We begin with the new additions to the second Trump administration. The President-elect hiring more of his most fervent and loyal allies for key positions with fresh announcements possible at any time. Cnn anchor Kaitlyn Collins is in West Palm Beach, Florida, covering the Trump transition for all of us. Kaitlyn, what are you learning, first of all, about Trump's latest pics?
Well, Wolf, it's been a very busy 72 hours or so here in Palm Beach. I expect that we could get more announcements potentially as soon as tonight or tomorrow, as Donald Trump is making these choices, ones that to him he's been thinking about for some time, certainly Elise Stefanik as the US ambassador to the United Nations, for example, is one of those that he confirmed today, since she accepted that position. But other steps that he's taking here, Wolf, just fill out what we know he wants his administration to start working on on day one once he takes that oath of office. And obviously, immigration has been a big part of that. That is why It's no surprise that you're seeing Stephen Miller and Tom Homan return to the West Wing in two very significant roles for everyone who's watching to see what that immigration agenda is going to look like. Obviously, Stephen Miller is someone who is a policy advisor to Donald Trump in his first term, often was doing a lot of the speech writing for him in his first term in office. He's been with him essentially ever since then, a loud voice on Fox News arguing for his strict immigration policies.
Also, Wolf, I should note, was part of drafting that Muslim country majority ban that was enacted in the early days of the first Trump term, and also the family separation policy, something that Steven Miller continued to argue he believed would have worked if it had stayed in place. Obviously, Trump rescinded it after there was major backlash to it. Then Tom Homan is the other one who is notable as well. He was Trump's acting ICE director before, and now he's coming in in this Tsar-like role, as it was described to me last night when he was on the verge of being offered this position, where he is going to really be helping streamline and head up these policies. And that is something that Trump wants to start working on on day one when he's in office. And then Wolf, the other thing that Trump has been very focused on, maybe more than anything else besides immigration, is the EPA, an environmental regulations and what that's going to look like. And he did announce today that he has selected Lee Zeldin, a former New York congressman who ran for governor there, unsuccessful in 2022 to lead the EPA.
Obviously, Wolf, if you want to know what Trump is going to with the EPA. He's been promising to drill baby drill has been what he has said repeatedly. He has been targeting very specific regulations, wants to reverse some of them on day one, actually already has those drafted and ready to go when he does get into office. And now Lee Zeldin is going to be the former congressman who helps him enact that if he is confirmed as the head of the EPA Wolf.
And Kaitlyn, I know we have some new reporting on the President-elects meeting that's coming up later this week with President Biden at the White House and who won't be there.
Yeah, not completely surprising for those of us who've been covering Trump closely. First Lady Melania Trump is not expected to join former President Trump, now President-elect Trump at the White House when they meet with President Biden in the oval office on Wednesday. That's not going to happen about 11:00 AM. And because of that, the first lady, Jill Biden, had invited Melania Trump to also come. It is a customary tradition. Typically, when a new president is elected, the President and their spouse are invited to the White House to meet with the outgoing President. That tradition was broken by Donald Trump and Melania Trump in the 2020 election when he was falsely claiming it was stolen. And there was no invitation extended to Joe Biden or to President Biden at the time. They are seeking to reverse that and trying to make clear and emphasize that they are committed to a peaceful transition of power. I should note, Wolf, that one source did say that it was a scheduling conflict for Melania Trump, but it also could be some insight into how she is going to take on the first lady role the second time around. Maybe less involved than she was even the first time around, Wolf.
We will find out. Kaitlyn Collins in West Palm Beach, Florida, not far from Mar-a-Lago. Thank you very much. And this note to our viewers, Kaitlyn, of course, will be back later tonight, 9:00 PM Eastern, to anchor her program, The Source. And we'll be watching. Let's break all of this down with our political experts who are here with me in the situation. Gloria Borger, let me start with you. Given the full list of Trump appointees so far, what do you see going on?
Well, the adage once burned, twice shy.
He doesn't I just want to repeat what happened in 2016. When he appointed people he really didn't know well, some of whom turned out to not be loyal to him, he felt. Now what he's doing is he's taking people he knows, very very well who have worked for him before, like Tom Homan and Steven Miller, for example, and giving them the appointments that he wants to give them. He just wants loyalists, and he wants people who are proven loyalists Yes, and that's what these people are. It's interesting, sure, Michael, that Republicans touted Susie Wiles, the new incoming White House Chief of Staff, the first woman to be the White House Chief of Staff, as a measured choice. But the hardliners, as Gloria just said, like Stephen Miller and Tom Homan. They seem to be more in line with Trump's thinking. What do you think?
