Transcript of Resistance or Opposition: Which Route Should the Democrats Take?

The Fox News decision desk can now officially project that Donald Trump will become the 47th President of the United States.

Many of you sitting at home right now digesting this news right now. Some of them will be you. I wish I had better news for my daughter later this morning.

It is a sweeping and stunning victory unlike any in our history. It will be studied and debated for generations, the impact broad and deep, a turning point for the country. Rachel Scott has been on the road with the Trump campaign.

She starts a song, country, Rachel. Well, that was a walloping. Even your most optimistic Mar-a-Lago member didn't see Donald Trump winning the popular vote, controlling the Senate, and sweeping all seven swing states. He came within five points of taking New Jersey. More than half of Latino men voted for him, as he said.

We overcame obstacles that nobody thought possible. It is now clear that we They've achieved the most incredible political thing. Look what happened. Is this crazy?

Delirium for Maga, devastation for Harris Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Chuck Schumer, and the rest. There's no doubt about it. They've lost the nation. So what on earth does the Democratic Party do now? One approach would be to keep doing what they've been doing. Resist.

I am unafraid to be nasty because I am nasty like Susan, Elizabeth, Eleanor, Amelia, Rosa, Gloria, Condoleezza, Sonja, Malala, Michelle, Hillary.

It's what they did the last time Trump won.

Our pussies ain't for grabbing.

Therefore, reminding In the aftermath of Trump's 2016 victory, America was stunned. There had never been a president so immune to normal analysis, and as such, so unpredictable. Every time he opened his mouth, it seemed, Donald Trump exploded political norms, and the Democratic Party responded in kind. Being a mere opposition party, at least at that moment for the Democrats, was not strong enough for the situation that they believed they were in. Instead, they need to become the resistance. They built this idea of resistance into their DNA, and it inspired and infected every aspect of liberal and progressive society. From talk show hosts- You know, Ivanka, that's a beautiful photo of you and your child.

But let me just say one mother to another, do something about your dad's immigration practices, you feckless to dining establishment.

White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee-Sanders, was asked to leave a Virginia restaurant on Friday. The co-owner of the Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia, Stephanie Wilkinson, told the Washington Post, her decision to ask Sanders to leave was based on the concerns of several employees. They pursued Donald Trump through law fair.

Following the historic conviction of former President Donald Trump on all 34 counts in the criminal hush money trial, Trump becomes-They have likened him to history's worst monsters.

Donald Trump's rally At Madison Square Garden comes days after his own former chief of staff went on record to describe his former boss as a fascist. But that jambouree happening right now, you see it there on your screen, in that place, is particularly chilling. Because in 1939, more than 20,000 supporters of a different fascist leader, Adolf Hitler, packed the garden for a so-called Pro-America Rally, a rally where speakers voiced anti-Semitic rhetoric from a stage draped with Nazi banners. And while the Democrats won in 2020, the resistance ultimately did not work. Democrats spent a decade telling Americans that Trump was an existential threat, and they just voted for him in overwhelming numbers. Their goal was to scrub Donald Trump from future history. Instead, he now controls it. So clearly, being a political party in perpetual outrage and high dudgeon was not the path to power. Let's be real, it was a total unmitigated disaster. They put on a pink hat, declared a sex boycott, and hollered constantly about fascism. And then gasped with shock when the nation chose the other law. It wasn't just poor strategy. Resistance politics turned Trump's opponents, in many cases, into the monster they claimed to be slaying.

Just listen to former Republican strategist turned anti-Trump extremist, Rick Wilson. I want to say something to you, Donald, and your little and your little minions, and your whole enabling class of the Maga influencer class.

Donald, if you try to steal this election tomorrow, and you're going to, we know, you're going to try, I promise you one thing, you will die in prison alone.

