Transcript of Candace Owens x Norman Finkelstein

The Economist magazine, it describes Gaza as, quote, a human rubbish sheep. The leading UN official on Gaza describes it as, quote, a toxic dump. For the people of Israel, Gazans are vermin. They're garbage. They're human refuse.

You guys were the ones that insisted, insisted that we all all have a perspective on October seventh. Then when we looked and we pierced that veil, we went, Oh, my goodness. How was that ever perished? And now you want us to shut up.

There's a problem here. A billionaire class of Jewish supremacists are now flagrantly using money as a blackmail weapon to silence not just criticism of Jews, but silenced criticism of an ongoing genocide.

All right, you guys. I am super excited about this conversation. Where do I begin? I'll just begin with my personal It was a very scary experience. October seventh took place, and I remember immediately after there was this peer pressure campaign to get everybody to make a statement about what had happened in Israel. Frankly, I was happy to make a statement about how tragic those events were, but I couldn't actually make a statement regarding why these events took place. I didn't know what had happened prior to that day. I didn't know the history of the modern state of Israel. When I began what I would call an honest inquiry into the history of the modern state of Israel, I felt that I was basically in a pressure cooker. People that I thought were my friends were telling not to pursue this route. I didn't comprehend what they meant when they said not to pursue this route. They were calling me names, saying that I was flirting with anti-Semitism by wanting to read books and speak to people that were on the opposite side of that issue. I got into a lot of trouble, and I mean a lot of trouble, from people that I thought were my friends, when I hosted the person who is now sitting across from me, Norm Finkelstein, on my previous show, The things that he told me about Gaza were shocking.

It was especially shocking because this wasn't from someone that they could easily describe as anti-Semitic, giving us history, which he's going to tell you about today. Very important discussion. Since he's also an individual that I thought, quite strangely, none of the people who were peer pressuring me were willing to debate. If Norm Finkelstein is wrong, and he could be, why wouldn't the most prominent voices of the pro-Israel debate be willing to sit down with him and have that discussion? We're going to figure out why. Norm Finkelstein, welcome to my show. Actually, mine, totally owned by me. I can host you here.

Thank you so much for having me on the show.

Just in case my audience has not been introduced to you, I would first just like you to, and we're going to get to your books, which are amazing, to tell them your backstory and your credentials and what happened despite the fact that you were so credentialed.

The back story is there's a personal element and there is a professional element. The personal element is that I am the son of survivors of the Nazi Holocaust. Both my parents were in what was called the Warsaw Gettle. The Warsaw Gadow was repressed after an uprising in April 1943. There were about 20,000 to 30,000 survivors of the Warsaw Gadow uprising, and they were deported to Meidenick Concentration Camp. Both my father and my mother were deported to Meidenick. My mother ended up in two slave labor camps after Meidenberg. My father ended up in Auschwitz, and he was in the Auschwitz Death March, every member of my family, apart from my mother and father, on both sides, everybody was exterminated. There were no aunts, there were no uncles, there were no grandparents, there was nothing. My parents were, for reasons not worth going into now, they were decidedly on the left, politically. It had a very deep impact on me growing up. In a way, even though I grew up in a lower middle-class Jewish neighborhood, I never quite fit in because of my family background and a totally different mindset, I think. Okay, partially different mindset than my peers because of my parents' experience.

In June 1982, we're fast forwarding. June 1982, Israel invaded Lebanon, and I got involved in the Israel-Palestine conflict. In my youth, it was mostly the war in Vietnam, the civil rights movement. In 1982, it became Israel-Palestine. I ended up writing my doctoral dissertation at at Princeton University on the Theory of Zionism. Then in 1984, there was a big national bestseller called From Time in Memorial, which claimed to reveal new aspects of the Israel-Palestine conflict that proved Israel was in the right and the Palestinians were in the wrong. I was still a graduate student at the time, and I proved, demonstrated that the this book, which had the endorsement of the who's who of the Jewish intellectual community back then. People like Barbara Tuckman, who you wouldn't know, Soul Bello, the novelist, they all endorsed the book. I am widely credited with the one exposing that it was a hoax. From there on in, I would say, after having demonstrated that this humble graduate student proving that all the luminaries were either promoting a thread bear hoax, from there on in, I would say, I encountered difficulties in my professional life.

Amazing. So despite, and you did achieve your PhD?

Yes.

Despite this, wasn't there some fracas that happened where they didn't allow you back? Or what happened at the end of your career, academic career?

Academic career. Right. I would say, speaking frankly, and believe me, at my age, I have no interest whatsoever in invoking pity. It's water under the bridge. I never had an academic career. I was in academia. It's called being an adjunct. An adjunct basically means you're hired from semester to semester. It's literally the equivalent of a substitute teacher in a public school system, except a substitute teacher is paid significantly more than an adjunct. I was never able to get beyond the adjunct status, except one brief period at the Paul University in Chicago, where by a concatenation of events, I managed to get on a tenure track job. Tenure track job. But when the moment When the moment of truth came, I was denied tenure. After that, because it was a national story when I was denied tenure, because Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University Law School made a determined public attempt to stop me. There was a big editorial in the Wall Street Journal by him. He made a very public attempt to stop me. Well, after that, that was 2008, 2007. After that, I was completely unemployed, not even adjunct. After that, actually, I know this will come as a...

It will It seemed unbelievable. I literally couldn't volunteer to teach. There were places where in high schools, a charter school, for example, in East Harlem, where the father of the principal was He was a friend of mine. His daughter, the principal, was really wonderful, and she ran a tight ship. That was a darn good school. You could see just walking through the hallways. I said, I'll volunteer. No. At that point, after the De Paul incident, I was completely blacklisted, but I never got started. The plane never left the tarmac.

Well, I do want to stress here, as I have been stressing on my show, that these schools are Soviet indoctrination camps. I implore people to read Thomas Soul's book about inside the American education system, and what he is saying, it's perfectly into there. The point is to indoctrinate your children. If you do not have a doctor, so to speak, that is willing to go into the classrooms and do that indoctrination, they won't let them in. This is absolutely proof of that. Okay, so I want to give the same background because you were a major piece of me waking up and realizing that I knew nothing about Gaza. Could you just unpack for people who are perhaps hearing this for the first time? I think a lot of people we've seen Israel's support has virtually collapsed, and that's because of the behavior that's going on with the censorship has become so extreme in America. But let's actually give these people a background education like you gave me when you came on my show of what actually Gaza is, what is the history there, what happened to these people in 1948.

Obviously, within the limits of an interview, it's very hard to go through that history with any Well, you have a book for it, so I am going to be a seamless promoter of this because we're going to give you the spark notes here, but Gaza: An Inquest into its Martyrdom is the title of the book that will be relevant for this.

But here we're going to give you some spark notes.

Basically, if I were to try to summarize it for the purposes of this conversation, I believe the place to begin is 1948. The state of Israel is created. In the course of its creation, about 90% of the Indigenous Palestinian population of Israel was expelled, about 750,000 people. Of those 750,000, about 300,000 were expelled to Gaza. That's when Gaza became Gaza. It was right now of the population of Gaza, about 80% are refugees from the 1948 War or descendants of those refugees. Under international law, a descendant of a refugee is still counted as a refugee. So it's 80% a refugee population, and it's also about 50% a child population. Now, from the moment Gaza came under Egyptian administration. After the 1948 War, Gaza comes under Egyptian administration. It's a very interesting fact when you start going through the history, there are all these outside observers who go into Gaza, either to work there, like under the auspices of the UN, or just to see the situation. And one of the things that struck me was each time somebody goes to Gaza, they He described Gaza as a huge concentration camp. Now, this is still under Egyptian rule.

So ELM Burns, the main UN official in Gaza, he writes a book between Arab and Jew, other As he described Gaza, he described it as a huge concentration camp. In 1967, during the June 1967 War, Gaza comes under Israeli control. In July 1967, the father of Al Gore, the presidential candidate, his father was also a senator. Al Gore or Senator Gore, meaning the father, he goes to Gaza. He comes back and he testifies before the US Congress. How does he describe Gaza? He says, Gaza is, a huge concentration camp on the send, if you will. You now fast forward to 2002. Now, one of Israel's leading sociologist. His name was Baruch Kimmerling. He writes a little book. The little book is called Politisite. How does he describe Gaza? He describes Gaza as, The biggest concentration camp ever. 2004, the head of Israel's National Security Council. His name is Giora Island. He's still around. He's active now behind the scenes in the Netanyahu government. How does he describe Gaza? He describes Gaza as a huge concentration camp. Now, bear in mind, this is before Israel imposed the blockade of Gaza. It was It's already a horror show.

It's been a horror show since 1948. In 2006, Israel imposes a blockade on Gaza. It decides what goes in. It decides what goes out, it It decides who goes in. It decides who goes out. They put Gaza on what they call a humanitarian minimum diet. You know what that meant? Meant they calculated, literally, we're not talking about hyperbole now, poetry. They calculated the caloric diet of everyone living in Gaza, and they admitted just enough food to avoid scenes of starvation. That was 2006. We're not talking about after October seventh. They prohibited baby chips from going into Gaza. They prohibited chocolate from going into Gaza. They prohibited potato chips from going into Gaza. They prohibited condiments from going into Gaza. No cinnamon allowed in Gaza. Why? They wanted to create such intolerable conditions that the population of Gaza would overthrow the government that they elected. So that was Gaza. Now, you come to 2006, October sixth, okay? You come to 2006. The Economist magazine, which you know is not a flaming liberal magazine, it describes Gaza as, A human rubbish sheep. The leading UN official on Gaza describes it as, A toxic dump. Sixty % of the young people in Gaza, the people who burst the gates of Gaza on October seventh, 60 % of them are unemployed.

All they have to look forward to when they get up each morning is to pace the perimeter of this tiny parcel of land, 26 miles long, the length a marathon, 5 miles wide. That was gossip. It was exactly what the UN official said, exactly what Al Gore's father said, exactly what the head of the Israeli National Security Council said. They were born into, they were born into, they languished in, and they were destined to die in a concentration camp. It was like an elephant burial ground, really. When I struggled after October seventh, I've said this many times, but it's a fact, it's not a drama point. What happened October seventh was awful. There's no doubt in my mind about that. The magnitude was significant. 1,200 people killed. About Estimates, it's not an estimate, close to 800 of them, civilians, 400 combatants, Israeli IDF members of the Israeli Defense Forces. It's a significant number. Can't get around that. I know there are all sorts of stories about Israel having killed a lot of your number. I've investigated as best I can. And I'll admit, there's still room on the margins for error, but I think it was overwhelmingly, it was by Hamas.

And so how do you reckon something like that? But in politics, there are many levels. There's the facts, there's your political judgment, there's your legal judgment, there's your moral judgment. And they don't come directly from the facts. They do not. They go through many filters or sieves before you get a moral judgment. When I started to try to think it through, I came upon in my mind the Nat Turner Rebellion. For those of your listeners who are unaware, it was the largest slavery vote in American history. Nat Turner, he gave the order. All the historians agree on this. There isn't a huge literature in Turner, but there is a literature. They all agree on one point. He gave the order, which he never denied. He did a famous confession. We don't know how much of the confession is actually him and how much is the person who's writing it. But this part seemed real. The order was kill all white people. Kill all white people. And that's what they proceeded to do. They went on what you might call a 48-hour rampage, less than 48 hours, actually, and hacked men, women, babies. It was brutal.

It was brutal. But then something struck me. One historian, his name is Stephen Oakes, and he's trying to understand Nat Turner's motivation. Why did he do it? He said, Nat Turner was a very smart guy. There was no question about that. The person who took down his confession, he was White. He said, White or Black, everybody agreed Nat Turner was a very smart guy. Then he said, the historian, he said, There was this huge gulf for Nat Turner very smart guy, between what he aspired to be in life and what he was destined to be because he was a slave. That huge gulf, he knew he was smart. And yet he also knew, as the historian Stephen Oakes put it, that this is only earthly existence He was born into languish in and would die a slave. And that was the people, the young people in Gaza. They knew. You see, now Gaza is in the news. But by October 6, 2023, Gaza had vanished from the news. I have made the point because I do believe it's relevant. I had spent about 15 years just chronicling the details of what's happening in Gaza. I began roughly in the early 2000s.