Look, I'm not surprised. I mean, any President is going to want some level of comfort in the individuals that are part of their key advisory team. I still think Susie Wiles is going to a very critical job in terms of making sure the machine is operationally running on time. You're going to need someone who's going to be able to move those puzzle pieces to make sure that the President-elect's agenda is effectively being issued in on behalf of the American people. I think she's going to do that. In terms of the other individuals, the American people voted for the former President, President-Elect, based on a couple of different things, the economy and immigration in particular. And I know there's some concern on the left about some of the immigration stances of some of these individuals, but this is in part, if you look to get the data, what at least a sizable % of the country actually expects. They want someone who's going to be hard-lying on this issue in terms of strengthening the border and potentially removing some individuals who've broken the law.
It's interesting. Kate Pettingfield is with us. Kate, a lot of us, of I just remember, you worked in the Biden administration. You know the Biden administration. How challenging is it to see the potential changes that are about to take place reversing so many of the Biden administration's policies?
Yeah, I think that is hard for a lot of the team that's there in the White House. When you look at things like things that they are most proud of, things that they've made progress on in terms of climate, for example, the Inflation Reduction Act. You have to imagine that the administration and the EPA is going to do everything they can to get as much of that money obligated out the door, committed to local projects, and committed to doing the work it's supposed to do before the Trump team takes over, as they've stated, that rolling back some of these things is the top of their priority. So yes, of course. I think it is personally It's personally hard, but this is also the way democracy works and administration's turnover. I know that the team there is going to spend as much time as possible ensuring that the work that they've gotten done in the last four years is cemented in place before the Trump team takes over. Comes and reverses it. A lot of it, but we'll see. We'll see. Look, then that will be up for political judgment by the American people.
Like pulling out the Paris climate.
Exactly. When voters go back to the ballot box two years in 2026, they'll look at what the Trump team has done and if they have pulled back some of those things, and the American people will get to have a verdict on that.
Drill, baby. Drill, oil. That's a major change from what the Biden administration was up to as well. Sure, I want you to listen to what Stephen Miller said back in 2017 about judges pausing then President Trump's executive order on immigration. Listen to this.
We have a judiciary that has taken far too much power and become, in many cases, a supreme branch of government.
Our opponents, the media, and the whole world will soon see, as we begin to take further actions, that the powers of the President to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned.
How concerned are you sure, Michael, that Trump is surrounding himself, specifically with Stephen Miller and others, who say that the powers of the President should not be questioned?
Yeah, I don't necessarily agree with that. I mean, a lot of these judges were appointed it by the former President, confirmed by a Republican-led Senate. The judiciary is to serve as a check and a balance on the executive. I don't know too many Conservatives who would actually disagree with that. So I would push back a little bit. Move forward with your agenda, you have a mandate. And if the mandate goes too far in terms of our laws, then some judges, including conservative appointed judges, will say, Well, wait a minute here. We cannot approve this because it does infringe upon certain legal codes. So it's As long as they operate with that mandate in mind, I'm okay with it. But when you start attempting to usurp that, I don't want an all-powerful executive, and I would be willing to guarantee most Conservatives wouldn't want that either, Wolf.
There's breaking news just coming into CNN on the Trump transition For more on that, let's bring back CNN's Kaitlyn Collins. She's joining us from West Palm Beach, down in Florida. Kaitlyn, tell us what you're learning.
Yeah, Wolf, we've just learned that Donald Trump has selected his first of many national security roles to fill, something will be obviously a closely watched portfolio of his second term. He has now selected Florida Republican Mike Walsh as his National Security Advisor. He's the first Green Beret to actually ever serve in Congress, and now he will be serving right in the West Wing with Donald Trump, obviously navigating some very difficult geopolitical conflicts, the war in Ukraine that has been going on that Donald Trump has pledged to solve in one day. Obviously, big questions about what that's actually going to look like once he takes the oath, the war in Gaza that's been underway, all All of these issues that the Biden Whitehouse is dealing with right now is soon going to be something that the Trump Whitehouse is inheriting, these global crises that they are facing. Of course, they are expected to handle them in very different ways, and so people will be watching this space very closely. I should note, congressman Walsh was seen down here in Palm Beach just a few days ago. He's been seen at the Mar-a-Lago Club once or twice.