Your family will be broken. Every property you've ever-So the party is in a pickle. Resistance has failed. And despite the warnings of Oprah Winfrey, If we don't show up tomorrow, it is entirely possible that we will not have the opportunity to ever cast a ballot again. There will be another election. And if the Dems want to have a shot at winning in 2028, then they need to look inward. The way losing parties survive is by figuring out why they lost and trying to win next time. In the meantime, they make the best of it and take wins when they can. They act like an opposition, not a resistance. This will require an entirely new approach. But the good news here is that the Democratic Party has been here before. And that brings us to the topic of today's episode. It's the story of how a few centrist renegades saved the Democrats 40 years ago from oblivion. The year was 1984. And if you are weeping over last week's electoral blowout, while Trump's victory was light stuff compared to the Reagan landslide against Walter Mondale. Democrats were not just in disarray. They were on life support and in real danger of vanishing completely.

And yet, eight years later, they found their savior, a young governor from Arkansas named Bill Clinton. From the Free Press, this is Honestly. I'm Eli Lake. After the break, the story of how the Democrats remade their party and took back the White House after being destroyed by Ronald Reagan.

Today's episode was made possible by Ground News. America's trust in the media has been on a long and steady decline, especially over the last few years. If you listen to this show, you know that's something that we care about and talk about a lot. Mainstream media often have their own agenda, which leads, and we've seen this many times, to bias coverage, public polarization, and ideological bubbles that reinforce readers' opinions rather than challenging them. That's why Ground News is so important. Their app and website allow us to access the world's news in one place to compare coverage with context behind each source. Reading the news this way helps you see discrepancies on how certain topics are covered or ignored so you can think critically about what you read and make up your own mind. Check it out at groundnews. Com/honestly to get 50% off the Groundnews Vantage Plan for unlimited access. Groundnews is subscriber-funded. By subscribing, you're supporting transparency in media and our work in the meantime. Hey, Honestly, listeners, I want to let you know about an amazing podcast called Unpacking Israeli History. If you read the headlines about what's going on in Israel, you're only getting a very tiny slice of a very long story.

Shorn of depth and historical context, so much coverage of Israel can't even get the most basic fact straight. One of the things we try and do here on Honestly, and at the Free Press more generally, is to go deeper into the most important topics of the day as we try and get to the truth. That's the mission of Unpacking Israeli History, hosted by Dr. Noam Weissmann. It offers listeners a journey through the events in Israel's past and its present. In a world where history is getting rewritten, the goal of Unpacking Israeli History is to provide listeners with a nuanced, fact-based understanding of the state of Israel that's both informative and entertaining. The show delves deeply into the nuances and complexities of Israeli history and how it relates to the present, examining tough questions like, is Zionism a colonialist project? Is Israel an Apartheid state? And are the settlements an obstacle to peace? You won't want to miss it. Learn the history behind the headlines and find Unpacking Israeli History wherever you get your podcast.

The day after one of the most impressive presidential victories in American history, President Reagan and George Bush won 59% of the vote beating the Mondale-Ferrero- It's hard to overstate just how massive a defeat Ronald Reagan's win in 1984 over Democrat Walter Mondale really was.

Mondale, who was vice President during Jimmy Carter's one-term presidency, lost everywhere except his home state of Minnesota and the district of Columbia. Reagan swept up everything else.

Thank you.

A conservative Republican won Massachusetts, New Thank you all very much. Hawaii, for God's sake. Thank you.

I think that's just been arranged.

Mondale's loyalty to interest groups inside the Democratic Party left him open to attack. Gary Hart, a Senator voter from Colorado and his chief rival in the primary that year, summed up the problem as follows. You have to reach those voters who don't feel represented by the AFL, the NAACP, NOW, or the Sierra Club. But Mondale could not see beyond the demands of the noisiest factions of his coalition. For example, his deference to the nuclear freeze movement was a terrible vote loser. His campaign actually attacked one of Ronald Reagan's coolest initiatives, research into space-based missile defense, Star Wars, space lasers.

Ronald Reagan is determined to put killer weapons in space.

The Soviets will have to match us, and the arms race will rage out of control, orbiting, aiming.

There's a bear in the woods. And Reagan countered with one of the most effective ads in American political history.

Others don't see it at all.

Some people say the bear is tame.

Others say it's vicious and dangerous.