And by 2020, I gave up. That's a fact. And it was not a fact I was proud of because I was writing books that were getting more and more detailed. I mean, so micro detail. And nobody was reading them. The last book I wrote was called I Accus. My publisher, not happily, informed me it sold 370 copies. Of those 370, I purchased half of them. No, it's a fact, because it was about a case related to Gaza in the International Criminal Court, and I was hoping to influence the court through my research, so I was going to present it to the ICC. But by 2020, I said, Norm, you have only one life to live Am I just going to stubbornly persist in the face of the fact that nobody cares? That was the situation in Gaza. Gaza had vanished from the political scene. By October sixth, 2023, all the talk was about whether the Saudi, Saudi Arabia, would join the Abraham Accords. Nobody was talking about Gaza anymore. And so the people of Gaza basically did what Nat Turner did. Now, here's the thing. Imagine an account of Nat Turner that doesn't mention he was a slave.

Just this crazy religious fanatic. He was a religious fanatic. No question about that. Nat Turner was a religious fanatic. He used the language of the Bible to try to make sense of his condition. That's what a religious fanatic meant. John Brown, who led the insurrection before of the Civil War, he also was a religious fanatic. He deeply fanatically believed slavery was an abomination, to the point that I don't want to get off on a digression, but when Frederick Douglass, the great abolitionist, when he went to meet John Brown, Douglass comments in one of his... He had three autobiographies. In one of them, he comments, he just wouldn't stop talking about slavery. He said he was boring. He was a fanatic. He was Johnny OneNote, John Brown, Only about slavery. And Nat Turner, too. He was a religious fanatic. But imagine if you tried to make sense of the Nat Turner Rebellion by focusing only on his religious fanaticism, like the religiously fanatical Hamas, Only focus on that and not mention the guy is a slave.

Or mention if it were the circumstance for Nat Turner, and it isn't, or mentioned the fact that Nat Turner, actually, the was funded by money that one of the slave owners gave him. That would be something that would be important if there was a Bibi Netanyahu circumstance there or that the slave owners received multiple warnings and for some reason just decided to ignore the fact that this rebellion was brewing I mean, there's a lot of things. I've been to Israel, and it is, Charlie Kirk said it best immediately after because he had been many, many times. Truly unbelievable. It's actually quite scary because every 15 feet, there's an armed person. They take their Security very seriously. Now people are speaking out, and I think a lot more is going to come out because they have been censoring. Bibi has been lying, censoring, editing transcripts. I've been following the case against him pretty closely because there are Israeli publications that have been documenting everything. Obviously, he's not well liked by the people in Israel. They were taken to the streets to protest him. But it is almost unbelievable that that circumstance, plus when you add to the fact they intercepted a document, right, way earlier that said 200 hostages were going to be taken by Hamas.

It's almost unbelievable that they ignored everything, plus Egypt warning them that something was happening on the border. I have never bought that there was not... Not that it took place, of course, it took place and it was terrible, but that it wasn't intentionally allowed. I truly believe that in my soul after I saw the footage prior to October seventh of Bibi Netanyahu. I'm not sure if you've seen this, but he thinks he's off record. He says, put the cameras down, off record, and he starts detailing a plan where he's like, We got to hit Gaza so hard that they can't go back. They needed a pretext of sorts. Do I think Bibi Netanyahu is evil enough to sacrifice his own people? Yes, a million times over. What's been happening in Gaza is a tremendous evil. I don't think we will truly know the full picture of evil it was until Bibi Netanyahu is removed from power and we're able to see the transcripts that he's blocking of the conversations he had that day with his cabinet.

Look, obviously, there are areas of interpretation here, and I don't want to pretend as if I have a monopoly in the truth. If you look back at 9/11, our own September 11th, if you look back, and there were many people who wrote at the time, there were a lot of people in the national security establishment who had reports that there was going to be an attack. They came in, the reports came in, no question about that. You have to remember, when you are a state the size of the United States and the power of the United States, you're going to be getting each day 10,000 intelligence reports about possible terrorist attack here, possible terrorist attack there. The United States has a huge number of bases around the world. So you're always getting reports. But a intelligence establishment has to rank threats, and they ranked the Osama bin Laden threat low or lower than it should have been ranked. In the case of Israel, here we're free to disagree. Israel is a Jewish supremacist state. That's not my opinion. The head of Israel's main human rights organization, it's called Betselem, V-T-S-E-L-E-M. The head of Israel's human rights, Betselem, this is a few years ago, It's a guy named Hagai El Ad, very decent guy.

I've never met him. I'm not sure if he ever wanted to meet me, but decent guy. He was a Harvard-trained PhD in physics, serious fellow. He put out a little report, or he was the executive director when Bitsalam put out a report. It was probably 10, 15 years ago now. Ten. My memory is bad for time He said, Here are the basic facts. There's one state from the Mediterranean to the Jordan. There's no Israel and occupied territories. It's just one state. He said, That state, its foundation is Jewish supremacy. There are different levels of Jewish supremacy. It's different for the situation of Arabs, the Palestinians living in Israel, Palestinians living in the West Bank, Palestinians living in Gaza and Palestinian refugees. It's different levels. But the foundation is it's a Jewish supremacist state. Now, why do I mention it? Because for the people of Israel, Gazans are vermin. They're garbage. They're human refuse. And so when you're getting intelligence reports from Gaza that they're going to launch an operation, Israeli intelligence establishment this thing. What are you talking about? They're going to outsmart us. They are going to trick us with our surveillance, with our technology, with our IDF.

This vermin is going to be able to pull this off. I think they did the same thing as our Bush administration did with Osama bin Laden. They put it on a low priority. They were shocked that Hamas was able, after October seventh, they were shocked that Hamas was able to pull it off.

Dave Smith, who's a good friend of mine, believes, has your perspective. He does have your perspective.

One last point on this, and I want to hear you out. You said that Israelis hate Netanyahu. I don't think that's true at all. Netanyahu is the longest sitting Prime Minister in Israeli history. If you follow it, as I do, and you're not obliged to, that's not your niche. Every few years, they report, Netanyahu is going, Netanyahu is going, Netanyahu is out. Netanyahu is finished. No, he's not. And you know why? Because he's an obnoxious, narcissistic Jewish supremacist. And that's Israeli society, obnoxious, narcissistic Jewish supremacist. When they see him, they see themselves. So there may be quarels on this policy issue and that policy issue. But at the end of the day, they keep voting for him, and they vote for him because Netanyahu is not just the face of, he's the reality of Israeli society. When they try so hard, the people who are critical of Israel, people like Bernie Sanders, who's been not bad in recent years. He has his limits, but he's been okay. He always tries to laser beam Netanyahu. That's not true. The problem is not Netanyahu. The problem is the whole of Israeli society. If you look at the polls, half of Israeli Jews believe Israel should commit a genocide in Gaza.

That's what the polls show. About 70 to 75% in polls say there are no innocents in Gaza. No innocents.

There's nothing but children.

No innocents in Gaza, half of the population being Jewish. The former Israeli or the current Israeli opposition leader, he said that the IDF, the Israeli Defense Forces, they kill children as a hobby as a hobby.

I've seen some videos of how proud they are when they kill a child. It's really dark. But also, I will say you can see psychological conditioning, as in their viewpoints on the Palestinians you can tell is being nurtured from the time that they're a child. I ran into somebody who left Israel, moved to Tennessee recently. I ran into him at a farmer's market, and he said, I absolutely love you, and I want you to know that we learn this stuff from the time we are children. I totally agree with that. He left, and he said, From the time we are children, we learn. He broke a psychological barrier to get there, obviously, as an Israeli. But you are correct. That's why psychology really is the name of the game. When you're talking about religious fanaticism, or any other fanaticism, I want to say also, there is an element of psychology. That is why in my capacity now, that's actually got a lot of trouble talking about the history of Sigmund Freud. But if you want to really speak what is happening with psychology, propaganda, PR. He's the father of all of that. Going back and tracing those routes, it's very scary.

I mean, these were really deeply dark people who were trying to cover up their own crimes. That is the reality without going off on a tangent here. But you are correct. I think I would like to hear your perspective on how the tentacles of that Jewish supremacy have manifested. You are actually, and I'm sure you wouldn't refer yourself as a victim, but I'm saying what happened to you in your life, the circumstances around what happened in your academic career, is actually reflected in the Jewish supremacethees are the perspectives that you have to have if you're going to be welcome into these spaces that we control. How did that happen?

Well, I would want to make the following points. Number one, the Jewish showing since October seventh. It's actually, I'm talking about broadly, American Jewish showing. It's actually not been bad. I'm actually very surprised. So for example, Somebody sent me this. Let's see. The most recent poll from the Washington Post, it found that 61% of American Jews say Israel has committed war crimes in Gaza. 40% say Israel has committed genocide there, and about half are opposing what Israel is doing in Gaza. It's about 10% less than the American people in general, but it's not a bad showing, and we should recognize that.

I say it on my show all the time. I say it's important to recognize that, not only that, because I grew up in Stamper, Connecticut, so I grew up in a very Jewish area. I always remark, these are not the Jewish people that you went to school with. We're talking about these hubs of power, DC, Hollywood. I totally agree. It sounds like when you're reading the news, Every Jewish person must hold this perspective, and that is not reality.

I want to say, Candice, I'm grateful that you say that. I believe that's factually correct. If you remember the first demonstrations against the genocide in Gaza, the biggest ones were led by Jews at Grand Central Station at the Statue of Liberty. It was deeply moving. They were very active Jewish students were very active in the encampments around the country.

They were. They didn't get the same showcasing in the media. They tried to pretty much squash it, but it was there, and that's important to state.

Within that context, where, as I I would say the results of the polls are in bed, in my opinion. Within that context, you use the word hubs. It is a fact, and one has to, in my opinion, face it because it's having real consequences. There's a Jewish supremacist's billionaire class which is exerting a huge amount of power and muscle up front and behind the scenes. I would just go through a few examples.

Can I throw one at you? Barry Weiss becoming the President of CBS News, where I am telling you, if she actually sat an IQ test, she would be below average intelligence.

I would call that, and I'll get to that. I would call that Jewish supremacist affirmative action. Correct.

That's what it is. Beyond affirmative action.

It's crazy. She has no competence.

She can't even hold a conversation. You don't even want to listen to her.

She is so lacking in gray matter that she couldn't pass the test to be on the view.

How is she not embarrassed to show up for work every day knowing that probably the majority- That everybody knows. Everybody knows. The majority of people that are... Probably everyone is smarter than her. They've worked harder than her. They would be better in that position. Everyone's looking at you going, This is an affirmative action hire. And I call this the children of Binai Barith, and people that are reading the books that I'm reading will learn a bit more about that. But it's so obvious. She did a year at Tel Aviv University. She's in the club, so to speak.

She was in the club from a quite young age. She was born into it. She led the campaign at Columbia University when she was an undergraduate to try to rid the faculty of professors critical of the state of Israel. She lost that battle, but now she's Obviously.

I would die of embarrassment if I showed up every day and everyone knew that I did not belong there. But like Daddy made a phone call, a feeling. I've been speaking a lot about Riverbed Ranch because I absolutely love their steak. I tell you guys that all the time. Black Angus beef is famous for its great flavor, but Riverbed Ranch has taken that to a whole new level. Because over the last 35 years, Riverbed Ranch has been creating an elite Angus herd by using ultrasound technology to select genetically superior cattle with a focus on flavor and tenderness. Each Each year, Riverbed Ranch provides about 850 elite Black Angus Bulls containing these special genetics to over 260 Western US ranches. Those partnership ranches receive a substantial premium from Riverbed Ranch for raising those calves without the use of growth hormones and without antibiotics. Every fall, the calves containing these elite genetics return to Riverbed Ranch to spend the following summer in lush mountain pastures. When you purchase from Riverbed Ranch, you are not only supporting the 64 cowboys and their families who work on the ranch, but you're also supporting the over 260 other US ranches and the hundreds of American families who work on those ranches as well.