He is someone who is rumored to be in the running for some national security job. Wolf, whether that was national security advisor or defense secretary, was one that was also floated to us in recent days. And so he's also been someone that you've seen and that people will be familiar with from television. He has been an ardent defender of Donald Trump's over the last several months, often out there defending him after the incident with the Trump campaign that happened at Arlington National Cemetery when they got blowback for filming campaign material there. Mike Walsh was out defending him on television. So of course, that is something that Trump is always looking for in this portfolio. But Wolf, one thing to keep in mind as we are announcing all of these new staff pics that Donald Trump is announcing seemingly by the hour here in Palm Beach, is that all of these have been informed by what happened in his first term in office. He has tried to learn from that and said staffing was one of his biggest mistakes. So all of that is a factor in every single person whose name you're seeing be announced, including Mike Walsh Wolf.
Caitlin Collins reporting for us. Thank you very, very much.
Plus, what you're hearing about the meetings happening down there as the second Trump administration starts to take shape.
Well, Jake, that island behind me where Mar-a-Lago is and the surrounding areas, you're totally right. The hotels, rental properties, that is currently really brimming with people who are wanting to get FaceTime with Donald Trump. It's the epicenter of where his transition is happening. Now, I will say Mar-a-Lago has always been a place where people have been really scrambling to get an in into. They are asking other members, others how they can get an invitation But we have seen that really increase over the last week or so now, according to our conversations. I think one really interesting thing about this is it's not just people who are looking to potentially get in front of Trump so they can be considered for a role in the second administration. A lot of them are just wanting to influence Donald Trump's pics or try to remain close to him and have these conversations with Donald Trump themselves. So we're seeing a lot of this, particularly ramp up in the last couple of days. Now, I think one really important thing to keep in mind is that now that Susie Wiles is his chief of staff, his incoming chief of staff, she really is someone who wants to control the chaos.
And one of her big roles, I'm told, over these past several days has been to try and cut off access to some of the more controversial figures who could be during Mar-a-Lago and meeting with Donald Trump. A lot of people who work with him and work with her say that she's like the grown up handling all of this. Remember, she was in control of the flight manifest for Donald Trump's private plane when he flew around state to state for his different rallies. It was a similar role then, trying to make sure that people who they don't want to be seen with Donald Trump aren't flying with him. It's the same thing now happening at Mar-a-Lago.
And Elaina, you've got some new reporting about the role that billionaire Elon Musk is playing in the transition.
That's right. Elon Musk has essentially been at Mar-a-Lago and with Donald Trump virtually every single day since the election. He was there on election night with Donald Trump. He was on stage during Donald Trump's victory remarks. But he's also been an omnipresent person at Mar-a-Lago over the past several days. He's been in the room when foreign leaders have called up Donald Trump, including the Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky. He has been giving some advice offering his advice to Donald Trump and the team, making his opinion known for certain roles. And now I'm also told today that he is also calling lawmakers, and lawmakers are calling him as they continue to try and find any influence with Donald Trump. I think what's particularly notable about this is we saw Elon Musk yesterday, shortly after Donald Trump had called for whoever the next Senate leader would be to agree to recess appointments, Elon Musk then went out and supported Rick Scott. So I think I'd watch all of these conversations that are happening with a lot of people scrambling to get to know Elon Musk very well, noting that his influence on Donald Trump is very great right now.
All right, Elaina Trin, in West Palm Beach. Thanks so much, President-Elect. Trump is wasting no time naming names for big jobs in administration. He's also talking about possibly going around the usual Senate confirmation process for some of his pics. He wants the next Senate majority leader to be okay with that. And given the speed with which some of the candidates tweeted that they agree, it might not be an issue. Trump writing on Truth Social, Any Republican senator seeking the COVIDed leadership position in the United States Senate must agree to recess appointments in the Senate without which we will not be able to get people confirmed in a timely manner. We need positions filled immediately. Cnn's Manu Raj. I'm sorry, that's what I do. That's what I do, and it's all caps. I'm just trying to for the people at home. Cnn's Manu Raj is joining me now. Manu, this would be a seismic shift for the Senate to just willfully say, Okay, we're going to go into recess. Go ahead and appoint whoever you want.