Since no one can really be sure who's right, isn't it smart to be as strong as the bear? If there is a bear.

What Mondale's appeal was to get the support of every interest group in the party.

This is Al Fromm, the man who would eventually remake the Democratic Party after Mondale's defeat.

I think it was in October of 1983, he basically got every group. And so from that sense, you could say, Mondale had the most unified Democratic Party ever, the only people who didn't support him were the voters. To me, that was a big problem.

And you can see an echo of this problem today.

And my basic diagnosis is that we have allowed the far left to have outsized power over the messaging and policymaking of the Democratic Party, which is causing us to fall out of touch with the working class.

This is Richie Torres, a Democratic House Representative from New York, on the lesson of the 2024 election.

Particularly working class voters of color who have been the heart and soul of the Democratic Party.

In early 1985, the Democrats were a big government, soft on crime party, animated by nostalgia for FDR's New deal and LBJ's War on Poverty. The party functioned as a coalition of unions, environmentalists, Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition, the National Organization for Women, peace activists, and dozens of other progressive tribes that believe that rallying under a common banner every four years was the way to win and hold power. But win, they did not. Between 1968 and 1992, the Democrats won only a single presidential election, 1976, the one that followed the Watergate scandal and the fall of Richard Nixon. The Reagan landslide of 1984 was the final straw for Al Fromm. He got to work in with another Democratic staffer, Will Marshall, forming a new group that would bring moderate governors, senators, and congressmen together to steer the donkey to middle ground. This was an insurgency led by people terrified that the Democratic Party would never again win the White House, that it would vanish into history like the Wigs. They knew the stakes were high, and they were unafraid of playing hardball. One of their first tricks was the name itself. They called themselves the Democratic Democratic Leadership Council, even though the leadership of the Democratic Party didn't like them one bit.

It was an audacious gamut that catapulted their group into the center of the political conversation.

Creating an illusion is the right way to think about it. Alan and I joked a lot about smoking mirrors.

We were an entrepreneurial insurgent operation.

The Democratic establishment was not happy about the formation of the Democratic Leadership Council, and the premise on which it was based was that In some way, the party establishment was failing. The first job of the Democratic Leadership Council, or DLC, as it was known, was to focus on the Republican-controlled Senate for the 1986 midterms.

Here they really did have success. This is former Senator and Governor Chuck Robb explaining how the DLC worked.

We couldn't endorse candidates. We couldn't give money to candidates, but we could provide issues forums that were directed towards specific things that we wanted to have discussed publicly and invite them to participate.

The DLC in these early years operated like a political policy shop. It published papers and articles that became talking points for new Democrats who weren't beholden to their party's orthodoxies. The DLC critiqued Reagan on his strongest issue, national defense. Instead of slamming the hawkish President for bringing us to the brink of nuclear war, as Walter Mondale had, The DLC published a policy book on national defense that chastised wasteful Pentagon spending. They weren't saying, Stop building bombs. They were saying, You're building bombs badly. The DLC began to germinate deeply of Democrats-sounding ideas at this time. They wanted national service for young people who received scholarships. They became deficit haws, which was threatening to their party's big spenders. And on crime, the DLC, unlike the mainstream of the Democratic Party in the 1980s supported the death penalty and more police on the streets. In 1986, the DLC had momentum. The Democrats gained eight seats that year, resting back control of the Senate for their party. Eight of the 11 new Democratic senators had run as DLC Democrats. Al Fromm and Will Marshall were ecstatic. After a strong showing in the midterms, the Democrats thought they were in great shape to end the Reagan era with victory in 1988.

Just a few minutes ago. It didn't work out that way. I called Vice President Bush and congratulated him on his victory. In fairness, the Democratic candidate that year, Michael Dukakis, made a point to say that he was not ideological. Nonetheless, his party was still vulnerable to the taint of excessive liberalism.

Bush and Dukakis on crime. Bush supports the death penalty for first-degree murderers. Dukakis not only opposes the death penalty, he allowed first-degree murderers to have weekend passes from prison.

One was Willie Horton, who murdered a boy in a- And again, we see an echo in 2024.