It's born in the USA, raised in the USA, processed here in the USA. The meat is aged to perfection for 21 days, and it's shipped directly from their ranches to your home. So this is not your average Black Angus beef. This is more flavorful, it's more tender than even the best Angus beef that I've ever tasted. Right now, if you head over to riverbendranche. Com and use promo code Candice at checkout, you'll get $20 off your first order. Trust me, you are going to be very impressed. Visit riverbendranche. Com and use promo code Candice. Jumping in here to tell you guys about prebornings, you know I love them. I've watched so many people who I'm close to be vilified for standing up for the truth. I, of course, have dealt with that myself, but I have also seen something else, which is a lot of courage right now in this moment. I don't play defense anymore. I don't water down what I believe to be palatable because silence, I have learned, is not kindness, it's actually consent. Right now, the greatest silence is surrounding the topic of the lives that are ended before they even take their first breath.

We're going to call ourselves Defender's of Life, then we need to act like it. That's why I'm asking you to join me to fight back with action, with truth, and with love for just $28. That is what it costs to give a free ultrasound to a woman that's in crisis and considering an abortion. $28 will help her see the life that's growing inside of her. It gives her the truth that our culture does not provide. So don't sit this one out. Don't wait for permission. Be bold, be clear. We should be unapologetically pro-life. Head to preborn. Org/candice right now. Give $28. You can also give 10 times that amount if you can. This is the line that I think that we must stand on. We have to stand for truth and what's right. We need to save lives from abortion and stand firm in the gospel. Again, that is preborn. Org/candice to provide an ultrasound for just $28.

When very shortly into October seventh, I'm asked to do a debate, and I said, Fine, by Lex Friedmann. He asks me to do a debate. He said, Who do you want me to debate? He said, This thing I didn't know what that person was. This thing called Destiny.

You got a date with Destiny. Yeah, exactly.

You are my Destiny. I don't claim to a distinguish established academic pedigree. But at this point in my life, I'm not debating a thing called destiny. So I said to Lex Friedmann, thanks, but no, thanks. And then he... By the way, I didn't know who Lex Friedmann was either. I don't follow podcasts or things like that. I'm a book person, old-fashioned. And then he gets back to me about three weeks later and he says, How would you like to debate Benny Morris? I said, Sure. Benny Morris is Israel's senior historian. I know his work very well. It would be exciting for me, actually, from an intellectual level to actually face him because I had written a lot on him. Then, Lex Friedmann says, And Destiny. I'm wondering, why are you harping on Destiny?

This random streamer. It was so strange.

It was strange. Exactly. It was so strange. I then thought to myself, if I refused, then it would look like I'm afraid to debate Benny Morris because he's a real senior star, and very smart. He knows his stuff, for Sure. I didn't want that to be broadcast far and wide, Fincaustina afraid to debate Benny Morris. I said, Okay, if he wants to come along with Benny Morris, this thing called Destiny, I said, Okay, I'll do it. I said, I'll debate with my good friend, very smart guy, Mouim Rabani, top of the line, and we have the same political outlook. Why do I mention it? A few A few months later, I'm having a conversation with a friend of mine, and he says to me, You know, Destiny was paid to be on with you. I said, No, nobody told me that. He said, Yeah, he was. He could describe it because he was discreet. He described it as a Israel advocacy group had groomed him to debate me and had—I'm using the words he said—paid him handsomely to debate me. It's an unimpeachable source. By the way, the person who told me this is not political at all.

Just by coincidence, he could say with absolute certainty, and I know it. Why do I mention it? Because at that time, this was this first month into October seventh, it was a a revelation But now we're two years later. We're two years later. In the time that's elapsed, not one, not two, three Ivy League presidents were toppled. There's never been... I know the history of academic freedom in our country. I've written on it. There's never been anything like it. This massive assault. How was it conducted? It started with people like Bill Ackman, the billionaire. He threatens Harvard. You don't crush the encampments. You don't get alumni money. That was very straightforward. It was pure blackmail.

Which is, by the way, their favorite tactic. Financial blackmail comes first.

It was financial blackmail. If you look at the Harvard report on anti-Semitism, one alumni, one Jewish alumni gave Harvard $200 million. One alumni gave Harvard $300 million. Ackman, $50 million. Then there was a petition organized. My memory is, but the number probably increased vastly, the original version of the petition, 1,200 Jewish alumni from Harvard threatened to withhold the alumni contributions. And so, systematically, these college presidents are being ousted. I can quote to you, but I can't tell you the source, but I could tell you, no, you have to judge people by their track record, whether I have a track record of being accurate or inaccurate. When President McGill was deposed from the University of Pennsylvania, a person approached her who knew her to express commisceration with her situation, and she replied with two words, Money talks.

I can speak to that. I mean, I've lived it, and that is the first thing that happens, which is financial blackmail. A lot of people want to know, Why is this person doing this? Or why are they not saying it? At the end of the day, they let you know you'll lose everything. Some people go, Well, it's not risk. I'd rather just toe the line so that I can keep life as I know it. The majority of people are facing that. They have families to feed, and they don't know how to restart because in most circumstances, it's all they've ever known. You're talking about someone who's maybe been in the academia for a very long time, and they're going, Not only will we force successfully kick you out, we'll also slap a tag on you and call our friends in the media, like a Barry Weis when she was at New York Times, to smear you and libel you as an anti-Semite. You're asking for a type of bravery that I would say most people people don't have, and they just go, I'm going to shut up. But the answer to that for people that are listening is take your kids out of the schools.

You don't need these schools. I mean, what is the upside? You're paying an absolute fortune for your children to go to debt. The system is rigged anyway. You think they're going to have the same jobs. They want their children to go on. What does it say about our society that Norm Finkelstein can't achieve tenure, but an admitted child rapist like Jeffrey Epstein had a office at Harvard University. That wasn't what caused the billionaire backlash, which would have made sense. We're all pulling our money unless you get this person who doesn't have any an academic career, by the way, off of our campus. No. This was after he admitted and served time in jail. Jeffrey Epstein still had an office at Harvard University campus. That's why I say to people, that's a Mossad operation, no matter which way you look at it. Harvard University, in my view, is running a Mossad operation. But again, don't want to get lost in another You are absolutely correct that that is a stunning example of how the mechanics are when we're speaking about their system of financial blackmail.

There are many aspects to it, and a lot of it has come out in recent months, the paying people of $7,000 for each post in support of Israel.

Life-changing money for most influencers. Imagine that. You can tweet 10 times a day and have $70,000? Yes. I know for a fact, you're saying you can't speak to your source. I know a fact, because I know someone who took the money, and they wouldn't tell me what billionaire it was, but I can tell you around May of this year, whenever I termed it Operation Mocking Pastor was happening, where every pastor, it seemed, jumped on stage one Sunday and said, Don't follow Candice Owens and Tucker Carlson, a very weird sermon to preach all on the same day. It was right after Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson had debated. There was a billionaire that went and offered what they said to me was an obscene amount of money for people to begin influencing by creating anti-Candice and Tucker videos. That's how it works. That is just how it works. But I think before Before, they were a little less arrogant, and they wanted to be less obvious that that's how it worked. Now, there's a panic happening. In their desperation, and this is what's happened over the last two years, they've just been in your face. We're throwing money at the cause.

We We control everything, and we don't care if you know about it.

I totally agree with that, that now it's become, as I said, it operates in two levels. Part of it, it is remarkably in your face. Bill Ackman, a hedge fund manager, decides on his own who is going to be President of Harvard University. There's nothing like that in our history. Just The brazeness of it.

And recently, how about Bibi Netanyahu on camera with American influence? I said in commentary about this, a couple of years ago, if you said that Jewish people held power in media, you'd be referred to as an anti-Semite. Fast forward to today, and you have Bibi Netanyahu sitting down saying that, I need this deal to go through on TikTok because that is a weapon that we need to be able to use in a room on camera with American influencers. So that is just, and They're saying, How do we combat Canada Stone and Tucker Carlson? We don't have any power. I shoot this show in my basement. I'm not feeding into some web and getting paid from foreign influencers or being funded by Qatar. I mean, all smears and liables. And so what What does that say when you have a foreign country leader? Bibi Netanyahu saying that on camera.

Well, I totally agree with the fact that he just blatantly says we have to control the media. I would say in response to what you said a few moments ago, you said it does take a lot of courage to resist this. I would say there are levels of courage that it requires. We'll take the most recent case that came out of was public, of Van Jones. Van Jones is not a poor man.

Certainly not.

He got $100 million from Jeff Bezos. Jeff Bezos, these are insurance policies. He gave Obama $100 million. He gave Van Jones $100 million. Why? It's perfectly obvious because he knows at some point there's going to be a major strike at Amazon because it's a huge operation with a large number of people who are paid substandard wages. So he has an insurance policy. Make sure if and when that moment comes, Obama will be on his team. Van Jones will be on his team. That's a straightforward transaction, business transaction. But it's money, $100 million. So why does he do this? Why does he come on TV with his yellow ribbon? I live in an old Jewish neighborhood in Ocean Parkway, Brooklyn, there's literally a synagogue in every block. In some blocks, there are two synagogues. You walk up and down Ocean Parkway. It's all Jewish. I don't see anyone wearing a yellow ribbon. I know, I'm really- No, I know. I don't see anyone wearing a yellow ribbon. Why is Van Jones advertising the flag? He's just advertising, I'm a slave.

That's what you're saying. He used to brand slaves.

He's just a slave.

This is how I feel when I see people in Congress, think about a presidential debate, wearing a flag pin from a flag that it's not American. It's like you're just a slave.

He's wearing the yellow ribbon here. If there were any what you call truth in advertising, he would wear a dollar sign here, a dollar gold pin over over here because it's just money. It's such a revolting sight. He goes on with Bill Maher and Tom Friedmann, two Jewish supremacists, and they're laughing about dead gazon babies. Very funny. They're laughing. The thing is, Van Jones knows they're not just laughing with him, they're laughing at him. He's our slave. He doesn't have even that minimum self-respect and dignity. He makes jokes about dead Palestinian babies.

Gosh, I didn't hear whatever joke that he said, and so that makes my skin call.

He said that if you open up TikTok, all you see is dead Palestinian babies, Dead Palestinian babies, dead Palestinian babies, did he? Dead Palestinian babies. And he says, You know why you only see that? He says, Because the Iranians and Qatar are behind it. They are manipulating the media. But there's another possible explanation. You know what the possible explanation is? Maybe there are a lot of dead Palestinian babies. In fact, just the very first month, just October 2023, do you know more Palestinian children were killed just that first month, then all the other war zones in the world combined in 2019, 2020, or 2021. If you combine them each year, if you combine each year, every other war zone, this tiny parcel of land called Gaza, more children were killed. Now, it's about the minimum estimate. The minimum estimate is 20,000 children killed. Now, if you look at the human rights reports, it'll probably come as a surprise to you. You look at the most recent one that's put out by the UN, the Navi Pillay Commission. Navi Pillay was the former human rights chief in the UN. And then she was on the tribunal, the President of the tribunal on Rwanda.

She's from South Africa. They report, Israel targets children, targets It's them in the head and in the chest. Israel targets toddlers. That's the word they use. Targets toddlers in Gaza. They said in the report, In order for children who are suffering from malnutrition, I know you have four children, so you'll be much more knowledgeable than me, they need a special infant baby formula. I guess it's a high-protein infant-baby formula. Israel bans it. But for Van Jones, with his frat boys, Tom Friedmann, it's all Qatari and Iranian propaganda.

What's interesting about that is they cannot produce a shred of proof that anybody is funded by Qatar. It's a literal talking point. That has been fictionalized by Bibi Netanyahu's agents. You have to register on Defra. Every time you take a meeting, they cannot produce one proof to that effect. And yet all of the proof is here. That actually everyone is funded by Israel in America. And so you just go for Van Jones. I can't imagine going to bed every night and just realizing it doesn't matter how nice your house is. You're still a slave. You're still a slave.

And to advertise it, the yellow ribbon. Who wears yellow ribbon? Does Ben Shapiro still wear it?

Did he use to wear it?

I think he used to.

I'm not sure.

But currently, this is two years later. I don't know anyone, but he still wears it. Just to show I'm sure it's in this contract. If you wear the yellow ribbon, an extra $1,000, a bonus, $1,000.