Yeah, and Jake, this is typically something centers would not want to do, to defer power to the executive branch of the White House. But this is very much Donald Trump's Republican Party and a Republican Republican Senate, in which the Republican leaders are hoping to either win his support or have him stay out of this critical majority leader contest come Wednesday. So they all quickly fell in line and said they are okay with this idea that essentially would short circuit the Senate confirmation process. Remember, typically the process is that the person gets nominated to the position, then there's a background check, then they meet with the committees of jurisdiction, then the committees have hearings, then there are votes in the committees, then there's a vote in the full Senate. A typical advise and consent process Recess. It could take up to about a few months. And on top of that, Donald Trump has up to 53 senators in the United States Senate. Right now, 52. Likely to get 53. We'll see how Pennsylvania turns out. That means he could lose up to four Republican votes. At most, four Republican votes in order to get his nominees confirmed.
But Donald Trump says, Forget about all of that. Let's just go ahead and have the Senate go into extended recesses so I can install my nominees directly. Now, this has been in the past about 17 years or so since Harry Reid was a majority leader and denied George W. Bush, his nominees. Majority Leaders have tried to deny the recess appointments by taking procedural moves. He's asking the next Majority Leader to not do that anymore. And as you heard from both John Thune, John Corne, and also Rick Scott, the three leaders, people vying for that position. They're saying, Okay, President Trump, we'll do what you say.
Yeah, I have to say, in Washington, DC, people usually don't willingly give up power, but I guess it's par for the course in Trump's Washington these days. What What about Senate leadership? Elon Musk and others specifically endorsing Florida Senator, Rick Scott, as Elaina just referred to. Just weeks ago, it seemed like Scott was a long shot. We haven't heard any word from Trump yet on Scott for this time that he's running for Majority Leader. I think he endorsed him when he ran against Mitch McDonald, but he got clobbered. How is this going to play out?
Yeah, look, Scott is still very much a long shot, Jake. Even though the MAGA influencers, the Elon Musks of the world, have out in support of Rick Scott. This is very much an inside game, one that is built on relationships, on fundraising, on promises that are made for committee assignments and the like, which means that senators vote often on their own self-interest. And on top of that, there's a secret ballot leadership election, meaning that Donald Trump may say one thing, or maybe perhaps some of these people close to Donald Trump may say, Support Rick Scott. But these members don't have to make their votes known publicly. They can just do it privately, vote however they want, This is why Senate insiders really believe that Rick Scott really has a very, very... He's the underdog of underdogs right now. And it's really John Cornen and John Thunes to lose. They are probably... It's unclear who is a favorite between the two of them. But Wednesday, we will know Who holds this critical position in Washington, Jake?
All right, Monty Raj, thanks so much.
Tonight, President-elect Trump's choice of Representative Elise Stefanik to be the US ambassador to the United Nations marks the second woman so far that he's tapping for his new administration. Our Brian Todd is taking a closer look at the Trump record on hiring women for top jobs. Brian, what can we expect based on what we saw during his first term? Wolf, if the past is any indication, then some of Donald Trump's closest and most trusted advisors we can expect in in the second term will be women. There's a decent chance that those women will be able to last longer in those roles than some of the more prominent men in the administration.
Susie, come Susie, come here.
Donald Trump has already picked two women for prominent roles in his administration. Susie Wiles, Trump's co-campaign manager for 2024, and a 40-year veteran of Republican politics, will be the first woman ever to serve as White House Chief of Staff. And Republican Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, a vocal supporter of the President-elect, has been tapped to serve as US ambassador to the United Nations, a position that will need Senate approval. Trump has characterized both women as, quote, tough and smart.
Donald Trump has always listened carefully to the female voices around him.
If you think back to the first Trump White House, his female advisors were some of the longest lasting officials in his White House.
Longer lasting than many of the men in the first Trump administration. Trump went through four chiefs of staff in his first term. The first of those, Reince Priebus, lasted only six months. General Michael Flynn had the shortest tenure ever for a national security advisor, 24 days. Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci lasted 10 days. Us. Conversely, senior Trump Whitehouse advisors Kelli Ann Conway and Hope Hicks, and Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee-Sanders, lasted much longer, left on their own terms and left on good terms with Trump.