Kamala supports taxpayer-funded sex changes for prisoners.

Surgery.

For prisoners. For prisoners, every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access.

It's hard to believe, but it's true. Even the liberal- Now, we should say Kamala Harris did not campaign on gender reassignment surgery for illegal immigrants in prison. She ran on keeping abortion legal in all 50 states and Trump's unfitness for office. But her past positioning as a senator from 2017 and her ill-fated primary run in 2019 was enough for the Trump campaign to paint her as an out-of-touch elite who didn't care about common sense.

Kamal is for they/them.

President Trump is for you.

I'm Donald J. Trump, and I approve this message.

Well, the same thing happened in 1988 to Mike Dukakis. When he finally realized that the Bush campaign defined him for the voters, it was too late.

Ronald Reagan is probably one American who will have a good night's sleep tonight. He's won two presidential elections in his own right, and in effect, helped George Bush win this one.

Another Republican landslide. The DLC decided their party needed what Al Frum would call reality therapy.

We put together a four-part strategy, and the first part was what we called reality therapy. If you don't understand why you're losing, you're probably not going to make the strategic changes you need to win. Over the 1980s, the Democrats lost the three elections in landslides that were greater than any party has ever lost in history in terms of the Electoral College. If you continue doing that, that's the definition of insanity.

How the Democrats got their mojo back with the help of a Southern governor with a silver tongue after the break.

The Credit Card Competition Act would help small business owners like Raymond. We asked Raymond why the Credit Card Competition Act matters to him.

I'm Raymond Huff. I run Russell's Convenience in Denver, Colorado. I've ran this business for more than 30 years by keeping it going as a challenge. One of the biggest reasons I found is credit card twice fees we're forced to pay. That's because the credit card companies fix prices. It goes against the free market that made our economy great. The Credit Card Competition Act would ensure we have basic competition. It's one of the few things in Washington that both sides agree on. Please ask your member of Congress to pass the Credit Card Competition Act. Small businesses and my customers need it now.

For more information on how the Credit Card Competition Act will help American consumers save money, visit merchantspaymentscoalition. Com and contact your member of Congress today. Paid for by the merchants payments coalition, not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee, merchantspaymentscoalition. Com.

In 1989, the world changed forever. That is the year the Berlin Wall came down. The days of the Soviet Union were numbered..

It was a vindication of Reaganism and the Republican brand.

After three election blowouts, the Democrats were finally ready for a change, and the DLCE was there to offer exactly that. They had a secret weapon, maybe the greatest political athlete of the last 50 years. Leaders, Bill Clinton. Barack Obama and Ronald Reagan were outstanding orators, of course, but no one combined the ability to think like a policywant and then sell those policies to everyday people like Bill Clinton. At a time when his party was wary of the police, Clinton would just amble up to cops and ask them about their jobs like it was shooting the breeze. He was obsessed with making schools better, and he would talk for hours and hours about his ideas for reforms, and he had a knack for presenting center-right ideas in the language of a folksy liberalism. After all, it was Bill Clinton who promised and delivered the end of welfare as we know it. Here he is in 1991 at the Arkansas Governor's mansion announcing his bid for the presidency.

To be sure the collapse of communism requires a new national security policy. I applaud the President's recent initiatives in reducing nuclear arms. They're an important first step. But make no mistake about it, the end of the Cold War is not the end of threats to America. The world is still a dangerous dangerous and uncertain place, and the first and most solemn obligation of the President of the United States is to keep America safe and strong from foreign dangers and to promote democracy abroad.

Bill Clinton's idea didn't come out of the vapor. They were honed during his time as chairman of the DLC. In that role, Clinton, in some ways, began his campaign before that announcement. He would travel throughout the country to spread the gospel of the New Democrats. Here again is Al Fromm explaining what these new values were.

We believe the Democratic Party's fundamental mission is to expand opportunity, not government. We believe in the politics of inclusion. Our party has historically been the means by which aspiring Americans from every background, have achieved equal rights and full citizenship, believed in being involved in the world, believed in private sector growth was the prerequisite to opportunity. We wanted to prevent crime and punish criminals. Us. And most important, in a sense, was we believed in the ethic that John Kennedy espoused that every American had a responsibility to give something back to the country.