It's really important for people to know how the dynamics work because they do this through charity. I know that there There are other people that are working on a report on this now because it's become so obvious of how they will even give people the permission, these influencers, to say, Well, I'm not taking any foreign money. Nobody expected that you were receiving a check from Bibi Netanyahu. What they do is they'll flood the zone and they'll give money to the international fellowship of Christian and Jews or put money into a church. Then those individuals will then give money to influencers. It's such an obvious game. I will say on the Christian side of things, we're seeing that people are awakening to these pastors that are going on these multiple trips to Israel and coming back and telling their congregants that no matter what, they have to support Bibi Netanyahu. I mean, it's nutty, but I'm happy because it does seem as though we are reaching this inflection point where the correct people, the honest people, rather, who have been telling the truth for a very long time, are finally getting their day.

I would say public opinion is shifting for sure. I'll return to that in a moment. As I said, there's such a complete unwillingness to see the situation you're in, you're placed in when you're just a slave for these folks. So you take the case of Barry Weiss, okay? And there are people who work in her outfit who are not Jewish. She wrote a little book. It was a stupid book. It was a comic. It wasn't a book. It's the... I teach, and it was something you'd get from a paper from a freshman paper. How does she end the Let me just quote. It's a book about anti-Semitism and how to fight it. She knows about fighting anti-Semitism. Here she writes, This is the force of who we are. We are a people, descended from slaves, who brought the world ideas that changed the course of history. One God, human dignity, the sanctity of life, freedom itself. This is our inheritance. That is our legacy. We are the people commanded to bring light into this world. That's a passage, if you replace the proper noun, it's something you'd read in Meinkopf. That's their mentality. These are Jewish supremacists.

And what did they think of a Van Jones? What's going through their head when they see a Coleman Hughes?

What do they think? They'll never be us.

Complete contempt. Complete contempt, our slaves.

100%, yeah.

It's pitiful, really.

They could ruin those people in four seconds. It's like, You are literally our property. I sensed that because I do want to add this one element, before October seventh, there were tons of people who were on the pro-Israel side like me, meaning never care to look at the issue, sounds okay, basic. I'm not going to speak about this issue because I don't really know about it. It's not relevant to speak about. I really entered in the scene of politics, really intent on waking up Black America to other layers of slavery, like what we learn in the classroom and constantly thinking that we have to marry ourselves to one party. Now I'm through both and being like, actually, both sides are really bad. But yeah, so it's very... I do want people to be forgiving and know that some people genuinely just don't know. But now we're not there. We're not at that point anymore. People don't know. They very much know, and they are making a conscious decision that the cash means more to them than the truth, that they are willing to allow children to be murdered and killed every day, plucked off in Gaza.

And joke about it. To tell jokes about it and to spread lies about the condition that is happening. When you see, if you do not have a spiritual reaction to seeing those children that are starving every day, they will always pluck the one example of this guy wasn't actually starving, and so therefore, nobody's starving. It is so It's plainly obvious that that is untrue. Again, before October seventh, that would have been untrue. That you just wonder if these… I just don't know how they do it. I genuinely don't know how they do it because I would rather lose everything as I've proven, take it all, than to speak something that is untrue because I know that my soul will pay a consequence for that.

As I said, 40% of American Jews are convinced Israel is committing genocide. But Coleman Hughes doesn't see it. Van Jones doesn't see it. There is a British proverb There are none so blind as those who will not see. If you know the Bob Dylan song from my generation, Blowing the Wind, How many times can a a man turned his head and pretend that he just doesn't see. Well, if the remuneration is enough, many times.

Well, I think that's also, and I know that you don't engage much on social media, and you also don't even have a cell phone. But I released this week, I waited for everybody to lie, which they did, of course, they love lying, about Charlie Kirk and what he was going through in the end. I released the text message 48 hours before he died, where he said, They've left me no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause. I really think that the best person that put it very plainly, if you lost Charlie Kirk, who was actually so committed to Israel for him as he started, evangelical Christian, and then he couldn't unsee, and he said explicitly in his message, because of Jewish behavior. We know what he meant. He didn't mean all Jews in America. It's like that power that we are talking about that happens and the way they were treating him as if he was. Suddenly, he woke up and realized, like I did, Oh, I thought that you guys were supporting me because you were my friends. I thought you supported me because I will pursue the facts. I thought you supported me because you wanted me to have a platform because I will speak truth to power.

Then when you turned around and realized, Well, wow, I was just a slave to you. You view me as something other. For Charlie, I think he was realizing at the or maybe he never understood it, that if you take the king's shilling, you fight the king's war.

Well, there's a proverb. I'm not familiar with that proverb, but there's, he who pays the piper calls the tune.

What do you do when you have a not-for-profit Ivo 1: C3, that has taken millions of dollars? Bob Shulman was one person who took $2 million away from him instantly if he didn't start pedaling the correct talking points about Israel. He was just done in the end. Then he died. It was no longer a problem, but they then rushed to misrepresent and to pretend that that period didn't happen. He literally told Bibi Netanyahu on the phone, No, because they were panicked about losing Charlie. He calls and invites him to Israel, and Charlie said no. And yet Bibi then rushed to lie, or I guess to not tell the whole truth, when he says, I called him two weeks ago and invited him to Israel. It's like, And what did he say, Bibi? What did Charlie to you. We see that story playing out right now where you see the fight to make sure that they control people, people that genuinely, like me and Charlie, believe that they were just our friends and believed in our mission to just tell the truth no matter what that truth is, which means that naturally, if you're interested and committed to truth, your perspectives will change with more information, which is what happened to me.

My perspective changed because, well, not even more information, just information in general, in large part thanks to the work that you're doing and people like Dave Smith. It really woke me up to what happened there.

There is the money issue, and then the money issue is combined with the wholesale assault on academic freedom and on freedom of speech. We'll just take a recent example. There were several young people. They were what's called non-citizen immigrants here, people like Khalid Mahmoud Khalil at Columbia University. And they were rounded up, sent off to strange places. In some cases, were things like, literally, writing an op-ed in the tough school newspaper. That's it. Critical of the administration because of its support of Israel, de facto support of Israel. It was two weeks ago, a decision came down in Eastern district Court on this whole case with these guys, who were arrested by ICE, put in strange places. The guy who wrote the decision, his name is Judge Young. He was a Reagan appointee, so we're not talking about Hamas supporter, a Reagan appointee. He wrote a 161-page decision. He said, as non-citizen immigrants, they have the right to free speech. That's in our jurisprudence, they have that right. Number two, he said, They didn't say anything that crossed any line. They supported the Palestinians. They didn't support Israel. Well, this is America. You have the right to free speech.

You yourself might be surprised. Our Supreme Court has ruled. You have the right to abdicate the violent overthrow of our government, the violent overthrow of our government. You have that right. That's what our Supreme Court ruled. Our Supreme Court ruled, you have the right to burn the American flag. During the war in Vietnam. There are a large number of demonstrators, myself included. You may not like it. I'm talking about our laws. We chanted, Ho Ho Ho Qi Min, the NLF, National Liberation Front, is going to win. Nobody got arrested for that. Nobody got pulled up off the street for that. There were literally millions of people chanting things like that. Now, these young people in the encampments, they're chanting things like, From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. I don't like that slogan personally, but that's their right. This is America. The judge ruled, Reagan appointee, he's 85 years old, he says, by not letting them speak, rounding them up, sending them off to strange places, he says, You're terrorizing, that's the word he used, You're terrorizing people's right to free speech. He said, When the ICE puts on the masks, you know what he said?

I'm quoting him word for word, These are cowardly desperados acting like the Ku Klux Klan. That's the words he used. Who was behind this assault on our freedom of speech?

The Trump administration.

No. The Trump administration, you could say broadly, but on the specific issue of the encampments in Israel and Palestine, that was the Jewish billionaire class.

The Trump administration. We're in radical agreement. But remember, it began under Biden. Yeah, I'm talking about when he actually, Mahmoud Khalil, because I followed that case. I was looking at it. That was because I believed in Trump and I voted for Trump. I agree with that part. They got up there and they pretended he was some terrorist, and they lied. I'm like, But he wasn't. We were the ones that said that we would fight for free speech the hardest.

He was actually the mediator at Columbia.

I know. He was the mediator. I followed it.

It's a wholesale assault on freedom of speech in our society. It was led by these people, the same billionaire class.

That cut checks. This is the problem when you take the money, which I say you fight the King's Wars. How did Trump get into office? Who cut him the checks? Who cut him a $100 million check? Miriam Adelson. The presidency can be bought. There's no question.

Yes, I think.

As all things in America, there is a certain level where you can purchase, outright purchase influence, and it's hard for us to recognize that. I had to really come to terms with that. This has been hard for me as someone who has been a vocal supporter of Trump, truly believed that he beats the billionaire class to get into office, to see him so radically in this term, specifically, shift on his perspectives of speech I actually feel watching him pains me to see this administration play twister to explain while we're free speech, but this is different. These are Hamas supporters, all of these psychological games. No, you're not instantly a Hamas supporter if you have questions about what's going on over there. And by the way, they also gaslight us where they're like, then they get to the, You're obsessed with us. It's like, no, you guys were the ones that insisted, insisted that we all have a perspective on October seventh. And so when some of us actually said, Okay, well, let me get educated because maybe let me roll my sleeves up and be radically pro-Israel. Then we looked and we pierced that veil, we went, Oh, my goodness, how was I ever pro-Israel?

And now you want us to up. Now you want our influence gone. Now you want to smear us as anti-Semites and Hamas supporters. It really is telling.

There are two aspects. Number one, this is America. You're allowed to be a Hamas supporter. That's our freedom. I am not a flag waiver, but facts are facts. That's what was determined by our Supreme Court. Secondly, they're not. You're correct. They're not.

They're not, and even if they were. I know. Exactly.

Exactly.

They're not, and even if they were. And even if they were.

That was what the judge said. The judge said, I disagree with a lot of the things these people say, but that's their right.

I just also want to say this to just get this off of my chest, because this is what deeply troubles me the most, going back to your slave analogy, which is actually not an analogy. What it feels like to me when these, and now I recognize Jewish supremacists, supported me and platformed me when I was attacking BLM, because I recognize this altogether I'm Marxist strand. I was saying, and I stood up to my own people, my own people, and said, Let me tell you why this is not going to work out. Let me tell you granddad's lessons. I wrote an entire book. You're amazing, Candice. Let me get you this platform, that platform, fly you here. Then when I was like, Oh, yeah, and I know this is going to be hard for you, but you guys are not going to have to stand up to the Jew. Get out of here. Get out of here. You are gone. You are banned from Australia for speech. I mean, think about this. This is crazy. I'm going, So what was I to you, actually? There was a difference here. You didn't agree with me principally on the BLM stuff.

Because if the principles held, if you said, I believe in free speech and you have to sometimes stand up in your own identity box and say something is wrong. They didn't agree with me, principally. That troubles me.

Yeah, it should trouble you. That's what happened to Glenn Lowry. I'll just tell you an anecdote. Let's call it a October seventh and thereafter anecdote. I wrote a book having nothing to do with Israel Palestine. It was on cancel culture, this book. I was very critical of the cancel culture, the woke phenomenon. I didn't agree with it. I strongly disagreed with it. So Glenn Lowry has me on. Now, remember, I said I had given up on Gaza. And one of the things I did after I had given up on Gaza was write this book on cancel culture. Totally different subject. So Glenn Lowry has me on. Truth be told, I didn't want to talk about Gaza. I didn't want to talk about Israel-Palestine. I had left it behind. I'm speaking factually, not proudly. I had left it behind. So Glenn Lowry says, he begins to show, it's on the YouTube, you could see. He begins to show by saying, I would be remiss in my responsibility if I I'm going to ask you about your views on Israel Palestine. I didn't bring up the subject. He brought up the subject. Anybody curious? Go watch the program.

I had no intention whatsoever of talking about it. He brought it up. So he asked me my opinions. I expressed them. And then we went on to talk about the book. Next week, he does a program. He doesn't tell me anything. He and John McWorther, they devolved about 20 or 30 minutes. I didn't watch the whole thing. It was too painful, not because of what they said about me, but the smarminess, the fact that they didn't alert me to what they were going to do. You know the African-American spiritual scandalized my name? I gave my brother my right of hand, and as soon as ever my back was turned, he scandalized my name. That's how I feel. Do you call that a brother? No. Behind my back, they start to cycle analyze me, John McWard, her. I mean, he knew me for the length and breadth of the program. And what happens? After October seventh, Glenmarrie gets pressure. You have to talk about what's happening here. And he has on Omer Bartoff, who's a senior scholar, says Israel is committing genocide. What happens? The Manhattan Institute that. Pulled the plug. You didn't know that? Mm-mm.