I think they all had their own style of communicating with Donald Trump, whether it was Hope Hicks behind the scenes or Kelli Ann Conway.
They were known for being able to deliver messages to him that maybe some of the men around him couldn't.
Another analyst who cover the Trump White House, Annie Carnie of the New York Times, told NPR, Trump didn't see those women as direct competition with him, as he saw people like political strategist Steve Bannon.
These women who survived there play along with him. There's no evidence that they challenged him or wanted to be seen as the main player, they were oftentimes obsequuous to him.
And Trump critiques say there's hypocrisy at play, that while Trump elevates and trusts some women, he denigrates others, such as women who served under him and then either left under less than ideal terms or challenged him, like Omarosa Manigal Newman, who was fired from the first Trump White House. This is what Trump called her after she published a book criticizing him. Low life.
She's a low life.
Or Nikki Haley, ambassador to the UN in Trump's first term, a loyalist, until she ran against him in this year's Republican primaries.
Birdbrain, you know who Birdbrain is, right, Nikki?
Trump is somebody who really values loyalty above anything else and saw Nikki Haley as turning against him, even though in the end, she offered to campaign for him.
Meredith McGraw-Politico says in the second Trump term, the formula for survival for the women in top positions, like the men, will be to pick their battles wisely and to not overshadow the boss. Susie Wiles, Trump's new White House Chief of Staff, is widely seen as someone who does have that capability. Wolf. Good point, Brian Todd. Thank you very much.
Cilla, specifically, what does Trump, naming Tom Homan, border Tsar, say about plans for mass deportation?
Well, this was widely expected. Tom Homan has been a supporter of Donald Trump over the last several years. It tells us two things, though. One, as you heard from Elaina, the power center on immigration policy is going to be the White House. Number two, it's that they're taking this very seriously. That might sound obvious, but Tom Homan is a veteran immigration official. We talk about his time during the Trump administration, but he served at ICE during the Obama administration. In fact, he presided over the time where Obama did deport a record number of undocumented immigrants, and the former President at the time had granted him the highest civil award. So he has a lot of experience when it comes to immigration, and specifically immigration, detention, and removals. Now, he was also behind family separation. He is an architect of that. He certainly does take a more hard-line view on immigration policy. But when he has described how he envisions this going, he says that he wants to target criminals, specifically public safety and national security threats. Now, we don't know what the definition is of those beyond what may seem obvious. But in addition to that, he also wants to resume work site enforcement rates.
That was something that President Biden discontinued in 2021. Now, when we've covered these types of enforcement measures before, you may go for one person, but you may come across others who are undocumented, and there can sometimes be collateral to these types of enforcement measures. It's also a way that you rack up the numbers when it comes to immigration, detention, and deportation. So he is going to be at the center of this, and he is someone who knows how to do it. So it was quite telling that they named him to be the border Tsar. Should also note, there was a time in the first administration where Donald Trump wanted to bring him on as a Tsar, and it caught Tom Homan by surprise. He didn't end up joining, but certainly, he has been an influential voice on the outside, and I'm told that he is going to be critical on the inside as well.
I think it's so important what you're saying, that the fact that he has all this government experience, he knows how to do it. Exactly. If they want to do it, and that's obviously super important because it's not just a lofty goal or not so lofty, depending on your political point of view. Priscilla Alvarez. Thanks so much. Appreciate it. Joining us now from West Palm Beach, Florida, former acting Homeland Security Secretary under Trump, Chad Wolf. Mr. Wolf, thanks so much for joining us. What do you think of Trump's decision to name Tom Homan, Bordersar?
Yeah, I think it's an excellent choice. Look, Tom, as you indicated, is a serious person. He's got decades of government experience, both at Customs and Border Protection, but also at ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He knows the border. He knows interior enforcement. He knows how to get the job done. And so what you have with the President's selection is just a professional that's ready to roll up his sleeves and go to work and solve a very difficult issue that the President obviously campaigned on and believes in. And I think with Tom there and with others around him, I think they're going to get the job done.