Not everyone loved it. At the top of the list of prominent liberals who hated these New Democrats at the DLC was Reverend Jesse Jackson, a formidable figure within the Democratic Party. Like Clinton, Jackson was also a great talker.

To assume that there may be equal opportunity and great gaps and results assumes that somebody is inferior and somebody is superior. The assumption of that statement stinks.

Now, a lesser politician would have continued to take pot shots at the DLC in the media. But Jesse Jackson was a cunning strategist. He sought to kill the DLC with kindness. He asked to speak at the group's 1990 Convention in New Orleans, where he delivered a speech in which he claimed, at least, that the DLC moderates were on the same page as his rainbow coalition. We are delighted to be united, Jackson said. And the Reverend knew what he was doing. He knew that the entire mission at this point of the DLC was to distinguish itself from the identity politics that the rainbow coalition was championing. Here's Jesse Jackson in 2016 in an interview for the documentary Crashing the Party.

I gave a speech, which was insulting to them, called Delighted to be United.

They reacted to that.

That was Delighted to be United. I laid out the things we had in common.

But they wanted to draw a distinction between the rainbow and the DLC.

So Delighted to be United did not exactly fit the stereotype.

Going into the 1992 election year, the relationship between the New Democrats and Jesse Jackson was frayed. It was about to get worse. After Clinton survived the first of many sex scandals in his political career, he came in second in New Hampshire.

While the evening is young and we don't know yet what the final tally will be, I think we know enough to say with some certainty that New Hampshire, tonight, has made Bill Clinton the comeback kid.

He would go on to vanquish his primary opponents. And just as he was preparing for the general election, Bill Clinton decided to deliver a little payback to Reverend Jackson. He decided to address the Rainbow Coalition. This is five weeks after the LA riots of 1992. Racial tensions in America were at a boil.

You had a rap singer here last night named Sister Soulja. I defend her right to express herself through music. But her comments before and after Los Angeles were filled with the hatred that you do not honor today and tonight. Just listen to this, what she said. She told the Washington Post about a month ago, and I quote, If black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people? As though you're a gang member and you'd normally kill somebody, why not kill a white person? Last year, she said, You can't call me or any black person anywhere in the world a racist. We don't have the power to do to white people what white people have done to us. And even if we did, we don't have that low-down, dirty nature. If there are any good white people, I haven't met them. Where are they? Right here in this room.

That's where they are. That was what became known in American history as a Sister Soulja moment. Today, it is shorthand for when a politician rebukes someone on their own side to appeal to a broader constituency. Clinton invented the tactic. In some ways, it was a cheap shot. Sister Soulja was a mediocre rapper, and she was invited to the Rainbow Coalition as one of several young black leaders. But it wasn't like Jesse Jackson was advocating armed struggle. He was a disciple of Martin Luther King. As a matter of politics, though, This was a master stroke. George H. W. Bush was trying his best to turn Clinton into Mike Dukakis in 1992, and Clinton actually gave him quite a bit of material. He wrote a letter, for example, in 1969, when he was a road scholar, to the colonel in charge of the ROTC training program that he was obligated to attend. He reneged on his earlier commitment because of his opposition to the war in Vietnam. Bill Clinton was a draft dodger. He also smoked marijuana, although he incredulously claimed he had not inhaled. So when Bill Clinton took a shot at the Rainbow Coalition at their own event, it served as an inoculation.

He wasn't an out-of-touch liberal. He He was a new Democrat, fighting for hardworking Americans that played by the rules. Now, this tactic had a dark side as well. Bill Clinton presided over the execution of a lobotomized cop killer named Ricky Ray Rector. Here, I want to quote from the late Christopher Hitchens. He no longer knew his own name and met most of the standard conditions for clemency. But Clinton left New Hampshire specifically to return to Arkansas and have him put to death. He did so in order to demonstrate or signal that he was not soft on crime. Rector's condition was such that as he left his cell for the last time, he saved the dessert from his last meal for later. Strapped to a trolley for a lethal injection, he actually assisted the executioners in their hour-long search for a viable vein in which to place the lethal catheter. He thought they were doctors trying to cure him. Rector had the mind of a child. It's cruel to execute such a person, even if the messaging was brilliant. In 1992, Bill Clinton defeated George H. W. Bush in a three-way race with billionaire H. Ross Perot.