Oh, I'm surprised he didn't have you on. Yeah, they pulled the plug. Lost all the money. John McWorther, he says, Every day, these poor Jewish students, they have to hear all of this anti-Semitism at Columbia University. Just as a factual matter, all this anti-Semitism, first of all, legally, even if they were being anti-Semitic, they have the right. But is there any truth to it? The most substantial report on the subject came out from Harvard. 314 pages alleging anti-Semitism. I read the report. I don't see anything. I said, Probably missed something that happens. I reread it. Actually, I see less. It's what Brianna Joye-Gray would call a nothing burger. There's nothing there. So you try to figure out, here's the question, how could you fill 314 pages on anti-Semitism at Harvard when if you actually read the report, there's nothing there? Evidence of anti-Semitism, there's nothing. So then you see the trick. There's a little verbal trick. The trick is they say, For the purposes of this report, we are going to define anti-Semitism as any time Jewish students, in particular, they said Israeli Jewish students, every time they feel that they're being excluded in the classroom or they're being excluded in extracurricular activities or they're being excluded in social life.

That's going to be the definition of anti-Semitism. Well, what does that mean de facto? So there are all these Israelis who are coming over to Harvard after serving in Gaza, right? And you are commanded now by Harvard in the name of what they call inclusiveness and pluralism. You have to pal around with them. If you don't pal around with them, you're an anti-Semite. That's literally, I am not exaggerating a If you don't want to be friends with murderers, you're an anti-Semite.

Exactly. If you don't want to- Well, maybe if that's the new definition. If you don't want to- Maybe I've been an anti-Semite my whole life.

I get what they're saying. If you don't want to hang around with child killers, you're an anti-Semite. I'm like, If you don't like Jeffrey Epstein, you're an anti-Semite.

If you don't like Jeffrey Epstein, you're an anti-Semite. If you don't like to abuse children, also, I get what we're doing alpha definition. Okay.

It's essentially a command coming from the top down that we have to normalize child killers. We have to say, Okay, Candace, when she applied to Harvard, she had worked in a food kitchen, and she put that in personal statement. Joe here, he helped build a sanitation system in the Congo. Then there is Yaacov. Yaacov killed children in Gaza. No, really? We're supposed to treat all three as the same in the name of inclusiveness and pluralism. Now, that to me, is a dictionary definition of insanity. I had a long exchange with a person I count as a friend. I like him very much, a Cornel West. It was a public exchange. Another woman who I absolutely like, her name is Nadine Strassen, the former executive director of the ACLU. We got into, there was no animus, hostility, but it was intense because Dr. West's argument was, if we excluded everybody who had blood in their hands or who propagated ideas that caused blood to be on your hands, he said that would exclude a large part of the Harvard faculty. They're advisors to governments, and they write books which influence public opinion. He said, That's a slippery slope if you start that exclusion.

Nadine Strausson, she said that we have to invite everybody because the only way you can get a truth is hearing out all opinions. I have to say that they can defend themselves, and they did in the course of the exchange. But to me, because I do tend to, like yourself, I gather, I do tend to personalize things. Let's say after World War II, there's a Nazi concentration camp guard, because those are perfectly ordinary people who are guards in the camp. One of them is an exchange student at Harvard. Perfectly It's completely possible. Now, you're telling me I should pal around with them?

If you don't want to be called an anti- German.

Anti-german?

Yeah.

I should be inclusive?

Well, nobody was more inclusive of the Nazis and the American CIA with Operation Paper Club and just giving them new identities. But when it's convenient, they want you to forget everything someone When it's not convenient, don't ever forget what this person has done or who their family and grandfather is. Totally. At the drop of a hat, they decide.

Totally agree. But you know what? That's not me. I don't believe that's Dr. West, and I don't believe it's Nadine Strauss. I believe that in the real world, if they had to confront that situation, they wouldn't pal around with them. No, of course they wouldn't. That was the command at the end of this 314-page report that you have to be inclusive of the Israeli Jewish students. We have to be pluralistic. No.

Which, by the way, one of the most offensive- They called it, You have to stop shunning them.

That's the word.

I'm actually comfortable shunning murderers. Totally agree. Call me whatever you need to call me. That's why I always say, You got How do they get over their game of ad hominant attacks, because if we've got to be called names, not hang out with murderers, we got to get comfortable with that real fast.

That's exactly. You got to get comfortable real fast with murderers. No. That was the anti-Semitism A large, certainly not a majority, but a significant number of the campus protesters were Jewish. How is it that they didn't detect this rampant anti-Semitism?

Also, I also want to tell you guys about PDS debt because debt from credit cards is not an accident. It's actually a system built to keep Americans down. The bank's profit, the creditors win, and families lose. Every call, every fee, every high interest trap is another reminder that the game is completely rigged. But there's another side of the story, too. Pds debt has already helped hundreds of thousands fight back, cutting debt, ending the calls, and putting money back where it belongs, which is in American pockets. Whether you are struggling with credit cards, personal loans, or medical bills, the PDS debt has custom options that can help you get out of debt. They go beyond the numbers to understand your unique financial situation and to craft a personalized plan that's designed just for you. There's no minimum credit score required. They're here to help you save money, pay off your debt faster, and start putting money back where it belongs. Pds debt is A+ rated by the Better Business Bureau. It boasts thousands of five-star reviews on Google, and it holds a five-star rating on Trustpilot. Why? Because PDS has helped hundreds of thousands of people get out of debt.

It's your money, it's your future, so do not let the system decide for You are just 30 seconds away from being debt-free. Get your free assessment and find the best option for you right now at pdsdebt. Com/candice. Again, that's pdsdebt. Com/candice. All right, guys, do you owe back taxes? A lot of people do. Or you're maybe having tax returns that are not filed. The October 15 deadline has officially passed. Maybe you forgot to file an extension. Well, if you haven't gathered all your documents or made any estimated payments, you could soon be targeted by the IRS. That's the reality. They can harness your wages, they can freeze your bank account, they can even seize your property. But there is help available. Tax Network USA, a nationwide tax firm, has helped the taxpayers save over $1 billion in tax debt. They've filed hundreds of thousands of tax returns, and they've assisted thousands in reducing their tax burdens. They can help you, too. Don't wait. Visit tnusa. Com/candice or call 1-800-958-1000 for a 100% free consultation. In one short call, the experts at Tax Network USA will guide you through some simple questions to determine how much you can save.

Take a Take action now before too late. Visit tnusa. Com/candice or call 1-800-958-1000. Also, I want to tell you guys about Field of Greens because we all have two ages, our actual age and our body's internal biological age. Because many Americans eat so many processed foods, and not enough fruits and veggies. They are 10 plus years older on the inside than their actual age. A major university study suggests how to slow down aging. Participants slowed their aging down by drinking Field of greens. That's all they did. They didn't change their eating, drinking, or exercising. They just started drinking field of greens. Each fruit and vegetable in field of greens was doctor selected for specific health benefits like cell health, heart, lungs, kidneys, metabolism. I feel great knowing how field of greens can slow down, how quickly I'm aging, and I encourage you all to join me. Swap your untested fruit, vegetable, or green drink for Field of Greens while there's still time. Check out the university study, and you'll get 20% off when you use promo code Candice at fieldofgreen. Com. Again, that's fieldofgreen. Com, promo code Candice. I wanted to actually, because one of your books, and this one I have not read, is called The Holocaust Industry.

I want to talk to you about the Holocaust, and please allow me to be offensive as I've been learning a lot about the Holocaust and why it is such a precious area where you are not allowed. There's no incursion. You can't ask a question. If I said, You know what? I think it was 5 million, forget it. I mean, it is very precious and protective. As I began reading more books, I do have a theory, and you may be offended by this theory, you can push back on it. But particularly, I felt even more confirmed in this theory. Are you familiar with Nicolas Gruner?

No.

Okay, so Nicolas Grunert was an actual Auschwitz camp survivor. He was on the march, same march as your parents were on. My father. Yeah, your father was on. He wrote a book in Giddish about his experiences. I'm sorry. His friend who was with him on this walk who he wanted to reunite, wrote this book in Giddish. When he found out that his friend had wrote this book and it had been translated into English, he went to go meet him. He was like, I'm going to be united with somebody that was in this camp with me. He gets up to shaking this person's hand, and he's like, You've taken on the identity. You're not the real survivor. That person whose hands he shuck was Elie Witzel. You might be familiar with him because he wrote the book Night, and it was proven that he lied about certain parts of it. Nobody knew why, what this was. He then spent the rest of his life, Nicholas Gruner, dedicated to telling people that this man was effectively a gypsey who stole the identity of a real person. He said he rolled up... Nicholas rolled up his sleeve. He's like, We all have tattoos.

He's not going to have one because he's not the real guy. This guy took his identity. Well, it turns out that Elie Witzel was a cousin to Robert Maxwell. Right? Fastinating. Absolutely fascinating. Robert Maxwell wrote about it in his own book, his authorized biography. We know Robert Maxwell, obviously, who everything about the risk know about him. I was fascinated by this idea that there were people who were stealing the identity, whether dead or alive, of people who had actually been in the Auschwitz camps building on their stories in whatever way. It's sad that nobody knows Nicolas Gruner's name. People should know his name because it was a valiant fight. He, to the very end said, There are people who are stealing our identities. I go, I've got this feeling that that happened a lot more than we think it happened. This is one guy, and by the way, Robert Maxwell then purchased a massive stake early on in McRaw Publishing, McRaw Hill, which means that... Then His wife was traveling around with Elie Witzel, and this guy was like, This was not prisoner number, whatever it was. He took his identity, and that's a really terrifying thing to think about that people with power saw, okay, these people were in camps.

Maybe they If they perished, we can take their identities, take their stories, whatever it is. He never found out what happened to his friend. He assumes he died sometime after the camp. It was his friend who wrote the manuscript in Yiddish, and then Elie Witzel adopted that. Now we have today, as you determine, a Holocaust industry. I'd like you to describe that, but just what I'm telling you. Isn't that just the most terrifying thing ever?

We don't really know each other. We're having a serious conversation now, and we should try to parse it, just means analyze it carefully. Let me give you, as I understand it, the situation, not just from family history, but from having read quite a lot in the subject at a certain point in my life, having read quite a lot, I would say almost obsessively because of my family history, and having written on aspects of It's not it. The estimates are there was an extermination campaign by the Nazis. We don't know. Two main questions remain open. Two questions remain open. The two questions that remain open are, when? When did it begin? That still is an ambiguous area. When did this Nazi extermination actually begin? Nazi extermination plan. We still don't know with any certainty why. What was Hitler's exact motive at that point? The when and the why, they remain gray areas. Now, for people who are listening, I have to be careful. I stopped reading about the subject about 20 years ago. So there may be a new scholarship which supersedes what I have just said, but that's it. Here are the two crucial facts.

One, I don't consider it crucial. The estimates by the best historians are between 5. 2 and 5. 4 million Jews were killed. It doesn't make much of a difference. Let's say it wasn't But let's say it was 3 million. That doesn't make it better, obviously. But the estimates are between 5. 2 and 5. 4. Now, coming to your question. The Nazi extermination was very efficient. You can use a slur and say it was done with German efficiency. To some extent, there's a truth to that. What makes a cliché a cliché is it's most of the time true. What is a generalization? A generalization is something that's generally true. What's a stereotype? A stereotype is a generalization that you don't like. If you say Jews are smart, Jews like that generalization. If you say something else about Jews, that's a stereotype. But the Germans carried out the Nazi extermination with great efficiency. Why is that important? There were very few survivors. Now, Candace, I'm not trying to I don't have an ax to grind. I'm just telling you factually. You take my mother. She had two sisters and a brother. They were exterminated. She had a mother and father.