Define the job. Obviously, I think nobody who's rational would disagree with the idea that violent gang members or criminals who have especially committed to violent acts should get them out of the country. That's fine. I don't think that's a difficult political decision. It's the next rung, right? And the rung after that and the rung after that. Are we really talking realistically about, I don't even know how many undocumented immigrants there are in this country, but let's say it's 20 million. Are we really talking about all 20 million being deported?
Well, Jake, it may not be a tough political position, but as you indicated, there's criminals here today that are not being removed. So I know I've heard Tom and certainly the President talk about removing these public safety and national security threats from American communities. Look, just under the Biden-Harris administration, convicted criminal aliens, 74 % less deportations than what we saw under the first Trump administration. I think it's important not to just gloss over the fact that you want to remove dangerous people from American communities. It's just not happening now. The Biden team will say that that's their priority, but the numbers don't lie. They're just not removing folks in the manner in which they should. So I think if they were to ask, that should definitely continue to be the priority. But this idea that you're going to exempt whole classes of individuals from the law, I don't think that should be the case either. And of course, we've seen that as well.
Yeah, I'm I'm not trying to gloss over it. I'm just saying it's, I mean, I think probably you'd get 99% polling on should violent criminals who aren't citizens be deported. But what happens after that? What about the idea that a large percentage, I've seen as many as 5% of the workforce, at least according to Pew, is undocumented. Without saying I'm advocating for them to be exempt, what happens to the economy if 5% of the workforce is deported?
Again, you got to prioritize the removals. And I know Tom, and again, the President has said doing that, making sure that you're removing the worst of the worst. But this idea that you've got to turn your head and just exempt people from the law or from consequences of the law, deportation of the like, because they have a job here in the United States. We certainly need to take a look at that, but there are other ways and other mechanisms and certainly other visas that allow individuals to come in and to contribute to the US economy. And if the Congress wants to do more, wants to allow more of those visas, that's certainly a debate that they should have. But to simply say that we're going to turn our head and just ignore the fact that the law is being broken, I don't think that that's the right approach.
Are Trump transition team members or others talking to Republican lawmakers to figure out how Trump will fund this mass deportation plan?
Well, I'll let the transition team speak for itself. I guess that they are. I would suspect that they are. I think that's really important because it's not only just a change in policy, which obviously the President can do, but obviously there's going to be some resources required to make sure that those policies are implemented in a way that's smart and that's consistent and that's sustainable over the long term.
What about the impact? Again, I'm not arguing in favor or pro or con against any of this, but what about, say there is an undocumented gentleman and he's married to an American citizen and they have children, does he get deported? What if both parents are undocumented, but the kid was born in this country? Did all three of them get deported? Is somebody gaming out all of these different permutations of the various status of these people?
Well, Jake, I'm not going to get into hypotheticals because the background of all those individuals you just said really, really matter. How did they come here? Have they tried to adjust status? A variety of If the things implement or, sorry, put in play, different decisions that are going to be made. But again, you go back to that prioritization of making sure that you're removing the worst of the worst first. Final orders of removal. There's almost 1.5 million individuals here that have gotten a final order of removal from an immigration judge but have not left the country. And again, they've gone through the due process system, and so it's really important to remove those individuals. But the example that you gave of an illegal alien spouse married to a US citizen, there's a way to cure their their illegal entry into the United States. The law already allows for that. They've got to take advantage of that. They've got to do that process, and then they can come back into the country legally. So I think a lot of this is just explaining the various options out there. And again, we come back to allowing folks to come into the country legally is fine.
I don't think that anyone is not in favor of that. It's the illegal activity and then turning your head and blessing it and say, No, that's fine. Let's just move on. And I don't think But that is certainly not the direction we need to go.
Mr. Wolf, I can't help but notice on the Kairon that you are in West Palm Beach, Florida. I don't know if that's a coincidence or if you have had a meeting at Mar-a-Lago, but do you think it's possible you might be asked to serve in the new Trump administration? And if asked, would you serve?
Well, it is a coincidence. But again, as I've said, it's an honor to be asked to serve your country, particularly by President Trump. I served him for four years. He's a reformer. He's a disruptor. I think that's what America needs, particularly along that border, and would be happy to serve again if asked.
Former Secretary Chad Wolf. Thank you so much, sir. Enjoy your vacation or whatever in West Palm Beach, Florida. We appreciate you being here.
CNN's reporters and analysts are reporting from West Palm Beach, Florida, and beyond on President-elect Donald Trump's ...