The drought ended. The Democrats were finally back. The DOC had accomplished its mission.

Don't stop thinking about tomorrow. Don't stop What can the Democrats learn from the DLC's journey out of the wilderness?

Well, to start, it should stop caving to the loudest pressure groups.

The far left is pressuring the party to take positions that are deeply unpopular with the American people.

This is Richie Torres, again, speaking about that killer ad that Trump campaign ran in the closing weeks on transgender care for illegal immigrants.

So I saw the ad. It was effective because it weaponized the vice president's words against her. And the question is, why did she feel the need to ever say that in the first place? Because the pressure from the far left on center-left Democrats is overwhelming.

Ignoring special interest groups was the first lesson the DLC ever taught the Democratic Party. It's worth listening to Congressmen Torres and relearning that lesson today. But there are other lessons as well. So To start, it's important to understand that resistance politics has taken over progressive discourse in recent years, whether it's climate change.

How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words, and yet I'm one of the lucky ones.

Black Lives Matter.

Nypd. Nypd. We're trying to block the nomination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The mockery and the trash of a This is a mockery, an infractions of justice. This is an infractions of justice. We will not go back. Cancel Brett Kavanaugh. We're here to give a meal of hair off.

The causes are different, but the style of discourse is the shame. It's the shout-downs, the screaming, the loaded rhetoric, and all of it makes the give-and-take of normal democratic politics impossible. On rare occasions, resistance really is required. But most, nearly all political disputes do not revolve around existential threats. Most rely on compromise, and that means acting like a political opposition.

Donald Trump signed five of my bills the last time I was in Congress.

This is Democratic congressman Roe-Cana.

California signed by him. He's the President of the United States, or will be. He was elected by over 50% of this country. My job in representing my district is to first do what is best for America. They elected me to represent them and what is good for this country. If there is someone who is President, and I think he's proposing something that is good for America, even if it's not perfect, and I could be part of the solution, that's my responsibility. That doesn't mean that when he proposes things that are bad for America, that I won't speak out. I think the the American people want that, and they are desperate in this country for some healing, some moving forward. I hope the President does it. I'm dubious of it. But Here's what I do know, that there's going to be the opportunity for the next generation in both parties to work towards finding more of that common ground and lifting up our politics so you don't have the ugliness of what we've had the past decade.

Pretending that Trump will end our democracy is to deride the choice of the blue collar Americans who Clinton brought back into the party. It could also be a self-fulfilling prophecy if Democrats return to law welfare, shunning their opponents, and encouraging disruptive protest and street anger. Not only will this give Trump and the Republicans an excuse to use the same tactics themselves, it also turns off the very voters a healthy political opposition should be trying to persuade. Right now, the Democrats have been too beholden to the well-organized fringes of their party who seek to lecture the people globalism has left behind.

I remember seeing a former colleague of mine come out in favor of defunding the police in the New York Times.

This is Richie Torres again.

I called him and I said, Let me get this straight. You want to conduct a social experiment known as Defund the Police on my constituents of color in the South Bronx. And my question to you is, what happens if that social experiment goes badly? What happens if it leads to an outbreak of youth violence and gang violence and gun violence? You live in Brownstone, Brooklyn. You have the luxury of advocating for defunding the police. But for my constituents, defunding the police is not a utopian ideal. It's a dystopian reality. It will lead to more violence, not less. For me, the lesson here is that working class voters of color have no interest in becoming guinea pigs for the utopian social experiments of the far left.