They were exterminated. My father, I don't know the details, but I know for sure he had one sister and one brother. These are taboo subjects in my home. Can't talk about them. So I don't know the detail. I know they were wiped One of the reasons I wasn't bar mitzvahed. I did not have a bar mitzvahed. And do you know why? I mean, there are many reasons. My parents were resolute atheists. But one of the reasons was there was no one to invite. You see, a bar mitzvah is a big family event. The cousins, the aunts, the uncles, and so forth. Of course, the person being bar mitzvahed invites his or her friends, or it's his friends, the person being bar mitzvahed or bat mitzvahed. But the big thing, it's a family occasion. There was no one to invite. There was no one to invite because the Nazi extermination was very efficient. The estimates are at the end of World War II, the estimates are less than 100,000 Jews survived the Nazi Holocaust. Less than 100,000. So that means, where did all these survivors come from? Everybody claims there was a period when the Holocaust industry was in full, was very lucrative.

There was a period where everybody claimed to be a Holocaust survivor.

That's what I'm getting at.

Yeah. They all claimed to be Holocaust survivors. They weren't Holocaust survivors. There was a person who- I actually think they were, but I fear they were survivors of another Holocaust that was going on at the same time, and they may have been in part executing it, which is a question that Alexander Solzhenitsyn writes, which is, Where did all the Bolsheviks go?

I think, and this is again a theory, while we're allowed to think, Well, this is a good opportunity right now to take on the of people who perished and to rewrite history of ourselves as the victims. When I saw that Nicholas Gruner story, I was like, That's so terrifying because it's required reading coming up in schools. You have to read the story. There's tons of Holocaust people that we could be reading your books, talking about your parents and what they lived through, and they picked this man.

Look, I will get to the Ili Rizel. I know well. In fact, I'm not trying to promote the book. It came out 25 years ago, but I write a lot about in the book. I remember my father, we both knew a person who had that tattoo. The only place there were tattoos were Auschwitz. Auschwitz, yeah. It was the only camp where they had the tattoos. I said to my father about this person, and my father had a tattoo. I always knew the number. It was like 028128, something like that. I had memorized the number, but now I've forgotten. I said to my father, I said, Do you think he was in Auschwitz? My father said, No. My father was not a conspiracy person. No, he just said, Very matter-of-factly, non-judgmentally, he just said, No. I said to my My father, I asked my father, So where did he get the number? My father said, and I'm quoting him now, he said, Well, after the war, some people took it off and some people put it on.

But he didn't say it as a joke. My father was- The incentive here is to have one. Yes. It's incentive. It's incentive culture, obviously. That took with this welfareism. If you're going to incentive bad behavior, people are going to do it.

Yes. Without going into that because that was on tangent. But yes. My father said, as a matter of fact, Lee. My mother used to get very frustrated because even more so than my father, she She could never let go of what happened to her family. She couldn't let go. There was something that really more than graded on her when people who didn't pass through what she passed through claimed to have passed through it. She once exclaimed in a bitter irony, she said, If everybody who claims to be a Holocaust survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill? Everybody's claiming to be a Holocaust survivor. There are very few, a handful, survived that ordeal.

Now- Especially, particularly in Auschwitz, because there's so many were like, Well, you said the tattoo.

There were all the death camps, and then there were the concentration camp, death camps. There were both work camps, and Auschwitz, and Meydanik. I once spoke to the world's leading authority in the Nazi Holocaust, Raul Hilberg. He was very kind to me. He was of your political persuasion. He was a right-wing Republican. He swore by the Wall Street Journal. I was at the other end of the spectrum, and I was a total pariah. However, don't ask me Why? Because I've never really understood it. He kept defending me. I was always very nervous around him. I didn't want to say anything wrong because he was my savior. He was saying that what Finkelstein is writing is true. When the tenure battle erupted at De Paul University, he He gave this very moving defense of me. He said that I told the truth. It was at a very big price, he said. But he said, In the history of those writing about history, Finkelstein's place is secure. In any event, I once asked him, he lived in Vermont. He taught at the University of Vermont. He was very very much his own person, so he could never get a job at a top university.

He said, Very few women survived Mydoneck. That's where my mother was. Very few people. So it was worse, actually. The women's section was worse than at Auschwitz. In any event, once the Holocaust industry became an industry, they were very picky about who they promoted. Now, Elie Wiesel was a fanatical supporter of Israel. He was fanatic dramatically pro-anything that any American government would say. And so he became the spokesperson for the Holocaust. As to his personal history, I'm just going to give you the details as I understand understand them. He claims he was in Auschwitz. He claimed that he was in Auschwitz. And he describes in the book Night, he describes some scenes which Raul Hilberg, Raul Hilberg, the person I mentioned to you from the person who defended me for reasons which still remain, except integrity, which is so rare. He was the chief historian for the Holocaust Memorial in Washington. E. Louis Wiesel personally picked him because Wiesel knew he knew his stuff. He said there were certain scenes that Wiesel describes in Night that occurred at Auschwitz. Wiesel, Hilbert said they could not have happened. They could not have happened.

Without question, they didn't happen. You read Nicholas Gruner, yeah.

When Wiesel was confronted with Hilbert saying they happened, he doubled down and said they did happen. Wiesel, I speak to, I knew some, not many, I knew some first-rank Holocaust historians, and they told me he was deported in 1944 from Hungary. That was one of the last deportations from Hungary. He maybe passed through Auschwitz en route to a labor camp. That may have happened, according to the people I talked to. But there was clearly, I discussed it at some length in that little book, Wiesel figures not in a cameo role, but he has a major... He's a star of the Holocaust industry.

I'm glad that I put Nicolas Gruner on your radar because he just knew the guy. He literally stole his identity. It's a crazy- I remember-he knew him because obviously, when you're in a camp together, and he was just so excited to meet, to re-meet this someone who had this experience with him and described the march, everything, and the souls of his feet. He just was like, what he did was the real person wrote the manuscript, and this gypsey just took on his identity. When he describes moment of being on the plane, what am I going to say to him? We haven't seen each other. Then could you imagine being confronted and going, Wait a second. You're not Norm Finkelstein. You're not Norm. He said he had cameras ready and they shook hands. Then he even said, What's even crazier is the real Holocaust survivor spoke Hungarian. Well, that is true. And Ily couldn't speak Hungarian at this time when this happened. And so he starts, he's like, he says, let's speak in English. It's an incredible, it's just an incredible thing to comprehend I think the best that I can guess is that you had these psychopaths, like true Bolshevak psychopaths who were like, well, we can't just walk in and be like, Well, I was just running the Bolshevak camp over here, mass murder and Christians.

So what better way to reinsure yourself into society than to be like, I'm the ultimate victim. I survived the Auschwitz camp. I think that's what happened. I think they laundered through. That's why there's so much confusion. People were like, You're denying that people died here because There's some people that are like, Well, nothing ever happened. It's like, No, something definitely. You read this guy, Nicholas Gruner, and you're like, This happened. There are some people who never lived a day in their lives of that. I say Elie Wietel is one of them who took their personalities, took their identities. Full-on gipsy.

I actually, regrettably, I read a lot on the Elie Wiesel case, and I tend to defer to Hilberg's judgment. I think the judgment that there were in his so-called memoir, there were fabricated scenes is correct. However, I also believe that when you explore any concrete situation, any concrete situation, there are going to be things that are inexplicable. You just can't explain how or why that happened. You have to accept that in any historical reconstruction, there are going to be in inexplicable enigmatic phenomenon. I think in the case of the Nazi Holocaust, it's like the flat earth society. When When you want to deny a certain phenomenon, of course, you have the right to deny it. To deny a person, the right to deny is what the great British philosopher, John Stuart Mill, called the presumption of infallibility, that you know the truth and nobody else can know the truth. No, we're fallible creatures. We're capable of error. We always have to leave some corner of our mind open to the possibility that our deepest, most sacred beliefs, our foundational beliefs- Could be wrong. Could be wrong. However, if you're in the flat earth society and you say the world is not round, in order to be credible, you have to respond to the mountain of evidence that's accumulated that shows the world is round.

You have the right to say the Earth is flat, but you also, if you're responsible, have to respond to a massive accumulation of evidence to the contrary. If you can't respond to it or don't respond to it, in my opinion, you're not entitled to be taken seriously.

Yeah, you're just a fraud.

Yeah, fine. You're just a fraud. We agree. My parents could be iconoplastic. They could be very bitter. By the way, the Nazi Holocaust has been not just misused but weaponized to justify all sorts of things which in many places, are not just deplorable, but abominations. However, in all their anger and indignation, which was transmission committed to me, it never would have occurred to them to deny the horror that they endured. When I wrote the little book, The Holocaust Industry, which caused me a lot of public grief and defamation.

Which means it's a must read. I know what that means. It's a must read.

When I wrote the book, I was always very clear from day one, I am not writing about the Nazi Holocaust. That's not what this book is about. There are many people with a vast knowledge of the subject. I have only a tiny, by comparison, a tiny amount of knowledge of the subject. This book is about how the Nazi Holocaust was, as if you can read the subtitle.

Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering.

Yes, it's about how a horrendous event was exploited. And the exploitation now has reached the point that it makes people so angry at how it's being exploited in the cheapest, most vulgar and also, not speaking as a person who's not religious, but sinful ways to say, Justifying the genocide in Gaza, that it causes people to then want to deny it ever happened. I believe we have to make the distinction. It happened, but also the way it has been manipulated, exploited, weaponized has also happened. Both of those things happened, just like, as I discussed with people, I was on the program with Breonna Joye-Gray a few days ago, I said, When you start talking about Jews and money, it very easily feeds a stereotype. However, it's also true. There's a problem here. A billionaire class of Jewish supremacists are now flagrantly, brazenly using money as a blackmail weapon to silence not just criticism of Jews, but silence criticism of an ongoing genocide as we speak. We have to address that also. Now, it's very hard to address it without feeding the stereotype.

But I think it's, and that's why it's so important for me to constantly be addressing Jewish Americans, because something that they're very good at doing is pretending that there's no differences. That's identity politics. You're Jewish, therefore this is your history, therefore this is how you should be responding to this. That gives them so much power. It's very important to study the Bolsheviks, right? Because that means at the same time, you had Jewish people who were suffering, actually and legitimately, and you had Jewish psychopaths who were mass murdering, Henry Yagoda, mass murdering Christians. The same thing is happening right now. You have literal psychopaths, and I would describe them as Zionists. Zionists, psychopaths who are happy to oversee the slaughter of children, some people who I think actually look happy when you talk about it. It's so disturbing, spiritually, to see people who can joke about suffering and things of that nature. Then you have people who are dealing with the kickback of those people who don't have platforms, who are being treated as if... It's because both of everybody around the world needs to understand it is possible for you can be any identity and to have multiple things going on at once.

I truly believe that the Zionist ideology is an evil. It is this idea that you are... It's an evil because it's a supremacist ideology that says you can trample over anybody's rights as long as it is like you serve Israel. That's what I have seen in my experience is that even people who I thought were fundamentally good, when it came down to it, turned into and celebrated the death of children because those children were Palestinian and were not Israeli. It's shocking working. It still continues to shock me to recognize that.

I want to just say a couple of things. Candace, you don't know me from a hole in the wall, and I barely know you. It's just a fact. I'm not a wet person. I've said that I am from the left tradition.

You are from- The right.

The right. My reading of, say, Russian history is going to be radically different than your own. I have to say that because there'll be people who, after watching this, say, Why didn't Fincaustine say that he is actually a supporter of Lenin and Trotsky and all those people?

Are you Trotskyite?

I wasn't a Trotsky, but I was certainly within that trajectory, for sure. Then I still I am. I'm an old man, but I still am. But having said that and setting the record straight, I think you are correct that there are aspects of what's going on now that are just hugely ugly. Take a simple example. A simple example. You use a computer, right? I don't know nowadays with computers, but sometimes you can work on something for three hours. You remember the day, and then you can lose everything. You press If I get the wrong key, everything is gone. Now they have backups and backups, but I don't know how to use them, so I lose whenever. Okay. Then you lose something that you worked on for three hours. Okay? You think It's the end of the world. Oh, my God. Oh, my God. I lost. I worked on it for three hours. Oh, my God. You lose three hours' worth of information, of work and information. Then you're in Gaza. This is not being done behind the scenes. These are Israeli soldiers posting on the social media their ecstasy and their euphoria when they blow up Palestinian homes.

Not three hours on your computer. Your whole life is vaporized, and they're thrilled. They're thrilled. They have what's called in Gaza, controlled demolitions.

