get to 6 Million subscribers. Want to stay plugged in? Become a subscriber for our Substack at mitisplus. Com. You'll get daily recap from Ron Filipkowski, add three episodes of our podcast, and more exclusive content, only available at mitisplus. Com. Der Insolvenzantrag ist gestellt und plötzlich läuft alles im Eiltempo. Für unsere Protagonistin beginnt jetzt die härteste Phase. In Folge vier unserer Serie „Endstation Insolvenz zeigen wir, warum Offenheit zur wichtigsten Währung wird, weshalb ein Insolvenzverwalter kein Gegner ist und wie sich ein Betrieb stabilisiert oder geordnet abgewickelt wird. Im Podcast-Kanal „Gute Geschäfte von Kreditreform. Überall, wo es Podcasts gibt.