Utopian social experiments of the far left is the stuff of resistance, not opposition. And opposition operates in political reality. And so the Democrats should criticize Donald Trump when he deserves it. And believe me, there will be plenty of opportunities for that. But they shouldn't go into his presidency calling him Hitler. It will only erode their credibility for later on. After all, one doesn't negotiate with fascists. One bombs them to smithereens. And Trump isn't Hitler. We know this because President Biden knows this, which is why last week he said, I spoke with President-elect Trump to I congratulated him on his victory, and I assured him that I would direct my entire administration to work with his team to ensure a peaceful and orderly transition.

That's what the American people deserve.

Now, Biden deserves credit for acknowledging his party's defeat, something Donald Trump did not have the grace to do in 2020. Nonetheless, his concession speech last week also revealed his earlier fascism rhetoric to be a messaging strategy, not a bold plan to save half the country from the candidate they just elected. Because if Biden really believed that Donald Trump was a fascist and an existential threat to a democracy, why in the world would he making his transition to power any easier. The other lesson, though, from the DLC is a little different. Bill Clinton's governing agenda planted the seeds of its eventual electoral rebuke. Clinton's tactics and political strategy are unimpeachable, pardon the pun, but his actual policy did not deliver.

I refuse to be part of a generation of Americans that fails to compete in the global economy economy, and so condems hardworking middle-class Americans to a lifetime of struggle without reward or security.

That line worked really well in the 1992 election. But by 2015, as both Trump and Bernie Sanders were energizing a new wave of populism, public perception shifted. Donald Trump just won the 2024 election in part by promising tariffs. That's the opposite of free trade agreements. His appeal to the forgotten man is a direct callback to those working class Clinton voters who didn't see their lives improve because of globalization.

There are a lot of great things that came out of that era. We have more wealth as a nation than ever before. There's $12 trillion of wealth, and we're the leading innovation hub of the world. We lowered the cost of things like phones and televisions But in the process of doing that, both parties and economists had a blind spot.

Again, this is Democratic congressman Roe-Khana.

We had a blind spot to what this was doing to destroy communities. I mean, we shipped off our steel industry, shipped away our aluminum industry, our textile industry. Towns were being hollowed out. We were giving condescending lectures to people to either train for jobs that they never had or to move miles away. And that was wrong. And I think the first thing a Democratic politician needs to say is, We messed up.

Congressman Kana is on to something. Small D democratic politics are fluid. They are ever changing. The key to success in the 1990s, selling neoliberal policies to Joe Sixpack, led to eight years of democratic rule, eight years of peace and prosperity. But it was also a time bomb. The populist response to Clinton's neoliberalism began in that 2016 election, but it came to fruition in 2024. And in that sense, it is the bookend to 1992. 2024 is the year when Clinton's working class coalition became Trump's. That's a tough pill to swallow for Democrats, particularly Democrats who were old enough to remember the glory days of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Law, but it should also be a cause for optimism for the Democrats of this generation. Trump's coalition looks formidable after last week's election, but coalitions change, and his policies today, particularly if he pursues the tariffs he promised on the trail, are likely to exacerbate the inflation that got him elected in the first place. If Trump alienates America's allies, he will make the wars he wishes to end last longer. Sometimes the best an opposition can hope for is to let the party in power make their own mistakes.

And that brings us back to the theme of this episode. The secret to Clinton and the DLC's success is that they realized the voters were not buying what the Democrats were selling, so they offered them something else. They learned how to win in opposition. They did not continue to signal their virtues to the progressive mandarins who refused to listen to the electorate. Power is earned through persuasion in democracy, not cosplay. So the Democrats are at a crossroads. One path is the make believe of the last eight years. The other path is for the party to roll up its sleeves and offer the voters an agenda worth voting for. The midterms are less than two years away. Time to get to work.

Open your eyes, look at the day. You'll see things in a different way. Don't stop thinking about tomorrow. Don't stop. It'll be here. It'll be here better than before yesterday I'm Eli Lake.

If you like this episode, if you learned something, if you disagreed with something, or if it simply sparked a new understanding of our present moment, please share it with your friends and family and use it to have a conversation of your own. If you want to support Honestly, There's Only One Way to Do It, go to thefp. Com and become a subscriber today. See you next time..