That's what everything has happened since October seventh has been a controlled demolition.

I agree with you. Everything has been with intent, to use the words of the 1948 Genocide Convention, it's intent to destroy a people. Just one step further, they go into neighborhoods where there's no Hamas, there's no nothing. They just calmly, rope off the area, and then detonate whole neighborhoods.

Because they're going to turn it into a beach town.

Well, they said over and over again- Jared Kutner is on camera saying it.

Yeah.

We're going to make Gaza... They said, Over and over again. We're going to make Gaza unlivable. So you will have two choices: to stay and starve or to leave. That's why all this talk about the Trump plant is so silly. There's nothing there. Do you know 95% of the homes. 95 have been vaporized.

I thought that it was 85, so it's up to 95.

It was 92% before the assaults on Raafa and Gaza City. So now it's about 95%. There is 50 million tons of rubble. The main agencies, UN and international humanitarian agencies, they say that it'll take until the year 2050 to clear away the rubble. Because the rubble is mixed in with all of these toxic substances like asbestos and also unexploded ordinance. So they did. Everyone says, Well, Netanyahu didn't achieve his goal. Actually, he did achieve his goal. Yes, he did.

Of course, he did.

He said, We will make Gaza unlivable.

A reason.

Either stay and starve or leave. He achieved his fundamental goal. Now, he was hoping for a stampede of them leaving or incentivized to leave by the relentless bombing and artillery firing. But now they'll leave in a trickle because there's nothing to go back to. There's nothing there. It's been pulverized. So One of the things I want to say that I find to be especially dark about the Gaza situation- No, I just wanted to complete the thought. What you're saying when you say that they're actually happy about it, that's not a speculative pronouncement by you. They posted it, and they still do. They posted on their social media what they're doing as they do it. That's a fact. When you read a lot of the human rights reports and the reports by genocide experts, a lot of... You know what their evidence is? They're signing the social media, what the Israelis post.

It's really dark. The videos. It's very dark. It's very dark. You see something in their eyes. That's what I always say. The eyes are the window to the soul. That's what I say. It's a demonic force that rules that. I don't care who the child was. If I saw a child suffering, I have a natural spiritual response to that. I don't care if that child is Arab, Jewish, Black, White, it doesn't matter. They don't have that. Instead, it's like, and you see it even in the commentators or Zionists, it's like they're trying not to crack a smile and a joke about how many of these kids have been killed. It's really disturbing. But I have to see God in this, which is just to say that what is happening in Gaza has awakened the world. America is the best evidence of that because we were the most asleep, and we were the most asleep. We were like zombies on the Israel issue. Yeah, of course, we support Israel. It's the size of New Jersey. Why can't... All the talking points. There has been this radical reaction. That tells us that people, when they are armed with facts and knowledge, are fundamentally good.

They're fundamentally good, and we're fighting back, and it's hard, and there are people that are selling out. But I think truth is winning.

I believe truth is winning, and we have to, I think, credit it to two reasons. One is a horrible reason to credit. Israel is conducting a genocide in broad daylight. It was very hard to conceal. But number two, it was because a large number of media outlets, in particular on the web, were out of control. Now there's a retrenchment, an attempt to control TikTok, control CBS News, control CNN. They're trying to now methodically gain control, again, as the expression has it, gain control of the narrative. There's a real problem on our college campuses right now. There are students, professors, in fact, tenured professors, are terrified of saying anything supportive of the Palestinians or critical of Israel. You remember in the spring of 2024, there were all the encampments. And you know what? The next a whole academic year passed without anything. It was like this eerie silence had descended on the college campuses because the students were terrified. And The media, academia, they're trying to regain control right now. I believe that people have, in particular on the college campuses, have to find, like you said earlier, it takes a lot of courage. There were a lot of students who were suspended because of the encampments.

They weren't allowed to attend graduation because of the encampments. Then if you were a foreign student, you were rounded up because of the encampment. It does require courage.

But I also want to remind people when you think that that requires courage, just imagine being someone in Gaza right now. It's such a small price to pay, in my opinion. Was it scary? Yeah, I'm not going to pretend. Last year was easy for me and my family. Me and my husband were committed to truth, that we were just like, whatever comes, whatever cost comes, you are now in that challenge and people say, What would you have done? We are finding out right now what people would have done when faced with a genocide. Do you turn the other way? Do you accept the money? Do you continue to be a part of the apparatus of the academia, which lies routinely? That's why I say people should read Thomas Soul, and he will tell you that every bad idea comes from academia, comes from the cult of academia. They will always publish the books and lie about what's happening, and it's because actually it's always been controlled. We're trying to achieve academics when in reality it's a small club and you got to have the right perspective if you want to stay in it, no matter how accomplished or if you're brighter.

I really challenge people to recognize that. You are talking about maybe losing money.

For a young person, I try to be sympathetic. For a young person, it is a big price. No, it's not the price of Gaza. But their parents are selling out a large amount of money. That's the money.

Money can't be a ruler.

An Ivy League school costs about $80,000 a year now for a student. Then if you saw places like Harvard, it wasn't just your college. They were blacklisting them at law firms, as in they said, literally, we're not talking again, poetry. We are going to get a list of names of everybody in those encampments, they will never get a job at our law firm. That's what they were being told. You will never get a job.

Which is good. I'm going to tell you, I put the pressure on their parents, not on the kids. I say, if this is happening, we have to be ahead of them. We need to establish our own law firms. If your kid got into Harvard, they're the cream of the crop. Great. The problem is that we are stepping into where they can control the entire plantation. When we have what it takes to create our own stuff, we have to be innovative.

It's not for me to tell them. You see, they have the right to choose their own future, and they're being denied it. You know what they did at Harvard? These creepy organizations. They did not only have what were called doxing trucks, where they went around Harvard and they posted pictures of the students and calling them terrorists.

That was crazy.

You know what else they did? You wouldn't even believe it if I told you.

I would.

They took the trucks and they went to their parents' homes.

Yeah, I did hear that, and I commented on that.

Like, 500 miles away. So I have to put... No, we have to try to step in the shoes of others.

Oh, I'm not saying they don't have a right to be traumatized by those events.

No, but I'm saying my parents, if a truck was going up and down their block saying, Norman Winckelstein As a terrorist, my parents would kill me. They would kill me.

What are you doing? Yeah, but I think now the point of this, and I what you do my platform to say, is parents toughen up, okay? Because the people that are doing this are psychological terrorists. That's the reason they're doing this is to give you that embarrassment. They have the money to embarrass you. They have the money to blacklist you. But what that actually reveals is a fundamental problem in the system that you can be punished for doing and saying the right thing. It means we've got to change it. I say to parents, pull your kids out of these schools, and I'm so happy that homeschooling is happening. Why do your kids want to go to Harvard? Well, because they say, This is the best school. We'll give you all these networks. And they do. They have access. They have a network. You're more likely to get a job But I'm saying that it's going to take us being bold for us to crash this system that says, Norm Finkelstein can't be tenured, but Barry Weis can be the president of CBS. We are going to have to be the radicals. This is what I'm saying by the way.

We have We have a very small window of opportunity here before they start coming for speech in America, which they're trying to do. I believe that. We have to be, literally be a change.

I've said that. I pulled my kids out of school. I totally agree with you. There is an assault right now going on against freedom of speech, which is a real problem.

When I see a kid that's being put on one of their lists, there's this account where they say, Auntie, semi of the week, and now they're doing 22-year-olds. I said, Hey, guys, this is now for Forbes 30 Under 30. We should be hiring as soon as we see these kids that are being put on this list, and this Harvard person did this, I'm like, Can I hire her? That's my mindset. You have a business, that's our Forbes 30 Under 30, and that's the best way to look at it.

You recognize that's a very minority mindset.

I don't think it is anymore. I mean, looking at the staggering rates of people, and that's why they're now trying to pass laws, people are listening. I'm telling you, we're going to be encouraged. You always have to be encouraged by the fight that they're putting up. I I'm not throwing them a towel. I think we're winning, and they're scared. That's why they're becoming more radical.

That part I agree with.

We say, Okay, we'll adapt. You say our kids can't go to that school. You say our kids are going to be put on lists. We're going to treat these lists as you're highlighting these students. Not the actual ones that are radical and beating people up, but I'm saying the ones who are harmless and using their right of free speech and getting busses outside, I want to hire that kid.

Look, I totally agree with you. I have looked very carefully. There were beatings going on in places like UCLA. That's when UCLA supporters of Israel attacked the encampments. It wasn't the students. A lot of the students, they were from abroad. They recognize their limits here, and they recognize don't cross certain lines. So I was at places like MIT. They just so decent. And a lot of the professors, the professors wanted... They were too old to sit in encampments. Woodstock is over. We're heading towards Social Security. So they sent food, so much food. There was such a festive, warm feeling there. And then when I hear John McWartek, who teaches at Columbia, saying, Oh, the poor Jewish students, They had to hear day in and day out anti-Semitism. What are you talking about? That never happened. Harvard, a 314-page report, they said the clearest example of anti-Semitism, the clearest, was a student who was at an encampment and got beaten up. That's what they write in the report. Then if you read in yesterday's New York Times, you know what actually happened? There was an Israeli student who came up to the encampment, and he was photographing it and videotaping it.

The folks in the encampment got nervous that they were going to It's the younger people's expression. I don't use it, doxing. They were afraid because of those trucks going around that he was filming them to dox them. We called them, my day, to blacklist them, but your generation, or within the younger generation, call it doxing. They held up their katheias to block him from filming. Then there was some moment where he might have been tapped. He might have been tapped. One of the demonstrators said on the back of his book back. And he did not file police charges for assault or anything like He did not. Then his father, who's the Israeli Council in Atlanta, he got into the picture. And then you see how everything is being orchestrated. That became the main piece of evidence. They said he was assaulted. Somebody in the Congress said he was pushed to the ground. Never happened. Then Bill Ackman used, exploited, weaponized that non-incident incident to demand a Harvard closed down the encampments.

It's a propagandist effort, backed by a lot of money. Yes. And by the way, that's exactly what happened to that. I think she was in Florida. We got to see he's wearing an IDF T-shirt. She says F U to him and pushed his phone out of the face. Within hours, Pam Bondi responded, Wow, that's amazing. I could not know that you could reach the upper echelons of government. I'm like, Oh, a federal response to, Oh, what a puny little kid. I mean, are you kidding me? You put this up there, you pretend you're a victim. We will not allow people to be. You would have thought they tard and feathered this kid with the response that it received from the- How many times you push people out of your face? I mean, learn toughen up, kid. It's a girl. I'm not saying it's okay. I'm saying what's not okay is that they achieved a federal response within hours. It's completely ridiculous.

It becomes totally weaponized. It becomes totally weaponized.

I want to tell you guys about home title lock, because if you are a homeowner, you should listen to what can actually happen to you. The FBI has been warning homeowners about a type of real estate fraud that's on the rise, which is title theft. This type of theft doesn't happen by breaking down your doors and stealing your stuff. It happens with just a one-page document with a forged signature that can get filed at the county. If your title, which is the legal record of ownership, gets transferred out of your name, criminals are using your ownership to then drain your equity or even sell your property, and you won't even know about it until you start getting collection or foreclosure notices in the mail. That's why I've partnered with Home Tidal Lock so you can protect your equity and find out today if you're already a victim. Use my promo code, Candice, at home title lock. Com, and you'll get a free title history report and a free trial of their million dollar triple lock protection. That is 24 7 monitoring of any title records, urgent alerts to any changes. If fraud occurs, their US-based restoration team will spend up to $1 million to fix it for you.

Again, that's home title lock. Com, and use promo code, Candice, or you can just use the link below. As always, I tell you guys about Nimi Skincare. They are my favorites because the beauty industry has been telling us for years that we need all these complex formulas to achieve healthy skin, and that's just not true. That's why I got so interested about Nimi Skincare. Nimi is doing something that I guess is radical by building one of the most popular lines that they have around one of the most nutrient-rich bioavailable ingredients that's on Earth, which is grass-fed beef tallow. Tallow is a traditional ancestral secret. Its composition is incredibly similar to our own skin's natural oils, which means your skin actually recognizes it. It's not a chemical coating. It's real nourishment. Nimi has two products from their tallow line that you should definitely know about. First, for your daily hydration, there's the Sunshine Talo cream. This is your go-to moisturizer. It's light, it absorbs quickly, and does not leave you with that greasy feeling. They've combined the Talo with a soothing aloe vera and a jojoba oil. It is perfect for your face and body to create a strong, resilient skin barrier against the daily grind.

Then for the problem areas, they have the Buzin Talo Balm. It's an ultra-rich Balm that uses Talo and beeswax to create a protective barrier. It locks in moisture, it shields your skin from the elements, and it allows it to heal. This is skincare the way that it was meant to be, which is simple, pure, and powerfully effective. It's a focus on skin-loving ingredients, which is made right here in the USA, by the To order, go to nemiskincare. Com. Explore their TALO line and use my code, Candice10, at checkout to get 10% off your order. That's nimeskincare. Com. I do want to get to your forthcoming book because I actually don't have a copy of it, but it is coming out. It will come out in November. It is called Gaza's Gravediggers: An Inquiry into Corruption in High Places. Tell me what that book is about.

In my opinion, the truth about Gaza is no, no. There is so much human rights material on it. About maybe already four months ago, South Africa, which has been prosecuting the genocide case, it submitted to the International Court of Justice a 700-page memorial. That's basically your with, believe it or not, 4,000 pages of documentation. When I wrote the Gaza An Inquest into its martyrdom, nobody knew anything about what was going on in Gaza. I sat down and I read through all the human rights reports, all the available information, and I tried to reconstruct the picture of what has happened to that God-forsaken place. But that's not needed anymore. Like you said, most people have a general knowledge of it. Then from a scholarly academic point of view, there's such a vast amount of information available. I didn't feel I needed to repeat it. I didn't have to do what I did with the gossip book. Instead, what I did was I looked at key figures in the international institutions, people like Pramilla Patty. She was head of what was called Conflict-Related Sexual Violence. They used the abbreviation CRSV, a very clunky abbreviation. Secretary General Gutieris of the UN Security Council, or UN System, Secretary General Gutiérrez, he has her go over to Israel to document sexual violence against Israelis on October 7.

She comes back and she says there's clear and convincing evidence or there's reasonable grounds to suppose the Hamas committed rape on October seventh. And as, of Of course, you know, and your camera people and your team know, that Israel ran with it. They ran with it, the Hamas rapists. So you look at the evidence. I look at what she has in her report. And apart from witnesses, in quotes, Israeli witnesses, there is no evidence. Now, you might say, Well, It could still have happened without witnesses. Excuse me. It could still have happened without evidence. But here's the thing. Towards the end of her report, she says, There's no medical evidence of rape. There is no forensic evidence of rape. Then she has this revealing tidbit, and I hope all of your listeners will process it. She says, We have 5,000 photographs from October seventh. She said, We looked at her team, looked at 5,000 photographs. She said, We looked at 50 hours of digital footage. That's not a small amount. Fifty hours of the digital footage. They said, We looked at CCTV. We looked at traffic cams. We looked at body cams. We looked at dash cams.

Okay? Now, she says, not me, not you. Camilla Patty says, We saw no photographic or digital evidence evidence of sexual violence. She didn't even limit it to rape. She said, We saw no direct photographic or digital evidence of rape. But did that stop her from concluding, We have reasonable evidence. We have clear and convincing evidence. There was no evidence.

It was money.

It was. Whether it was money, I honestly can't say in her particular.

It's a guess for me that usually when somebody comes to a conclusion like that, there's a fellowship. There's just something there that you'll find.

I'm not disputing that. I say as a factual thing, I can prove it. I'm not saying it's not true what you said.

I'm guessing, and I don't know it's true.

But then, as you know, Israel ran with it. You know why they ran with it? Israelis did not need the incentive of rape to commit genocide in Gaza. They ran with it for here because of our own history. They knew it would resonate here because of our own history of slavery and the lynchings and so forth.

That was also behind the babies were put in ovens, which got debunked. It's the idea is actually what you're trying to exploit is Jewish-American emotion when you hear the concept of ovens at all. That's very clear. I never thought of that. He did get caught, by the way, that he did specifically share, and this was a part of the Bibi trials, which are now, I don't know what the update on that is, but that a team of propagandists moved to spread lies to the Western public. So that's exactly- It got weaponized here.

Then another Jewish supremacist billionaire, this was Sheryl Sandberg, the former COO, Chief Operating officer of Metta. She makes a documentary called Screams Before Silence. Now, Sheryl Sandberg has a factual matter. You know her?

I don't I know her.

Oh, I'm surprised.

She's very smart. I know who she is, but I know what she wrote, her book and whatever about women, lean in.

She was the top student in her class in economics at Harvard. She's no fool. She knows evidence. By their own admission, there was no evidence. There was no material evidence of rape. There was not. In fact, I think the evidence, it's not just an absence of evidence. The fact that there's no photographic or digital evidence, none. Now, if it were the case, there were only three pictures But 5,000? Now, Candace, I don't know how old you are, but obviously you're several generations younger than myself. They said that the rapes, Israel said, that the rapes occurred in public, broad public space. They said the witnesses were in hiding as they observed these gang rapes, they said. Now, I'm not of the younger generation, but I certainly observe the younger generation. You know, they take pictures of everything. Everything they photograph. You're walking along the street, you see a dead pigeon, out comes the iPhone. You see a bee in the air, out comes the iPhone. You're telling me not one of these witnesses thought to photograph a gangrate? They said they're in the safety of a hiding place. None? I think rather than cast it as no evidence of rape, I think it should be cast as overwhelming evidence that there was no rape.

But that doesn't stop the top student in her year in the Harvard Economics Department from making a documentary claiming there was mass rape on October seventh by Hamas. Why does she do it? It's very simple why she does There are the little facts, like the ones we just spoke of, the pictures, the absence of medical evidence, absence of forensic evidence. There are the little facts. Then, as you well know, there is the cause. There is the cause. All the uncomfortable little facts, like there's no evidence, they pale in comparison to the cause. The cause is Am Israel, chai, Israel must live. They're a complete supremacist. Now, I am not going to quarrel with your deep seed belief, I will not quarrel with it, Israel must live. If that's your belief, I won't quarrel with it. But it's as if a German, during World War II, were making propaganda films on the pre-tense. And they did. They made films saying the concentration camps weren't bad. They went into some of them. They had This newsreel footage made it look like a summer home. The issue now, or I should say, the issue then during World War II, It's not whether Germany should live.

At that point, the issue was the mass extermination of people. Nobody was denying Germany's right to live. What they were denying was Germany's execution of a genocide. It's the same thing now. You could say, Am Israel high, Israel must live, or Israel will live to the end of time. Fine, you could say it. I grant you your belief, I don't I happen to agree with it, but I'm not going to deny you that. I can understand that sentiment. But when that sentiment in the midst of what's happening in Gaza now, and that part of it is It's not just morally unacceptable. You're just a propagandist for genocide. She's no different, and I'll say it, Ms. Sandberg, and I'm not going to deny you your achievements and your accomplishments. I will not. I recognize it's hard work. She wasn't born rich. I know. I've heard people who know her. She was a hard worker. It's not Barry Weiss. No, it's not. I'm not going to deny you your achievements, but you're no different than Lenny Riefingstall. That was the famous film propagandists were Hitler. She did a very famous... She happened to be very gifted in film.

She used it for the wrong purpose. She had made a famous film called Triumph of the Will. Glorifying Hitler. You're now different. Okay, you're not on the scale of Lenny Reef and Snow, but you're a propagandist. This is not about Let Israel live. The issue is let Palestine live. That's the issue right now. You have You have self-recruited yourself as a propagandist for a genocide. And by the way, Ms. Sandberg, that's just not my opinion. It's As the most recent Washington Poll showed, 40% of American Jews believe it's a genocide. You have self-recruited yourself as a propagandist for genocide, as does Mr. Van Jones. That's your job title as of now.

It's something that I want to reiterate as we close here, and I want to basically direct people where they can find your book. But I have said this over and over again, and I think it's starting to register with people. If you side with evil, you should remember that evil is always an orphan. If you are finding someone that feels nothing when they kill a child, you are dealing with somebody that has a capacity for evil that you mean nothing. They won't even flinch if they have to kill you, too. This is something that I have really taken the time to explain to people. That includes you, Jewish Americans, right? When we're speaking about Bibi Dey at Yahoo, and people with that capacity for evil, there is nothing to those individuals but themselves. You have to be very careful when you're outlying with evil to realize that it will snap in two seconds and take you out. Evil is always an orphan.

I would just comment on that. I think it cuts both ways. One of the questions that's always been asked is, is it possible for a person to be evil, a mass murderer, in so to speak, one compartment of his or her life, and then be just a very- No. Okay.

Absolutely not.

I agree. It's an open question, but if you ever have time, one film which very much struck me, nobody's ever heard of it, You should watch it. It's called The Music Box, and it's about a young woman, a lawyer. She lives in Chicago. Her father sacrificed everything in his life so she can get through law school. The film begins. She loves her father to death. The father loves her to death. He was a wonderful father to her. The film begins with the US government presenting her father with papers that he was a mass murderer during World War II in Hungary. Okay? Her father asks her to defend him. I don't want to give away the ending because some people may watch it, the music box.

It explores that theme.

I think you will be touched and moved by how that whole story unfolds, whether you can be a monster in one compartment of your life and a loving family member in the other. Now, I'm not saying you're wrong, because I think it is a complicated question, but it's worth pondering.

It definitely is worth pondering. I want to point them in the direction, by the way, where can they get your forthcoming book? Is that out now?

No, it'll be out, hopefully, in January.

In the interim, you guys, all of these topics that we covered today are really important. The Holocaust It's an industry. We all know it's happening. Finally, we were at a circumstance where the people can go backwards and understand more about how that happened. Also, Gaza, an inquest into its modernism. If you are just starting to realize something is very wrong and you need to independently educate yourself, that is a good place to start. Lastly, I'll burn that bridge when I get to it. These are his heredical thoughts on identity politics, cancel culture, and academic freedom. I'm sure some of this he and I disagree on and agree on, but what I will say is that one of my favorite things is that this issue is bringing people together from other sides, and that needs to happen. We need to start allying ourselves and recognize whether you view yourself on the left or the right. It doesn't matter. Do you follow goodness or do you follow evil at your core? Anything that you would like to add before we get you out of here?

No. I want to say, first of all, when I was first on your program, which is about two years ago now, I appreciate the fact that you listened. You listened. I was on with Jordan Peterson's daughter. I forgot her name.

Mikaela Peterson.

Mikaela, yeah. She listened. You don't have to agree with me. There are many things I said today we didn't agree on. But I respect the fact that you were a good listener. I would I'll also say that if you disagree with me, Mr Shapiro, Ben Shapiro, Sam Harris, Van Jones, if you disagree with me, Stop trying to, not in the case of Van Jones, but the others. Come up and just talk about it. Try to be Candace Owens. Listen, and then you can respond just like she did. What's the fear? Why are you so afraid? You've received countless requests to debate me, and each and every one of them, you've turned down. I sent a list, a very long list, to Piers Morgan, of people who they say, Who would you like to debate? And all of them turned it down. I put Ben Shapiro on the list. I put Sam Harris on the list. I would be happy to debate Bill Maher, even though I believe he's a moron. I'd be happy to debate him. Defend yourself. I believe you should have the courage of your convictions. Ms. Sandberg, let's debate it. Let's debate what happened on October seventh and whether there's any material evidence of right, any material evidence of right.

Let's look. Let's examine it. I'm appreciative, even though we come from very different corners of the political universe that you gave me the time. I remember somebody once said to me, she's a senior historian of Nazi Holocaust, she says, In judging a person, character is much more significant than ideology. You can have nasty people across the political spectrum. Character is a much better indicator of a person than his or her ideology. I discovered that with Raul Hilbert. Ideologically, polar ends of the spectrum. But the guy, he came out slugging for me. That was a real... It was an epiphany for me. I'm grateful that you gave me the time as well.

I'm grateful that we were able to do this in person. I think there's going to be so many people who challenge themselves and make sure that they have the courage of their own convictions. You guys, so much to learn, so much to process, all of us just trying to make sure we know what we are saying and that the facts are on our side. Thank you for joining us in this discussion. We'll see you next time.